Signs of Full-Scale Mideast War
Signs of Impending Full Scale Mideast War
Tuesday, 12 June 2007
-
UN Envoy Warns ...
-
Signs of Full-Scale Mideast War
-
Has NWO Decided To Start Major War?
2 Stories Signal NWO Plans
Bilderberg Concludes For War?
-
A-O Analysis
by
R.A. Coombes
-
It's now reached the "mainstream news" - a possibility of "full-scale war" in the Mideast. AP Newswire Services reports that a UN envoy, Terje Roed-Larson has warned that the Middle East could see full-scale war. He urged fresh efforts to contain the current violence, or energetic diplomacy to try and bring pease.
Larsen was quoted by AP as saying "The picture wich emerges is very dark, and apparently getting darker." The UN diplomat also went on to state that there are "reasons for real concerns in the international community."
Roed-Larson is the current UN envoy for Lebanon-Syria and for many years has been the top UN Mideast envoy. Because of his stature in the diplomatic community, his words carry some amount of weight.
Some other opinions Larsen shared included:
"The geographical landscape of the Middle East has changed fundamentally over a few years. A few years ago, as it had been over many, many decades, the centre of gravit for all the conflicts were the Israeli-Arab conflicts. "Now, there seems to be four epicentres of conflict in the region with their own dynamics, the Iraqi issues, the Iranian issues, the Syrian-Lebanese issues, and of course the heart of hearts, the traditional conflict, the Palestinian-Israeli issue."
A-O Notes:
How interesting that this story emerges a week after the Bilderberg Conference. This sort of revelation is typical after a Bilderberg meeting. Usually a week or two after the meeting, the NWO agenda's direction for the year ahead begins to emerge through either NWO operatives themselves or relayed through non-NWO "proxies" or NWO "fellow-travelers"
This is the first indication after the Bilderberg Conference of the direction that the NWO wants to go in the next 12 months, war in the Mideast. This does not mean that they're pushing for it to occur in this next twelve month period, but that they're preparing or acclimating the world for a full-scale war in the Mideast. They want it to happen, but they want it to happen when they're effectively ready for it. This comment from a UN envoy strongly suggests that they're getting ready for it.
I don't know if Larsen was at the Bilderberg Conference or if he's even a NWO insider, although I wouldn't be suprised. The point is, he made these comments and the mainstream media picked right up on it. It's the mainstream media's pickup of his remarks that is the most revealing of the NWO's coming agenda. The MSM only report what the NWO wants them to report.
Initially, when a NWO agenda is ready to be unveiled to the public, it begins with remarks like Larsen's that are given minor or modest coverage, usually in the print media, such as the newswire services like AP. UPI or Reuters. The agenda usually won't receive much if any glare from TV until the printed revelations have had some time to digest. Often times, the print revelation is used as a "code" to the lower NWO ranks to alert them to the agenda to get the rank-and-file ready to follow in lock-step, or a reasonable facsimile thereof.
What I would now expect is for this story to make a few rounds in the mainstream print media then let the agenda languish for an undetermined period of time. The next phase usually is editorial commentaries in the mainstream print media followed by another lull away from public focus. Then events transpire that triggers the glare of both Broadcast and Print coverage that begins modestly and slowly becomes a "drumbeat." This is the pattern that emerged before both Gulf Wars 1 and 2, the Yugoslavia conflict and the US invasion of Panama and again last year with the Lebanon Summer War.
The statements by Larsen inidicate the next war may not be limited to just an Israeli-Arab conflict, but rather, a much wider or "full-scale" war throughout the Middle East. Larsen's statements are the first inkling that the New World Order is now perhaps ready to trigger "the" war that starts many wars around the globe and perhaps WW3. Whatever the size of their planned conflict, if it is in the Middle East it will no doubt have significant prophetic impact. For that reason, Bible Prophecy watchers need to maintain a heightened watch for more signs of a coming "full-scale" war in the Middle East and not merely another Israeli-Arab conflict.
To read the AP Newswire story, LINK here.
UPDATE:
Before this story could even be posted, another separate but related news story emerged as the Democratic Party's Top Senator, Harry Reid warned that a US strike on Iran would be destabilizing to the Middle East. This story was picked up and carried by Reuters Newswire services. It was posted late Monday night prior to the AP story by a few hours.
The Reuters article compares Reid's remarks with that of fellow Democrat Senator Joe Lieberman who had made a casual remark on a Sunday TV talk show (that failed to really gain media coverage) claiming that the US had good evidence that Iran was fueling the violence in Iraq. Lieberman advocated that the US launch a military strike against an Iranian traning camp being used to train Iraqis to fight American forces in Iraq.
