BRAINWASHING THE CHILDREN: A GLOBAL EFFORT
By Jill Cohen Walker, J.D.
June 14, 2006
What’s happening to our young people down to the smallest member of a nursery school class is part of the most diabolical plan ever created by the ruling elites. Our children are not just part of a systematic plan to destroy their minds; they’re part of a plan to steal their souls for eternity.
Go back to “Educating for the Anti-Christ,” which is only one statement of the evils perpetrated on children. The writer discussed a 14-year-old boy who was learning about Buddhism—complete with 10-minute, daily meditation assignments. This was a favorite of Lucis Trust founder, Alice Bailey (more on her later in this piece). Anything that denies God must be employed when educating the children.
When the boy was asked by his mother what he was supposed to meditate about, “he said just on nice things and himself.” When that task was complete, he worked on his other assignment: making up his own ten commandments because the ones handed down by God don’t let evil, like the ACLU, and evil behavior flourish.
This leaves parents with the daunting task of deprogramming their children, but it can only happen if the children tell them what’s taking place. The evidence, however, indicates that school personnel demand secrecy. As the writer stated, “I praise God that they [the children] make me aware of what things they are actually being taught otherwise I would not know, because children are told not to discuss these lessons with their parents. Other parents I have alerted have been telling me the same sort of things.”
The UK hasn’t just abandoned its Christian roots; it’s totally immersed in witchcraft, occultism, and hedonism. It’s the home of “Harry Potter,” books that brainwash American children, compliments of Scholastic Publishing. This is not harmless reading for children. It is out-and-out witchcraft and mucking around in the occult.
Here’s how it works. In the UK, a nine-year-old boy went on a four-day school trip to an “outdoor activity center.” The first activity was a visit to what was called a witch’s tree. In his diary he wrote: “We formed a circle around it to keep away evil spirits, then we went up to it and felt it. It felt rough in some places and smooth in others. Then we tasted it, it tasted like dirt. We could also hear it breathing.”
Apparently, no one told those children they were actually inviting demons in by forming that circle. Personally, I find it incredible that they can hear a tree breathe but refuse to recognize the heartbeat of a living baby inside the womb even when that heartbeat is scientifically documented. It must be the woodsy environment that gives the tree more prominence and the right to live, or perhaps the worship of trees goes hand-in-hand with sacrificing the unborn to the rulers of “this present darkness.”
It gets worse. An A Level Performing Arts student was doing well until she lost interest in the program. During parents’ night, her mother was told she was failing because she “was offended by the material she was supposed to be studying and refused to participate.” The offensive material: A video, which the mother watched for herself, that contained a “blasphemous, sexually depraved presentation involving a bare breasted woman hanging on a cross, weird demonic music and dance, and a couple having sex in a dingy room.”
Material from the “One World Trust” was found circulating in a school in Liverpool, England. Their plan is “the emergence of a completely new kind of world civilization, based on dramatic scientific advances and ideas of human rights (somehow they forgot to include mine as a Christian); the beginning of a world community attempting to deal with its problems through the application of reason.” Also a study “which illustrates the ways in which the protection of civil liberties requires a global authority capable of enforcing civilized behavior on national governments.” I guess God didn’t do the job well enough for them.
As early as December 1997, the (London) Daily Telegraph reported that schools celebrated Diwali, a Hindu festival, but won’t celebrate Christmas with the same gusto because it might promote Christianity as the foundation of British culture and offend others. When asked about the abandonment of their Christian roots and culture, the headmistress of one school said: “British culture is only equally important with other cultures. What we’re doing here is to create citizens of the world. All cultures have to be equal.”
So, why do all cultures have to be viewed as equal when the truth is they’re not? I discussed the issue with my co-author, Jack, (as I usually do) and he said, “Let’s be real here! Those groups that advocate a world authority are only in it for a raw power grab of a magnitude that humbles the totalitarians of the last century.”
He added that if the UN has taught us anything, it’s this: “the amount of bureaucratic ineptitude increases logarithmically as the institution increases in size.” If we, as conservatives, cannot trust our own (fairly small) government, how will we fare when that government grows to mammoth proportions? Worse yet, this new society will have a bevy of thought crimes to ensure it will continue. That’s a frightening prospect.
“As it stands, our nation has been fairly resistant to passing laws against dissent, although our not-so-noble leaders have tried their best to do so. A number of blue states have ‘hate crimes’ (a.k.a. 'thought crimes’) on the books,” he said. “Our neighbors to the north have criminalized any philosophy, e.g. Christianity, that opposes the left-wing notion of tolerance (which is rather intolerant of them, I’d say), and unfortunately they’re not unique among Western civilizations.”
