Wednesday, December 05, 2007



Dr. Eugene Narrett, Ph.D
December 1, 2007

For decades The Economist has maintained continuity in British imperial policy, loving Israel to death. It is apt that its November 24 cover features the photo of G.W. Bush beneath the caption, “Mr. Palestine.” This title was initially held by the Emperor Hadrian. Hillary Clinton pants to inherit it. DC’s perennial regime is filled with racists who define the expulsion of Jews as “peace,” Orwellianism like the “War on Terror.”

The Economist cover push does more than illustrate the Anglo-American tango regarding the Jewish people since the Evian Conference of 1938 locked the Jews of Europe into a fate the British knew was awaiting them. It also clarifies the perennial role of Israel among the nations, the whipping boy and scapegoat whose light the world does not want unless it can steal or pervert it, -- endless iterations of the primal identity theft.

Be clear: this is suicide by murder, the inverse of the “suicide-bomber.” In this role, the elites of the West shake hands with their avowed enemies. The West’s sin is the more perverse occurring largely on the metaphysical and spiritual levels. Israel brought the world, especially the West its sense of providence, purpose and a historical sensibility. With these came an emphasis on memory and moral consequence. In pushing Israel back to the “Auschwitz borders,” leaders of the West, fronted by America’s rulers, prepare for another extreme exercise in population management and control whose ultimate form was the holocaust. Beware: what is being done to Jews in the heartland of Israel is a test case for humanity and liberty.

In this bad business, the world powers have been assisted by the perennial Labor Zionist and anti-Zionist ruling elites, in Israel, America (like Felix Warburg) and elsewhere who since the late 1920s rationalize and front for the interests committed to aborting the Jewish State and crushing the Jewish people. The main wish of these elites is to join the world community, to blend into the “synthesis and fusion” of the New Age which is not so new; or rather, to act as its apologists and vendors to the Jews of Israel, presuming to speak for them and to decide their fate as the dictatorial puppet, Mr. Olmert does.[1]

Israel is not and should not be a party to its own destruction. As attested in Torah repeatedly, “it is a nation that shall dwell apart and not be counted among the nations” (Numbers 23:9); like America it should long since have left the UN; then “Israel shall dwell secure, solitary in the likeness of Jacob” (Deut. 33:28). This status is underscored by the designs of the Annapolis chaos-fest and by numerous little-known stories of Jews in early American history. The AJHS journal Heritage we may examine them here for the light they shed on the current darkness.[2]

As middle and high school students we learned that the state of Rhode Island was settled by Roger Williams and its history is all about freedom of religion and conscience and liberal pluralism. We learned a lot of lies. Consider the experience of Aaron Lopez and his family.

These Jews had managed to live as conversos in Portugal for almost two hundred fifty years from the time the Portuguese imported the inquisition from Spain. In 1740 the Lopez family sailed from Portugal to New York, subsequently moved to Newport, Rhode Island and established themselves in the shipping and candle-making industries. Heritage recounts that after nine years of living in Newport, Aaron Lopez applied for citizenship as did another Jewish man, Isaac Eliezer.

The legislature stated that “inasmuch as the said Aaron Lopez hath declared himself a Jew, this Assembly doth not admit him or any other of that religion to the full freedom of this Colony. [No member] of said religion [Jews] may be chosen into any office in this colony or be allowed to give vote as a free man for choosing others” (4-5).

Not as bad as Spain of Portugal; it’s not being burned alive but it’s not citizenship, either.

When Aaron Lopez appealed to the Superior Court that august body, on March 11, 1762 rejected his petition for redress. Rhode Island had become “too crowded” (it also was too crowded for Jews during WW II; now there are millions of illegal aliens of other kinds) so the charter for settlement no longer upheld their request. The next year the Court commented further that Jews would interfere with the “free and quiet enjoyment of the Christian religion” and that “no person who does not profess the Christian religion can be admitted [as a] free” man and full citizen in Rhode Island [5]. That is, your existence interferes with our religion. That attitude, not new in 1762, led to iron gates and ovens and now is applied to Judea and Samaria, too in favor of “a non-nation and vile people” just as was foretold (Deut. 32:21).

The story gives perspective on the undeserved reputation of Rhode Island, -- or perhaps on the hypocrisy of its dissenters from Puritanism. It certainly seems predictive of Israel’s place among the nations as enacted daily for decades at the United Nations, the “world community” of the New Babel, backed up by American efforts climaxing at Annapolis to bury or drown Israel in an Arab Federation and regional holocaust.

[To order Dr. Eugene Narrett's books click here]
It is noteworthy that Ezra Stiles, later a President of Yale and proponent of enshrining the Jewish basis of Western civilization in the curriculum commented on Lopez’s experience with the Courts and legislature by alluding to the Scriptural verses cited above: “Providence seems to make everything work to the mortification of the Jews and to prevent their incorporating into any nation that thus they may continue a distinct people.” This is according to the Divine Plan by which Israel is “Holy to the Eternal One,” the control group within but also set apart from the rest of the human family. It is this unique identity that Israel’s ruling cadres like the cultists and globalists of the West and East continue trying to dissolve with predictably convulsive results.

Another story gives a similar lesson and also highlights unique similarities between being a Jew and the American Republic, when it was a Republic and the almost super-human strengths of character required of individuals in the holy nation (Exodus 19:6).

Benjamin Nones, descended of fugitives from the inquisition, emigrated from France to America in 1772 when he was fifteen. He fought under General Pulaski in the Revolution, was promoted to major and cited for bravery. After the War, he returned to Philadelphia working as a government interpreter and notary and with his wife raising a family of fourteen children.

Benjamin was a partisan of Thomas Jefferson and the Republicans, recognizing in them the social model of a nation of independent small farmers that his ancestors had carried in their hearts for three millennia. In August 1800, Philadelphia’s Federalist newspaper, the Gazette, singled him out for criticism as “a Jew, a Republican, and poor” [6-7].

His response was memorialized by the Jeffersonian paper, Aurora:

“I am a Jew. I glory in belonging to that persuasion which even its opponents, whether Christian or Mohamedan allow [admit] to be of divine origin, -- of that persuasion [Judaism] on which Christianity itself was founded and must ultimately rest – which has preserved its faith secure and undefiled for near three thousand years, whose votaries have never murdered each other in religious wars or cherished theological hatred so general among those who revile them…

“I am a Republican! I have not been so proud or prejudiced as to renounce the cause for which I have fought as an American throughout the whole of the Revolutionary War. I am a Jew and for this if no other reason I am a Republican. In republics, we have rights…

“I am poor, I am so and my family also is large but soberly and decently brought up. They have not been taught to revile a Christian because his faith is not so old as theirs.”

This dignified letter expresses patriotism and national, not personal pride in the eternal heritage of Israel. The entire story also reveals the rift, stemming from this heritage as witnesses that non-Jews inevitably are tempted to use in words or deeds to wound, pillage or destroy rather than honor Jews. This is the story of the Jewish land for worthless promises of peace process, a war process to which the elites are addicted and which is embedded in their seemingly inextinguishable envy. Edom and Ishmael, thirty-five nations each, each ruling half of the world cannot rest except in alliance against the small nation chosen by the Creator to bear his testimonies and statutes to the end of time, carrying therein all the science, healing and wonders of creation.[3]

The Bush administrations have betrayed the American people in many ways. Not the least are their relentless efforts to continue the work of at least seven previous administrations in betraying Israel; at this point, check has been announced and check mate is in view. All these administrations have cursed where they should bless and so have joined with the neo-colonial, neo-imperial Jew haters of the world community, Amalek in our days (Exodus 17, Numbers 24:20) [4]. Their willing executioners in the Israeli government have been foreseen [5] and Israel’s unique identity is being asserted the hard way to redemption. Having been prevented by American forces from preempting an Iranian strike it is being set up again, as it was by the Nixon administration in 1973 to absorb a first strike and then be blamed for the world disruptions that follow its life saving counter-strike. This might just break the hold of the new Nimrods, too who thus would prefer a graduated, Fabian-style collapse into MEFTA.

As Benjamin Nones, the patriot stated, “we have preserved our faith secure and undefiled for three thousand years” just as the great gentile sorcerer was compelled to admit: “for from its [Israel’s] origins I see it rocklike” (Numbers 23:9). “Those who bless you are blessed and those who curse you are accursed” (24:9).

As western leaders rush to collapse Israel’s borders their own borders and nations are collapsing. People should take note. A world without memory and honor is inhuman, its liberty redefined as serving a pagan State.


