Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Iran Plans Summer Attack On USA Forces In Iraq

Iran Plans Summer Attack On USA Forces In Iraq

For months now, the A-O Weekly Newsletter has been reporting that various civilian intelligence publications, think-tanks and D.C. insiders, as well as Mideast leaders have been expecting a "summer war" in the Mideast. Now, a mainstream British newspaper is reporting the same thing only pointing to Iran as the nation that starts the shooting.

The Guardian Newspaper in Britain is quoting unnamed but "senior" US officials who are indicating that the US has proof that Iran is planning on launching a summertime "proxy" war on US military forces in Iraq, to compel the US to withdraw its forces quickly.

The Guardian quotes US sources as indicating that there is now firm evidence that the Iranians are working covertly with Al Qaeda and all other insurgent groups in Iraq to combine together in one big push to chase the US out of Iraq before the fall.

"Iran is fighting a proxy war in Iraq and it's a very dangerous course for them to be following. They are already committing daily acts of war against US and British forces," a senior US official in Baghdad warned. "They [Iran] are behind a lot of high-profile attacks meant to undermine US will and British will, such as the rocket attacks on Basra palace and the Green Zone [in Baghdad]. The attacks are directed by the Revolutionary Guard who are connected right to the top [of the Iranian government]."

The Guardian says that US commanders are bracing for a nationwide summertime offensive somewhat like the TET Offensive of the Vietnam War.

"Certainly it [the violence] is going to pick up from their side. There is significant latent capability in Iraq, especially Iranian-sponsored capability. They can turn it up whenever they want. You can see that from the pre-positioning that's been going on and the huge stockpiles of Iranian weapons that we've turned up in the last couple of months. The relationships between Iran and groups like al-Qaida are very fluid," the official said.

"It often comes down to individuals, and people constantly move around. For instance, the Sunni Arab so-called resistance groups use Salafi jihadist ideology for their own purposes. But the whole Iran- al-Qaida linkup is very sinister."

The Guardian goes on to note that there is also evidence that Iran has now begun meddling in Afghanistan with aid to the Taliban as part of a two-pronged effort to chase America out of the Middle East. This is not news to A-O Weekly Newsletter readers as this developement was also recently reported as part of an Iranian plan to position Iran as the leader of the Muslim world. A-O Weekly also reported that Iran was seeking to overthrow the Pakistani government and get their hands on Pakistan's nuclear arsenal.

The Guardian also notes that the patience of the White House is wearing thin although publicly, the State Department and Secretary of State Rice seem to be more patient and optimistic. That may well be a ruse. In fact, the entire move towards direct negotiations scheduled for next week between the US and Iran may be a ruse by both sides to lure the other into a false sense of complacency while the other side maneuvers for a 'surprise attack.'

Read the Guardian's full article. LINK here.

We are not fighting just any enemy we are fighting the Devil himself.

We are not fighting just any enemy we are fighting the Devil himself.
Posted: Tuesday, May 22, 2007
- written by jerry golden

It’s not easy fighting an enemy who has no rules, no morals and no conscience. An enemy who trains it children from child birth that to die killing Jews and Christians will make them a Martyr and guarantee a place in Allah’s presence with 72 virgins. To wrap a bomb around yourself and kill innocent civilians will give your mother and father great honor that they will be able to stand before the community saying how proud they are of you. And all your family and friends will dance in the streets passing out candy over the Jews you have killed. How do we fight such an enemy? The fact is we best find out soon because they are real and they want your blood to spill on the streets.

Here in Israel we are constantly faced with trying to defend ourselves and not make the international community mad at us. As admirable as that may seen there is something very important missing with those two goals, neither of them is what God is calling us to do. For our first goal as Jews living in the land promised to us by God should be to be true to His Word in all that we do and in every action we take.

We are not fighting just any enemy, we are fighting the Devil himself, and this is the religion he has prepared for the past 1500 years for his last and final battle before being cast into the lake of fire forever. And you can believe it will be one hell of a fight for it will be hell on earth for us all before it’s over. I read articles that say this is not a carnal battle but a spiritual one, and they are right, it is a spiritual battle as far as you and me as individuals are concerned. How you and I react to circumstances will determine what kind of witness we are to those around us, but more important it will show your understanding of what salvation in Yeshua is really all about. That spiritual battle rages inside us. Paul spoke of the battle of the flesh against the spirit and we all know of this battle, but will become more aware of it as time goes by. As long as we are alive here on planet earth we have certain obligations towards each other and even more importantly to our families. I would like for you to read this article again. http://www.thegoldenreport.com/asp/jerrysnewsmanager/anmviewer.asp?a=1112.

