THE ROCKEFELLER PLAN
PART 2
By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
December 15, 2008
NewsWithViews.com
Twas the night before Christmas, and with great elation,
Barack Obama was planning to “change” the nation.
Corporate stockings were hung at the Congress with care
in the hopes that bailouts soon would be there.
The public was nestled all snug in their beds,
while visions of tax cuts danced in their heads.
Women in their kerchiefs and men in their caps
had unfortunately settled for political c___.
When over the airwaves there arose such a clatter,
people sprang from their lethargy to see what was the matter.
Away to the TV, they flew like a flash,
heard economic bad news and feared for their cash.
Stocks on the Dow hit a new fallen low,
creating more fears down the tubes we would go.
When what to our tearful eyes should appear
but Congressional leaders allaying our fears.
With their leader Obama so lively and quick,
we knew in a moment there must be a fix.
More rapid than politicians fleeing all blame,
Barack whistled and called his allies by name.
Now Daschle, now Geithner, now Gates and Biden,
on Rahm, on Pelosi, on Reid and Clinton (Hillary).
"To the top of the world," we heard him call,
“Proclaim our agenda, Socialism for all!”…
Obama flashing his smile spoke in such prose
that the world was in awe at this king that arose.
He sprang to his throne, to his team gave a whistle.
National sovereignty was gone without the firing of missiles.
But I heard him exclaim from his lofty height,
Now I possess such great power, there’s no use to fight (it)!
In addition to the educational and social control elements of the Rockefeller plan, the economic component has also been important. Mayor John Hylan (mentioned in Part 1) of New York City, in the March 27, 1922 NEW YORK TIMES claimed that the Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests and a small group of others “virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes.” These “selfish purposes” would even include helping the Nazis, as on July 15, 1941 Major Charles Burrows of military intelligence wrote that Standard Oil of New Jersey was diverting 20% of its oil going to the Canary Islands instead to refueling Nazi submarines with 6 of the oilships manned mainly by Nazi officers.
A few years later, on July 26, 1950 Gen. William Donovan (former head of the O.S.S.) as chairman of the American Committee for a United Europe (ACUE) wrote a memo on how to promote a European Parliament. By 1958, the Federalist European Movement received over 53% of its funds from the ACUE, which itself was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and others. The globalist Bilderbergers held their first meeting in May 1954, and have also been funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.
In the next decade (1960s), James Simon Kunen in THE STRAWBERRY STATEMENT (1968) revealed Esso (Rockefeller) money went to Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) “to make a lot of radical commotion so they can look more in the center as they move more to the left.”
This “move more to the left” was exemplified by David Rockefeller in his August 10, 1973 article in THE NEW YORK TIMES. David Rockefeller had attended the London School of Economics (founded by Fabian Socialists), which from 1924 to 1949 had received $3 million from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial Fund. And in David’s article he praised the economic and social “success” of the brutal Chinese dictator, Chairman Mao, who had killed millions of innocent Chinese civilians.
This was also the same year (1973), David Rockefeller founded the Trilateral Commission (TC) with the Marxist-praising Zbigniew Brzezinski as its director. In Holly Sklar’s TRILATERALISM: THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION AND ELITE PLANNING FOR WORLD MANAGEMENT (1980), she revealed these “ruling elites” would use debt “as part of an economic and political destabilization campaign to strangle a rebellious nation into submission.” And in Sen. Barry Goldwater’s WITH NO APOLOGIES (1979), he explained that what Rockefeller’s TC “proposes is an international economy managed and controlled by international monetary groups through the mechanism of international conglomerates manufacturing and business enterprise…. What these Trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved.”
One mechanism of this “worldwide economic power” was revealed at the September 11, 1987 “Fourth World Wilderness Congress” held in Colorado with David Rockefeller as a speaker. There was talk at the Congress about creating the International World Conservation Bank that would collateralize 30% of the Earth’s land surface (relevant to “debt for nature” swaps).
Another mechanism of the “worldwide economic power” has been GATT, which on December 1, 1994 Sen. Earnest Hollings revealed “is being pushed by David Rockefeller and the Trilateral Commission. About GATT, House speaker Newt Gingrich said it was “a very big transfer of power from the United States to a new organization (World Trade Organization).”