Reuter's newswire story then contrasted the two senator's remarks, as Reid went on to warn that the US should not invade Iran because it would "destabilize that part of the world more." Reid's comments were made at a forum hosted by the Center for American Progress, a Washington, D.C. think tank. No one, not even Reuters covered the forum. Instead Reuters cites their source for the remarks being the think tank's website - www.thinkprogress.org
The Reuter's story notes that Joe Liebermans remarks advocating military action against Iran were characterized by other analysts as "an escalation of official U.S. rhetoric. They noted that President Bush had vowed to confront any Iranian networks found inside Iraq. The Reuter's story then takes a highly significant turn in its coverage of the issue. Reuter's then cites comments from Ray Takeyh, a NWO analyst and Iran "expert" for the Illuminati-oriented "Council on Foreign Relations."
Takeyh is quoted as saying;
"This takes it across the border...But it would not be a surgical limited strike. It could potentially escalate into a much more serious confrontation between the two countries, and if that's the direction Lieberman wants to go, he has to be very honest about the potential pitfalls."
A-O Analysis:
This story is really the first indication of the Bilderberg agenda, yet at first glance, many NWO watchers may not grasp this because it appears to be giving off mixed signals of adocating war and opposing war. This is a typical tactic of the Illuminists and their methodology of operations. Remember "Order out of chaos" is their motto. The Hegelian approach is to create an issue by creating a problem and two opposing sides and then controlling both sides.
The Illuminists do this in layer upon layer. Here we see one layer. US politicians taking two sides of a possible response to a problem, Iran's actions in Iraq. There is the greater conflict between the US and Iran over it's nuclear program. There are also numerous other conflicts between the two nations including monetary and economic issues. These are also layered with other inter-twined issues involving relations with other nations. The plan is to work both sides of any given issue and profit from the resolution by gaining more power and control. It is a very insidiuous and carefully concealed strategy aided by supernatural assistance.
This story is then followed by AP's newswire story of the UN Envoy warnings of a full-scale war. AP didn't cover the Reuter's story about the two senators. Reuters didn't cover the UN envoy's statements. Now this is particularly odd, because AP is an American-based newswire service and provides the most comprehensive newswire coverage of U.S. news. Reuters is based in Europe and primarily known for providing the best and most comprehensive international coverage. You would think AP would have covered the differences between the two US senators and that Reuters would have covered the UN envoy's statements, but this is not the case. Why?
I suspect it is to balance the stories so that the idea of full-scale war doesn't overly panic the world. Had Reuters covered the UN envoy's statements, it would have carried more weight and especially if AP also carried it. With only AP covering the story, the international media is likely to not trump the story into near hysteria. Why? Media outlets around the world except in America tend to respect and rely more heavily on Reuters than AP. The opposite is true in American news media, particularly in the broadcast news media. The fact that the Senator's remarks run in Reuters but not AP means that it will likely get less exposure in America and yet be treated less significantly around the world because the world's usually not interested in what might be perceived to be a single inter-party bickering in the US political world. Yet, the stories get out, but their impacts are managed and potential panic or hysteria is limited.
It should also be noted that by Reuter's promoting the remarks by the US senators the story gets wide publicity around the globe and makes the US look like its contemplating war. This makes the US look like the bad guy to much of the world. The fact that the UN envoy's comments have gained little coverage around the globe suggests that his remarks should be confined to the US not the world. The NWO is craftily working to create a bad-guy image and the UN envoy's remarks might cloud that bad guy impression for which the NWO wishes to brand upon America's reputation within the global community.
The NWO wants the stories out there for the public to grasp a hold of, but they do not want the issue to go spinning out of their control, thus they craftily control its dissemination. These stories combined provide one example of how the NWO insidiously manipulatess the news. I know first hand because I once was a broadcast news reporter albeit at the local level, but even at that level, I've witnessed these sorts of dichotomies first hand. Oddly enough, at a casual glance one would never pay attention or notice such discrepancies. Without knowledge of the NWO, its strategies and methodologies no one would ever guess or realize what is really going on.
The conclusion to be drawn here is that these stories combined indicate that the NWO agenda for the next twelve months is pointing toward either an outright full-scale war in the Mideast or final preparations for such a war to be launched later in perhaps 2008. I suspect it really depends on how well the NWO can orchestrate it and get the players to cooperate in a proper coordinated fashion. In other words, all the players have to get their subjects mental attitudes into the same rythm and move everyone in synchronized fashion to steer the leaders and their nations to engage in the appropriate action namely the engagement of war. In other words, its much like a dance. Everyone has to follow the choreographer's on-stage dance design.
Will there be a full scale Mideast war soon? I do not know, but more and more subtle signals like today's strongly suggests that such a war is looming around the corner and is now slowly moving towards us. It seems now that the real issue is only in the timing of its start and where it will start - Israel or Iran.
Read the Reuters story on the US Senator's comments - LINK here.