1. An example of the routinely misunderstood role of these elites, and their association by many with Israel and Zionism, Jewish patriotism itself may be seen in the role of Felix Warburg in opposing Jewish efforts to secure Jewish immigration to and building of the Promised Land in the 1920s-40s. Warburg assisted anti-Zionists and helped the British. He attacked even the neutered Jewish Agency and its British quota by saying he didn’t want to hear about “that National Home stuff.” His father Max, beyond disinterest, from his bank in Hamburg regarded himself as “the god of the Jews of Germany.” See Samuel Katz, Lone Wolf (NY 1996), 1138-52 and Wikipedia on Max Warburg. Yet critics of Israel and of supposed “Jewish power” hold up the Warburgs as examples of this power. Kuhn-Loeb, Rothschild or Schiff’s would long since have settled the Jews powerfully in Judea and Samaria or build the heartland if they had the interest. As for Ehud Olmert, for 16 months his approval ratings have ranged from 3 – 15%.
2. Heritage the journal of the American Jewish Historical Society (NY), fall 2007. Page numbers cited in text refer to the special insert, “the Blessings of Freedom” that is paginated separately from the rest of this issue.
3. See Psalm 83:1-7 and Elijah the Vilna Gaon commenting on Psalm 20:8, “some with chariots and some with horses, but we…” and on the psalm’s seventy words as an allusion to the seventy nations of the world (Deuteronomy 32:8 cf. Exodus 1:1-5). See Gerald Schroeder, the Science of God (NY 1997), 55-71, passim
4. Maimonides identifies Amalek in Hilchot Melachim, “The Laws of Kings and their Wars” I: 1-2 and 5.
5. Talmud tractate Sanhedrin, 94-97 (NY Mesorah 2002) discussing characteristics of the end of days including leaders in Israel that will mistreat Jews badly and invite foreigners to do the same.

© 2007 Eugene Narrett - All Rights Reserved


By Cliff Kincaid

December 4, 2007

Americans don’t have to look to Sudan to see Islamic fanaticism and extremism in action. The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) is trying to destroy the Savage Nation radio show featuring Michael Savage. Having forced the firing of radio host Michael Graham from WMAL in Washington, D.C., CAIR is trying to force independent conservative Michael Savage off the air nationally by intimidating his advertisers. Officially, CAIR claims its mission includes encouraging “dialogue.” But this is a big lie.

This so-called “dialogue” is a one-way street. CAIR has found Savage “guilty” of having an “anti-Islam” bias in the same way that a British teacher was jailed and expelled from Sudan for naming a teddy bear Mohammed.

We had better wake up fast. “They’re applying Sharia law here,” says Bill Warner of the Center for the Study of Political Islam. “In the United States we’re getting Sharia law by the inch. Islam cannot be criticized. It is a sin against Allah. What Savage has done is a grievous sin against Allah, Mohammed and Islam. They are not making this up. CAIR has no choice here. As a real Muslim, they must condemn anyone who criticizes Islam.”

In a November 15 release, CAIR announced that OfficeMax “has joined a growing list of companies that have stopped advertising on Michael Savage’s nationally-syndicated radio program because of the host’s anti-Muslim views.” CAIR thanked OfficeMax “for its prompt response to Muslim concerns” and “is asking other Savage advertisers to follow that company’s example.”

The modus operandi is as straightforward as it is frightening—pressure companies to stop advertising on the show, and “The Savage Nation” will go off the air. Hence, a prominent critic of political Islam will be silenced.

Ironically, CAIR is distributing a column by Ibrahim Hooper on the Teddy Bear case insisting that “the Prophet had the opportunity to retaliate against those who abused him, but refrained from doing so.” The article goes on to say, “After the Danish cartoon controversy and allegations of Quran desecration at Guantanamo Bay, CAIR initiated educational campaigns as a peaceful, constructive response. This is an approach that people of all faiths can appreciate, as it helps us move toward respect and religious tolerance.”

But CAIR isn’t interested in the virtues of “dialogue” and “tolerance” in Savage’s case. It isn’t waging an “educational campaign” but is trying to force him off the air. It did the same thing with Michael Graham, who was fired from WMAL in 2005 for claiming Islam was a terrorist organization. At the time, CAIR welcomed WMAL’s action “as a step toward reducing the level of anti-Muslim bigotry on our nation’s airwaves.”

What we are witnessing is a direct attack on the First Amendment disguised as a campaign against “hate speech” that comes from special interest groups, not government. But the use of government for this same purpose is being promised by liberal-left organizations that want a President Clinton or Obama to put in place a liberal majority at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to crack down on conservative talk radio. That is why AIM has titled its new book on the controversy, The Death of Talk Radio?

The CAIR vs. Michael Savage case provides a lesson in how this campaign will proceed once liberals control the White House. It is important to realize that, with a 3-2 majority on the FCC, the liberals won’t even have to bother with pressuring advertisers. They will be able to directly use the full force of the federal government to pressure talk radio to toe the politically correct line. The FCC can bring back the so-called Fairness Doctrine, in order to suppress “hate speech” on the air, without a vote by Congress.

In fascinating comments on the Savage case, CAIR Communications Coordinator Amina Rubin was quoted as saying that it was “encouraging that companies nationwide are choosing not to associate with Mr. Savage’s hatred and bigotry.” She added, “Freedom of speech includes the right not to subsidize hate.”

The right not to subsidize hate? What about the right to free speech? Notice how the First Amendment has taken a back seat to whether the speech meets with CAIR’s approval. In effect, CAIR is setting itself up as a national arbiter of what should be permitted to be said on the air. CAIR even advises its supporters to “organize local coalitions with friends of the Muslim community to challenge Savage’s hate rhetoric.”

Those friends include Media Matters, the Hillary Clinton front organization which has publicized CAIR’s complaints about “anti-Muslim” comments in the media.

The return of the Fairness Doctrine would give these groups direct access to the FCC.

The issue isn’t whether Savage has been critical of Islam or even whether he has made some extreme statements. The issue is that a special interest group wants to muzzle its political enemies. And it is succeeding! It is just as dangerous as the campaign against the British school teacher in the Sudan.

Ironically, CAIR’s vice-chairman received the ACLU’s 2003 Liberty’s Flame Award “for contributions to the advancement and protection of civil liberties.” But the civil liberties of Michael Savage don’t matter in CAIR’s scheme of things.

Whether you like Savage or not, he must not be forced off the air as the result of a special interest political pressure campaign. Beyond that, however, the public must be educated about how CAIR’s campaign against Savage is part of the effort to force Sharia law on the world.

CAIR’s opposition to “hate speech” is quite extraordinary, in view of the fact that the Islamic holy book the Koran declares that “They who dispute the signs of Allah [kafirs] without authority having reached them are greatly hated by Allah and the believers.”

The Koran also declares that the “kafirs” should be killed through beheading. “When you encounter the kafirs on the battlefield, cut off their heads until you have thoroughly defeated them and then take the prisoners and tie them up firmly,” it says.

The “kafirs” are usually described as the unbelievers. But Bill Warner of the Center for the Study of Political Islam says the term has far more sinister connotations.

“The worst part of hate speech in the Koran is what we translate as unbeliever,” he says. “But that is a ruinously false translation…A kafir can be tortured, killed, deceived, raped, and robbed. Allah despises the kafir. Allah deceives and plots against the kafirs. Allah hates the kafirs.”

“The worst part of the hate language from the Koran is its name for us—you and me,” he says.

Will Sharia law or the First Amendment prevail in the U.S.? The fate of Michael Savage will provide the answer.

© 2007 Cliff Kincaid - All Rights Reserved



By Betty Freauf

November 22, 2007

About the time I was reading I Tim. 5:24: “Some men’s sins are open beforehand, going before in judgment, and some men they follow after,” Duane “Dog” Chapman, the renowned T.V bounty hunter on A & E was tearfully repenting on many cable shows about his use of the “n” word in a private conversation with his son, Tucker, who was recording the conversation. Duane’s family wins the prize for a dysfunctional family. Duane and both of his sons have served time in prisons. The oldest, Christopher, went to prison on a robbery charge and the National Enquirer offered him money for dirt about his dad, which he accepted but now regrets. Now Tucker has sold his father’s inappropriate language private conversation about Tucker’s black girlfriend to the National Enquirer. “Dog” says none of his Anglo-Saxon boys have Anglo-Saxon girlfriends and he’s not racist. Both boys, like Judas, sold their father out for money and yet a sign of a Christian is forgiveness, which “Dog” says he has done. He said “Forgive them, for they know not what they do” – what Jesus said as he hung from the cross.

When the true gospel is preached and men come to Christ, they all become brothers. We don’t need all this hype about better race relations. Let’s be honest. We cannot create better relationships by forcing people together. Only the gospel of the grace of God will make a man into a brother. When that happens the color of a man’s skin makes no difference at all.