Today the world can see that the Palestinians Authority (PA) is nothing more than a terrorist organization no different from Hamas or Hezbollah, and that Abbas who we are told we must negotiate with is the head of the PLO under the control of Fatah. The world is watching the battle unfold in Lebanon with Fatah and the Lebanese Army. These “Palestinian” refugee camps hold over 400,000 and are training camps for terrorist that will be coming to you soon, much like the one Bush and Sharon developed in Gaza with the Disengagement the difference is Gaza now has millions of very mad Moslems who want us all dead and Egypt, Iran and Syria are making sure they get all they need to wage their war against the IDF. For months now these Arabs who call themselves “Palestinians” have been shelling our southern city of Sderot, and now threaten to shell deep into Ashkelon and Beersheba. In Ashkelon there are some very important oil and electrical facilities that if hit will affect the entire country. After thousands of Jews have fled Sderot because this Olmert government has failed again to protect its citizens the IDF has now decided to make pin point strikes in defense of its citizens, while bloodthirsty Islamic murderers continue to shell our cities doing their best to kill civilians.

In the mean time the world sits still while Iran becomes a nuclear power and takes over the Arab world, forcing Israel to do what the free should have done. Then of course that same free would once again condemn Israel for doing it just like they did when we destroyed the Iraqi nuclear reactor.

But through it all two things remains constant, God’s Word and our salvation in Yeshua HaMashiach. And God’s Word assures me that Israel will be here when the Lord returns. In the mean time we have little choice but to follow God’s calling and prepare to rescue as many Jews who will be fleeing out of Europe as we possibly can. For those who God has called to this Ministry I will say once again we need a much larger boat, and if every one reading this would stop right now and pray I know God will speak to your heart an soul telling you what He would have you to do. Gen. 12:3 never has anyone been called to a ministry closer to God’s heart than to touch the Apple of His Eye.

Pray for the peace of Jerusalem, for our son Joel and all the IDF soldiers. Pray for this ministry and your part in it. Shalom, jerry golden

Sunday, May 20, 2007



David M. Bresnahan
May 20, 2007

On April 1, 2006 David M. Bresnahan wrote a tongue-in-cheek commentary on illegal immigration that received significant national attention and inspired a hit song. This is his follow-up to “Mr. President I’m Headed to Mexico.”

Dear Candidates for President,

My family and I need your help. We do not know what to do. Some people are breaking the law, but we cannot seem to find anyone willing to do anything about it.

My family and I were away for a while, and when we came home we discovered something that has us a bit concerned. We need your advice.

When we returned to our house we discovered there were several different families living in our home. We never met any of them before. They just showed up and decided to stay without asking our permission.

We tried to ask them to leave, but that made them angry. Apparently they were quick to make friends with some of our neighbors when they moved in, because when our neighbors found out we wanted these people to leave they told us we should be kind to them and let them stay.

We have always thought of ourselves as caring, concerned, compassionate people. However, in the past we have selected when and how to be of service to others, and how much money and to which cause we would donate our funds.

These uninvited guests want us to feed them, but they are unwilling to pay for anything. One of them is having a baby soon and would like us to pay the costs because they do not have insurance. They told us that they are entitled to healthcare simply because they are living in our house. They said that because they are in our house we are responsible for their well-being and their children’s education, and they require us to communicate with them in their native language.

Even though they have money to spend on themselves, they are unwilling to pay money towards the food they are eating, or to help with other expenses for running our home. They say they do not have to help us with cooking, cleaning the house, taking out the trash, or doing the laundry. They keep telling us that they expect us to do those things for them.

We asked the local police for help, but they said they are not authorized to do anything. We went to our elected officials, but apparently the people who moved into our house made friends with elected officials. The politicians do not want to upset them, so they are not getting involved.

We need your help. There are people here who are breaking the law and stealing from our family. What should we do? What will you do to stop this from happening?

Sincerely yours,

David M. Bresnahan

Note: This tongue-in-cheek commentary is intended to get people talking to the candidates and to their elected leaders about the illegal immigration issue. The original commentary that has now been sent in millions of E-mails and published on thousands of web sites can be found at [click here] and the song inspired by this commentary “Can You Get Me In” can be found at [click here]

© 2007 David M. Bresnahan - All Rights Reserved

David M. Bresnahan is an independent journalist with over 30 years of experience as a reporter, author, columnist, and broadcaster. He writes both news articles and commentaries without pay or compensation. He finances his writing through www.FreedomPhoneServices.com, which offers low-cost communications services and a free business opportunity. If you need phone services, Internet access, web site hosting, VoIP, cell phones, or any other communications services please visit his site. If you are interested in a part-time opportunity offering these services to others please contact him.

Web Sites: www.ThatPRGuy.com and www.Bresnahan.org

E-Mail: nwv@Bresnahan.org



John W. Slagle
May 19, 2007

For the past seven months in Southern Arizona, politics and events on the border are normal, with no major change from events reported in 2003. Most human trafficking and narcotics smugglers control the vast network of "walking trails" leading from the Border at Sasabe, Nogales. People have been "shot" and murdered but these events are of little importance nationwide. The Arizona Star carries the local trivia.