Tuesday, 12 June 2007
-
UN Envoy Warns ...
-
Signs of Full-Scale Mideast War
-
Has NWO Decided To Start Major War?
2 Stories Signal NWO Plans
Bilderberg Concludes For War?
-
A-O Analysis
by
R.A. Coombes
-
It's now reached the "mainstream news" - a possibility of "full-scale war" in the Mideast. AP Newswire Services reports that a UN envoy, Terje Roed-Larson has warned that the Middle East could see full-scale war. He urged fresh efforts to contain the current violence, or energetic diplomacy to try and bring pease.
Larsen was quoted by AP as saying "The picture wich emerges is very dark, and apparently getting darker." The UN diplomat also went on to state that there are "reasons for real concerns in the international community."
Roed-Larson is the current UN envoy for Lebanon-Syria and for many years has been the top UN Mideast envoy. Because of his stature in the diplomatic community, his words carry some amount of weight.
Some other opinions Larsen shared included:
"The geographical landscape of the Middle East has changed fundamentally over a few years. A few years ago, as it had been over many, many decades, the centre of gravit for all the conflicts were the Israeli-Arab conflicts. "Now, there seems to be four epicentres of conflict in the region with their own dynamics, the Iraqi issues, the Iranian issues, the Syrian-Lebanese issues, and of course the heart of hearts, the traditional conflict, the Palestinian-Israeli issue."
A-O Notes:
How interesting that this story emerges a week after the Bilderberg Conference. This sort of revelation is typical after a Bilderberg meeting. Usually a week or two after the meeting, the NWO agenda's direction for the year ahead begins to emerge through either NWO operatives themselves or relayed through non-NWO "proxies" or NWO "fellow-travelers"
This is the first indication after the Bilderberg Conference of the direction that the NWO wants to go in the next 12 months, war in the Mideast. This does not mean that they're pushing for it to occur in this next twelve month period, but that they're preparing or acclimating the world for a full-scale war in the Mideast. They want it to happen, but they want it to happen when they're effectively ready for it. This comment from a UN envoy strongly suggests that they're getting ready for it.
I don't know if Larsen was at the Bilderberg Conference or if he's even a NWO insider, although I wouldn't be suprised. The point is, he made these comments and the mainstream media picked right up on it. It's the mainstream media's pickup of his remarks that is the most revealing of the NWO's coming agenda. The MSM only report what the NWO wants them to report.
Initially, when a NWO agenda is ready to be unveiled to the public, it begins with remarks like Larsen's that are given minor or modest coverage, usually in the print media, such as the newswire services like AP. UPI or Reuters. The agenda usually won't receive much if any glare from TV until the printed revelations have had some time to digest. Often times, the print revelation is used as a "code" to the lower NWO ranks to alert them to the agenda to get the rank-and-file ready to follow in lock-step, or a reasonable facsimile thereof.
What I would now expect is for this story to make a few rounds in the mainstream print media then let the agenda languish for an undetermined period of time. The next phase usually is editorial commentaries in the mainstream print media followed by another lull away from public focus. Then events transpire that triggers the glare of both Broadcast and Print coverage that begins modestly and slowly becomes a "drumbeat." This is the pattern that emerged before both Gulf Wars 1 and 2, the Yugoslavia conflict and the US invasion of Panama and again last year with the Lebanon Summer War.
The statements by Larsen inidicate the next war may not be limited to just an Israeli-Arab conflict, but rather, a much wider or "full-scale" war throughout the Middle East. Larsen's statements are the first inkling that the New World Order is now perhaps ready to trigger "the" war that starts many wars around the globe and perhaps WW3. Whatever the size of their planned conflict, if it is in the Middle East it will no doubt have significant prophetic impact. For that reason, Bible Prophecy watchers need to maintain a heightened watch for more signs of a coming "full-scale" war in the Middle East and not merely another Israeli-Arab conflict.
To read the AP Newswire story, LINK here.
UPDATE:
Before this story could even be posted, another separate but related news story emerged as the Democratic Party's Top Senator, Harry Reid warned that a US strike on Iran would be destabilizing to the Middle East. This story was picked up and carried by Reuters Newswire services. It was posted late Monday night prior to the AP story by a few hours.
The Reuters article compares Reid's remarks with that of fellow Democrat Senator Joe Lieberman who had made a casual remark on a Sunday TV talk show (that failed to really gain media coverage) claiming that the US had good evidence that Iran was fueling the violence in Iraq. Lieberman advocated that the US launch a military strike against an Iranian traning camp being used to train Iraqis to fight American forces in Iraq.
