OBAMA'S RACE SPEECH: INSULTING OUR INTELLIGENCE
By: Devvy
March 26, 2008
© 2008 - NewsWithViews.com
"Obama’s victory was more than a progressive move; it was a dialectical leap ushering in a qualitatively new era of struggle. Marx once compared revolutionary struggle with the work of the mole, who sometimes burrows so far beneath the ground that he leaves no trace of his movement on the surface. This is the old revolutionary “mole,” not only showing his traces on the surface but also breaking through." The People's Weekly World, an on-line communist propaganda rag
On March 18, 2006, Barack Obama gave what dullards in the dominant media have dubbed as his "race" speech in response to the fire storm over his long time association with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. This speech was damage control, a carefully crafted oration full of all the right words and phrases in an effort to stop Caucasian voters from running away from his campaign.
Obama's speech on race is being called "brilliant." Some gas bags on cable networks are comparing Obama to Abraham Lincoln. Really? Abraham Lincoln was an open racist, a white supremacist who hated the Negro race and cared nothing about freeing slaves. As a matter of fact, he wanted to ship anyone with black skin out of this country. What, you say? How can that be? I was taught in school that Honest Abe Lincoln (the mascot for the Republican Party) is a hero who bravely took on the south to free the slaves!
There are two books everyone should read and should be required reading in all schools throughout this country. I know time is an issue for everyone, but I promise you, these two books are well worth the time invested. The first is Lincoln Unmasked: What You're Not Supposed to Know About Dishonest Abe by Thomas DiLorenzo. The second is Forced into Glory: Abraham Lincoln's White Dream by Lerone Bennett, Jr. The hero image of Abraham Lincoln is as tarnished and fake as the one hanging on John McCain.
With a great amount of pushing by his handlers, Obama has now gone to great lengths to distance himself from the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, basically saying he didn't know Wright is a racist and hates America. Despite the clever word smithing of his race speech, this simply does not sell as truth. How can you attend a church for 20 years and not be exposed to the agenda hawked by Rev. Wright? Obama has been sold as an "African-American," yet his church under Wright clearly and without apology states their complete allegiance is to the continent of Africa. Fine, Rev. Wright. Pack your bags, go to Africa, pick any country you like, and spew your hatred of Caucasians and America from your beloved land. I'm sick of hyphenated Americans. Either we're all together as Americans or divided we will fall. Obama and others have tried to prop up Rev. Wright with how much his church has done for AIDS victims, outreach and other good deeds. Sorry, Obama, it doesn't wash. All of these altruistic undertakings can be done without hating America, other races or religions, i.e., Wright's admiration for a bigot like Louis Farrakhan.
Obama said in his speech he wouldn't disown Rev. Wright. Why would he? Obama has put his real feelings out into the public domain and they are in harmony with the Rev. Wright:
"Beneath this bland Good Obama lies a more interesting character, one that I like far better—the Bad Obama, a close student of other people's weaknesses, a literary artist of considerable power in plumbing his deep reservoirs of self-pity and resentment, an unfunny Evelyn Waugh consumed by indignation toward his own mother's people. He has been hiding out on the bestseller lists for the last two years in his enormously revealing, but little understood, 1995 “autobiography”—a more accurate term might be “autobiographical novel”—Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance....
"He cherishes every cause for complaint he can discern against white folks. He is constantly distressed at being half-white. Obama says he “ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of twelve or thirteen, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites,” even though he surely realizes that his media-sensation status stems from how much white people love highly accomplished blacks who speak with white accents. He wouldn't be a serious candidate for president at age 45 if he weren't part black.
"Obama's teenage self-consciousness is perpetually crucified by contact with stereotypes about blacks. When his grandmother wants a ride to work because the day before, while awaiting the bus, she was threatened by a black panhandler, he is outraged—at his grandparents."
While, Steve Sailer, the author of the column above seems to find Obama fascinating, I find him to be just another closet communist, using being a mulatto to hide his racism. Obama recently referred to his grandmother as a "typical white person" which drew even more criticism. Fact: Obama attended Wright's church for the past twenty years. He darn straight knew the racist, anti-American agenda of that church. Anyone who thinks Obama could have attended a church for twenty years and not been aware of the agenda of that church is in denial. Fact: Obama has made it crystal clear how he feels about Caucasians. He holds them in contempt. How can anyone continue to support this deceptive individual, the mole "burrowed so far beneath the ground that he leaves no trace of his movement on the surface"?