J. Vernon McGee’s commentary on I Tim. 5:24 says sometimes God will judge a Christian’s sin right here and now but if He doesn’t judge him immediately, it does not mean that He is not going to eventually judge. It seems that prominent personalities who claim Christianity are being judged now. Even TV evangelists have been exposed. “Dog”, a biker, an ex-con and now bounty hunter claims to be a Christian and his black pastor confirms this but had been cautioning him about his careless language. Obviously “Dog” has not attended any required sensitive training programs. However, like so many people who claim to be a Christian but refuse to change their lifestyles and language, he was definitely a Christian who needed a wake up call. His early childhood environment carried over into his persona on his T.V. show as a tough guy, so his habitual bad language is a part of his character. But God has said to him through his pastor and counselor, “If you don’t voluntarily change, I’ll force you to do so.” I believe “Dog” has learned his lesson the hard way as so many Christians do.

Sean Hannity from FOX was the first to have an interview with “Dog” followed by Larry King on CNN. In both instances, he seemed like a truly repentant sinner and whom God can now mightily use and the overwhelming consensus seemed to be that he should not have his livelihood destroyed over this private conversation. Even Dr. Phil agreed “Dog” should not lose his livelihood; however, he seemed disappointed that “Dog” wouldn’t appear on his show to be questioned by the likes of Al Sharpton, who has been a notorious name caller and habitual agitator. Also to appear on Dr. Phil’s show was a black rapper who frequently uses the “n” word and Tucker’s girlfriend’s mother. I didn’t see that show so I don’t know the actual outcome. I personally believe the “n” word had pretty much disappeared from the vocabulary of the majority of Americans until the black rappers came along resurrecting it so what we see as evil, God will use as good and hopefully the black rappers will begin to clean up their foul language and it would be my wish that programs on TV would follow. It’s a step in the right direction. If we aren’t judged now, we’ll be judged later.

Polarization seems to be the name of the game. Liberals would have trouble expressing themselves if they were deprived of words and phrases such as “racist, bigot, White supremacist, anti-Semite, McCarthyism, Fascist, Birchites, isolationist, homophobic, xenophobic, sexist, atheist, red neck, conservative, heartless, greedy, discriminate, religious fanatics on the fringe of society, Nazis and other hateful words. Our President has been called scumbag and compared to Hitler. Militia leaders have been described as a group of free-lance malcontents with Constitutions in their hands. A whole series of loaded epithets have been invented for the purpose of dividing us. “Right wing extremist” is the automatic catchword applied to any person who seeks to expose or oppose the Socialist advance and even to persons expressing the mildest sort of patriotic sentiments. One undecided voter in a focus group following a recent Republican debate said Ron Paul was “certifiably insane” for being a Constitutionalist. [Read] Liberal talk show host Bernie Ward out of KGO in San Francisco has said “a law should be passed making Christianity a felony.” This type of toxic language, like chickenpox, can be highly contagious.

For many of us to see God using someone like “Dog” in the future may seem hard to believe until we remember how God used Apostle Paul, who enjoyed killing Christians until he met God himself in human form (resurrected Jesus) on the road to Damascus. God can take the worst of the worst and use them for His glory. But perhaps what is much worse than “Dog’s” foul mouth is how collectively in America we have fallen far from God’s grace that we once enjoyed. Anyone who watches the news can see our unrepentant sins on a daily basis and more violence than ever before, as we become a fractured America controlled by opposition front groups being used to destroy us.

In Isaiah chapters 12-13, we can read how God brought down judgment on a society. “Behold, the day of the Lord cometh, cruel both with wrath and fierce anger, to lay the land desolate and he shall destroy the sinners thereof out of it.” (Isa. 13:9) I personally believe that America has been on sinking sand since Roe vs. Wade in 1973 and the killing of millions of babies but God is patient. He waits to see some sign of repentance from our collective society but it seems to continually get worse. How long will it be before “hate” crimes include being a Constitutionalist, a Christian and perhaps even a homophobe who will be sacrificed on the altar of the almighty dollar for their organs?

A recent National Geographic documentary was about organ transplants and how it is becoming a huge lucrative industry. There are even Tourist Travel Agencies who handle the whole procedure from start to finish. Poor people in India are exploited and offered money for an organ but the brokers never pay the victims. In China, it’s been reported that Chinese prisoners are being used to supply organs. One body can provide many different organs. The bottom line for the documentary was to encourage people to sign up to donate. Many years ago I had an organ transplant symbol on my driver’s license but it didn’t take long before I realized how barbaric this technology could become. The love of money is the root of all evil and I’ll probably go to my grave as an insensitive, selfish person with all my body parts intact unless someone steals them after I’m dead.

How do we destroy a nation? We have politics without principle. The only principled presidential candidate running thus far is Ron Paul and you’ll notice the biased media and the GOP is doing everything it can to thwart his being recognized as a viable candidate even though he raised between $4 and $4.5 million in a 24-hour period earlier this month and primarily from $100 or less donors, a feat never before heard of in an election cycle, thanks to the Internet. Remember, the only poll that counts is on Election Day and please disregard all the silly attacks.

We have a government without morality. We have pleasure without conscience. We have laws without justice. Check out Charlotte Isbebyt’s article “The Devil’s Seven-Prong Fork” or Why Don’t We Blush Any More? The downfall of a nation is the result of apostasy, immorality and political anarchy. I fear if Ron Paul continues to be ignored by the GOP hierarchy, a type of anarchy could result. While some paid agitators may turn to unlawful practices that genuine Ron Paul supporters would condemn, others say they’ll vote for Hillary in the general election or they simply won’t vote at all. Bob Murphy a professor in economics from New York University and author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Capitalism says at some point, the GOP will need to explain why the party of limited government couldn’t possibly nominate a man who would actually limit government. (And the only GOP candidate who can beat Hillary.) What are they going to say, he asks? Ron Paul’s opponents are gambling and the GOP is going to lose big time if they continue ignoring him. Are you listening Media Mogul Rupert Murdoch, who owns FOX and the “conservative” New York Post?

America is coming to a boiling point. Houses are being foreclosed. In a letter from the Rothschild Brothers of London with fellow conspirators discussing their new banking scheme, June 25, 1863, they stated: The few who understand the system, will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favors that there will be no opposition from that class. The great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage will bear its burden without complaint.”

Ron Paul understands our problems started with the creation of the unconstitutional Federal Reserve using the unconstitutional I.R.S. as tax collectors. “The Banker’s Manifesto” taken from the Civil Servants’ Year book, “The Organizer” Jan. 1934 said “Capital must protect itself in every way… debts must be collected and loans and mortgage foreclosed as soon as possible. When through a process of law the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law (Cops) applied by the central power of leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. This is well known among our principal men now engaged in forming an imperialism of capitalism to govern the world. By DIVIDING the people we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us except as teachers of the common herd.” A caller to a San Francisco talk show recently said he’s been in the car repossession business for 12 years and he’s never been this busy. He often finds the cars in front of deserted houses with the keys in the ignitions and he repossesses as many as five every evening. Jobs have gone overseas in our global economy, Wall Street is worried and another Boston Tea Party may be in the making. I don’t know in what form it will take but I fear it’s going to be real ugly!

So will America, like Duane “Dog” Chapman repent and be judged now…or later? I believe the 2008 presidential election will decide the final outcome. America is in the final phase of freedom, as we’ve known it in the past. Have readers ever considered our National Anthem ends with a question? Does our flag still fly ‘oer the land of the free and the home of the brave? No, it’s been trampled and spit on and burned all in the name of “free speech.”

© 2007 Betty Freauf - All Rights Reserved



By Paul Proctor

November 28, 2007

Once again, leaders from the so-called "church growth movement" are demonstrating for us the Hegelian Dialectic - that transformational Marxist process of compromise and consensus made famous by Georg William Friedreich Hegel which seeks to rid the world of its divisive absolutes in the interest of global peace and unity.

Here's the formula: Thesis + Antithesis = Synthesis

The Christian Post reported the following in a November 23rd article titled, Christian Leaders Invite Muslims to Love God, Neighbors Together:

Christian leaders across denominational lines responded to the unprecedented open letter signed last month by 138 representative Muslim leaders with their own letter, calling on the two Abrahamic faiths to love God and neighbors together.
The key word here is "together."

To begin with, nowhere in scripture are Christians instructed to unite with other religions and their deities to do anything. Such a plan doesn't display a love for God at all, but only a disregard for Him and His only begotten Son.

Among other things, the dialectic process redefines "love" to mean tolerance instead of obedience, and calls Christianity and Islam "Abrahamic faiths" as if the two groups have some moral obligation to unite under a god of common ground.

"Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God." - James 4:4

The Bible is uncompromisingly clear on this issue both in 2nd Corinthians 6:14-17, where we are specifically commanded to not yoke ourselves with unbelievers, and again in Ephesians 5:11, where we are instructed to "have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness."

Jesus Himself said: "He that is not with me is against me: and he that gathereth not with me scattereth." (Matthew 12:30, Luke 11:23)

How then can Christians join Muslims to love God together and not be an abomination before Him? We're talking about two entirely different "Gods" here - not the same God with differing names. And that's the big lie hidden in this global agenda. By swapping love letters with Muslims, these "Christian leaders" endeavor to legitimize the illegitimate by setting aside the whole counsel of God for Results & Relationships.