Acknowledging what was occurring as within David Rockefeller’s realm of activities, Gary Hufbauer’s and Jeffrey Schott’s WESTERN HEMISPHERE ECONOMIC INTEGRATION (1994) was dedicated “To David Rockefeller.” And in it one reads about an “integration agenda,… the need for some institutional mechanism to administer the arrangements,… and the case for a common legal framework.” Each of these elements are related to David Rockefeller’s globalist Power Elite efforts described in his MEMOIRS (2002), which will be quoted later.
Economic integration will ultimately be a global synthesis of Western Capitalism and Eastern Communism into a World Socialist Government, and President-elect Barack Obama is the Power Elite’s choice to lead Americans into a Socialist future with his campaign emphasis on “spreading the wealth around.” It will be as Edward Bellamy related in his 1888 novel LOOKING BACKWARD, 2000-1887, wherein he projected that around 2000 A.D. Americans would come to allow their economy to be managed by a “Great Trust” (Socialist) rather than maintain a free enterprise Capitalist system.
What usually compels people and nations to accept what they otherwise would not is some sort of crisis like the current international economic one. Relevant to this, Gideon Rachman in “And Now For A World Government” (FINANCIAL TIMES, December 8, 2008) writes: “For the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible, (and) would involve much more than cooperation between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws.” He then quotes Australian historian Geoffrey Blainey as writing that “for the first time in human history, world government of some sort is now possible,” and Rachman assesses that “the financial crisis and climate change are pushing national governments toward global solutions, even in countries such as China and the U.S. that are traditionally fierce guardians of national sovereignty.”
Relevant to Obama, Rachman comments on the importance of his appointment of Rhodes scholar Susan Rice as U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Then Rachman refers to “a recent report from the Managing Global Insecurity (MGI) project, whose small U.S. advisory group includes John Podesta, the man heading Mr. Obama’s transition team and Strobe Talbott (Rhodes scholar), the president of the Brookings Institution, from which Ms. Rice has just emerged.” Rachman relates that the MGI report “talks about ‘global governance’ rather than world government, but Jacques Attali, an advisor to President Nicholas Sarkozy of France, argues that: ‘Global governance is just a euphemism for global government.’… So, it seems, everything is in place. For the first time since homo sapiens began to doodle on cave walls, there is an argument, and opportunity and a means to make serious steps towards a world government.” For part one click below.
© 2008 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved
PART 2
By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
December 15, 2008
NewsWithViews.com
Twas the night before Christmas, and with great elation,
Barack Obama was planning to “change” the nation.
Corporate stockings were hung at the Congress with care
in the hopes that bailouts soon would be there.
The public was nestled all snug in their beds,
while visions of tax cuts danced in their heads.
Women in their kerchiefs and men in their caps
had unfortunately settled for political c___.
When over the airwaves there arose such a clatter,
people sprang from their lethargy to see what was the matter.
Away to the TV, they flew like a flash,
heard economic bad news and feared for their cash.
Stocks on the Dow hit a new fallen low,
creating more fears down the tubes we would go.
When what to our tearful eyes should appear
but Congressional leaders allaying our fears.
With their leader Obama so lively and quick,
we knew in a moment there must be a fix.
More rapid than politicians fleeing all blame,
Barack whistled and called his allies by name.
Now Daschle, now Geithner, now Gates and Biden,
on Rahm, on Pelosi, on Reid and Clinton (Hillary).
"To the top of the world," we heard him call,
“Proclaim our agenda, Socialism for all!”…
Obama flashing his smile spoke in such prose
that the world was in awe at this king that arose.
He sprang to his throne, to his team gave a whistle.
National sovereignty was gone without the firing of missiles.
But I heard him exclaim from his lofty height,
Now I possess such great power, there’s no use to fight (it)!
In addition to the educational and social control elements of the Rockefeller plan, the economic component has also been important. Mayor John Hylan (mentioned in Part 1) of New York City, in the March 27, 1922 NEW YORK TIMES claimed that the Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests and a small group of others “virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes.” These “selfish purposes” would even include helping the Nazis, as on July 15, 1941 Major Charles Burrows of military intelligence wrote that Standard Oil of New Jersey was diverting 20% of its oil going to the Canary Islands instead to refueling Nazi submarines with 6 of the oilships manned mainly by Nazi officers.
A few years later, on July 26, 1950 Gen. William Donovan (former head of the O.S.S.) as chairman of the American Committee for a United Europe (ACUE) wrote a memo on how to promote a European Parliament. By 1958, the Federalist European Movement received over 53% of its funds from the ACUE, which itself was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and others. The globalist Bilderbergers held their first meeting in May 1954, and have also been funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.