Obama decries playing the race card, but has embraced the endorsement of a loser like New Mexico Governor, Bill Richardson. Former failed Secretary of Energy under Marxist Bill Clinton and Ambassador to the communist UN. Richardson is of Mexican ancestry. Obama believes Richardson's endorsement will bring him the Hispanic/Latino vote, which is why he and Richardson were up in Oregon the past few days. There are no Hispanic, Latino or Mexican issues regarding the U.S. Constitution, specifically, Art. 1, Section 8. The president of these united States of America is constrained by Art. II, of the U.S. Constitution. An American president is not a king, he is a public servant. All of these empty promises spewed by Obama and Hillary Clinton are just that. During the pretend primaries, Marxist Clinton took New Mexico (Richardson's state) because according to seditious, militant LaRaza mouth pieces, Hispanics "don't trust blacks." And, let's not forget Marxist Clinton has declared "no woman is an illegal." Music to the ears of all the illegals voting in New Mexico.
Obama picked up another endorsement yesterday. The big splash over this endorsement is because Mr. Kmiec is a Republican with impressive credentials. Kmiec states in his endorsement he doesn't want to denigrate any of his sodomite friends, but supports traditional marriage. He also says he's Catholic and goes on to say, " I believe life begins at conception, and it is important for every life to be given sustenance and encouragement." Kmiec knows the Church forbids the filthy practice of sodomy and the murdering of unborn babies. If Kmiec believes that life begins at conception, how on earth can he endorse someone like Barack Obama who not only supports abortion on demand, but also supports the barbaric practice of murder called partial birth abortion? How can any Catholic or Christian who professes they believe in God's word and laws endorse such a morally bankrupt individual like Barack Obama?
Because he's promised 'change'? Anyone who has listened to him and read his official web site understands that Obama represents no change, only a continuation of failed policies. He has thrown out this clever marketing plan about 'change' and 'hope' to desperate Americans, especially regarding health care and his message that we can all transcend racial lines. The reality is this man harbors hatred of America, Caucasians and the U.S. Constitution. All his flowery words and promises cannot change what's right in front of your face. Anyone who thinks Obama knows anything about constitutional government is in denial. Obama has ZERO experience with our military. He would immediately get rid of the 'don't ask don't tell' policy regarding sexual deviants serving in our military. Barack Obama knows nothing about being Commander in Chief. He's never served in uniform and has surrounded himself with war mongers and individuals who are working to bring America under world government; see links at bottom. In his own words, Obama desires a one world order - no more sovereign U.S.; see video here.
Americans have little understanding as to how the communitarian (communist) morality is being sold to the American people, but Obama knows. A couple of his mentors are hard core commies and Obama has learned well. Below are links that you might wish to read and consider. One thing that has surfaced over Obama and Rev. Wright is what the media calls the "theology of black churches" in America. I've watched a number of Internet videos and representatives of so-called "black churches" this past week and some of this stuff has shocked even an old war horse like me. Where does this hate come from? The old chant about slavery is a favorite for these 'sermons.' How much longer will Negroes in this country flog this disgraceful episode in America's history? There isn't a person alive right now that had a single thing to do with importing Negroes from the continent of Africa and making them slaves. I would say that with a few exceptions, every American in this country finds the idea of owning another human being totally repugnant. We should never forget, but using slavery as an excuse to whine about every challenge in life has long worn itself out.
Oppression has been a tragic staple of governments since the beginning of time. My grand parents on both sides of the family fled Europe to escape tyranny in the form of Mussolini and Hitler, but they never used it as an excuse to hate America, anyone of another race or grovel for welfare programs. They had nothing to do with slavery. None of us had anything to do with any of the holocausts, Nazi Germany, Rwanda, Dufar and tens of millions of Catholics slaughtered in Russia. Slavery is alive and well in this world, yet little attention is given to this on-going tragedy.
Race hucksters like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Jeremiah Wright want equality, yet their 'black churches' are filled with hatred against Caucasians. They mock and slap all Americans in the face who have worked to make this country color blind. Take a good look around this country. Americans of all races are friends and colleagues, no matter our skin color or professions, we get along just fine. Yes, there is racism out there and I've seen it, particularly from those of Mexican and Latin origin against 'gringos.' What shocks me is the number of reverends who boldly proclaim Wright's toxic message isn't racism, it's a "liberation theology":
Transcript, Anderson Cooper, CNN, March 18, 2008:
"Dr. Gail Anderson Holness, Greater Washington Council of Churches: He is not preaching hate theology. And that should be a clear statement. It's not hate theology. It is a liberation theology. When Jesus was around, they didn't respect Jesus. They were angry with him. When he spoke the beatitudes on the mountain. They were angry with Martin Luther King when he was around, and they didn't respect him. And now he's a great hero."