Aggravated with both political parties in general on many issues , nothing ever changes in prospective regardless of the controlling authority. I have served many Presidents in my lifetime, and met numerous politicians, some good with a desire to fulfill their oath of office and duty to their nation, but a vast majority have sought public office for personal agendas and monetary gains at taxpayer expense.

Despite the fact that I have enforced the laws and Constitution of the United States for decades, I have been remiss in actually reading all articles including the Declaration of Independence presented in 1776, the U. S. Constitution in 1787, and the Bill of Rights in l791. This nation can be very proud of our early elected officials who actually represented the people of the United States.

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. Beautiful words then and now, as well as the Pledge of Alligence to the United States, One Nation, under God.

Polticians come and go in the history of this nation. We've had great men worthy of respect, to carpet-baggers, scoundrels and thieves that prey on taxpayer's trust. When it comes to politicians regardless of the very sad two party system where campaign funds determine votes, the Constitution of the United States should be a factor for every citizen that is a voter in the United States. In God I have Trusted, not "snake oil " salesmen in war and peace for more years than I care to remember.

© 2007 John W. Slagle - All Rights Reserved

John W. Slagle is a U.S. Navy Aviation Veteran, Commercial Pilot, Multi-Engines rated and was a Firefighter, Engineer Lt. prior to United States Border Patrol service spanning 30 years. Duties included Agent/Medic, Special Tracking and Rescue Unit, Intelligence Officer, Sector Pilot to Criminal Investigator.

Slagle spent 12 years in undercover operations nationwide as a Special Agent, Anti-Smuggling Operations involving organized human trafficking, narcotics, certified Master Gun Smith and second degree Nidan black belt Goshin Iaido.

E-Mail: Slagles079@comcast.net



By Dr. Laurie Roth Ph.D.
May 18, 2007

What is happening to the innocence of our children? Are we adults SO perverted and desperate for fulfilling our own sexual appetites that we can't support laws that protect our children? Are we going to stand by as we continue to push our country into an international revamp and let International child sex laws affect U.S. policy?

Our children already are facing an enormous amount of sexual dangers in our country! The United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) have reported that one in five American children who use the Internet are approached by an adult stranger who wants a sexual encounter.

Other dangers lie in the whole realm of professionals redefining the basics of what abuse is even defined as!! Sam Kastensmidt wrote a great article posted at reclaimamerica.org, which highlights just that. The American Psychological Association has published the "Rind Report," asking Congress to get rid of terms like "molestation" when referring to an act of sexually abusing a child. They have been lobbying for a value neutral term like "adult-child sex or "willing encounter." The Department of Education has released a study, which is enough to freak any parent out! They discovered in one survey that one out of every ten students had experienced unwanted sexual encounters by an educator!! Also that more than 4.5 million students will be subjected to sexual abuse by an employee of a school between kindergarten and 12th grade."

You would think that these stats and dangers would be enough to wake up congress, the ACLU and other groups regarding our children's safety…but no….what am I thinking? When you are selfish and perverted by nature and already look the other way regarding 50 million abortions why spend too much energy protecting the kids after they are born?

As our culture declines and morals descend into fossil exhibits we see pressures to lower the age of consent. The ACLU wants it down to age 13. Other countries continue to share their enlightenment in this area. Already we see Denmark, France, Sweden, Poland and the Czech Republic having their national age of consent at 15. Of course, even more enlightened is Hungary, Austria and Canada, with its consent age at 14. Just when you think you can't get inspired any further, Mexico, the Netherlands, Argentina, Chile and Columbia blows our mind with a consent age of 12! According to Sam Kastensmidt at relaimamerica.org, there are reports that more than 16,000 Mexican children are into prostitution! There are groups here and abroad who won't stop until there is NO sexual age of consent!!!

The scary thing to me is that we as a country are morphing more into International Law i.e. North American Union, looking at international governing bodies to make our legal decisions and literally establishing or dismantling are very moral system!

Our own Supreme Court has relied on international law to strike down a Texas anti-sodomy statue. Even Justice Ginsburg has called for the sexual age of consent to be lowered to 12 years old. The depravity and betrayal to our children and culture is NEON!!!

What we are really talking about is the blatant assault on our very standard of morality and submission to a higher standard, namely God. If we can demonize God's standards, our Christian heritage and absolute guidelines of sexual protection and expectation for our children, we can turn our culture into walking, acting out machines of perversion.


We must keep the age of consent up, turn to God and remind ourselves of real values, prosecute sex offenders who want to experiment and play with our kids and draw REAL lines in the sand, not slime in the sand!

© 2007 Dr. Laurie Roth - All Rights Reserved

Laurie Roth has a Ph.D. in Counseling and held a small private practice for many years. She earned a black belt in Tae Kwon Do. In the late 90's, Laurie hosted and produced a successful PBS television show called "CD Highway" that aired nationally on 130 TV stations.