In the next decade (1960s), James Simon Kunen in THE STRAWBERRY STATEMENT (1968) revealed Esso (Rockefeller) money went to Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) “to make a lot of radical commotion so they can look more in the center as they move more to the left.”
This “move more to the left” was exemplified by David Rockefeller in his August 10, 1973 article in THE NEW YORK TIMES. David Rockefeller had attended the London School of Economics (founded by Fabian Socialists), which from 1924 to 1949 had received $3 million from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial Fund. And in David’s article he praised the economic and social “success” of the brutal Chinese dictator, Chairman Mao, who had killed millions of innocent Chinese civilians.
This was also the same year (1973), David Rockefeller founded the Trilateral Commission (TC) with the Marxist-praising Zbigniew Brzezinski as its director. In Holly Sklar’s TRILATERALISM: THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION AND ELITE PLANNING FOR WORLD MANAGEMENT (1980), she revealed these “ruling elites” would use debt “as part of an economic and political destabilization campaign to strangle a rebellious nation into submission.” And in Sen. Barry Goldwater’s WITH NO APOLOGIES (1979), he explained that what Rockefeller’s TC “proposes is an international economy managed and controlled by international monetary groups through the mechanism of international conglomerates manufacturing and business enterprise…. What these Trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved.”
One mechanism of this “worldwide economic power” was revealed at the September 11, 1987 “Fourth World Wilderness Congress” held in Colorado with David Rockefeller as a speaker. There was talk at the Congress about creating the International World Conservation Bank that would collateralize 30% of the Earth’s land surface (relevant to “debt for nature” swaps).
Another mechanism of the “worldwide economic power” has been GATT, which on December 1, 1994 Sen. Earnest Hollings revealed “is being pushed by David Rockefeller and the Trilateral Commission. About GATT, House speaker Newt Gingrich said it was “a very big transfer of power from the United States to a new organization (World Trade Organization).”
Acknowledging what was occurring as within David Rockefeller’s realm of activities, Gary Hufbauer’s and Jeffrey Schott’s WESTERN HEMISPHERE ECONOMIC INTEGRATION (1994) was dedicated “To David Rockefeller.” And in it one reads about an “integration agenda,… the need for some institutional mechanism to administer the arrangements,… and the case for a common legal framework.” Each of these elements are related to David Rockefeller’s globalist Power Elite efforts described in his MEMOIRS (2002), which will be quoted later.
Economic integration will ultimately be a global synthesis of Western Capitalism and Eastern Communism into a World Socialist Government, and President-elect Barack Obama is the Power Elite’s choice to lead Americans into a Socialist future with his campaign emphasis on “spreading the wealth around.” It will be as Edward Bellamy related in his 1888 novel LOOKING BACKWARD, 2000-1887, wherein he projected that around 2000 A.D. Americans would come to allow their economy to be managed by a “Great Trust” (Socialist) rather than maintain a free enterprise Capitalist system.
What usually compels people and nations to accept what they otherwise would not is some sort of crisis like the current international economic one. Relevant to this, Gideon Rachman in “And Now For A World Government” (FINANCIAL TIMES, December 8, 2008) writes: “For the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible, (and) would involve much more than cooperation between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws.” He then quotes Australian historian Geoffrey Blainey as writing that “for the first time in human history, world government of some sort is now possible,” and Rachman assesses that “the financial crisis and climate change are pushing national governments toward global solutions, even in countries such as China and the U.S. that are traditionally fierce guardians of national sovereignty.”
Relevant to Obama, Rachman comments on the importance of his appointment of Rhodes scholar Susan Rice as U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Then Rachman refers to “a recent report from the Managing Global Insecurity (MGI) project, whose small U.S. advisory group includes John Podesta, the man heading Mr. Obama’s transition team and Strobe Talbott (Rhodes scholar), the president of the Brookings Institution, from which Ms. Rice has just emerged.” Rachman relates that the MGI report “talks about ‘global governance’ rather than world government, but Jacques Attali, an advisor to President Nicholas Sarkozy of France, argues that: ‘Global governance is just a euphemism for global government.’… So, it seems, everything is in place. For the first time since homo sapiens began to doodle on cave walls, there is an argument, and opportunity and a means to make serious steps towards a world government.” For part one click below.
© 2008 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved
posted by shummer60 at Monday, January 12, 2009
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home