Martin Luther King was a drunk, a womanizer and was communist trained. This accurate, factual description of a media created icon like King is always met with death threats and hate mail, but Alan Stang's column on King is 100% factual. Like Abraham Lincoln, both have been reinvented for political games.
The crutch of racism and slavery is the propaganda tool that's been hyped for decades to give special treatment and plundering the people's treasury for social causes for a particular race of people; same show transcript:
"The AME Church ascribes to a black liberation theology, and it can lead to some passionate sermons. But hate?
"Reverend Ronald Braxton, Metropolitan African Methodist Episcopal Church: Yes and no. Yes, it's hate. It is hate of a system, of a society, of a politics that will not treat all persons equal, that will -- will spend billions of dollars to fight a war, but will not spend half of that amount of money to make sure that children have health care.
"When you see, day to day, when people come into your office or come to your church looking for a loaf of bread, mothers come in: "Can you do anything for me, Reverend? I need some help." They come to your Bible studies. They come to your prayer services at night. And they stand at your door when you get there. It is hate for that kind of a system, because you know within your heart that this country, the richest country in the world, can provide for her people. But she will not."
The U.S. Constitution does not authorize Congress to legislate in the area of health care, education, the environment or any welfare programs. Churches are one of the private sector organizations where a helping hand is there for those who need it. Charity begins at home, but not in Congress. Of course, this doesn't sit well with Americans who have been brain washed into the communitarian (community, communist) morality that mother government is there to see to all your needs. Reverend Braxton's comment that America is the richest country in the world is just more hog wash. This republic is completely bankrupt. Our treasury is over drawn $9.4 TRILLION dollars while Congress continues to write hot checks to fund unconstitutional social programs and endless, wasteful wars.
I've heard ad nauseum that we need to have a dialogue on race in this country. How many more words need to be written or talking heads do we need to hear on the issue of race? It seems to me that while tens of millions of us of different races are oblivious to a person's skin color, it's "black churches" in this country, politicians and media mouth pieces who seem to have a problem with becoming color blind. After all, the lucrative business of race baiting would go away if not continually fanned by special interest groups, the lame stream media and politicos. While some are afraid to say it, I'm not. There is a huge double standard going on in this country and it shouldn't be tolerated. As for racist organizations in this country like the KKK, who pays any attention to those idiots? Give them the media spot light and you empower their destructive rhetoric. Ignore them and eventually, their numbers will dwindle into nothing more than small groups of people with hate in their hearts.
The Democrats will choose their nominee at their convention in a few months and shove their choice down the throats of the party faithful who will vote for that nominee regardless of how corrupt or evil they are "for the party." Those will be the votes of America's destruction. It is no different than Republicans who have already accepted their chains of bondage and will hold their nose and vote for a rotten, corrupt man like John McCain, if God forbid, he's still in the race come September. Those will be the votes of America's destruction. As for me, I will wait to see what happens at the GOP convention in September. If Ron Paul doesn't get the nomination, I will write his name on my ballot in November, but I will not vote for any corrupt, morally bankrupt candidate for any political party. My conscience will be clear.
Research links:
1 - Democrats for Ron Paul - video
2 - Democrats for Ron Paul web site
3 - Talk Show Host Reveals Obama Connection to Terrorists
4 - Obama’s words as troubling as pastor's
5 - Obama's communist mentor
6 - Pastor Manning on Obama's Bra 54 Double "D"
7 - Obama's New Spin Doc Is Gen McPeak, The 'Bomb Now, Die Later' Butcher Of 1991 Iraq War
8 - Obama Campaign Linked To Chechen Terrorism
9 - Beyond Obama's Beauty
10 - How key is Wright to Obama?
11 - Obama the hypocrite
12 - All about Obama
© 2008 - NewsWithViews.com - All Rights Reserved
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies sold. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country, ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker. Devvy belongs to no organization.
She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy isn't left, right or in the middle; she is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party. Her web site (www.devvy.com) contains a tremendous amount of information, solutions and a vast Reading Room.
Devvy's website: www.devvy.com
Before you send Devvy e-mail, please take the time to check the FAQ section on her web site. It is filled with answers to frequently asked questions and links to reliable research sources.
E-mail is: devvyk@earthlink.net
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home