They are after your kids.
Posted: Saturday, March 28, 2009
- written by jerry golden

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Israel is and always will be the central target of Satan and his final battles on planet earth, but there are other agendas that must come about before this world gets to the place where a false messiah (anti-Christ) will be totally revealed. The first event even before dealing with Israel and what will set up the seat of this anti-Christ is the USA must be completely neutralized or completely destroyed.

Many things are now being revealed to anyone with the eyes to see or the ears to hear, the economy, the destruction of the Dollar, the sudden exposure of the coming one world global currency, most likely by passing the already printed Amero. Masses of terrorists are infiltrating the US borders and criminal gangs causing decent law abiding citizens to live in fear.

With a New President who is proving to be the most dangerous the world has ever seen. With civil unrest building coast to coast and the average American not knowing what is going to happen to them and their families if things keep going the way they are.

There is something that has caught my eye and it is very revealing and disturbing and that is the Obama Youth programs. A bill has passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 321-105 and now goes to the Senate and with a majority being Democrats it will pass easily.

The reason I find this so revealing is a quote from a man I dislike even writing his name, Hitler said in a speech in 1935 “He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.

The bill is being called “Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education” it forms what is being called “Obama’s Youth Brigade.”

Here is part of the HR1388 Bill’s wording:
SEC. 1304. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES AND INELIGIBLE ORGANIZATIONS.

Section 125 (42 U.S.C. 12575) is amended to read as follows:

SEC. 125. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES AND INELIGIBLE ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) Prohibited Activities- A participant in an approved national service position under this subtitle may not engage in the following activities.
(1) Attempting to influence legislation.

(2) Organizing or engaging in protests, petitions, boycotts, or strikes

(7) Engaging in religious instruction, conducting worship services, providing instruction as part of a program that includes mandatory religious instruction or worship, constructing or operating facilities devoted to religious instruction or worship, maintaining facilities primarily or inherently devoted to religious instruction or worship, or engaging in any form of religious proselytization.

Folks if you live in the US you are in serious trouble, and if you don’t let your voice be heard loud and clear and very soon you will lose what you cherish most, your freedom.
It should also be said, that the Government that is now taking total control of your life, finances and every possible part of your life is also aware of the possibility of mass riots against them. They have many ways to take your mind off of what is happening. Possibly a false flag operation (a major terrorist attack done by the Government and blamed on a known enemy). To allow terrorists to infiltrate the US in mass numbers in order to set off a major weapon of mass destruction (such as a dirty bomb) causing national martial law. In so doing take total control of your very life in every aspect.
What can you do about it, not much, but if anything at all you have to do it now not after the fact. If nothing else you must prepare the best you can for your family and enough to share with those who will want to take what you have if you don’t share.
Oh I know that I will be called a nut for writing this, but if you haven’t woke up yet it is only a short time before you will.

You have many obligations that you must answer for in the coming months, the first is your relationship to God. If you don’t know Yeshua (Jesus) as your personal Messiah now would be a great time for you to get very serious about that, asking the Ruach Hakoddesh (Holy Spirit) to show you the truth of the Blood and the Cross, your responsibility to your family and friends and to those who need to know the truth.

If you don’t understand the Bible and want a serious study that will bring many things to light for you I invite you to read this book it is a free down load. CLICK.

As desperate as I am to save Jewish lives by rescuing them by boat in the very near future I also feel an obligation to try my best to wake you up and cause you to act responsible for yourself, family and even for your nation, for even it can be saved if Christians would start realizing what they are about to lose by being silent.

Many are called but few are chosen, and if God has chose you to bless the Apple of His Eye then it is you that I am asking to be obedient to that call, for many Jewish lives may depend on your obedience to that call.

If you are still reading this article you may have a chance, but act now, I know that most will call this conspiracy stuff, but believe me dear brother’s and sisters it is very deadly real.

The Islamic world will not deal completely with Israel until the US has either been neutralized or destroyed. And that is what is about to happen if enough Believers don’t wake up real soon.

If God has brought you to this Ministry we need to hear from you in a big way right away.

Pray for the peace of Jerusalem, for our son Joel and all the IDF soldiers. Pray for this Ministry and your part in it.

Shalom, jerry golden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Golden Reort
http://www.thegoldenreport.com/

TELEVISION'S JUDGE JUDY: "THE OLD GUARD HAS TO DIE OFF"

By Attorney Constance Cumbey
March 21, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

I arrived home in time to catch only the last few minutes of the Larry King Live interview of the indomitable "Judge Judy." It was airing Monday night, March 16th, between 9 p.m. and 10 p.m. in the Eastern Daylight Savings time zone for the Detroit metropolitan area where I reside.

Judge Judy was very unhappy about something happening in the great state of California. The something she was unhappy about was voter ratification of a constitutional amendment barring "gay marriage." "What with AIG, bank failures, and our other problems, why are we unhappy about two responsible people who love each other and get married, sometimes to start a family, sometimes not?", she opined. When Larry King told her the religious people felt strongly against same-sex marriage, her ire increased. "The religious people can feel any way they like," she said. "They have no right to impose their feelings on the rest of us." She then tried to draw parallels between interracial marriage and same sex marriage.

According to the biblical record, Moses took an Ethiopian wife and when sister Miriam complained, she was stricken with leprosy for her criticism and had to spend a week outside the camp as punishment. The same scriptures that record this also condemned a man lying with a man as with a woman. Clearly same sex marriage is proscribed. Bi-racial marriage was not. The Scriptures clearly said, "all men are one blood." You can read the Moses account for yourself in Numbers, Chapter 12 of the Old Testament. Clearly, Judge Judy drew a bad analogy. I hope she researches case law, local ordinances, and statutory law better than that in her real – non-television – judicial work.

Judge Judy went on to say that the numbers opposed (while still the majority) to "gay marriage" were dwindling. She then made the most inflammatory statement of all: THE OLD GUARD (opposed Christians and others) had to DIE OFF. Her words, "the old guard has to die" were indicative of the prophesied anger which will culminate in the fifth seal of the book of Revelation: the bodies under the heavenly altar crying out, "how long, Lord, how long." They were given white robes and told to rest for awhile until their fellow servants should be killed as they had been killed.

We are now in an era far more wild than the old movies we once watched about end time events including the Left Behind one. Karen Armstrong opined Friday night on a Bill Moyers' PBS interview that the three monotheistic world religions were guilty of idolatry for "casting God in their own image." Turning the scriptural definition of idolatry: "Thou shalt have no other gods before Me" on its very head, she redefined idolatry as belief in "One God, the Creator of Heaven and Earth." Only the monotheistic religions were guilty of this -- said the ex-nun who evidently left her long discarded habit far behind.

Attacks on Christianity and traditional values of monotheist religions have become a virtual "thrill a day," sometimes now coming several times in a day. Karen Armstrong was Friday night. Ellen DeGeneres brought her "wife" Portia on her program this morning and showed provocative seductive footage of Portia enticing heavily breathing males. The undiscerning studio audience cheered raucously. Tonight Judge Judy publicly sneered at Christians with traditional moral values.

Jesus warned us that as it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be in the day of the coming of the Son of Man. He also drew parallels to Sodom and Gomorrah. Even in my former wildest dreams cum nightmares did I dream it would be fulfilled quite as literally as it seems to be happening.

Years ago, Fr.Seraphim Rose, a Russian Orthodox priest who saw all of this coming wrote that "Satan was now entering naked into human history."

Yes, he obviously has. The Revelation seals may well have opened. The day is fast approaching when God will say, "let he who is righteous be righteous still, let he who is filthy be filthy still."

I urge you to hurry to line up on the right side of that "digital divide." I am the Lord, I change not, was God's immutable word to us throughout human history. "The times are changing and we MUST change with them was Judge Judy's message tonight on Larry King Live. I choose to go on God's word rather than that of Judge Judy of whom it was said has 10 million viewers.

Tough times are coming -- tough times are here. It's no time to give up on God and weaken. These things prove the truth of God's word. Hang in there!

Where do I stand on ‘gay marriage.’ I will say here what I always say with a wry smile: "Sorry guys. It was ‘Adam and Eve.’ It was NOT "Adam and Steve," nor was it “Madame and Eve."

For the record, I am now fighting fire with fire. If you have been unable to locate my books, THE HIDDEN DANGERS OF THE RAINBOW and A PLANNED DECEPTION I am making them available for on-line viewing, reading, and downloading by going to my blogspot and clicking on the "Presentations for downloading link" or more directly by clicking here. Press the down arrow on the small black button to the right for download access. You will need an Adobe ® PDF file reader or equivalent to open the file.

I conclude by quoting Fr. Seraphim Rose, “It is later than you think. Hasten now to do the work of the Lord.”

© 2009 - Constance Cumbey - All Rights Reserve

THE 2010 CENSUS IS COMING, I SMELL A BIG RAT
By Dr. Laurie Roth
March 20, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

Obama and his team, for the first time in our nations history put the controls of Census taking into the White House. You may ask, why does the executive branch have to control a formally bi partisan, non-political structure?

Why is the census so important to begin with?

I’ll tell you why. It is mandated by our constitution that we count our population so our Government can figure out tax distribution properly and fairly. Accurate counting of our citizens also reflects representation and appropriations of the 435 seats in the House of Representatives. It involves accurate representation of voting districts as reflected by the people living in them.

Allegedly there are major consequences that are clearly defined for committing fraud and manipulating an accurate report. The Census Bureau boldly declares they are nonpartisan, non-political and very dedicated to an accurate count. Wow! I feel so much better. I’m just certain then that even though our President has grabbed the reigns of control with this group that fairness and ethics will prevail.

Lets gear up for the big count in 2010

The bureau needs to recruit 1.4 million temporary workers, the door-to-door folks. To do this, they are employing help from more than 250 national partners. With all the help they will need and with all their non-partisan commitment to accuracy and ethics in counting how is it that they even are considering the Gambino Crime Family to help coordinate a big part of this count??? OH MY, that was a Freudian slip. Did I say Gambino Crime Family???? I am horribly sorry. I meant ACORN.