Reuter's newswire story then contrasted the two senator's remarks, as Reid went on to warn that the US should not invade Iran because it would "destabilize that part of the world more." Reid's comments were made at a forum hosted by the Center for American Progress, a Washington, D.C. think tank. No one, not even Reuters covered the forum. Instead Reuters cites their source for the remarks being the think tank's website - www.thinkprogress.org
The Reuter's story notes that Joe Liebermans remarks advocating military action against Iran were characterized by other analysts as "an escalation of official U.S. rhetoric. They noted that President Bush had vowed to confront any Iranian networks found inside Iraq. The Reuter's story then takes a highly significant turn in its coverage of the issue. Reuter's then cites comments from Ray Takeyh, a NWO analyst and Iran "expert" for the Illuminati-oriented "Council on Foreign Relations."
Takeyh is quoted as saying;
"This takes it across the border...But it would not be a surgical limited strike. It could potentially escalate into a much more serious confrontation between the two countries, and if that's the direction Lieberman wants to go, he has to be very honest about the potential pitfalls."
A-O Analysis:
This story is really the first indication of the Bilderberg agenda, yet at first glance, many NWO watchers may not grasp this because it appears to be giving off mixed signals of adocating war and opposing war. This is a typical tactic of the Illuminists and their methodology of operations. Remember "Order out of chaos" is their motto. The Hegelian approach is to create an issue by creating a problem and two opposing sides and then controlling both sides.
The Illuminists do this in layer upon layer. Here we see one layer. US politicians taking two sides of a possible response to a problem, Iran's actions in Iraq. There is the greater conflict between the US and Iran over it's nuclear program. There are also numerous other conflicts between the two nations including monetary and economic issues. These are also layered with other inter-twined issues involving relations with other nations. The plan is to work both sides of any given issue and profit from the resolution by gaining more power and control. It is a very insidiuous and carefully concealed strategy aided by supernatural assistance.
This story is then followed by AP's newswire story of the UN Envoy warnings of a full-scale war. AP didn't cover the Reuter's story about the two senators. Reuters didn't cover the UN envoy's statements. Now this is particularly odd, because AP is an American-based newswire service and provides the most comprehensive newswire coverage of U.S. news. Reuters is based in Europe and primarily known for providing the best and most comprehensive international coverage. You would think AP would have covered the differences between the two US senators and that Reuters would have covered the UN envoy's statements, but this is not the case. Why?
I suspect it is to balance the stories so that the idea of full-scale war doesn't overly panic the world. Had Reuters covered the UN envoy's statements, it would have carried more weight and especially if AP also carried it. With only AP covering the story, the international media is likely to not trump the story into near hysteria. Why? Media outlets around the world except in America tend to respect and rely more heavily on Reuters than AP. The opposite is true in American news media, particularly in the broadcast news media. The fact that the Senator's remarks run in Reuters but not AP means that it will likely get less exposure in America and yet be treated less significantly around the world because the world's usually not interested in what might be perceived to be a single inter-party bickering in the US political world. Yet, the stories get out, but their impacts are managed and potential panic or hysteria is limited.
It should also be noted that by Reuter's promoting the remarks by the US senators the story gets wide publicity around the globe and makes the US look like its contemplating war. This makes the US look like the bad guy to much of the world. The fact that the UN envoy's comments have gained little coverage around the globe suggests that his remarks should be confined to the US not the world. The NWO is craftily working to create a bad-guy image and the UN envoy's remarks might cloud that bad guy impression for which the NWO wishes to brand upon America's reputation within the global community.
The NWO wants the stories out there for the public to grasp a hold of, but they do not want the issue to go spinning out of their control, thus they craftily control its dissemination. These stories combined provide one example of how the NWO insidiously manipulatess the news. I know first hand because I once was a broadcast news reporter albeit at the local level, but even at that level, I've witnessed these sorts of dichotomies first hand. Oddly enough, at a casual glance one would never pay attention or notice such discrepancies. Without knowledge of the NWO, its strategies and methodologies no one would ever guess or realize what is really going on.
The conclusion to be drawn here is that these stories combined indicate that the NWO agenda for the next twelve months is pointing toward either an outright full-scale war in the Mideast or final preparations for such a war to be launched later in perhaps 2008. I suspect it really depends on how well the NWO can orchestrate it and get the players to cooperate in a proper coordinated fashion. In other words, all the players have to get their subjects mental attitudes into the same rythm and move everyone in synchronized fashion to steer the leaders and their nations to engage in the appropriate action namely the engagement of war. In other words, its much like a dance. Everyone has to follow the choreographer's on-stage dance design.
Will there be a full scale Mideast war soon? I do not know, but more and more subtle signals like today's strongly suggests that such a war is looming around the corner and is now slowly moving towards us. It seems now that the real issue is only in the timing of its start and where it will start - Israel or Iran.
Read the Reuters story on the US Senator's comments - LINK here.
posted by shummer60 at Thursday, June 14, 2007
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home