Tune in to The Roth Show, Weeknights from 7:00 to 10:00 pm PAC and find out for yourself! You can listen live on cable radio network (live on the internet) channel 6 or visit The Roth Show web site and click on "where to listen" www.therothshow.com Call the Roth Show at: 1-800-837-9680

E-Mail: Drljroth@aol.com



By Joel Turtel

May 19, 2007


The driving force behind the eco-radicals’ fierce efforts to strangle the free market with environmental regulations is their virulent hatred for a free, prosperous economy. Yet behind this hatred is an even deeper one. To understand why they try to wreck our economy, you have to grasp the shocking fact that many eco-radicals hate the human race and Western civilization. They hate the fact that you, your family, your friends, and millions of other human beings live and prosper on this planet.

Most of us are naive about the environmental movement. We believe that when eco-radicals say we should “protect the environment,” they mean we should protect it for people. What they really mean is that we should protect the environment against people. People are the enemy. Rats, swamps, and old-growth forests must be protected against you, your family, and the rest of the human race.

To confirm this, just watch nature programs on public television. In every program I’ve seen, human beings are depicted as the enemy. These programs portray humans as vicious, violent destroyers of birds, wildlife, forests, rivers, and oceans. Nature is seen as “pure,” “fragile,” and “innocent” (including child-eating hyenas and alligators). Environmentalists or their sympathizers create these programs, so the programs reflect the environmental movement’s deepest attitudes toward the human race.

If environmental groups valued human life, they wouldn’t try to cut our oil supplies by banning drilling in arctic wastelands or off the coast of Florida and California. They wouldn’t ban the hunting of alligators that kill children. They wouldn’t file lawsuits against housing developments that give people shelter, to protect kangaroo rats.

They wouldn’t have lobbied Congress to ban DDT, the pesticide that saved the lives of millions of people worldwide from malaria. They wouldn’t ban logging in northwest forests to protect spotted owls, a ban that destroyed over 30,000 logging and sawmill workers’ jobs.

Here’s what one environmentalist had to say about loggers losing their jobs:

“Loggers losing their jobs because of Spotted Owl legislation is, in my eyes, no different than people being out of work after the furnaces of Dachau shut down.”

In other words, forcing owls to move to another forest because you cut down trees they nest in is just as evil as murdering six million people in gas chambers. Owls are as important as six million human lives. If loggers unintentionally kill a few owls, they’re as evil as the murderers who ran the Nazi gas chambers. Therefore, we should have no sympathy for loggers who lost their jobs. Here’s another quote:

“Somewhere along the line . . . we quit the contract and became a cancer. We have become a plague upon ourselves and upon the Earth . . . Until such time as Homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along [emphasis added].”

In other words, this eco-radical wishes the human race to die out—for your family, your children, your friends to die, so that the “sacred” Earth will be free of the “plague” of human beings.

These are quotes by radical environmentalists. These quotes eloquently reveal the eco-radicals’ utter hatred and contempt for the human race, and for human life and progress on this Earth. Are these the kind of sick people that we, and State and Congressional legislators should be listening to?

I knew that the environmental movement values swamps and kangaroo rats over human life, but I didn’t realize how sick this movement really is until I read a shocking article in the New York Times. It seems that in Brazil, “endangered-species” regulations forbid hunting “protected” wildlife. This ban includes the dreaded jacaré and caiman, two Brazilian alligator species.

The jacaré is a vicious, prehistoric, man and child-eating monster who inhabits the Amazon River Basin. In the high-water season, alligators infest the riverbanks near where Mrs. Ramos lives. One evening in August, an eighteen-foot jacaré emerged from the lagoon to forage for food in waters flowing around the stilts of her house. The New York Times article described what happened to Mrs. Ramos’s son:

“Gilson (Mrs. Ramos’s 17-year-old son) went down to tie up his canoe,” said Sidecley Conceicão Andrade, a barefoot, 12-year-old neighbor. “In the dark, he thought he grabbed the canoe, but it was the jacaré’s tail. It took him away and ate him up.”

Can you imagine the horror of being eaten alive by an alligator? Can you imagine the nightmares and searing pain Mrs. Ramos must feel when she thinks of her son? Well, Brazil’s environmental regulations killed her son and hundreds of other innocent victims of alligator attacks.

Imagine that you lived in Florida and were the parents of a beautiful little girl. How would you feel if an alligator protected by the Endangered Species Act snatched your daughter and ate her alive? How would you like hearing your little girl crying for her mommy or daddy while the alligator ripped her to pieces? I apologize for describing such a horror in detail, but I want to bring home the real meaning of environmental laws like the Endangered Species Act. If you want to picture the essence of many eco-radicals’ contempt for human life, just remember what the jacaré did to Mrs. Ramos’s son.

Radical environmentalism and its strangling regulations threatens our health and our lives. But environmentalists can hurt us only because most of us have fallen for their propaganda. The problem is that we’re a good-natured, but sometimes naive people. We give everyone the benefit of the doubt, including environmentalists. We think eco-radicals are normal human beings like we are, and couldn’t possibly mean what they say. That’s what the world thought about Hitler—people didn’t believe what he said in his book, “Mein Kampf.” But we can’t be naive any longer.