If you have read and studied any of the many cases of fraud across the country by ACORN workers in Washington, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Missouri, Arizona, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Vermont, North Carolina, and Florida you would have a HUGE concern about their ability to count accurately and care about anything but stacking the deck for their election goals.

ACORN can talk all it wants about its intentions but when you have seen crimes and fraud in so many states, so many years and times it doesn’t take rocket scientist brains to figure out that correct numbers will be flattened, manipulated and ruined if their workers are anywhere near the census!

Looking at the huge pile of endless cases against ACORN in the 14 states I mentioned you would have to give many of their workers an F- in math and an F-in statesmanship. Their crooked workers in case after case were signing up the same person, hundreds of times, signing up celebrities in other states, dead people, illegal aliens, falsifying documentation, using blatantly false forms, offering other people’s social security numbers, make believe addresses and signing up convicted felons. Oh, there was much more, creative and horrific voter fraud and crime involved. So, given the huge amount of fraud in so many states over so many years, HOW IS IT THAT THE NON PARTISAN, NON POLITICAL CENSUS BUREAU WOULD DARE TO EVEN CONSIDER USING ACORN ANYWHERE NEAR THE 2010 CENSUS???

Just think of what is at stake

If you have groups already committed to cheating and voter fraud involved with counting folks in counties across this country, logic says you would simply have to know that numbers will be drastically violated and misrepresented to manipulate more representation and money in the direction of democratic strongholds. Why would this not happen when in every election fraud with voting happens?

© 2009 Dr. Laurie Roth - All Rights Reserved

WHERE'S THE BEEF AT AIG?

By Marilyn M. Barnewall
March 22, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

If the way Congress has mismanaged "The AIG Affair" doesn't tell you what a bunch of clowns represent you, nothing will. If you believe Congress is really trying to solve the AIG problem (which, to be totally truthful, Congress created) you should not read the rest of this article. It will make you angry.

Yes. To answer a popular question, Timothy Geithner, our inept Treasury Secretary, had to know about the employee bonuses being paid to AIG. If he did not know about the bonuses, he wasn't doing his job as the head of the New York Federal Reserve Bank (which he was, at the time the bonus agreement occurred). It's this simple: If he is so naïve or dumb that he did not know what was happening, he has no business being Secretary of the Treasury for the United States of America. And, these appear to be the only two possibilities: Either he lied, or he is dumb and naïve.

When I was president of the MacGruder Agency, a bank financial consulting firm, I signed a lot of contracts with commercial banks. When a bank wanted to retain me, I gave them my consulting contract which was then given to the bank's lawyers. Each bank added its own requirements. My contract told them they would have to pay for my first class airfare, for example. It told them how many hours I would work during a "day" and how many of my days each year the amount they were paying would buy.

They required specific things of me, too. I was promising to create a credit-driven private bank for them. They required me to specify costs and services provided. In other words, the contract made clear what we could expect from one another.

From the largest to the smallest banks in America with which I worked, believe me if I did not perform as my contract said I would, they could have terminated the contract any time. Now, when a group of people are so inept as to bring a company to bankruptcy, there is plenty of reason to say "You didn't earn your bonus this year." There is rarely - if ever - a contract offering money for performance that does not have a specific performance clause in it.

There was one logical question to be asked of Edward M. Liddy, President and CEO of AIG, when Congress raked him over the coals at hearings last week. You know which hearings I mean - where everyone was "outraged" over the employee bonuses? One question needed to be asked and I certainly didn't hear anyone ask it. Thus, the "outrage" lacks credibility.

"Where's the beef?"

Translated: "Where are the employment contracts signed by AIG? I need a copy to determine what you promised to pay these people and what you required of each employee to earn this bonus. Black out the names if need be, but I need to see a copy of the contracts you say you absolutely must honor!"

Without a copy of the AIG contract giving bonuses of $165 million to employees, no one really knows whether or not the bonuses had to be paid.

"But we need this money to retain these employees," was the story given.

Really? Then maybe you can explain why over three dozen of them have already left the company.

Because the right questions were not asked, I mark the Congressional hearings off as "artistic performance," not serious questions and answers trying to solve a problem.

Rather than ask one simple question - the right question - Congress instead passed what appears to be unenforceable legislation. Pelosi's past actions have proven how little concern she has for the U.S. Constitution, so it should surprise no one that she is willing to tromp on the civil rights of a group of people to over-compensate for not doing sufficient due diligence before giving AIG huge amounts of money. This problem exists because of her arrogance and stupidity!

AIG isn't the only mistake Congress made. For example, did you know that Goldman Sachs is offering money to employees they had to terminate because of the economic crises that company helped create? Yep. Such a nice thing to do, too, offering their former employees tax dollars to pay their moving expenses to locations where it might be easier to find employment. Haven't heard about that one yet?

Surely you read the Wall Street Journal article this week about Fannie Mae paying bonuses to its employees? These are retention bonuses of from $470,000 to $611,000 to be paid in 2009 to executives. Frankly, we would all be better off if every executive at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were not "retained." The performance of the company certainly doesn't justify doing anything to encourage Fannie's executive managers to stay nor for paying them a bonus.

Bear in mind, Fannie and Freddie just reported combined losses of nearly $108 billion largely from home mortgage defaults. Who decided to bank those mortgages? Executive managers they want to retain via a bonus are responsible for such decisions. If they were not, they should have been. The Treasury Department will provide up to $200 billion for Fannie and $200 billion for Freddie.

The two mortgage behemoths currently need $60 billion in additional funds (since TARP) to cover loan losses to date. There are so many mortgage bankers looking for jobs right now, it is very doubtful anyone is going to walk away from their job over a lost bonus. If they do, we still win. With a little help from Congressman Barney Frank (D-MS) and Senator Chris Dodd (D-Del), they got us into this mess. We could benefit from their departure.

Are you feeling "outrage" yet? How about this:

Thirteen of the firms that received billions of dollars of bailout money owe hundreds of millions of dollars in UNPAID TAXES.

See how generous you are, America? You not only loan AIG money so it can pay foreign banks billions and billions of dollars, you pay back taxes owed for companies who haven't paid their own tax bills! What a country!

One company that received bailout funds owed $113 million in unpaid federal income taxes, another $1.1 million (plus another $223,000 in federal employment taxes). Oh, they can't release the names of these companies to you. That wouldn't be fair. Apparently it's fair for you to get billed for everything but kept ignorant of for what your tax dollars pay (and those of your children and grandchildren).

All of the banks and other firms that received federal money signed contracts stating they had no unpaid taxes so if they lied, we can prosecute them. That, of course, won't get your money back, but it will help you with the "outrage" and reduce the costs involved with your anger management classes.

Using AIG as an example, here's what is outrageous.

After the big AIG fall last September, Edward M. Liddy, 62, took over two positions with AIG, succeeding Robert B. Willumstad. Prior to taking on responsibilities for the failing AIG, Liddy was affiliated with Sears as Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and later was Chairman of Allstate Insurance.

AIG has been presented to the American public as an "American-based" company. It has offices in New York, but its corporate headquarters is in London. The company's roots are in Shanghai - which is part of the People's Republic of China. Specifically, AIG was founded by C.V. Starr as American Asiatic Underwriters in Shanghai in 1919. In 1921, Starr founded Asia Life Insurance Company. It was the first company to offer life insurance to the Chinese people. .In 1975, Maurice R. Greenberg, Chairman and CEO of AIG at the time, traveled to Beijing for the first time. He made many similar trips during future years.

Is that what you call an American company? I don't.

AIG was involved in credit swaps - you don't need to know what they are to understand what AIG did, so I'm not going to waste words explaining it - with 25 international financial institutions. These financial institutions are called "counterparties." Had you, dear taxpayer, not been so generous, when the credit swaps went bad and AIG was unable to pay insurance losses on them without billions of tax dollars, the company would have gone into bankruptcy… probably Chapter 11. AIG first gave these "counterparties" the collateral supporting the loans. You understand the collateral process. Just look around your neighborhood and you'll be sure to find someone who's been foreclosed on. The bank took possession of the collateral on your neighbor's mortgage loan by kicking their butts out into the street. That's the collateral process. So, AIG first gave their "counterparties" loan collateral. Later, AIG gave them billions of your tax dollars and, lo and behold, it made the "counterparties" whole.

Who were these wonderful American companies you helped by giving money to AIG so it could give it to its counterparties? Société Générale (France); Goldman Sachs (New York); Merrill Lynch International; Deutsche Bank (Germany); Calyon, Crédit Agricole (France); UBS (Union Bank of Switzerland); Barclays (England); Coral Purchasing, DZ Bank (Germany); Bank of Montreal (Canada); Rabobank (the Netherlands); Royal Bank of Scotland; Bank of America (U.S.); Wachovia Bank (U.S.); HSBC (Household Bank, England), and Barclays Global Investors (England).

Looking at the amount of money injected via funds given to AIG because it needed to be saved and then somehow got into United Kingdom coffers, I'm sure we can expect a thank you note from the Queen, any day now.

In other words, while your legislators are keeping you either entertained or nervous with "outrage" they themselves created, the American taxpayer has once again gotten the fickle finger of fate shoved in their faces - but it's a golden finger!

They are keeping your attention diverted from what is really going on in the hallowed halls of your United States Congress.

The employee bonuses totaled only $165 million. The payments to all of those foreign entities listed above almost totals $100 billion.

You've been had. Again.

© 2009 Marilyn M. Barnewall - All Rights Reserved

ONE WAY TO REVERSE AMERICA'S COLLAPSE

Dr. Eugene Narrett, Ph.D
March 19, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

The contrived collapse of America’s economy and financial markets is not the focus of this essay although it is a subset of the collapse that is the essay’s key topic: the collapse of traditional gender roles and goals as reflected in major areas of social decay, -- ruined education, de-population, paganizing of sexual mores; disruption of the workplace by the terror of blackmail and pettiness so that it becomes a fashion runway of envious games; infantilized politics and punitive gigantism in a Nanny-State.