Jesus Christ is not the Son of Allah; and to even imply that He is by claiming to love the same "God" as Muslims is not only being dangerously deceitful - it's blasphemy!

But that's what the Hegelian Dialectic does to the Christian faith - it unites opposites and enemies under a guise of goodness - all at the Lord's expense; and that is and always has been the modus operandi of the "church growth movement" - to mingle the sheep with the goats until they are indistinguishable.

Christianity (thesis) + Islam (antithesis) = One World Religion (synthesis)

It should come as no surprise to the readers of my column that two of the reported signers of this letter who "share the sentiments" of Muslim leaders are none other than pastors Rick Warren of Purpose Driven Life fame, and the seeker-sensitive Bill Hybels from Willow Creek Community Church.

The CP article went on to say:

"Peaceful relations between Muslims and Christians stand as one of the central challenges of this century, and perhaps of the whole present epoch," wrote the Christian leaders.
I thought the Great Commission was our central challenge as Christians - to love God and our neighbor by faithfully and obediently proclaiming His Gospel - to preach the cross - to call sinners to repentance and faith for the forgiveness of sins through the shed blood of Jesus Christ!

Have we now abandoned that for an ecumenical Plan B to world peace?

"If we can achieve religious peace between these two religious communities, peace in the world will clearly be easier to attain."
But Jesus said in Matthew 10:34, "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword" which is the Word of God that divides us, not just from the strange fire of other religions, but oftentimes from our own beloved family members.

"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man's foes shall be they of his own household." - Matthew 10:35-36

Do Warren and Hybels believe the Bible or not?

You be the judge:

Christian leaders urged for an interfaith dialogue that moves beyond "polite" ecumenical talks between selected leaders. Instead, leaders of both faiths should hold dialogues to build relations that will "reshape" the two communities to "genuinely reflect our common love for God and for one another," the Christian letter stated.
My, how this bunch loves to re-imagine, re-interpret, re-define, re-envision, re-invent, re-think and re-shape the world to suit them!

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls." - Jeremiah 6:16a

You see, they're not just seeking to shake hands with Muslims on the street, at work or in the grocery store - the objective here is to "hold dialogues to build relations." That's the dialectic process I referred to earlier that relieves participants of their divisive absolutes for a compromised collective conscience, resulting in a synthesis of spiritual beliefs that both can embrace together peacefully. (i.e., religious groupthink)

Why do they want to "hold dialogues to build relations?"

To "reshape the two communities" so as to "genuinely reflect our common love for God."

Which "God" - theirs or ours?

And that's what this is really all about - systematically merging the two faiths into one through the dialectic process - not merely finding "common ground" or "reflecting" a "common love for God," but actually creating a common god for the common good.

Who stands to benefit from this?

The coming antichrist, of course.

Kind of gives a whole new meaning to the term "church growth movement," doesn't it?

In spite of their seemingly benevolent agenda, Jesus Christ came to offer peace with God - not peace with Allah.

"Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds" - 2nd John 1: 9-11

Related articles:

1. Christian Leaders Invite Muslims to Love God, Neighbors Together
2. A Christian Response to 'A Common Word Between Us and You'
3. The Church of Common Ground
4. What Rick Warren Wants
5. Willow Creek Hegelian Dialectic & The New World Order
6. The Test of Faith

© 2007 Paul Proctor - All Rights Reserved



By David J. Stoddard

October 2, 2007

In 1965, thanks largely to Sen. Ted Kennedy; an immigration act was passed that opened the United States to third world poverty and third world social norms. Instead of our laws focusing on immigrants who are good for America, (that is: immigrants who have a skill or expertise to add to the American melting pot), America began focusing on what America can do for the immigrant. Family unification without regard to societal costs became the norm. For the first time in American history, immigrants (because of their lack of skills) became a burden on American society. We began importing uneducated, unskilled, low wage workers. Those workers in turn began importing their friends and relatives without conforming to the inconvenience of doing it legally.

Today for the first time in American history, America has more illegal aliens coming to this country than legal aliens. They are not coming to add to or strengthen U.S. society, but to take advantage of the hospitality and the fruits of hard work by the American middle class.

For forty years there has been unfettered immigration (legal and illegal) into the United States. The social costs and detriment to U.S. culture has been enormous. Today there is great media play on the illegal “immigrants” who have come to America and opened businesses, became “successful” and raised children. There has been no mention of the vast majority who have bankrupted hospitals, knocked-up underage girls, joined gangs, killed others while driving drunk, formed drug cartels, smuggled other aliens and drugs across the border, and generally wrecked havoc in American society. For the first time in American history you can go for emergency medical treatment and have to wait behind a line of illegal aliens receiving treatment for free. For the first time in the history of the USA, our prisons have 30% illegal aliens.

You can go to practically any park in almost any city in the USA and see derelicts, drunks, drug addicted, diseased, insane, homeless and hopeless people. Some are U.S. Veterans, brothers and sisters whose plight is ignored while illegal aliens are given free medical treatment, welfare, government subsidized housing, taxpayer subsidized education and other special privileges.

The world community has come to regard America as an “International Park” where other nations, (particularly Mexico) can dump its hopeless, diseased, insane, criminal, uneducated and undesirable people.

For the first time in American history, we have millions of illegal aliens and their anchor babies demonstrating on America’s streets demanding “rights” and other benefits set aside for lawful residents. We are reaping the whirlwind of foreigners and their supporters demanding open borders and rights never earned nor deserved. They are aided and abetted by the Catholic Church, LULAC, MALDEF, NCLR, MeCHA, Communists, Marxists, Socialists and the Mexican Government. These groups and politicians such as (you guessed it) Sen. Ted Kennedy, Senator Specter, President Bush and Luis Gutierrez (D Ill) spout mantras and propaganda in an attempt to minimize the great damage to this country by giving those who sneaked into America a legal status. They even attempt to deceive us through slogans like “family values,” “economic necessity,” “wanting a better life,” “nation of immigrants” and other half truths and outright lies.

For the first time in American history we have powerful politicians bowing to the wants of powerful corporations and ethnic identity groups who are demanding a free flow of unskilled cheap laborers whose expenses and social costs are being borne by America’s middle class.

If this situation is allowed to continue we as a nation will literally become the “International Park’ for the third world exporters of humanity. We, as a nation of hard working middle class Americans, are reaping the whirlwind created by the failure of our government to act in our best interests.

How will you be voting in 2008 and 2010? There is a general individual perception in this country that, “Sure, my representatives and senators are corrupt globalists and nutballs... But, they are MY nutballs and globalists. I want YOU to vote your nutball out but I want to keep mine.”

Today the U.S. Government, under pressure from the masses has taken steps to curtail mass illegal immigration through using the “No Match” letters of the Social Security Administration. As expected, the ACLU, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the AFL-CIO has stepped up to the plate in behalf of our illegally imported Marxists, Communists and the dregs of other societies, while ignoring the needs and wishes of real Americans.

Some states, like Arizona, have enacted state laws to preserve national integrity and the many benefits that hard working Americans have fought and died to keep for those who have earned them.

In keeping with prior practices, the same players have come out in opposition to these state laws preserving America. To wit: The ACLU, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, LULAC, MALDEF, PRLDEF, the U.S. Contractors Association, the Catholic Church and many others. All are globalists, communists, socialists, anarchists or poverty pimps wanting their particular groups to suck on the national mammary at the expense of lawful, patriotic Americans who have paid the price with their blood, sweat and taxes.

The Bolshevik revolution was brought about by less than 1% of the population while 99% of the people stood by and watched. What are you doing? Will you sit by and watch while we turn into a huge global “International Park”?

© 2007 David J. Stoddard - All Rights Reserved


Dave Stoddard has lived and worked on the border all his life. He has traveled in Mexico and has friends and family there. Dave lives near the Mexican Border in Cochise County, Arizona. He speaks, reads and writes Spanish fluently.

Mr. Stoddard spent 27 years in the Border Patrol and served in Calexico, California, Vermont, Yuma, Tucson Sector Headquarters and Naco, Arizona. He also worked in Texas, Florida, Puerto Rico and other locations.

Stoddard provided testimony about immigration reform to Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner's (R-WI) House Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims in 1999 and a Congressional subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources in 2002. He has also been a guest on multiple nationally broadcast Radio and television programs, including Bill O'Reilly's "The Factor."



By Jim R. Schwiesow

December 5, 2007

Only the most deceived and blindly ignorant among us have failed to note the rapid confluence of events that are moving this nation toward a third world war, a war that approaches in part by virtue of a complete departure from morality by our deeply corrupted government; a seemingly inevitable war that transfixes this nation with bloody eyes. Believing that we are greatly and divinely blessed by the very God who has been made the object of national ridicule and scorn, a God who’s Son has been blasphemed, denigrated and denied, we wander blissfully through each succeeding day imagining, without a basis in reason or fact, that we will be preserved and delivered from the very same inhumane and terrifying events that we have inflicted upon the hapless civilian non-combatants of other nations. We have sown the seeds of hate and violence and we are soon to reap the harvest; we are staring into the murky depths of a demise delivered upon us by our failure to adhere to moral principles.