We have to judge eco-radicals by their words, values, and actions, and recognize that the agenda of too many environmentalists is evil. The only way to stop them is to de-fang them, to take away their power, to repeal most environmental regulations and abolish the Environmental Protection Agency.

© 2007 Joel Turtel - All Rights Reserved

Related Article:
Save the Planet - Kill Yourself?

Joel Turtel, author of Public Schools, Public Menace: How Public Schools Lie To Parents and Betray Our Children, holds a degree in Psychology. For the last ten years he has served as an Education Policy Analyst, studying the climate of today's public schools and its effect on children and parents.

Mr. Turtel has written two books, published over fifty articles, and has been interviewed in both print and broadcast media on the subject. His latest book, Public Schools, Public Menace has garnered national media attention – recently, for example, Dr. Laura Schlessinger featured the book on her nationally syndicated radio show.

Joel Turtel is available to discuss his book Public Schools, Public Menace in the media, at conferences, or with individual groups. Be warned though, you may be shocked by the revelations he has uncovered in America's public-school system.

Web site: www.mykidsdeservebetter.com



Nancy Levant
May 15, 2007

“Generation Gap” is a New Age term that was coined to create the “gap” in our minds. The effects of this gap were devastating – much like all missions of perpetrated divisibility. But the generational division has dire consequences and particularly for the young.

Since America’s global/regional job is to police the world’s “common security perimeters, the New Age soldier’s future is dim – to say the least. So, it may be valuable, at this stage of the global game, to consider the “health craze” that has been systematically implanted into the minds of all once free American people.

The global term, coined by Kissinger, “useless eater,” is very telling. It implies that “usefulness” is now defined by the elite and for the masses. We know that under Communitarian intentions, one must be “useful” to the “community.” Living in America, and with American people now policing the world’s “common security perimeters,” new world soldiers must be fit and ready to serve as “rapid response” intentions clearly serve the missions of global crisis “emergencies.”

For decades, children have been directed into competitive sports regimens. This is particularly true for children born into upper-middle class families. And, you will recall, that there were once many upper-middle class families in America. Equally, America’s under-classes have always been directed into standard military service, but standard military men and women no longer serve in or for America. They have all been deployed throughout the world’s global regions, and they continue to be deployed, serving the profiteering of the unending global war machine.

But it would appear that “civilians,” or non-military “citizens” of our nation, are being trained for “usefulness,” as so defined by the socially designing elite. First up is the Presidential Fitness drive in all schools that has been an on-going “mission” for decades. Then, what use to be “sports” became “competitive” or “select” sports. Coaches became “professional trainers,” and sports became “regimented.”

Physical training became mandatory for participation in competitive sports – nearly daily and grueling training regimens – and “games” took over entire weekends. So much for the Commandment to keep the Sabbath holy… Now, competitive sports, which originate in government schools, are the breeding ground for “elite” athletes. These young athletes have parents with big money to pay for their children’s “professional trainers,” and once trained, these kids are indoctrinated to believe that they “play” not for fun, but to win at all costs. To stay on “select teams” means that losing is not an option. Winning is a mindset.

These kids are instructed on what to eat, how many miles to run each and every day, and to stay socially connected to their “teams.” Their parents are instructed by “trainers” to orchestrate social gathering for the “teams,” and to further the cause and connections of the team units. In effect, competitive “teams” are segregated from the non-select. What you see are pre-military physical, intellectual, and emotional boot camps, and the line between sports and military blurred – much like blurring between law enforcement and military.

Competitive trainers pull no punches and they are relentless physical disciplinarians. They allow no faultiness, no slacking off, and their teams must progress, which means win.

Then there is the federal, state, and U.N./global intervention into health and fitness. In today’s global world, being overweight, diseased, smoking cigarettes, or being “unfit” takes on whole new meaning. But why? Remember that your “usefulness” is now mandatory. This is why human euthanasia is considered by the New Age to be an act of “compassion.” When we consider that governmental agencies, like The Humane Society, calls the mass slaughter of animals an act of humane compassion and “health safety,” and we also consider that the chipping of animals, now mandatory, is a precursor experiment to human chipping, which is now occurring, it’s not too far of a stretch to realize that your “usefulness” is being charted and graded – beginning in all governmental schools.

For what reasons are we being “graded” for our usefulness? Let us consider the “human relocation” mandates of Agenda 21, for example, and also the “civilian management” missions, legislation, and powers that have been attained by “civilian management” agencies and authorities in our nation (and globally). We are to be graded, grouped, designated with and to work assignments, and relocated as ordered. We are to be assigned jobs based upon our “usefulness” factor. Mandated servitude requires stamina and physical prowess – especially when food and water is to be rationed, and standard proteins are to be eliminated from our diets. Remember that eating meat is a New Age/U.N. no-no.