It is possible to reverse this collapse of the most basic model of human relations and its attendant areas of decay. Those most able and obligated to bring healing are those who inadvertently or gladly brought it about: American women. To do this they will have to reject and persist in resisting the siren song of the media, the emoluments of the courts and foundations and what now are engrained habits and attitudes that go back at least to the 1920s. These domineering and arrogant attitudes that have distant antecedents in the “Queen of Beauty” core of medieval chivalry and tournaments and the ancient goddess worship this pageantry carried forward are deeply rooted in a perversion of the Creator’s plan for human abundance and the logic of creation.

At this point of our culture’s decline this reversal may be an impossible quest but it is necessary if one wants to retain the goodness of the world as a possibility within reach and it includes actions that individual people and families can take that would have an immediate impact for the good on basic institutions that form or deform attitudes and behavior.

The renovating revolution is in principle simple; but because it starts with a change of mind and attitudes, habits of gesture, expression and familiar deeds, -- and a surrender of power and the accoutrements of the kinds of power our era exalts -- it is a challenge greater than the bursting of any purported ‘glass ceiling’ a goal dishonest in formulation and not suited to true love. Women have leapt or let themselves be led into a cage of mirrors by the enticement of extraordinary powers. To escape this cage of cruel and sterile selfhood, women need to respect their husbands, accept their role as helpmate of their husband and support his authority including instructing them how to vote (or not to vote as the husband may decide) and to reject recourse to seductive “women’s groups” and their affiliated lawyers and the courts whose postmodern divorce regimen has destroyed the status of husband, father and man, re-created goddess worship (as may be seen in any glossy magazine, even those pitched to men) along with legions of marred youth.

“No-fault” divorce statutes, among the most dishonest and destructive aspects of modern “progress” should be repealed and the right to divorce returned to husbands alone, if you want marriage to survive and gender relations to have any health to them.

What could induce human beings to surrender “rights” with backing by color of law and mass-modeled mores that have been thrust upon them? Economic collapse and loneliness may open a fissure through which humanity might grow. Perhaps the understanding that the devil’s bargain of feminism has been and is destroying them and anything they hold dear, from their own self-centered happiness to their ability to have loving and supportive human relationships instead of fealty to a State monster that bows down to them, in the short term in order to destroy their men and children and the responsibilities that make them human, -- and that support their freedom, the genuine freedom befitting a woman, which arises out of service to her husband and family which will love and cherish her.

“Your wife shall be like a fruitful vine in the inner chambers of your home” states one of many psalms that deals with the blessing of children, “like olive shoots surrounding your table” “like arrows in the hand of a mighty warrior, happy is the man who fills his quiver with them.” The greatest blessing of the Creator is to “transform a barren wife into a glad mother of children” (128, 127, 112, etc). Blessing pertains to birth the greatest sages teach, commenting on the clear message of the blessings to “increase and be fruitful, fill the earth and subdue it” stipulated in the first chapter of Scriptures.[1] Anne Bradstreet, the first American poet, a wise, insightful and, as her poems to her husband, children and grandchildren show, a woman of great love, devotion, courage and faith wrote that she had deep grief, wept and prayed that the Creator did not enable her to conceive for what she felt as a painfully long time after her marriage…four years, not until she was twenty-one years old! She had eight children or, as modern, feminist editors put it, “she risked death by childbirth eight times.” Imagine that! Given that most women have, eagerly, since earliest times sought children and that this has never carried less risk than in the modern West, feminists perhaps are great cowards and well as bullies. But Bradstreet was from a culture of health, one imbued with Scripture not Malthusian or Darwinist dogma; didn’t have any abortions, she loved her husband; she loved being a woman, not an imitation-man who hated men. Clearly modern Malthusians and their useful idiots would like to bury her example. They much prefer the antinomian, socially radical Anne Hutchinson, a witch promoting the “inner light” which in our day has crystallized into a slogan, “no woman is illegal” and the shibboleth that sex roles are artificial and transferable by surgery and imagination, like clothing a matter of whim and wealth.

No wonder this culture is beset by “monsters of the id,” that it is “consumed with bewildering terrors” (psalm 73); the Terror of the French Revolution, the eruption of the novel of “Gothic” Terror as a major literary genre, and the paean of modern feminism, “the Vindication of the Rights of Women” burst upon the West early in the 1790s. As the “full day” of the seventh millennium of human history rose, the first fruits of great and terrible transformations showed themselves. We live with or, rather, die from their fruits. Already in the dawn of that day, Abigail Adams grated on her husband John in letters demanding full legal rights for women: “we are determined to instigate a rebellion” she declared, echoing the women of Athens in Lysistrata. John Adams’ reply was only too apt: men’s legal privileges were essential, he wrote, “we dare not exert our power [in the home] in its full latitude…in practice, you know, we are the subjects. We have only the name of masters. To give up on this would subject us completely to the despotism of the petticoat.”[2] Thus did the subterranean deference and goddess worship of chivalry and ancient paganism, diffused through the antinomian charisma of the “inner light” and worship of the Queen of heaven threaten gender relations the very year of the Declaration of Independence; it was a dark undercurrent of rebellion and collapse; amid a revolution to establish accountability it threatened the most essential human duties: Pandora’s box was opened.

Let Bradstreet speak for herself: in the prologue to her poem, “A Dialogue between Old England and New” she notes the pagan Greek penchant for imagining female divinities, appealing to them and investing them with inspirational powers (the Muses, for example) “But this weak knot” of ostensible divinity and its devotees, she observes, women themselves “will soon untie; the Greeks did nought but play the fools and lie.”[3]

Let Greeks be Greeks, and women what they are;
Men have precedency and still excel;
It is but vain, unjustly to wage war;
Men can do best, and women know it well…

They still know it but as in so many areas, our culture denies the most obvious facts of our lives in order to impose its lies as new truths, the better to de-populate and beggar the world. “Men still excel” in those few instances they are allowed to work, the list dwindling to professional athletes and top bankers. To speak of small matters, perhaps you have noticed the rash of knee injuries requiring surgery and braces that high school and College Amazons suffer from their intensive, Title IX mandated “play” of soccer, lacrosse, etc. It is part of what your health insurance covers; of greater import, it contributes to the confusion of gender roles and physical nature that are subsets of the gender war kindled by the Malthusians and developing naturally from the portions of goddess worship embedded in the West’s composite culture. Recreation is nice but competitive attitudes that should not be fostered in women and that their bodies cannot support are part of the destruction of a culture of abundance. Instead of deference and love we have tyranny, terrors and many forms of ruin.

The original marriage service states the mutual duties of the couple toward each other in ways that supports what is best and suppresses what is potentially damaging in each. The woman shall “love, honor and obey” her husband as if he is a minister of state. The man shall love and cherish his wife as his dearest possession. Do not woman understand the habit of having possessions and being possessed? Rather than “to have and to hold” the entire apparatus of modern “economy” inflames their desire “to have” and directs it toward SUV’s, telecom and “beauty” products. With the laws and prejudice of the collapsing postmodern State at their backs, the world of work brings out what is worst in women, and women in the workforce not only has been a major factor in destroying the family and encouraging female contempt for men but in destroying the seriousness and easy-going professionalism that once was a rule not an exception until quotas, targets and preferences transferred the gender wars into the workplace.

Nor is it good that women flounce or march around in male drag: that is an abomination and sure sign of a society lost in paganism, in a social order disempowered by magic and perversion, by fantasies of unnatural transformation, by unproductive fantasies and sex. Every time an elected or appointed harlot mouths the slogan, “our brave men and women in uniform” they reiterate the last rites for America.

Next to the 13th Amendment, the 19th, giving women the right to vote (1920) was the most pervasively destructive alteration of our basic law; it was the enabler of the latent authoritarian power of the 13th because it began the legal process of destroying the families and, indeed, the identity of the people that would otherwise buffer the growth of an imperial State feeding on taxes. As the growing cult of victim-defined pc “thought crimes” and affiliated syndromes has shown, the unisex dogma is intrinsic to the terror and rhapsodic madness of the last generation so aptly reflected in its degrading mass “entertainments.” Raw democracy, like fire, is a terrible thing, the cloak of tyranny and perennial destruction of the bonds whose unloosing no society can survive.

The renunciation of female “equality” or “equity” is a facet of self-government; it is like asking the nation to return to the spirit that the Founders rightly termed essential for the experiment of a Republic of limited governmental powers to succeed. To whatever extent women can choose self-government and to be governed, to once again choose the reciprocal duties articulated with beautiful wisdom by Cordelia[4] to love, honor and obey father and husband, they with their men must educate their children themselves or find able educators, schooled in their discipline to educate them; these teachers will be men, if one wants society to thrive. School marms may find happiness in Amazonia. The public school system of programming, conditioning and “psychological counseling” already has destroyed this nation by destroying the ability and inclination to think as much as by its burial of the actual matter of the subjects it pretends, or used to pretend to teach. Women must play a great role in reversing this, by self-government and withdrawal.

The public school system not only has been pernicious in degrading education with “relativism” and multiculturalism: from the first (c.1840) it has been the province of women, teaching as its basic content that women are in charge and must be obeyed. Any society that instructs the education of its young to women puts a noose around its neck; the women will soon enough pull the trap as has been shown. At this late stage in our culture of terror, public “schools” are sites of detention, violence, control and stupefaction that lay the basis for indoctrination into “global citizenship” and Statist – fascist attitudes, intolerance and conformity in “Higher Education.” What once was derided as Main Street “Babbitry” has entered a coercive and deracinated stage.

To conclude this discussion of specific measures to restore a collapsing culture one should add rejection of Television for this is the corrupting eye and mouth of a State built on programming and control, on teaching bad manners and superficial, self-absorbed rebellion as fad after fad dazzles the spectators. Rejecting TV also liberates from a primary means used by those who own the networks, in tandem with their sponsors to teach unnatural and “glamorous” identities to citizens who have devolved into “consumers” only to become ripe for consumption themselves, their money and their lives which gladdens the eco-maniacs and Malthusians that support them.