Our crusades are no longer righteous and our goals are no longer altruistic. A great degeneracy has settled upon the people and the institutions of our society. Whereas our national demeanor used to reflect benevolence and justice we are now indwelled by the deadly sin of insatiable greed. This has deadened our sense of discernment and submerged our conscience. We have been delivered up to delusion. Methodical reasoning has been replaced by a dogma, which closely parallels the most recent or prevalent intimations of the government and its mouthpiece the national media. Propagandists have blurred the lines between good and evil and beneficial and destructive. Our time is short and we don’t even know it, we are like a galloping beast that has been shot through the heart and is carried forward by momentum not even realizing that it is already dead.

Until recently the United States had the trust of the international community in regard to jointly responsible monetary policies, this faith is an absolutely essential ingredient for the stability of the world’s economic system. Since the currencies of the world are not backed by tangible assets the nations must be able to rely on the sureness of the fiscal integrity of those who are partners in what now amounts to a seamless worldwide economic community. To abrogate that trust by deceitful policy is to threaten the economic stability of the entire world.

One would think that since the United States is a debtor nation and heavily dependent upon foreign investors for the capital to shore up this hugely in debt nation and a drastically faltering dollar that our government and financial institutions would pay scrupulous attention to a steady and unfailing commitment to honorable international policies. Unfortunately this nation had demonstrated just the opposite demeanor. Though many will bridle at the contention that our goals are often dishonest and our honor purchasable there is much to substantiate this contention.

The constant manipulation of the domestic economy by tinkering with interest rates in order to stimulate or maintain an appearance of continual growth and prosperity has had dire consequences. When the economy is continually stimulated artificially with no eye to allowing for a balancing of the system through natural forces it is a fool’s game. It is analogous to, as a preventative measure, providing the body with a continual stream of antibiotics, the presence of which suppresses the development of natural antibodies. Sooner or later super microbes will develop against which the antibiotics have no effect and against which the body has no natural resistance. Disaster for the poor host to these super microbes is inevitable. And disaster for this nation appears also to be inevitable.

The housing bubble calamity and the fall out that accompanied it is a case in point. The collapse of the housing market was predestined by the idiotic policies of the Fed in regard to manipulating the economy by artificially lowering interest rates in order to prop up the stock market and to placate the politicians who seemingly have an urgent desire to continually assure their constituents that they will never allow less than an always-rosy economy.

The created frenzy among the greedy, grasping and gullible in regard to the pursuit of mortgages at unrealistically low interest rates, which enabled them to acquire hugely over priced houses with little or no commitment toward equity was bad enough, but the treachery of the lenders who encouraged this wildly irresponsible borrowing and then scammed, with the help of American investment rating agencies, foreign investors into purchasing these nearly worthless U.S. mortgage securities was nothing short of criminal. The domino affect of the collapse of the housing market bubble affected not only domestic financial institutions, but also the stability of many foreign banks and mortgage lenders. These were staggered by the U.S. housing slump that deflated the bubble; some were on the cusp of a complete meltdown and had to be pulled from disaster by quick government intervention. And we wonder why the international community hates us, with friends such as the United States who needs enemies.

Throughout our history we have been a nation that has presumed to act as the moral conscience of the nations of the world, a champion for international justice and morality. We viewed it as our destiny to promote peace, to subdue injustice and discipline belligerent nations. We set up tribunals to punish those that we believed to be responsible for inhumane acts against the weak and the helpless. We condemned and executed political and military leaders of Nazi Germany and the Empire of Japan who we felt were responsible for heinous international acts. When one assumes this posture one had better have clean hands. Don’t look now, but ours are dirty - extremely dirty.

That the United States has become an aggressor nation cannot be disputed. We claim a right to anticipatory or preemptive military strikes to enforce our will upon nations that are subjectively labeled as rogue. The simple fact is that we deny the same right of self-direction to governments with policies that diverge from ours that we claim as a divine right. The Bush administration has carried subterfuge to new heights. Inventiveness in regard to fabricating justification for a military invasion has become an art form. The president while searching for ways to secure congressional approval for an attack on Iraq changed pretexts as often as he changed shirts, finally settling on weapons of mass destruction. Today almost five years after the inception of the attack on Iraq no signs of weapons of mass destruction have ever been found and the president has had to alter his propagation for a seemingly interminable conflict as a war for democratization. Where is it written in our laws or our Constitution that we have the authority to bomb a country and kill innocent non-combatants in order to convert them to democracy?

This country is spiritually wretched, pitiable, poor, blind and naked. We have reached the ultimate low in social degeneration. Our politicians and public officials are treacherous and devious. They are continually deceitful; lies fall easily from their lips. Our courts impose and uphold the aberrant and the indecent, while contravening that which is good and righteous. We have renounced any faith in the Sovereign God and we deny His Son. Perversion lies across this land like a filthy blanket. Money is our God; there is no repentance in our soul, and our fall from grace has destined our future.

Even now the thunders can be heard in the distance and the winds of judgment swirl about us. When the thunders rain destruction upon us, and the hot winds scorch us it will be too late. No amount of pleading, begging, wailing or crying will deliver us from that of our own making.

© 2007 - Jim R. Schwiesow - All Rights Reserved


By Greg Evensen

December 4, 2007

There can be absolutely no mistake when you read these compelling words from our Declaration of Independence. The founders had it absolutely right, they knew precisely what they were writing, and meant exactly what they wrote.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their CREATOR with certain una-LIEN-able (cannot have a lien or mortgage placed against them) Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to SECURE these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, DERIVING THEIR JUST POWERS FROM THE C-O-N-S-E-N-T OF THE GOVERNED, that whenever ANY form of government becomes DESTRUCTIVE of these ends, it is the RIGHT of the people to alter or ABOLISH it, and to institute NEW Government”…….but when a long train of abuses and usurpations”……….evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their RIGHT, it is their D-U-T-Y!!! to throw off such government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” (Emphasis has been added)

Although hundreds of complaints could have been listed there, roughly 27 of them were included for a “candid world” to read. We are living out--at this very moment--those grievances and many far more serious ones so extreme, that our original Declaration is now in its second application. Only this time, it need not go any farther than our own capital, Washington, D.C.

A few readers have recently been very critical of my governmental viewpoints as irresponsible and “incendiary.” Some have accused me of racial intolerance regarding the illegal Mexican invasion in our southwest states. A few more have called me the worst type of homophobe because I do not accept the “gay agenda’s” lies to justify, that are cross-dressed to appear as the “new truth.” Well, you go figure these “sweetie pies” out. I can’t, and I won’t waste any time trying to, either.

I believe that America has been reduced to an island of tradition, sanity, morality and decency surrounded by and ocean of ignorance, stupidity, gross immorality and arrogance. Our nation as a whole is about to be further reduced in its domestic “leadership” by the implementation of a crackdown against Americans who have had enough of the government’s constant application of tyranny through the courts and hundreds of governmental agencies. This will come through domestic “terrorism” legislation now before Congress that will attempt to put my views out of business and in jail.

Reject my warnings at your dire peril. The day of unbridled, brutal, raw governmental power is at hand. If you support our Declaration and its clearly stated concepts of freedom, then you are an “enemy of the state.” (When a poor argument fails, generally the side losing resorts to name-calling…racist, homophobe, red-neck, or….patriot) If you have believed in the legal premise that the Constitution is the one and only unchanging source for law and order, (the government doesn’t) then you will have your chance to convince fellow believers from behind barbed wire in detention camps. (“Halliburton/US Army Hotels.”)

Your one and only chance for freedom or survival will be to claim the right and the duty to throw out those in government who would reduce your status from “sovereign citizen” (the 14th amendment eliminated that) to prisoner. You will not reclaim America by reason, argument, Fox News debates or petitions to your congressional representative. (They don’t listen anyway). It won’t come because you voted, went to the candidate meetings or attended your local city or county council sessions. It will not happen because you volunteered to help with Bible school or gave blood to the Red Cross. It still will not happen when you pay your taxes and use your zip code. It will only happen when you are left no choice but to exercise your second amendment right, (a natural right that cannot be taken away by anyone, ever, unless of course, you turned in your weapons for a $50 keep our schools safe reward) and that day is virtually upon us.

You will be forced to plan how you will use your last resort option to the best advantage. Who will you join with in this last ditch effort to bring freedom back to our people? How will you free those already in custody? Can you bring yourself to the point where you will declare literal war on those who have masterminded your removal from our society because you actually believed that real, true, American freedom was worth fighting for?