Clearly, sickness and disease have become designer and highly profitable weapons to eliminate “uselessness.” And the training for the “community mindset,” in which we are all embedded due to the NGO leadership in all American “communities,” also suggests that “planned community” takes on whole new meaning and in preparation of “other communities” raised by and for the intentional “relocation” of the masses. Think civilian labor. Think “planned communities” called Civilian Labor Camps, where total compliancy, food and water rationing, enforced labor for no wages whatsoever, and mandated by “emergency” relocation. Survival of the “fittest” takes on whole new meaning.

This is why “pet ownership” is slated for extinction. No pets in camp. This is why children are being forced to be more than fit, more than controllable, and under the guidance and undisputed orders of “trainers.” It’s all a big picture of the future to come, but the infrastructures of that future have arrived. They are operational. So, tell me, what grade will you received for your civilian management factor? How manageable a community servant have you become? And are you healthy enough to be a desirable candidate for your civilian labor duties? And one wonders why the community movers and shakers – the admirable ones – have all become so fit and health-oriented. Wonder, indeed… “The Plan” is in “Order.”

© 2007 Nancy Levant - All Rights Reserved


Nancy Levant is a renowned writer for Constitutional governance and American culture. She is the author of The Cultural Devastation of American Women: The Strange and Frightening Decline of the American Female (and her dreadful timing).

She is an opponent of deceptive governance and politicians, global governance by deception, political feminism, the public school system, political economics based upon manufactured wars and their corporate benefactors, and the Federal Reserve System. She is also a nationwide and lively radio personality. To book an engagement with Nancy Levant, send an email request to:

E-Mail: nlevant@juno.com



By Jim R. Schwiesow

May 17, 2007

The defining moment of the recent Republican candidate debate was, at least to me, when the following question was put to John McCain by Chris Matthews, quite evidently without any forewarning, “Do you believe in evolution?” It was as if time stopped, and in that brief instant before it resumed one could plainly discern that thoughts were racing through the heads of the candidates. And one could almost, by watching facial expressions and body language, read those thoughts. The candidates on stage with McCain were mentally giving thanks that they had not been singled out for such a question out of the blue, and hoping that they would be spared in the follow-up. The poignancy of the moment was stunning.

The look on Mr. McCain’s face was worth the price of admission to the event, if in fact payment for admission was required. It was the look of a deer caught in the headlights of an onrushing truck on a busy highway. In that brief instant John McCain was contemplating his political future. He had to decide, and do it quickly, if he in fact believed in God, or if he did not. Would it benefit him politically to stand up for God and stand down to the half-baked theories of men, or could he gain more momentum by standing down for God and embracing the mumbo-jumbo of Darwinism? You do have to give it to old John; he made no bones about the fact that his lust for the office of president far outweighed his love of God. With very little thought, other than a very slight, but perceptible, hesitation he denied before the entire world any faith in Almighty God, the creator of the heavens and the earth and all that is in and upon the same. Wow! Is all that I can say.

The next time that John McCain uses the name of God in a speech, an address, an announcement, an ad or a phony public prayer to ingratiate himself with voters, we will know him for the hypocrite that he is. Apparently it was Darwin and his cockroach theory that sustained John through his captivity in Viet Nam. God had nothing to do with it.

At this point John added a little preachifying to the occasion. He, realizing the magnitude of the blockbuster that he had just delivered, followed up with an ingratiatingly and patently phony little homily on how much he appreciated nature and enjoyed communing with the great outdoors. It was almost as if when he engaged his mouth he could just not put the brakes on his tongue. Which nature were you talking about, John? The one created by an accidental non-directed cosmic explosion, which sprayed terrestrial bodies into precisely located, but unplanned, positions, orbits, rotations, and speeds for complete harmony and equilibrium? Ah, yes, it has to be that man-made version of the birth of the universe because you just told the world that you do not believe in a God of Creation.

Meanwhile back to the stage of pain, where we have a bevy of candidates, who might otherwise be enjoying John’s discomfiture, but who are instead anxiously contemplating their turn at the hands of the same Matthews who had just nailed John’s feet to the floor with his question. All are hoping that inquisitor Matthews had been satiated by the affects of the clever trap that he had sprung upon John McCain, a trap that exposed the true nature of John McCain to the world. But just when it appeared that the rest might escape having to put up or shut up the rug was pulled from beneath them when another moderator opened the question up to the group by asking all those on the stage who disbelieved in evolution to raise their hand.

The boys responded with comedic jerkiness, for an instant it was as though I was watching an out of time vintage movie. With furtive glances at their compatriots they responded less than enthusiastically. Three raised their hand rather hesitantly like a schoolboy who doesn’t know if he is doing the right thing or not by volunteering to answer a teacher’s classroom question. To their credit Sam Brownback, Tom Tan Credo, and Mike Huckabee affirmed their disbelief in evolution by the raising of their hand. The next day Huckabee called a news conference and desperately tried to back off of his commitment by complaining about the fairness of the question and it’s pertinence to the presidency, saying that if he were to be elected president he would continue to encourage the teaching of evolution in public schools and that he would make it illegal to teach Biblical creation in the same. So, we now know that Mr. Huckabee lied when he raised his hand, but this is typical of most politicians, most are inveterate liars. Mr. Tan Credo and Mr. Brownback, to their credit, did not backtrack. The rest of the candidates shuffled their feet and dragged their knuckles rather than respond one way or another.