For seventeen centuries it has become ‘pious’ dogma to despise “the law” for the new dispensations of “freedom” and “love” purchased by verbal assent and conducing neither to freedom or love but their contraries. There is wisdom in the original instruction manual to emphasize negative commandments just as it was for the Constitution to emphasize what the government could not do; because people, like governments filled with people who are filled with appetites have many more ways of transgressing at their own and each other’s expense than they do of choosing the simple path of life abundant. If we are to have a humane future it would be well to look to the past; to reject toxins sometimes is the most positive and life-affirming act a person can take.

Could it be put more clearly? American women need to repent, to cease self-adoration and return to obey, love and most honor their men and families. A redemptive miracle made from a change of heart and secession from the Empire.

Footnotes:

1. “Blessing pertains to birth” wrote the Teacher, Moshe son of Nachman (“Nachmanides”), commenting on Genesis 17:16 in light of Genesis 1:22, 27-8
2. John and Abigail Adams, correspondence, 2 March – May 07, 1776. These demands occupied Abigail as the minutemen were assembling, dying and fighting at Lexington and Concord.
3. Bradstreet here, in 1650 is articulating a Puritan precept that the great poet, statesmen and essayist on social questions, John Milton reiterated many times in his greatest work, Paradise Lost (1673), that the Greek myths about gods and goddesses are lies. “From morn to noon, from noon to dewy even he fell, a summer’s day; and with the setting sun, dropped from the zenith like a falling star on Lemnos, the Aegean isle. Thus they relate, erring,” Milton writes, describing the story of how an enraged Zeus hurled momma’s boy Hephaestus out of Olympus
4. King Lear 1.1.95-106: “Good my lord, you have begot me, bred me, loved me; I return those duties as are right fit, obey you, love you, and most honor you. Why have my sisters husbands if they say they love you all? When I shall take wed, surely that man who takes my pledge shall carry half my love with him, half my care and duty” aside from the half reserved for her father. Shakespeare (1564-1618) was the end of the beginning of the West; Milton, who made an epic character of the Creator, marked the beginning of the end. Hobbes and Machiavelli already had expressed the Statism and manipulation that a despair of human goodness and free will seemed to require. There remained only the means to pursue the global imperium that both Edom and Ishmael have as their goal.

© 2009 Eugene Narrett - All Rights Reserved

THE CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS IS ALREADY HERE

By Lynn Stuter

March 24, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

Many have foretold the coming of a constitutional crisis if Also Known As (AKA) Obama does not produce the documents proving his eligibility to the office of president. AKA has made it very apparent that he does not intend to produce the documents willingly because to do so would show that he knew he was ineligible from the outset; that the only conspiracy in this matter was the conspiracy in which he engaged to defraud the American people.

Congress, at the time fully aware of the evidence proving AKA ineligible, refused to object to the certifying of the Electoral College on January 8, 2009. Further, and after the fact, they continue to make such inane and stupid claims as “he’s produced his birth certificate”; “he was born in Hawaii”; “he has been vetted by the vote of the people” knowing full well that such is not true.

The Supreme Court and lower courts refuse to address the issue, making such inane claims as “standing”, “moot after the fact”, “frivolous”; or no comment at all. In Allen v Bowen, the judge dismissed, claiming it the duty of Congress to address the matter at the time of the certifying of the electoral college; that outside that objection, no legal remedy exists.

In another recent case, Hollister v Soetoro, Federal Judge James Robertson dismissed, claiming …

"The issue of the president's citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and otherwise massaged by America's vigilant citizenry during Mr. Obama's two-year-campaign for the presidency…”

Not only is this a lie, but in stating this, Judge Robertson violated judicial canons wherein judges are to refrain from making decisions based on facts not in evidence. It is very apparent that Judge Robertson made this statement based on personal opinion or on information he obtained outside the scope of the pleadings before him.

If ever there was a case of judicial misconduct, Judge James Robertson is a candidate.

When an American citizen had the temerity to call Robertson on the carpet for his conduct, that citizen was visited and threatened by U.S. Marshall’s in a manner reminiscent of Hitler’s Gestapo.

But what becomes apparent, in all of these absurd judicial machinations, is that, no matter what, the people will not find justice via the courts because equal justice under the law does not exist. This, of itself, is a violation of the United States Constitution in which rule is by law, where money, power and position is to make no difference in how the court rules. Such has clearly not been the case with preferential if not exclusionary treatment being afforded AKA.

At this point in time it should be crystal clear to the American people that neither the judicial nor the legislative branches of our government are functioning within the bounds of the United States Constitution.

On January 20, 2009, we watched AKA and Justice Roberts bungle the oath of office. It was reported that the oath was retaken in a private ceremony the following evening. In light of the fact that these people have been proven liars, we don’t know that this is true. And in light of AKA’s ineligibility to the office of president, the bungling of the oath is just a little too convenient.

If AKA did not take the oath, he cannot be criminally charged as having taken the oath when he knew he was ineligible.

Since January 20, 2009, the American people have watched as bill after bill, directly targeting the freedoms and rights of the American people, have sailed through Congress with little opposition. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, is so ecstatic over her part in helping AKA destroy this nation that she has even had the unmitigated gall to tell illegal aliens that the existing laws making them criminals are un-American, thus violating her oath of office.

Massive bills, obviously unread by legislators, have zipped through Congress at the speed of a run-away train. H.R. 1 (the piggy package of pork barrel spending), 407 pages; H.R. 1105 (omnibus appropriations, 2009) 465 pages; HR 1388 (the GIVE act), 310 pages.

H.R. 1 is $787 billion in nothing but pork barrel spending; H.R. 1105 follows suit with another $410 billion in pork barrel spending at a time when America cannot afford to grow government or spend that kind of money on pet projects.

H.R. 1388 begins the process of establishing the AKA civilian national security force; the brainwashed Marxist brownshirt goon squad not unlike those that aided Hitler and that the German people learned to hate and fear.

And last week saw more “scandal” regarding TARP money; this time involving the payment of “bonuses” by AIG. It seems that Timothy “I’m Turbo-tax challenged” Geithner knew the bonuses would be paid but did nothing because to stop the bonuses, issued under contract, could result in lawsuits. Christopher “I’m so confused” Dodd didn’t know a thing about it, then he did because Geithner wasn’t taking the heat alone, then it came to light that it was the language Dodd had inserted into the bill that allowed the bonuses to be paid; and that Dodd knew full well why the language was inserted.

But in light of the lies the American people were told about the TARP money, its purpose and what it would be used for, are we being told the truth about the AIG bonuses? I recently received the following explanation of the AIG situation,

“The payments, popularly known as ‘bonuses’, are actually deferred contractual obligations AIG entered into over a year ago with certain very specialized traders who were critical to the performance of the Financial Products Division of AIG. Generally, the contracts were engaged with the intent of retaining these traders for a period of one year, providing the traders achieved certain benchmark performance during the year. Retention of traders through the year is tactically important to their customers.

The ‘bonus’ calculations were based on the traders' commitments and level of successful performance per their respective metrics. The formulae used were ordinary and customary to the industry and cannot be fairly classified as ‘extravagant’. There was nothing unusual about these contracts and to accuse AIG of irresponsibility in their actions is inappropriate. In fact, it would have been irresponsible of AIG to not use these contracts as has become normal to their industry and critical to retaining highly qualified employees. AIG's customers rely heavily on the subject traders in their business transactions with AIG.

This subject has become a popular means of demonstrating political posture to an uninformed public. It has also become a distraction from more important economic maneuvers that have been occurring unnoticed by the media. Over a trillion dollars has been distributed over the past few days with little mention by the media … Obviously, this distraction by the current administration was successful.”

Is it possible this is the case and all the pontificating, posturing, and finger-pointing coming out of Congress is nothing more than diversionary tactics to conceal not only the truth but what is really going on in DC while the media keeps the public focus on this “outrage”? While I have not been able to verify this as the case, doesn’t this make just as much sense, considering the lies the American people were told about TARP, as does the bilge coming out of Congress?

Regards the AIG “scandal”, the House passed H.R. 1586 on March 19, 2009 by a vote of 328 – 93, taxing certain bonuses of companies receiving TARP funds; the constitutionality of this bill has already come into question making it apparent that it was a knee jerk reaction to appease the people as opposed to actually dealing with the issue, which it appears, doesn’t exist. While it is doubtful the bill ever makes it out of the Senate, it is obvious the Congress hopes the outrage of the people at this contrived “scandal” will be appeased so Congress can move on to the next contrived crisis with the people being none the wiser.

And what this all says, bottom line, is that you can’t trust a word out of the mouth of your elected representatives in Washington, DC. Fancy that!

The American people are under attack, not only by Congress but by a Marxist, sitting in the Oval Office, who is not an American citizen, holds no allegiance to this country, hates this country and everything it stands for, and would like nothing better than to see it destroyed at his hand.

With every passing day, more and more people are waking up; even those who voted for AKA believing his lies about “hope and change”, who have realized the man is a pathological liar who can’t string two cohesive words together without the aid of a teleprompter. Everything has to be scripted for him making it apparent he hasn’t an original thought in his head, he’s just an empty suit with a pleasing voice and great delivery. Even the bumbling misspeak of George Bush is preferable to this bozo’s insincere newspeak.

None of this, including the protests that have met AKA at every townhall meeting he has attended since becoming the usurper-in-chief, has been reported by the lamestream media whores. Are we surprised, given the fact that lamestream media has been, for many years now, complicit in that which serves to undermine the United States Constitution and destroy freedom?

Yet to come on AKA’s agenda of destruction are socialized medicine, gun control, controlling food, and bringing children under full control of the state.

H.R. 875 and S 425 have been introduced, essentially outlawing small farms, organic farms and the family garden. If you want to eat, you will conform; otherwise the state will deprive you of food under the auspices of your being a non-conforming “useless eater.”