Will you take the ultimate step and use the power in your hands to end the greatest threat to personal liberty on our soil since the war for independence round 1? Will you take the ultimate stand and expend the courage necessary to end the reign of brutal terror brought to us by enemies foreign and domestic? What is this great struggle worth to you? Giving up your home? Being separated from your families? Experiencing cold and hunger to fight for a goal that should never have been taken in the first place? Are you willing to fight to the finish against illegals who would take your home, job, benefits, and US social security from you because they think they have some undeniable right to invade our sovereign land?

Who justified the “policy” that gave international politicians the authority to write our laws, influence our courts, and take our income through foreign aid, taxes, and entitlements? Who voted to change our moral standards and culture because a committee dreamed up new “rights” that did not ever constitutionally exist, and in the eyes of a righteous God should never have even been discussed? It was US Senators and Representatives…..that’s WHO “justified” it.

Who said it was all right to give away your nation’s traditions, rewrite it’s brave, bold and at times deeply flawed history to some power broker in Washington? Who said our national treasure should be squandered by a private banking cartel masquerading as the “Federal Reserve Bank” and “authorized” to do the monetary business of the American people? Why was the income tax falsely called ratified, to rob the fruit of our labor? Who gave blanket permission for our property to be seized without compensation, and who gave the state the right to deny me the absolute authority to do with my property as I see fit, as long as I do not injure anyone else or their property? The United States Congress did all of these things to you for your “well-being” and to prove the benevolence and necessity of big government.

Who were the socialist, Alexander Hamilton “central government rules” advocates who insisted that our nation could not exist without federal bureaucratic wasteland agencies, sucking up billions of dollars to operate enforcement, regulatory, and idiotic rule making bodies that do nothing but create bad policies we don’t need, and that are NOT constitutional? It was the Congress of these United States, again.

When were our police agencies turned into law enforcement commando units that rule and abuse rather than protect and serve? And why was this done? To more effectively serve warrants? That’s what our police agencies were told. Take the government money while you can they said. Build a better SWAT team to take out the frustrated mom protecting her children who can’t take anymore drug induced beatings by her criminal husband. Why do we insure that the roadside DUI stop becomes a killing field for the latest “mission essential” military type state police roadblock? Who started all of this and WHY?? It was the FBI, the Justice Department, and law enforcement lobbies along with U.S. socialists and one world bullies that want to create a centralized police state to eventually take all freedoms from us.

When you begin to dig down through all of the smoke and mirrors thrown up by the government, then you will find answers you are not going to like---at all. All of these have one source. It is POWER. It is the kind of power that only a government can command. It is the kind of power that people fear and have every reason to fear. It is the type of control that has no end, no reasoning level, no compassion and no compromise. Power that is more desirable than money. Power that corrupts completely and leaves nothing but destruction in its wake. This is the kind of power that drives men and women to sell out their nation. It is the kind of force that justifies any laws like the Patriot Act, or Executive Orders, and Presidential Directives, and agencies (CIA, FBI, IRS, BATFE, FDA, Homeland Security, NSA, NSC, DIA, NRO, and FEMA) none of which are constitutional nor it can be argued, necessary for freedom and liberty.

Corrupted individuals with hidden agendas for socialized power, and the total subjugation of free people is the goal. It will be achieved through a series of regional world power “unions” (European, African, North American) so that entire sections of the planet can be maintained by “owners” of the world. It is Satanic in design, evil to the core, and virtually complete. We have allowed this to happen and in some cases encouraged it to happen because these same elitist rulers offered us a crumb or two under the table of governance, and we took it like starving dogs.

Well, the dogs are about to be butchered and eaten. To this point, world rulers like David Rockefeller, the Rothschild’s, the Council on Foreign Relations, The Bilderburgs, the Trilateralists, the Rhodes Scholars, the Bush dynasty, the Clinton Horror Show, and all the other bad guys are constantly winning and we are continually losing. Why? Because we would rather talk than really fight against this takeover.

The time for talk is over. More talk will just mean more power grabs for the elite. It’s less time to prepare for the American liberation teams. Look, for those of you who will now write and complain that I didn’t spell it out more clearly for you, quit relying on me and others to do your work. To those of you who claim to know the mind of God in this, stop saying that resistance to this kind of evil is not a Godly endeavor. It sure won’t be if that is all you believe, and please excuse our trying while you hide, because you see America as Babylon. Get to the task of real preparation. Quit lecturing me about how this is not a Christian endeavor and God will never sanction our working to correct a deeply flawed American culture. Just admit you would rather be “Raptured” than have to really do something that would require some courageous action. If you want to feel good, then go to one of the many smiley, “believe in nothing Godly” churches who agonize over where this year’s manager scene is going to go. May God forgive and deliver us from such Laodicean abject spiritual cowardice.

Plan for your own personal changes and preparation, instead of reading NWV columns like they were fictional stories written to entertain you.

When you finally realize that all of the major issues in the world, economics, war, banking, business, politics, power and control are in the hands of a few who will not rest until it is ALL their own, then you will see why there can be no outcome except conflict. It is Biblical and it is real. If you choose to place your fate in the hands of God, believe in His righteous plan for your life, and who believe in the ultimate victory through Jesus, then you cannot lose, no matter what! The Rockefeller crowd will lose and we will ultimately win. However, in the meantime, I am not willing to let them enslave and imprison patriots without a fight. Stand and be counted or run. But remember, you won’t get far. The “rulers” will get you one way or the other, and put you away. Therefore, I choose to stand with fellow fighters and get to the business at hand. Now,…….have you gotten it to this point? Considering that we are in such a minority of people who really care or are capable of understanding this globalized monster, it will take a miracle of God Himself to see us through this storm.

It is impossible to even consider winning this titanic struggle without reclaiming the last sentence of the historic Declaration of Independence.

“……And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our Sacred Honor.” Those brave founding Republic souls did just that, and won their freedom by the grace of God, against the most powerful Kingdom in the world.

Is it within your heart and soul to even try?

To all who have signed up to be on this email list, we are excited to let you know that Greg has just completed four new CD’s. They have been borne out of the need to teach, inform and inspire the true patriots of this nation, onward and upward in the quest to regain our freedoms. They are of the highest quality and reflect Greg’s professional vocal skills in both singing and speaking. You will be truly blessed through the words and emotions expressed in these beautiful musical selections. Greg’s singing is as powerful as his writing. Join with many of our fellow patriots in securing your copies of these inspirational CD’s. What better time than during this Christmas season to share these gifts with your friends and families?

From our home to yours, Greg and Liz Evensen

=© 2007 Greg Evensen - All Rights Reserved

Greg Evensen Greg is an award winning Kansas Lawman and former Kansas State Trooper. He is author of The Sovereignty Papers and has completed two inspirational singing CD's "Hymns from the Heartland" and "After the Storm." You may visit his website at to get your copies of this and other materials offered by Greg. See the NWV central advertising banners for ordering information, also. Greg may be reached at his website for a scheduled speaking or concert date as well.

An Assessment of the NIE Report And The Current Situation In the Middle East

An Assessment of the NIE Report And The Current Situation In the Middle East

In Regards To Iran's Nuclear Program

(A-O Newswire) -- The NIE report assessing Iran's nuclear weapons program is proving to be a trigger for a geo-political earthquake of immense magnitude. For all practical purposes it rules out any credibility the US might have had for launching military air strikes against Iran's nuclear weapons program, because the NIE now says that no such program exists. The report carries with it enormous implications.

#1. It calls into question the credibility of the Bush administration.

#2. It rules out the need for diplomatic sanctions

#3. It gives the Iranians a green light to finish their nuclear weapons program.

#4. It prevents the Israelis from having a reasonable cause for attacking Iran

#5. It signals to Arab nations that their own their own against Iran

#6. It means Persian Gulf nations will need to cooperate with Iran to avoid destruction

#7. It gives Iran free reign to bully its neighbors

#8. It singals to other Arab nations the need for their own nuclear weapons program

#9. It creates a rift between the US and the EU because now the Europeans have been deceived and lost trade with Iran as the result of foolishing following the Bush administration.

#10. Should Israel decide to attack Iran, it would have no believeable ecuse for doing so and thus at the minimum become a world pariah or worse, come under world military attack.

#11. The implications for Iraq's problems are enormous. The pressure will grow for allowing Iran to straighten out the mess in Iraq.

There is also the question to be asked: How is it that the US intelligence community have been so wrong in its 2005 assessment and remained wrong for 2 years?

Some analysts are noting that the NIE's on any given issue can be edited by political pressures for a 'chosen' outcome. Several analysts believe this to be the case with the new NIE on Iran. In other words, the White House chose this NIE outcome for a reason, meaning that the administration has simply chosen to ignore Iran's nuclear weapons program and use the NIE to cover for a switch in policy. What that reason for a switch in policy then becomes the subject of debate. Some analysts think it is because the Bush administration is now desperate to get out of Iraq and regroup. By changing the NIE, the Administration now has a chance to work with Iran to find a compromise that will allow the Bush administration to extricate the troops from Iraq.