The fact is that such a question at a Democratic debate would go over in humdrum fashion. The national media naturally assumes that all Democrats are devoid of any commitment to Biblical principles. But, since they believe that some Republicans may still secretly embrace Biblically espoused values, such must be exposed as heretics to secular progressiveness. If every one of the Republican candidates that night had flunked this liberal media test, they could have concluded the debate with honor.

Throughout the Internet in the days following the debate the entire godless secular community squealed and howled like banshee monkeys. Their vitriol and their language were atrocious and their shrill invective was exceeded only by their monumental ignorance and stupidity. They were absolutely enraged that the “majority” of the ten Republican candidates had the audacity to disbelieve evolution. That they believe three out of ten to be a majority points up their mathematical prowess and makes me better understand why Mexican aliens are brought in to take their jobs. Every time one makes a case that evolution is specious the secularists go spastic and throw themselves upon the compost pile to prove that they are the living descendants of reptiles and anthropoids. They may look like apes, they may act like apes, they may even smell like apes, but they are not apes. Nor are they descended from Apes. They are human beings descended from Adam, and they are, if they don’t change their ways, going to spend eternity contemplating their rejection of the Living God.

We have been through two debates now, and have had a chance to look at the candidates for president of the two national parties. The results were predictable. That the entire bunch represents collectively a fairly typical example of the nation’s moral and character deficiencies certainly doesn’t bode well for the immediate or long-term future of the nation. That this nation still stands despite the decadence that prevails within its borders is one of the wonders of the world. The fact that other nations of the world reflect these same sick values seems to account, in part, for our survival. However, if our only claim is that we have maintained equity in social depravity with the other nations of the world it certainly gives us no bragging rights or reason for comfort.

As I see it there is very little in the way of redeeming personal values for the liberal Democrats who are running for the office or for the Republicans who are similarly involved. First of all there is no such thing as Blue Dog Democrats. It is an illusion that was created long ago to enable Democrats to have their cake and eat it too. They used this little old conjuring trick very well in the last election to regain control over the Congress. All Democrats are liberal and they encourage the institution of nauseatingly despicable social practices. Republicans are more likely to talk a good show and when at all possible they at least endeavor not to flaunt degeneracy, but when it comes to delivering on their promises they always defer to a convenient lack of memory. They are no more or no less proficient at the lie and the sellout than the Democrats.

George Bush has proved to be a bigger braggadocio liar than a good many of his contemporaries in the other national party. Apparently that is why he feels so comfortable with the likes of Kennedy and company, birds of a feather so to speak. If there is a difference it is this. A liberal Democrat, remember there is no other kind, will look you in the eye and proudly admit to being a reprobate, and then spit in your eye and dare you to do something about it.

Whereas straying Republicans will sneak around and do their dirt, then when caught they will whine, snivel, blubber an apology, and run and hide by checking into treatment. When they finally do face the people they complain that the media pillories them for the same types of sin for which Democrats are given a free pass. This is true, but if they had not violated the trust placed in them in the first place they wouldn’t need a free pass. One would think that they would aspire to be better that venal Democrats rather than equal to venal Democrats.

The bottom line is that they are all freedom killers and have contributed equally to the destruction of the Republic. They have pretty much demonstrated as well that they will sell their soul to attain the office, which they seek. They must believe that they are going to live forever.

© 2007 - Jim R. Schwiesow - All Rights Reserved


Jim Schwiesow is a retired sheriff with 46 years of law enforcement service. He served with the Unites States Army with the occupation forces in post war Berlin, Germany, and has a total of nine years of military service, which includes six years in the U.S. Army Reserve.

His law enforcement service includes: three years in the military police, fifteen years as an Iowa municipal police officer, and twenty-eight years as the duly elected sheriff of Sioux County, Iowa.

Jim has written a number of articles, which have been published in various professional law enforcement journals.

E-Mail: jimr@orangecitycomm.net

Web-Site: www.sheriffjimonline.com



By Darren Weeks

May 19, 2007


We are told that over-population is the greatest threat facing planet earth. Daily, we are given lectures of how we humans are screwing up the environment, damaging the earth’s “fragile” eco-system, killing the birds, and polluting the air and water. Forked-tongued politicians, finger-wagging bureaucrats, and a choir of “green” organizations moan an off-key chorus of alarm about the human “footprint” on earth.

We are blamed for over-fishing the seas, deforestation of wooded areas, droughts and desertification, wildfires and floods. We cause congestion in the cities, sprawl in the suburbs, and terrorize the creatures in the countryside. It is obvious from what we’re told, Americans have no place in the world and the world is better off without us.