S. 244 has been introduced to address early childhood learning, bringing young children under the aegis of the state in promulgating life-long learning, cradle to grave. The nanny state of life-long human resource development in the interests of the state; no better than chattel.

This past week saw the publication of a memo ordering Army personnel at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, to surrender information to their command regarding privately owned weapons. When the memo came to light, it was quickly claimed a “mistake.” Was it, or was it a test to see how a captive audience—in that they are under direct government command and control—would respond to such an order? In the day and age when military personnel are being asked whether they would fire on American civilians, when we know Marxist AKA wants the populace disarmed, only a fool ignores the implications of such a memo.

In Washington DC we have AKA’s anti-gun Attorney General, Eric Holder, calling for gun control in the name of keeping guns out of the hands of Mexican drug cartels. Maybe Holder should look into the CIA as the source of those guns; but then, having the CIA supplying guns south of the border serves AKA’s purposes in instituting gun control in America.

How many times do we need to see the created crisis played out in the name of achieving a government agenda to realize that the government is more than likely complicit, if not the culprit, in the type of armaments showing up south of the border?

Chaos reins at this very moment. A constitutional crisis isn’t coming, it arrived on January 20, 2009. AKA is creating crisis after crisis for the purposes of creating chaos, not the least of which surrounds the fact that he is ineligible to the office of president. This usurper is not our legal president, and as such, has no authority to sign any bill into law, yet he is doing so and those laws are being implemented as though legal authority exists, appropriating (stealing) money from the American people to be used by the government to further oppress the people.

And the only ones who can stop this are the American people. Thomas Jefferson stated that the tree of liberty must, from time to time, be refreshed with the blood of tyrants and patriots.

It becomes more apparent, day by day, that the tree of liberty, if it is to survive, will survive only at the price of blood; that this is not a situation of our choosing; it is a situation being forced upon us by Marxists intent on destroying our nation.

As never before, we must seek the wisdom and counsel of God.

© 2009 Lynn M. Stuter - All Rights Reserved

MAINSTREAM MEDIA FINALLY CATCHING UP TO THE DEWEESE REPORT

By Tom DeWeese
March 25, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

Again and again, The DeWeese Report has told you that the real agenda we face is a global one called Sustainable Development, as outlined in the UN’s soft-law document called Agenda 21. We’ve warned that this policy is designed to establish the United Nations as the main force for imposing global government, replacing national sovereignty, controlling the economy and the population, and that it is based on a strange mixture of Socialism and Fascism. Time and again, we’ve reported that global governance is a euphemism for global government. In addition, we’ve exposed the world-wide environmental movement as the driving force for such policies, working toward a wrenching transformation of the world economy, using the environment as the center (or the excuse) for such policy.

I think that about sums up what The DeWeese Report has been focused on for our entire existence. And for that entire time, forces in the federal government, in the UN, and NGO’s in the Environmental movement have universally denied it, saying we were fringe fanatics and silly conspiracy theorists.

Oh yeah? Well, let’s just share a few headlines appearing in the international press in the pass month.

First, headlines flashed across the nation after the Washington Times reported that Obama’s new Climate Czarina, Carol Browner was a member of a global Socialist organization called, “The Commission for a Sustainable World Society. Here’s how the group’s website states its purpose: “We are aware that essential tasks still lie ahead which we can master only through common action, since human survival increasingly depends upon joint efforts of people round the world… It is the people of the world who should exercise control by means of a more advanced democracy in all aspects of life: political, social and economic. Political democracy, for socialists, is the necessary framework and precondition for other rights and liberties.”

Can you read between those lines? “More Advanced Democracy?” “The necessary framework for other rights and liberties?” They mean the other rights and liberties they will give to us – if it fits their agenda – which is what?? SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT! Just like The DeWeese Report has been telling you.

Second, in a December 8, 2008 article entitled “And now for a World Government,” carried in the internationally-respected Financial Times (hardly a right-wing conspiracy rag) there is a quote by Jacques Attali, advisor to French President Nicolas Sarkozy, which states, “Global governance is just a euphemism for global government.” Imagine that – just like The DeWeese Report has warned. The article goes on to a recent report issued by the “Managing Global Insecurity” project, in which it calls for the creation of a UN-controlled military force- again, discussed in The DeWeese Report more than ten years ago.

Third, On February 2, 2009, The Times newspaper in London reported the British government’s “green advisor” Jonathon Porritt, who chairs the government’s Sustainable Development Commission and was Tony Blair’s advisor on the environment, said that couples having more than two children are being irresponsible by creating an unbearable burden on the environment. According to the Times, “a report by the commission says that governments must reduce population growth through better family planning.” Family planning? Condoms? Abortion? How? China has a good policy. They kill any babies over the government-set limit. And offending mothers are thrown in jail.

As The DeWeese Report has said on many occasions, Sustainable Development is about much more than environmental protection – but, we’re just a bunch of nuts!

© 2009 Tom DeWeese - All Rights Reserved

A WORLD GONE MAD

By Paul Proctor
March 18, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

Anyone with an ounce of discernment can tell that our world is losing it. Sin has its consequences; and it’s clear to many now that we are beginning to reap what we have sown.

Oh sure, there have always been liars, thieves, con men, murderers, drunkenness, debauchery, lasciviousness, perversion, profanity, blasphemy, violence and cruelty; but have you ever seen depravity so widely accepted in America? And, what a passion and pride we have for it now!

Brazen sin, as the Bible defines it, has become our cultural standard – the rule rather than the exception. That’s what brought fire and brimstone raining down on Sodom and Gomorrah! And we act as if that tragic story from Genesis 19 was just a fable – that the Lord would never actually bring judgment to the fruited plain.

But, God does not need America – America needs God.

We’re so proud of our depravity that we mass market now. It’s what America is known for around the world. It’s our trademark! And, selling our depravity as entertainment is no longer limited to the seedy side of society, but is now readily available in primetime and on main street in almost every format and venue imaginable, as news, commentary, business, music, sports, politics, religion, retail, drama, documentary, gossip, cartoon, commercial, sitcom, standup, talk show, game show and reality TV.

It’s on your big screen – it’s on your laptop – it’s on your radio – it’s on your CDs, DVDs, MP3s and in 3D. It’s on your cell phone and on your home phone – it’s in your mailbox and in your inbox.

It’s on billboards, banners and in bathrooms – it’s in courtrooms, classrooms and chat rooms. It’s in print ads and in want ads – in pop ups and in previews – on t-shirts and tattoos and clothes you can see through.

It’s in analog, digital, high def and blue ray – it’s in musicals and plays both on and off Broadway. It’s in videos, in bloopers, in trailers and in teasers to tempt everyone from grade-schoolers to geezers.

It’s at the ballgame – it’s at the theater – it’s at the mall – it’s at the park – it’s on parade – it’s in concert in broad daylight and at dark. It’s in hotels and motels, in lodges and in bars – it’s right out your window and staring from cars.

It’s in clubhouses, bathhouses, crack houses and church houses – where cursing and lewdness are met with roundhouses. It’s in studios, spas, salons and in parlors – at clinics and centers that take credit or dollars.

It’s right on the shelves of your local library – It’s in magazines and tabloids where customers tarry at the grocery, the bookstore, the drug store and quick mart – with shocking new photos and headlines of gossip.

It’s at your kid’s school and in back of the bus – and hidden in lockers behind all their stuff. It’s studied at college in classes with teachers proclaiming their theories like humanist preachers.

It’s just business – a living – a career move – an occupational hazard – a hobby – a pastime – a charity event – a good cause – a talent – a gift – a vice – an accident – an excuse – a diversion – a disease – a disorder – a journey – a ministry – a memoir – a book deal – a good deal – a way out of poverty and a means to an end – not to mention a basic human right.

Sin has come a long way since the Garden of Eden, but its wages are still the same even though many would have us believe it’s all relevant in our evolutionary world – a sure sign of madness.

And where is the church in all this?

They’re right in the middle of it looking for market share with a designer Jesus.

“For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.” –1st John 2:16-17

© 2009 Paul Proctor - All Rights Reserve

IT'S TIME TO SMOKE THEM OUT

By Coach Dave Daubenmire
March 19, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

There's something happening here . What it is ain't exactly clear.
There's a man with a gun over there. Telling me I got to beware.
I think it's time we stop, children, what's that sound? Everybody look what's going down.
There's battle lines being drawn. Nobody's right if everybody's wrong.
Young people speaking their minds. Getting so much resistance from behind
I think it's time we stop, hey, what's that sound? Everybody look what's going down.
What a field-day for the heat. A thousand people in the street.
Singing songs and carrying signs. Mostly say, hooray for our side.
It's time we stop, hey, what's that sound. Everybody look what's going down
Paranoia strikes deep. Into your life it will creep.
It starts when you're always afraid.
You step out of line, the man come and take you away. -Buffalo Springfield

Is it just me or does it feel like the sixties all over again? There is one big switcheroo this time, however. In the sixties the hippies were fighting the establishment. Today, the hippies ARE the establishment.

What's that old saying? "What goes around, comes around." For the past sixty years the communists have worked in secret to overturn the "establishment." The culmination of their efforts reached the zenith with the election of communist Barack Hussein Obama to the pinnacle of American power. He and his minions are doing all they can to change the White House into the Red House. But don't be discouraged. Their "victory" has forced them out of the shadows. No longer can they hide in academia, or behind the facade of "environmentalism" where for too long they have stirred their witches brew of anti-Americanism that has splintered this nation.

No my friends, they are out in the open now. They can no longer slink along like cock-roaches in the Capitol Building restrooms. Treason is easiest when done in secret. The cover of darkness is the security blanket under which the bacteria grow. Light makes the roaches run for cover and destroys the mold that grows inside the walls.

Well, it's our turn now. Like the April flowers preparing to bloom in Washington, their true colors are being exposed for all to see. Finally, they have been lured into the light of day.

I have never in my life seen what I see in America today. And it is a good thing.