Indeed, the Pentagon analysts told the White House that one of the major reasons why an attack on Iran is not in the best interests of the United States is because of the Iranian threat to US forces in Iraq. Indeed, an Iranian counter-attack in Iraq would have been a debacle for US forces in Iraq much akin to the massacre of Custer's Last Stand in the Battle of the Little Bighorn. In other words, to attack Iran, US troops need to be out of Iraq. IF, we should see in the coming weeks, developments between Iran and the US involving cooperation on Iraq, then this theory will likely be proven a reality. No matter what, it seems like the Bush administration is resolved now to pass along the Iranian nuclear weapons problem to the next administration for resolution.

No matter what the reason is for the shift, one thing is clear - change is coming in US foreign policy. Every analyst in the past 48 hours who has commented has agreed with such a conclusion.

The NIE Story, Israel & Biblical Prophecy

The NIE Story, Israel & Biblical Prophecy

A Short and Preliminary Analysis


R.A. Coombes

Note: There is more analysis available for A-O donors who have access to the A-O Insider Report webpages.

(A-O Newswire) -- The revelation of the Unites States National Intelligence Estimate Report and its conclusions are sending shockwaves around the geo-political world and it is being felt most dramatically in Israel.

The Israelis were made aware of the NIE report a week ago, just after the Annapolis Summit. The NIE revelation stunned the Israeli contingent. During the Summit itself, Iran was the main focus and a sense of urgency was in the air. Yet the following day, Israel's Prime Minister is told of the NIE report and its conclusions.

Daniel's Prophecies of Geo-political Alignments Taking New Shape

In response, on Monday, Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah and Iran's President cordially joined with the Gulf Cooperation Council summit as seemingly partners for a new Muslim World Order (MWO). This development strikes us as being highly significant prophetically. The Saudi's rise to military prominence is now escalating under the guise of needing to defend itself against Iran, while at the same time seeking to establish warmer relations with Iran and open new military and diplomatic channels with Russia. All these developments suggest a signal that the geo-political alignments prophesied by Daniel are now coalescing into place for future fulfillment. Even so, it will take time for this coalescing to reach maturity. How long? At least 4 to 5 years if not 10 to 20 years.

At the moment, reports indicate that Saudi Arabia is taking the lead in protecting the Persian Gulf from Persian hegemony by joining the Persian alliance, tentatively. The Saudi King believes that America's ability to project power in the region is diminishing rapidly as long as it languishes in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Saudi's see America's effective power draining away worldwide, although the US retains its nuclear power. The Saudis conclude that nuclear power, alone, is not enough for America to be able to enforce its will on the Middle East. America's conventional military and economic power is perceived by the Saudis as dwindling down to the point that the Saudis are maneuvering towards what amounts to a new Muslim World Order (MWO). As such, the Saudis may well constitute what Daniel calls, "The King of the South."

Iran's role would be linked to either the King of the North - with Syria and or Magog, which could be either Turkey as Magog or Russia. I believe Turkey is Magog as this is where Magog originated, not Russia. Turkey is showing signs of moving towards that role as Magog and the trends suggest acceleration towards that role in the near future. We shall see how things develop in the coming days, weeks and months ahead.

Even as Bush was backing away from Iranian confrontation and a new Muslim World Order was being birthed, Iran's government slammed the door against any diplomatic efforts. A new hardline negotiator has taken over as Iran's lead negotiator. On Saturday, December 1, Iran's new negotiator, Saeed Jalili shocked the EU negotiator by pulling all prior negotiations off the table. The Iranian negotiator did so with an extremely cavalier rudeness that shocked the EU's top diplomat, Javier Solana at the London meeting. Jalili made it quite clear that Iran was in no mood to negotiate. The UN's IAEA, he claimed had given Iran a "clean bill of health." The meeting set the international diplomatic community abuzz with talk of just how distastrous the meeting turned out. The Iranians have no intention of negotiating any further nor in any sort of compromise. Even last weekend, before the NIE was made public, the Iranians had realized that 'the game is over' for the Americans and that the US will do nothing militarily to stop Iran's clandestine nuclear weapons program.

As for a new round of sanctions, the NIE report will justify Rusia and China's refusal to go along with new sanctions. The NIE report also brings Gerrman, French and British leaders to question Bush's credibility on anything. In other words, the view is - Bush misrepresented himself on Iraq's WMD's and now again on Iran's nuclear program. Conclusion: Bush cannot be trusted. We are witnessing the implosion of a Presidency. We've not seen anything like this since Jimmy Carter and the hostage crisis of 1979-80. The Bush administration will easily be remembered as far more inept than that of Jimmy Carter.

Israel's Military Option Is Also Off the Table?

The NIE report effectively makes it poltically untenable for Israel to launch its own military attacks on Iran. The NIE report simply devastates the credibility of any future Israeli claim of an urgent Iranian nuclear threat. The world will simply not believe any Israeli claims now that the US NIE report has been released unless the Israelis can show hard proof. If the Israelis had that hard proof and they may, should they bring that to the world's attention it will only infuriate Washington, because the Bush administration is now desperately trying to avoid a confrontation with Iran. Should Israel proceed with a military attack, it will find itself probably more than totally isolated. It might find itself under Muslim military attack WITHOUT American protection. In other words, An Israeli attack on Iran could set the stage for the Magog war/invasion attempt as predicted in Ezekiel 38 and 39.

The Iranians Celebrate

The Iranian Leadership is reportedly celebrating its victory over America. The NIE report signals the defeat of American efforts to halt Iran's nuclear weapons program.

Oddly enough, Debkafile reports that Israeli Prime Minsiter Olmert was not briefed on the NIE report by the Americans last week while visiting in Washington after the Annapolis Summit. However, the Jerusalem Post reports that Israeli Prime Minister Olmert has acknowledged that he was indeed briefed by the White House during his visit. This does point out that Debkafile is not immune to its sources being in error.

The Post reports:

"According to Olmert, the report's findings were brought up during his meetings with Washington officials soon after the Middle East Peace conference in Annapolis, Maryland last week." See LINK here.

US Rocks World On Iran's Nukes

US Rocks World On Iran's Nukes

NIE Triggers US Policy Shift

On Iran's Nuclear Weapons Program

The A-O Report will be providing follow up analysis on these

dramatic changes in the next few hours and days ahead.

US Intel Believes Iran Stopped Nuke Weapons Program in 2003

President Bush's National Security Advisor, Stephen Hadley revealed on Monday that Iran halted it's nuclear weapons program in 2003. Hadley's revelation came as the result of a comprehensive, coordidinated review of intelligence data by all of America's intelligence agencies and not just the Central Intelligence Agency. The data was compiled into a report called the National Intelligence Estimate.

The report concludes that Iran halted it's nuclear program in 2003 and the program remains on hold. For some experts, the conclusion comes as no surprise, because CIA estimates all along had strongly believed that Iran was still years away from achieving a nuclear weapon's production capability. The report does note that Iran could reconstitute its nuclear weapons program and could develope a nuclear bomb somewhere between 2010 and 2015.

This latest assessment comes as the White House is urgently pushing for new and stiffer sanctions against Iran. In light of the new NIE report, analysts believe that Russia and China will point to the NIE report and conclude that there is no need for urgency in slapping new sanctions on Iran and will not join in voting for new harsher UN Security Council sanctions which could hurt their own trading policies with Iran. For more on the report itself. LINK here. Still more details, LINK here.

President Bush Says Iran Still Dangerous

In light of the National Intelligence Estimate new findings reporting that new evidence indicates Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003, President Bush held a White House press conference on Tuesday to convey to the nation and the world that Iran remains a dangerous nation and the diplomacy must continue to ensure that Iran does not develop nuclear weapons in the future.

The President noted that the Iranians continue to develop a uranium enrichment program which is the central core of a nuclear weapons program. Bush noted that there is nothing to stop the Iranians from re-constituting a nuclear weapons program and for that reason diplomacy through the United Nations must move forward including sanctions. The president made it clear that he believes new sanctions should be adopted and measures taken to prevent Iran from acquiring full ability and know-how to make nuclear weapons.

The President also noted that military options are still on the table including the use of military force if necessary. The President said that: "Iran was dangerous, is dangerous and will continue to be dangerous." He noted that while Iran's nuclear weapons program was halted in 2003, a new regime under Mahmoud Ahmadinejad took over in 2005 and has a mindset for nuclear weapons development. Bush implied that the diplomatic sanctions applied since 2005 have prevented Ahmadinejad's regime from moving forward to reconstitute it's nuclear program. For more on the President's remarks, LINK here.