What we must force ourselves to realize is that not all civilizations or cultures have something to offer the twenty first century. I’m not advocating eliminating the people groups that practice what most of us would consider backward notions or whose cultures seem locked in some bygone era, but must we subsidize them? I mean . . . if they want to stay centuries behind, who are we to tell them they’re wrong (as long as they don’t force us to do the same)?
Moral equivalence is at the heart of these latest outrages, and moral equivalence is a dangerous and all-to-prevalent enemy of real morality. We must understand and accept that some cultures are inherently inferior. The heart of our constitution allows ideas to be dissected so the unworkable can be discarded. To insist that all cultures are equally good flies in the face of our common sense, our republic and, quite frankly, our faith. It brings to mind Douglas Adams’ assertion that true intelligence is the ability to reconcile opposites. This works in humor, but it doesn’t work in real life.
Why would anyone try to reconcile the truth and a lie, notwithstanding that Satan will give us enough truth to try to get us to swallow a lie? Well, here’s a little Intolerance Alert: Compromise with evil does not enhance good. It only serves to deaden a society’s ability and willingness to discern the difference between the two.
Now, look at the foundation of the New World Order and realize why everything it stands for is the polar opposite of God’s Word and Judeo-Christianity. I don’t care how you bang the truth into your head as long as you get it there. And the truth is: like the material educators are pouring into our children’s minds, like the immoral agenda of leftists, like the intolerance of those who demand tolerance from us, it’s based on a lie.
That lie has been around for a long time and it became most useful through the cunning work of Helena Petrovna Blavatsky who Hal Lindsey referred to as “the spiritual godmother” of the New Age Movement (See Planet Earth—2000 A.D, 1994).
In 1875, Blavatsky founded the Theosophical Society, a new age organization, in New York. Lindsey noted one of their earliest pronouncements regarding Christianity was: “To oppose . . . every form of dogmatic theology, especially the Christian, which the Chiefs of the Society regard as particularly pernicious . . . to counteract, as far as possible, the effects of missionaries to delude the so-called ‘Heathen’ and ‘Pagans’ as to the real dogmas of Christianity and the effects of the latter on public and private character in so-called Christian countries.”
I feel as if I just read a headline from a current newspaper. Perhaps that’s because nothing’s changed. They’re still at it.
In truth, Blavatsky and her followers hated God, Jesus, and Christianity and their successors still do. As Lindsey noted, “she went so far to suggest that Satan ‘was an innocent victim of God’s capricious and intemperate wrath.’” She also held that the name “Sa’tan, in Hebrew Satan, and Adversary . . . belongs by right to the first and cruelest Adversary of all other Gods—Jehovah; not the serpent which spoke only words of sympathy and wisdom.” Uh, he did? Maybe I missed something . . .
Blavatsky’s followers were in love with Satan and with their successors they started the Lucifer Publishing Company in the late 1890s. Their prime publication was titled Lucifer. They changed their name to the Lucis Publishing Company due to public sentiment and, in 1922, disciple Alice Bailey, established the Lucis Trust. That organization had its headquarters at the UN until the early 1990s.
Dare we trust the UN and its minions to create godly rights for children? I think not. But we can rest assured they will find every nasty and evil way possible to indoctrinate them with anything anti-God and anti-Christianity. Remember what the serpent told Adam and Eve. Updated for today, he basically said, “God just doesn’t want you to have any power or fun! Don’t listen to Him! Eat that fruit and YOU can run things your way and have all the fun you want!” Don’t bet on it. The last thing those elite globalists want you to have is even a scintilla of power.
Well, it’s only for a season that the NWO will have its way, and then God’s going to “show up and show out” . . . and some mighty interesting folks are going to be scrambling before the King of kings to explain away their actions. And this time, it won’t work. For part 1 click below.
Jill Cohen Walker earned a BA from Goddard College in 1977, a JD from Franklin Pierce Law Center in 1980, and an MS in journalism at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville in 1999. A freelance writer for fifteen years, she has written numerous articles for tech magazines and newspapers, and co-authored a book on hiring practices in the printing industry.
She taught Social Studies for one year in a northern middle school, and medical-legal and bio-medical courses in the Allied Health division of a local community college for four years. A student of legal history and the US Constitution, she began to study current events and Bible prophecies in March 1985. Her deep interest in and awareness of American politics started during the 2000 elections when she realized the prophetic time clock was ticking fast. She is the co-author of the novel "The Call to Prayer". (www.thecalltoprayer.net).