George Bush was an albatross to "we the people." Masquerading as a "conservative" many were willing to stand with him because he represented to them "the lesser of two evils." Although they were not comfortable with much of what he did, he was still the establishment candidate. He was the face of all that the leftists hated about America.

Bill Clinton was a lefty, but he was a pragmatist and a pervert; a Bubba, if you will, that never seemed a threat to Joe Six-Pack America. Gore was goofy. "Red state" America could not swallow his insincerity. He won more votes than Bush, but not where the “real Americans" lived. Even his home state of Tennessee could not swallow his shtick. Kerry was the same....a lefty pretending to be an everyday guy. Not even he could defeat the "war president" in the midst of an unpopular war. None of the camouflaged-communists could pull it off.

But Obama could. With his silver tongue, and his mulatto ancestry he was able to lure away enough-middle-of-the roaders to carry him on his magic carpet to the highest office in the land. He disavowed the god-haters and America haters that surrounded him so smoothly that Peter Graves from the old TV show Mission Impossible must be envious.

But let there be no doubt, he is the marionette that the communist puppet masters had been grooming for years. A true Manchurian Candidate he was the perfect hand-picked front man programmed to do the communist’s bidding. With the help of the socialist media, the socialist labor unions, and the socialist entertainment industry he was swept into office with the bogus claim that he was America’s first “black” president. He was the first president “of color,” to be sure. But the color is red, not black.

The years of communist indoctrination in our schools had finally paid off. After two generations of students steeped in the socialist gobbledy-gook of a morality characterized by tolerance, diversity, and racism, millions of government-schooled robots used their vote to show how tolerant, diverse, and accepting they were as a sign of their moral superiority. Voting for a “black” man was the greatest evidence of personal morality; far above those intolerant one’s who would dare vote to save the life of the unborn.

Character of the candidate didn’t matter. His positions on the issues were irrelevant. He was everything the change-agents had worked to promote, a multi-cultural minority who was tolerant, diverse, and non-discriminatory. He was the poster child of the communist, traitorous, democratic left.

And now he is president. We must tip our caps to Obama and his handlers. They executed their plan to perfection.

But he is not our king. We are not yet a dictatorship. But the window of freedom is rapidly closing.

Here is the good news. Americans are beginning to awaken like no time in recent history. Tea-Parties, 912 meetups, and other patriotic groups are holding rallies to defend the freedom for which other patriots had died. They are popping up at government buildings all across America. But my experience is that a broad appeal is no appeal. It may garner media attention, it may invigorate those that attend, but in the long run, without an established, focused plan of attack these events will not accomplish what the well-intentioned attendees pray will happen. The event is self-satisfying, but action is not necessarily a sign of effectiveness. Walking on a treadmill feels like progress, but the scenery doesn’t change.

Listen folks. Obama and his power mad cabal of communists do not care what the people think. They have worked their whole lives’ for this opportunity and a few thousand people standing on the courthouse lawn in Cincinnati will not divert them from their goal. They will point to the election, claim a mandate for “change” and hand this nation over to the New World Order boys.

But those in the House of Representatives…now they are a different story. Although they are loyal to Obama as the leader of their party, they know that of all the elected officials in Washington they most must answer to the people. It is time to smoke them out. It is time to find out if they represent the people, or are they merely a rubber stamp for Obama’s communistic agenda. They are weenies waiting to be roasted.

For what it is worth, here is my suggestion. Obama can not succeed with his bailouts, by outs, and sellouts without the approval of YOUR elected officials. To be most effective, those organizing the rallies must begin to hold the rallies outside the offices of their elected representatives. This is not an issue of democrat vs. republican. It is an issue of tyranny or freedom. Obama won’t listen, but your elected representative will.

It is time to smoke the lefties out. Take the focus off of Obama and begin to apply pressure to the person in your district elected to represent you! Demand he make a choice. He will either stand with the people (who are gathered outside of his office with signs and megaphones) or with America’s first red president. Divide and conquer is the oldest trick in the book…the very tactic that the change agents have used to divide this country. In order to reclaim this nation we must force our representatives to choose between the president and the people. Trust me; in the end the weasels in Washington are out to save their own necks.

If you have any influence in any of these rallies, please change the location and begin to congregate outside the offices of your Congressional Reps. Make appointments with them the day of the rally. Flood their offices with phone calls, faxes, and emails. Demand an answer as to where their loyalty lays…the president or the people. The tried and true slogan of the political gurus is “all politics is local.” Turn the heat up on the local boys and quit wasting energy on Obama.

If the thousands I saw on TV this last weekend had a steady presence outside the offices of those Reps I guarantee you they would flip-flop faster than a fresh fish in a flat boat.

Divide and conquer is a proven strategy. Pull the support out from under Obama by threatening to pull the rug out from under your Congress critter.

It is time to find out where they stand. Force them to publicly choose between the red President and red blooded Americans.

It is time to smoke them out.

THE TWIN CRISES: IMMIGRATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE

By Frosty Wooldridge
March 23, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

On Sunday at church, my preacher said, “If you want to be happy for a moment, eat your favorite meal at your preferred restaurant. If you want to be happy for a day, get married because the celebration provides much happiness. If you want to be happy for a lifetime--plant, grow and tend a garden.”

For most of the past 50 years, the citizens of the United States enjoyed a ‘moment’ of happiness. They called it the American Dream. They and their leaders yielded to instant gratification, overstuffed themselves with food and possessions, and now, suffer obesity of debt and body, dwindling resources and dozens of other consequences.

They ‘married’ deficit spending along with the Korean, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq Wars; 700 bases with 572,000 troops ‘Growing an Empire’ around the world; and offshoring, insourcing and outsourcing jobs to everywhere but within America. They ‘married’ mass immigration in 1965 that continues today in a rocky relationship that undermines the foundation of their civilization. From 1986 and continuing today, they tolerated 20 million illegal aliens that migrated into America.

Results: $10.3 trillion debt, 16 million Americans unemployed, 31.1 million Americans living on food stamps, water crises, energy dilemma and an added 100 million people in 40 years with the prospects for adding 100 million more people within 30 years.

But, much like the passengers on the Titanic that kept dancing in the grand ballroom two hours after the ship hit the iceberg, Americans continue thinking they can maintain the same ‘financial and population dance’. Reality check! They can’t! They won’t and the party will not continue!

The task of simultaneously increasing population and achieving sustainability proves impossible. What causes hyper-population growth in the United States? Answer: unending legal and illegal immigration! Both cause America an impossibly degraded future for all citizens.

For a simple example, the press called her “Octo-mom” for birthing six children that she couldn’t support, and then, several years later, Ms. Nadya Suleman, unmarried and unable to sustain those first six kids, birthed another eight children that placed not only the first six in peril, but endangered all 14 children.

The mother cannot take care of them with any competence, thus the ‘state’ or the rest of us must pay for them and their welfare, and they cannot be taken care for their individual needs of love, attention and parenting. In the end, Ms. Suleman loses any sense of sanity or reasonable life as a parent or human being and her children lose any chance for a reasonably parented childhood. If Suleman lived any place but the United States, she and her children would live in abject poverty and most of her kids would die of starvation. For example, African women average eight children, but five to six of them die of starvation or related diseases.

What does Octo-mom with too many kids have to do with America? Short answer: her irresponsibility illustrates our capriciousness; especially our lack of comprehension as to what we face as a civilization.

The United States, already bursting at its demographic seams today, allows the Congress to import 138,000 legal immigrants every 30 days, and another 80,000 to 100,000 illegal migrants every month. The total exceeds 2.2 million people added annually. It also imports another 1.5 million H-1B visas awarded to skilled or professional workers every year to our workforce.

Visit www.numbersusa.com and download “Immigration by the Numbers” for a stunning understanding of the futility and danger of unending immigration from a line that grows by 77 million annually, globally.

So what you yawn while scratching your belly hanging over your belt.

How fast does the world add humans? For a first hand jolt, please visit: www.populationmedia.org

Like a 400 pound fat man that cannot afford to add another 100 pounds, the United States cannot support itself or maintain basic infrastructure to feed, house and water its citizens. In a sweeping report, Edwin S. Rubenstein, premiere economist, wrote a sobering expose’ of America’s accelerating infrastructure crisis brought on by unending population growth.

“The Twin Crises: Immigration and Infrastructure” by www.thesocialcontract.com, Volume XIX, No.2, page 3, 4, Winter 2009, by Edwin S. Rubenstein--addresses U.S. airports, bridges, dams, drinking water, energy, hazardous waste, waterways, schools, railroads, solid waste, mass transit and water and sewer systems.

In a nutshell, this country adds more people at such lightning speed that we cannot keep up with basic infrastructure that allows everyone to live a decent and healthy life. For example, from 1999 to 2005, over 1,500 bridges failed.

“In August 2008 the Census Bureau projected that U.S. population will be 433 million by 2050—an increase of 135 million, or 44 percent, from current levels,“ Rubenstein said. “Eighty-two percent of the increase will be from new immigrants and their U.S. born children. The brutal reality is that no conceivable infrastructure program can keep pace with that kind of population growth.”

As a teacher, and having traveled throughout all 48 states in the past 24 months, I can attest that our highways and bridges degrade faster than we can maintain them. Our large cities decay faster than any army of dentists can drill, fix or fill. Our waterways run in disgusting pollution, so much so, the Mississippi River suffers a 10,000 mile square dead zone at its mouth as it pours toxic waters 24/7 into the Gulf of Mexico.

California, growing at 1,700 legal and illegal migrants daily, must build one new school every day in order to educate the influx of immigrant children. “Some Los Angeles schools are so crowded that they have lengthened the time between classes to give students time to make their way through crowded halls,” Rubenstein said. “Los Angles’ school construction is so massive that the Army Corps of Engineers was called in to manage it.”

California grows by 602,000 people annually and destroys 250,000 acres of land in order to provide housing, schools, roads and basic infrastructure.

The crisis facing medical facilities runs beyond acute. Rubenstein said, “The uncompensated costs are killing hospitals. In California, 60 emergency departments and major hospitals closed to avoid costs of illegal alien caseloads.”