Israel Believes Iran Still Has Nuke Weapons Program

Israel's Defense Minister, Ehud Barak came out Tuesday stating that Iran continues with efforts to produce nuclear weapons. His statement contradicts the latest US National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) which was made public on Monday stating the Iran halted its nuclear program in 2003 and has not reconstituted it, but does continue with efforts to enrich uranium, the most necessary component of a nuclear weapons program.

Barak did not deny that the Iranians stopped the program in 2003, but asserted that Iran has since re-started the program. Israeli intelligence has recently concluded that Iran could produce a bomb as early as 2009 or 2010.

Barak, speaking out on Israeli radio stated: ""It is possible that this is correct, but I do not think that it is our place to make assessments about US [policy]. It is our responsibility to ensure that the correct things are done. Constantly speaking about the Iranian threat, as we have done recently, is not the right thing to do… words do not stop missiles. .. There are differences in the assessments of different organizations in the world about this, and only time will tell who is right."

Israel's Prime Minister Olmert noted on Tuesday that he was briefed on the NIE report last week after the Annapolis Peace Summit, when he met the next day with President Bush at the White House. The NIE report will no doubt put something of a distance between Israel and the United States over the Iranian issue, as Israeli intelligence believes there is urgency in the Iranian threat and the NIE report reduces the sense of urgency. It may well be that with such distances, Israel will feel compelled to act alone, militarily against Iran. For more on Israel's reaction to the NIE report.

Bush Drops Military Option, Tehran Slams Door on Diplomacy

Bush Drops Military Option, Tehran Slams Door on Diplomacy

December 3, 2007, 11:03 PM (GMT+02:00)

Ahmadinejad's good friend Saeed Jalili: "With me, you start over."

In a radical about-face, White House officials suddenly “discovered” Monday, Dec. 3, that Iran had halted it nuclear weapons program four years ago, but has continued to enrich uranium and could have enough material to build a bomb between 2010 and 2015. This “discovery” appeared in the latest National Intelligence Estimate, together with the comment that Iran seems less determined to develop nuclear arms than previously believed and is more vulnerable to international pressure.

This finding caused astonishment and dismay in Israeli political and military circles, particularly in the light of the close Israel-US rapport over last week’s Annapolis conference on the Middle East and the close Olmert-Livni-Barak lineup behind the Bush vision of Palestinian statehood.

Monday, too, even the “moderate” Arab turnout at the Middle East conference proved to be an illusion when Saudi King Abdullah walked into the GCC conference hall in Doha hand in hand with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The Iranian president was invited to the Gulf summit for the first time. The “moderate” Arab front against Iran, proudly presented by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and prime minister Ehud Olmert, melted away to nothing.

Presenting the NIE, Bush’s national security adviser Stephen Hadley said: “The estimate offers ground for hope that the problem can be solved diplomatically without the use of force, as the administration has being trying to do.”

DEBKAfile’s sources in Israel: In effect, Washington has taken the military option off the table at the very moment that Tehran’s Saeed Jalili slammed the door on diplomacy in the “disastrous” conversation he held with the European Union’s Javier Solana in London, Saturday, Dec. 1.

The Bush about-face, which leaves Israel high and dry against a regime committed to wipe the Jewish state off the map, may be designed to draw attention from the happy communion between the Saudi monarch and Iranian president in Doha and other policy debacles.

After years of foot-dragging, Tehran has decided it has nothing to fear from the US and so why bother with further engagement over its nuclear program? Deputy foreign minister Saeed Jalili, the dour official who took over negotiations from the urbane Ali Larijani, did not mince his words with the Solana. According to the New York Times , Ahmadinejad’s close ally said: ‘Everything in the past is past, and with me, you start over,’” He added: ‘None of your proposals has any standing.’”

When Solana said that he was under the assumption that there would be continuity in the talks, Mr. Jalili told him he was wrong

The French official described the meeting as “a disaster,” adding “Jalili essentially said: ‘Everything that Larijani has proposed is a dead letter and we have to start from zero.’”

The Iranian official is also quoted as saying: “There is no longer an Iranian nuclear problem,” and the only interlocutor recognized by Iran from now on would be the International Atomic Energy Agency, with whom he claimed Tehran had solved all its problems.

The London conversation took place as the five permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany met in Paris over the weekend to discuss a third sanctions resolution. The Chinese delegate agreed for the first time to join a sanctions motion, but the meeting was unable to agree on the nature of those penalties or the degree of their harshness.

From the posture adopted by Jalili in London, it is clear that Iran is no longer willing to heed international pressure for halting its drive for nuclear arms – especially since the Bush administration is clearly short of backing from the “moderate” Arab front.

In these circumstances, the White House has opted for minimizing the Iranian nuclear arms threat rather than confronting it.

DEBKAfile Exclusive: Dispute over Iran’s nuclear program throws Israel-US relations into grave crisis

DEBKAfile Exclusive: Dispute over Iran’s nuclear program throws Israel-US relations into grave crisis

December 4, 2007, 7:56 PM (GMT+02:00)

Senior Israel security and intelligence officials report: Washington is refusing to heed the intelligence Israel has gathered on Iran’s covert military nuclear program which refutes its latest estimate, denies Israel access to authentic US intelligence and has embarked on steps detrimental to Israel in relation to Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Lebanon, without informing its government.

Defense minister Ehud Barak challenged the US intelligence estimate on Iran Tuesday, Dec. 4. He said that Iran may have stopped its military program in 2003, but has since apparently restarted it.

Prime minister Ehud Olmert, left in the dark by Israel’s senior ally, is at a loss to arrest the serious deterioration in their relations. At pains to conceal the gaping rift with Washington, the prime minister’s office released word of George W, Bush’s coming visit to Jerusalem, his first as president. However, DEBKAfile’s sources disclose Israel will be only one stop Jan. 9 along an extensive Middle East tour, which will take Bush to Egypt, Morocco, Saudi Arabia and Ramallah, where he intends to make a big deal of proclaiming his support for forthcoming Palestinian statehood.

He will also visit Beirut, by which time Gen. Michel Suleiman will be installed as president. Bush will hail his administration’s diplomatic success in securing Saudi, Iranian and Syrian approval for the election of a pro-Syrian Hizballah supporter as Lebanese president.

Talking to the media Tuesday, the US president ducked the question of whether the new US Intelligence Estimate had changed Washington’s Iran policy. Next month, our sources report, he will have ample opportunity to demonstrate his abrupt, tidal policy reversals when he tours Middle East capitals.

DEBKAfile’s Jerusalem sources report Olmert, loath to admit the loss of Israel’s most powerful friend, is under mounting pressure by leading political, intelligence and military officials to stand up and articulate an independent Israeli stance in the light of the Bush administration’s actions, especially in response to the true facts of Iran’s nuclear activities. The rift with Washington is not just political, they say, but touches on critical security issues that affect Israel’s very survival.

One immediate proposal is for the establishment of a national emergency government.

Israel publicly challenges US intelligence report that Iran’s nuclear weapons program is on hold

Israel publicly challenges US intelligence report that Iran’s nuclear weapons program is on hold

December 4, 2007, 11:32 AM (GMT+02:00)

Defense minister Ehud Barak won't be led

Defense minister Ehud Barak argued that Iran had in fact restarted its program.

“It’s apparently true that in 2003 Iran stopped its military nuclear program for a time. But in our opinion, since then, it has apparently continued that program,” Barak told Israel army radio. “We cannot afford to rest just because of an intelligence report from the other side of the globe, even if it is from our greatest friend,” said the defense minister.

Israel’s foreign missions were instructed to step up the international campaign for tough sanctions against Iran to repair the impression created by the US intelligence reassessment that Iran is off the hook on its military nuclear program.

DEBKAfile Reports: Russia launches first naval power build-up in the Mediterranean in response to the US about-face on Iran

DEBKAfile Reports: Russia launches first naval power build-up in the Mediterranean in response to the US about-face on Iran

December 5, 2007, 9:19 PM (GMT+02:00)

President Vladimir Putin and defense minister Anatoly Serdyukov decided to send a sortie of six Russian warships, led by the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier and the Moskva guided missile cruiser, to the Mediterranean. This will be the first prolonged stay of a Russian carrier to the eastern Mediterranean vicinity of Israel’s shores and waters patrolled by the US Sixth Fleet. On its decks are 47 warplanes and 10 helicopters. The Moskva is the Russian Navy’s Black Sea flagship.

According to our Moscow sources, the Kremlin is determined not to be left lagging behind the new Bush administration’s steps towards an accommodation with Iran, which were signaled by the US National Intelligence Estimate absolving Tehran of running a military nuclear program from 2003.

DEBKAfile’s military sources report that the Russian fleet, which has already set out for its new mission from the North and Black Seas, will have the use of naval facilities at Syria’s Tartous port. Its presence for several months will be a complication for the Israel navy’s operations opposite the Lebanese and Syrian coasts, especially if the Russians are joined at Tartous by Iranian submarines or warships.

The Kremlin also decided to send a sortie of ships to the northeastern Atlantic.