When it comes to water, El Paso, San Antonio and Phoenix expect to run out of water within 10 years. San Diego’s water company has resorted to a once un-thinkable option: recycling toilet water to tap for drinking.

“National parks along the southern border are scarred by thousands of unauthorized roads and paths used by illegal alien migrants crossing into the U.S.,” Rubenstein said. “Their fires, feces, trash and vandalism have despoiled thousands of acres of pristine parkland.”

Rubenstein finished, “The prognosis is not good. The brutality is that no conceivable infrastructure program can keep pace with that kind of population growth. Demand reduction is the only viable way to close the gap between supply and demand of public infrastructure. Immigration reduction must play a role.”

In the words of my preacher, if we, as a civilization expect to survive into the 21st century, we must tend our garden. We must live within the carrying capacity of the land, water and resources. Unfortunately, like the patrons on the Titanic, we’re still dancing in the ballroom as 200,000 immigrants flood into the USA every 30 days without end.

Listen to Frosty Wooldridge on Wednesdays as he interviews top national leaders on his radio show "Connecting the Dots" at www.themicroeffect.com at 6:00 PM Mountain Time. Adjust tuning in to your time zone.

© 2009 Frosty Wooldridge - All Rights Reserv

OBAMA AND THE NEW AGE

By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
March 23, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

[NOTE: In “One On One: Regulating the Pursuit of Self” (Jerusalem Post, February 4, 2009), Amitai Etzioni states: “There is no philosophy that better describes Obama’s position than Communitarianism,” which Etzioni defines as a term “that would speak for community and the common good.” (In his March 4, 1801 inaugural address, while referring to majority rule and minority rights, Thomas Jefferson was the first president to refer to the “common good.”) Interestingly, Etzioni in his The Essential Communitarian Reader (p. ix) said the term was coined in 1841 by John Goodwyn Barmby, who founded the Universal Communitarian Association (originally called the Communist Propaganda Society). In Dana Milbank’s “Needed: Catchword for Bush Ideology; ‘Communitarianism’ Finds Favor” (The Washington Post, February 1, 2001), Etzioni was quoted as saying George W. Bush’s Inaugural Address was “a Communitarian Text.”

As I’ve mentioned numerous times before, the Power Elite (PE) uses crises to move us toward its ultimate goal of a World Socialist Government. The current global economic crisis is devaluing currencies so that the people of the world will be forced to accept regional currencies and then a global currency, which is an important part of the PE’s plan. Relevant to this, Ira Iosebashvili in The Moscow Times (March 17, 2009) wrote “At G20 Kremlin Pitch New Currency,” which begins with “the Kremlin calling for the creation of a supranational reserve currency to be issued by international institutions as part of a reform of the global financial system…. Both President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin have repeatedly called for the ruble to be used as a regional reserve currency…. Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev proposed a global currency…. He also suggested that the Eurasian Economic Community… adopt a single noncash currency – the yevraz – to insulate itself from the global economic crisis…. Nazarbayev’s proposal did garner support from at least one source – Columbia University’s Prof. Robert Mundell, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1999 for his role in creating the euro.”]

In Part 4 of my NewsWithViews.com column on “The Rockefeller Plan,” I referred to 2012 as the year New Agers believe the Piscean (Christian) Age will end and the Age of Aquarius will begin. Relevant to this, the cover of the January/February 2009 edition of the New Age innerchange has 2012 with a question mark, and the editor states: “There are many great visionary writers, scientists and social theorists who believe that 2012 is the threshold for a time of accelerated planetary change. Some spiritual leaders believe it is the impetus for a great spiritual evolvement.” Inside this edition is also a description of “the Lucifer Archetype.”

I further mentioned in Part 4 of “The Rockefeller Plan” that Lucifer Publishing was the original name of Lucis Trust. For a number of years, Gordon Davidson worked for Lucis Trust. He and Corinne McLaughlin formed Visionary Leadership and authored Spiritual Politics, in which we are told there are “Enlightened Ones” or “Masters of Wisdom” who “form an ‘invisible government’… that guides humanity’s evolution.”

If one looks at, one will see McLaughlin’s 2006 article titled “What if Christ or Buddha Returned as a Businessman or even a Politician?” In the article, she related the New Age concept that “Christ, Buddha and other great Masters… show us how to transform society….” Writing about “the inner divinity within ourselves,” she explained “it is the fiery light that creates the magnetic love energy vortex.”

McLaughlin then asked, “How far fetched can it be for Christ to return as a politician?” She answered her own question by saying, “If Christ returned as a politician, he would embody, yet transcend, Christian doctrine and appeal to all faiths.” (Remember here that Barack Obama carries a miniature of the Hindu monkey-god idol “Lord Hanuman” in his pocket.)

McLaughlin next asked, “What kind of changes would the Christ make if he were elected President of the United States?” (Remember here that when New Agers refer to the “the Christ” they aren’t referring exclusively to Jesus.) As if forecasting our own political situation today, she explained: “A great Master who returned would probably be low key at first, acting as a unifier, rather than a divider of people…. [People] would recognize him also by his compassion, humility, and universality—embracing all kinds of people from all religions…. He would listen to views on all sides of an issue and find higher common ground.” Sound familiar?

Using New Age language, McLaughlin asked, “Wouldn’t we be affected by the power of his energy field?” And she concluded by indicating “a great Master… would come to establish the principles and techniques for creating right relationships.”

Remember all of the above was written by McLaughlin in 2006. Then compare it to McLaughlin’s and Gordon Davidson’s 2008 article, “The Spiritual Dimensions of Obama’s Leadership.” This work begins with the New Age authors contending that “in this moment of historical crisis, another great leader, uniquely qualified to meet the needs of our nation and the world, has come forth, overlighted by Spirit…. He is a catalyst dropped into a supersaturated solution… that has for years been calling out for a leader to unite our nation and establish right relations with the world.” They next describe his destiny as “actualized by the radiation of his own soul and by the collective consciousness of the people who call him forth and prepare his way.” And they conclude by calling him “a transcendental leader” and explaining that “the economic cleansing currently underway paves the way for an eventual reordering with greater integrity and fairness in our financial systems.”

In “Hillary Clinton failed to master female approach, former mentor Jean Houston says” (Los Angeles Times, May 12, 2008), reporter Robin Abcarian noted that leading New Ager Jean Houston said Sen. Obama has “a shamanic personality, of course.” And in “New Age America Is Entranced By Obama’s Electoral Aura” (The Guardian, July 3, 2008), reporter Oliver Burkeman noted the endorsement of Obama by “Oprah Winfrey, increasingly involved in New Age spirituality.” Burkeman further explained that “American New Age guru Deepak Chopra” declared that if Barack Obama entered the White House as president, “It will represent a quantum leap in American consciousness.” Burkeman continued: “A curious side-story in this year’s election campaign is that the new age movement in the U.S. has embraced Obama even more fervently than most of his supporters…. ‘Many spiritually advanced people I know… identify Obama as a lightworker, that rare kind of attuned being who [can] actually usher in a new way of being on the planet,” wrote the San Francisco Chronicle columnist Mark Morford in a piece headlined ‘Is Obama an Enlightened Being?’… The Obama-as-lightworker notion is more than a matter of tone. We’re talking about the dawning of the age of aquarius.”

Another leading New Ager, Barbara Marx Hubbard, recently in her blog stated that “our recent presidential election clearly reflects the evolutionary shift that we have been talking about and sensing. Many of us appreciate that President-elect Obama is already a universal person…. This could not have happened if there was not a rise in consciousness in the United States and throughout the world.”

And more recently, New Ager Tom Carney of Arcana Workshop in his column “We are the Great Unfolding” (Thoughtline, February 2009), quoted from Luciferian Alice Bailey’s “Ascended Masters” and refered to the New Group of World Servers (NGWS, founded by Bailey in 1925) and “The Plan.” Carney next announced, “We were able to invoke, from the community we call the NGWS, a qualified leader…. This man’s name is Barack Obama.” Carney then refered to “the spiral of the Will which carried Barack Obama into the most powerful position on the planet” and the “paramount importance of the Common Good.” He concluded by stating “that we charted a new Soul determined course in Sagittarius is evident in the behavior and the model of right human relations… as humanity moves forward into the new civilization and world culture of the new age we will come to know as the Age of Light.” Remember here that to Theosophists like Bailey, Lucifer is the “Light Bringer” and Sagittarius rules Washington, D.C.

Finally, New Ager Benjamin Crème, who claims to be a spokesman Maitreya (“the Christ”), in a November 30, 2008 interview said Obama would be more responsive than John McCain to Maitreya’s ideas. And in response to a question as to whether Obama could be the last President (to be replaced by a group of wise elder statesmen) Crème replied: “That is still the Plan, so there is every chance that Mr. Obama will be the last President.”

© 2009 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved

THE SHERIFF - MORE POWER THAN THE PRESIDENT

by Alan Stang
March 20, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

[Announcement: Did you know Alan Stang has a new radio show? Click here for details.]

For many years, the people’s attention in the Battle for America has been directed toward the federal government and its offices. Candidates stand for the House and the Senate. Patriotic groups publish voting records of incumbents. Considerable time, effort and money are expended in support of candidates for President. After decades of such commendable activity, the record shows it is an utter failure. The danger to the nation is worse than it ever was.

For many of those years, Republicrud bosses whined that if the people would only give them control of the federal government, they would undo Democrud damage and restore Free Enterprise. Finally, the people gave it to them. Remember? The Republicruds controlled the House, the Senate and the Oval Office long enough to turn the country around. What happened? The Republicruds made our problems much worse. Their spending made the profligate drunken sailor look like Scrooge. They deserved it when the people kicked them out. They lost all credibility.

Yes, there is Dr. Ron Paul. But Dr. No is a political aberration. Time and again, he stands alone. He has neither men’s room problems nor woman problems. He doesn’t take congressional retirement. He actually returns “money” (computer entries) to the federal treasury. He proposes abolishing the Fed and the income tax and replacing them with nothing. In foreign affairs he suggests that we mind our own business. Imagine! But, again, he is an aberration.

Why? Certainly one reason has to be that we ship the successful congressional candidate off to the District of Corruption. However good the new congressman may have been when he or she boarded the plane to the District; he is subjected to intoxicating blandishments when he arrives in the enemy camp.

Soon, he succumbs to the blandishments, maybe even making himself blackmailable, and begins to vote as the party boss says, without even reading the bills. Instead of representing the people of his congressional district in the District of Criminals, he represents the D.C. to the C.D. He or she now is one of the boys or the girls. It has happened hundreds of times.

So, if the long, heroic effort to elect federal legislators has failed, does there remain any governmental Horatius who can stand in the gap; who can lead the Battle for America and restore the Constitution? There is. Lock and load, mount up and prepare for the return of the sheriff.

My guess is that in the minds of many Americans the sheriff is an antiquated figure who lives in the movies. In the older movies he is the hero; he is Gary Cooper in “High Noon,” awaiting the train that will bring killer Frank Miller back to town. In the new ones, he is the southern sheriff, even bigger than Rosie O’Donnell, sneering, sadistic, racist, violent, etc. He has no modern relevance.

But now here comes Sheriff Richard Mack, elected and re-elected in Graham County, Arizona, where he served for eight years. During his tenure, three federal agents came to a meeting of Arizona sheriffs and told them in certain terms how they would be dragooned as unpaid federal bureaucrats and administer the new, federal Brady gun registration law.

The law was named of course for Ronald Reagan’s press secretary, who was severely wounded in the immensely suspicious attempt to assassinate the President. Since then, Mrs. Brady has become a leader of the campaign for Nazi gun confiscation. I don’t know whether she was as crazy before the shootings as she is now. Just one more increment of lunacy and they would have to lock her up.

Richard Mack and the other Arizona sheriffs at the meeting rebelled. Sheriff Richard says the language he heard – in which he did not participate – could not be repeated in the presence of genteel Christian ladies, so we can’t tell you here what the sheriffs said. But Sheriff Mack did take the government to court. He sued the United States, and Sheriff Jay Printz of Montana joined him as plaintiff.

On June 27th, 1997, the sheriffs won; in Printz v. U.S. (521 U.S. 898) the U.S. Supreme Court struck Brady down. Associate Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the ruling for the Court, in which he explained our system of government at length. The justly revered system of checks and balances is the key:

“. . . The great innovation of this design was that ‘our citizens would have two political capacities, one state and one federal, each protected from incursion by the other’” – “a legal system unprecedented in form and design, establishing two orders of government, each with its own direct relationship, its own privity, its own set of mutual rights and obligations to the people who sustain it and are governed by it.” (P. 920)

Scalia quotes President James Madison, “father” of the Constitution: “[T]he local or municipal authorities form distinct and independent portions of the supremacy, no more subject, within their respective spheres, to the general authority than the general authority is subject to them, within its own sphere.” The Federalist, No. 39 at 245.

Again and again, Justice Scalia pounds the point home (page 921): “This separation of the two spheres is one of the Constitution’s structural protections of liberty: ‘Just as the separation and independence of the coordinate branches of the Federal Government serve to prevent the accumulation of excessive power in any one branch, a healthy balance of power between the States and the Federal Government will reduce the risk of tyranny and abuse from either front.’. . .” Gregory, 501 U.S. at 458.

He quotes President Madison again: “In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments, and then the portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments. Hence a double security arises to the rights of the people. The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (P. 922)

No one could make this any clearer. The primary purpose of the Fathers was to prevent someone from grabbing all the power. When that happens, they knew, the result is arbitrary, confiscatory, government, the kind Tom Jefferson described in the Declaration of Independence. We would call it totalitarian.

Madison explains: “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” Federalist No. 48, February 1, 1788.

To prevent that from happening, they divided the power. First, they divided the federal power into three parts: the executive, the legislative and the judicial. They would bicker among themselves, so that no one of them could seize all the power the Constitution grants to the federal government.

The Founders divided the power even more. They set the limited power the Constitution grants the “general authority,” Madison’s term for the federal government, against the vast residual powers of the states. Each sphere of government, state and federal, would be supreme in its own sphere. Neither could control the other. Each protects itself from intervention by the other. Each has its own laws and rules.

Madison says this: “Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of.” Loc. Cit.

What does all this mean today in the Battle for America? Sheriff Mack says it proves that the sheriff is the highest governmental authority in his county. Within that jurisdiction – inside his county – the sheriff has more power than the governor of his state. Indeed, the sheriff has more power in his county than the President of the United States. In his county, he can overrule the President and kick his people out. Remember, the President has few and limited powers.

What? The sheriff can do that? He’s not just a character in a movie? That’s right. Not only can the sheriff do that; sheriffs have already done that, more than once. Most Americans are not aware of that because lying, conspiracy scumbags like Rush Humbug, Shallow Sean Hannitwerp and Hugh Blewitt (a lawyer) etc., haven’t told them.

Remember, the office of sheriff has a pedigree so long, we are not positive about when it was created. We think it was in the Ninth Century in England. We do know that each land district, or “shire,” was governed by a “reeve.” The sheriff of Nottingham became famous. At first, the king appointed them. With few exceptions, our American shire reeves are elected by the people.

In 1997, in Nye County, Nevada, federal agents arrived to seize cattle that belonged to rancher Wayne Hage. The sheriff gave them a choice: skedaddle or be arrested. They skedaddled. The cows stayed where they were. Wyoming sheriffs have told federal agencies they must check with the respective sheriff before they serve any papers, make any arrests or confiscate any property.

In Idaho, a 74-year-old rancher shot an endangered gray wolf which had killed one of his calves. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service sent three armed agents to serve a warrant. Lemhi County Sheriff Brett Barslou said that was “inappropriate, heavy-handed and dangerously close to excessive force.” More than 500 people turned out for a rally in the small towns of Challis and Salmon to support the sheriff and the rancher and to tell the federal government to back off.

While Richard Mack was sheriff of Graham County, Arizona, a bridge washed out. Parents had to drive twenty six miles to get their kids to school half a mile across the river. But the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers wouldn’t fix it. First they had to do an “environmental impact study,” to replace a bridge already there. They were in no hurry. The study would take a mere ten years.

The people’s suffering reached the board of supervisors. The board voted to dredge the river and fix the bridge. The feds warned that they would be fined $50,000 per day if they tried. The supervisors hesitated. Sheriff Mack promised them and the workers protection and pledged to call out a posse for the purpose if necessary. They built the bridge and the Corps of Engineers faded. The board never paid a dime.

So the long dormant spirit of America is reviving. The states are beginning to adopt Tenth Amendment resolutions, using powers they have always had. The people are restoring our long unbalanced constitutional system. There is something “blowin’ in the wind,” but it isn’t what Bob Dylan thought it was. Recently, Sheriff Mack addressed 570 people in Fredericksburg, Texas. He reports that the reception was “beyond fantastic.”

What can you do? For once we are not just complaining. There is a plan. I do not argue that you should forget about Congress. Not at all; if you see an opportunity there, take it. Always remember that right now it is run by people like Barney the Bugger of Taxachusetts, who will be elected by moronth in hith dithtrict until he dieth of AIDS.

Most of the time, when you approach your congressman, you come to complain. In the new crusade, you will approach your sheriff and tell him that he is not only handsome, charming and overwhelmingly masculine, but also that he has powers he may not be aware of. You have come to tell him what they are and to back him up. My guess is, when you tell him that, he will not kick you out.

Tell him you expect him to return the courtesy when the Nazis come from the District of Criminals to get the guns. Tell him you are ready in a minute to serve under his direction in a posse. He will not move to Washington and be corrupted. He will stay there with you. Show him the ten orders the Oath Keepers will not obey. The Oath Keepers are retired and active duty military and police. Their web site is oath-keepers.blogspot.com. The first order they promise to disobey is an order to disarm you.

Put him together with Sheriff Mack. You will find him at sheriffmack.com. His telephone numbers are 928 792-4340 and 928 792-3888. Bring the sheriff to your town to speak. He will explain all this. Invite your own sheriff. At the meeting I attended, the local sheriff and chief of police were there and loved what they heard. No one dislikes hearing how important he is.

What if your sheriff is stupid or a federal factotum? That is what you will find in many big cities. I once interviewed Los Angeles County Sheriff Peter Pitchess, who said no one should have a hand gun. I asked him how a five foot lady alone in bed could defend herself from a rapist. Realizing he was perilously close to making himself look even dumber than he did usually, Pitchess conceded she could have a long gun.

I brightened. A street sweeper isn’t really the best weapon for close quarters, but it would give the lady a chance. Unfortunately, Pitchess added the word, “unloaded.” I asked him what that five foot lady with an unloaded shotgun could do against a six foot rapist. A police captain sat beside Pitchess during the interview. His job was to extricate Peter from the jams he persisted on getting himself into. The police captain extruded a barrage of miasma. It was effective. I did not get an answer.

In such cases, says Sheriff Mack, move to a county where the sheriff is receptive. Many more will be. For instance, in Texas there are 254 counties. Each has a sheriff. If it is feasible to do so, run for sheriff yourself. Even your wife will be impressed when she sees you with a hog leg on your hip and a star on your vest. Imagine the intense joy of meeting IRS Communists or BATFE Nazis at the county line and denying them admission.

The Battle for America will be decided in your county at your front door. If you act now, later you will not need to “fill your hand.”

[Announcement: Alan Stang's radio show, The Sting of Stang, airs from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. Central, M-F, via Republic Broadcasting Network. Call him on the air at (800) 313-9443. To listen, go to republicbroadcasting.org and click on Listen Live. If you can't listen at that time, do so via the archives. I'll be talking about the various manifestations of the conspiracy for world government, its tactics, such as the illegal alien invasion, its purposes and its players, from Jorge W. Boosh on down.]

© 2009 Alan Stang - All Rights Reserved