We drive too much, eat too much, breathe too much and throw away too much. We are living too large, we take up too much space, we are too rich, we’ve become too fat, and we have too many children.

Every day, and in every way, we are evil. We kill, we destroy, we pollute, we intrude. We are the scourge of “Mother Earth”, and the warts on Gaia’s backside.

This is the message that is being declared from the halls of government, academia, tax-exempt foundations, and the Establishment-controlled media. Never before has it ever been clearer that not only are we unfit stewards of the land and its natural resources, we literally are not worthy to breathe the air.

As a matter of fact, with the recent Supreme Court decision that declared carbon dioxide a “pollutant” that must be regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency, we are officially damaging the planet by doing nothing else than breathing.

At the same time the venom of elite-driven hatred spews forth from every channel of propaganda, we have bacteria being added to our lunch meat and fluoride added to our water supply. We have foreign substances being sprayed in our skies, and genetically-modified crops producing their own pesticides for our consumption. Our vitamins and nutritional supplements are being eliminated in favor of a limitless bombardment of toxin-infested vaccines and mandated pharmaceutical drugs. [Read the book "Fluoride Deception"]

Our farmers and ranchers have been molested for years by endless regulations, land-use and irrigation restrictions, and have, for decades, been paid not to produce. As domestic food production has dropped, foreign food imports have risen, along with sicknesses, food poisonings and contaminations.

It is high time that every American begin to make the connection between the demonization of all normal human activity, versus the daily and ongoing attacks on our food, our water, our vitamins, on all of the basic staples that we need to sustain our lives.

Upon careful examination of the evidence, it is difficult to escape the reality that we are gradually and deliberately being made victims of a mass genocide. The necessary pieces are being placed together to eliminate a large number of the population.

In an April 16th Associated Press article headlined, Imported Food Rarely Inspected, it said,

“Just 1.3 percent of imported fish, vegetables, fruit and other foods are inspected — yet those government inspections regularly reveal food unfit for human consumption.”

On April 23rd, the Associated Press ran a follow-up article headlined, U.S. Food Safety Strained by Imports. The article said,

“The same food safety net that couldn't catch poisoned pet food ingredients from China has a much bigger hole.

“Billions of dollars’ worth of foreign ingredients that Americans eat in everything from salad dressing to ice cream get a pass from overwhelmed inspectors, despite a rising tide of imports from countries with spotty records, according to an Associated Press analysis of federal trade and food data.

“When U.S. Food and Drug Administration inspectors at ports and border checkpoints look, they find shipments that are filthy or otherwise contaminated. They rarely bother, however, in part because ingredients aren't a priority.”

How does that make you feel America? Your very own mainstream news media is telling you that you are eating trash! Your government is aware of the problem. In fact, they created the problem by persecuting domestic food producers at every turn, and forcing family farm owners out of business. In the vacuum, massive multi-national corporations and foreign producers have stepped up production to feed you and almost none of their products are inspected. It isn’t a priority. Why? [See Vedeo "Future of Food"]

Could it be that the answer lies in the fact that they keep telling us that over-population is a problem? Could it be that the real movers and shakers behind public policy in America consider you a liability to their environment, to their power base, and to their world Order?

The truth is that those who hold the reigns of power consider this planet theirs. The air you breathe, the water you drink, the land you think you own — it’s all theirs! That’s why you’ll pay to use it all. And make no mistake about it, taxes upon your carbon emissions are right around the corner. They will charge you to use the air because you’re a liability to their planet, simply because you’re alive. They place themselves in the position of the Almighty, and they’ve decided that you don’t belong here.

This principle is demonstrated with unequaled clarity at the Church of Euthanasia website, where their motto is “Save the planet, kill yourself.” This non-profit foundation promotes what they refer to as their “four pillars” — suicide, abortion, cannibalism, and sodomy. Their one commandment is, “thou shalt not procreate.” Although they say their purpose is to restore “balance between humans and the remaining species on earth,” they glorify death, encourage suicide and have even hosted instructions on how to commit suicide.

Though much less diplomatic in their choice of language, the Church of Euthanasia’s ideology is harmonious to the United Nations Environment Programme’s Agenda 21 initiatives that are being implemented all across America and around the world. Though the UN is much more careful to disguise it’s people-hating agenda with pretty terms such as “human rights”, “walkable communities”, “Smart Growth”, “New Urbanism”, “Cool Cities”, “Scenic Byways”, and “conservation easements”, the outcome is the same. The plans that are being implemented around the country and the world are designed to crush human activity, put the means of production off limits to you, and to stop human “sprawl” — meaning, people living any place they decide you shouldn’t.

Americans must quickly awaken and realize that there is a silent and undeclared war upon our freedom, our health, and our very existence. Quietly, and behind the scenes in secret meetings, these people haters are plotting to remove every support needed to sustain life.

In 1972, the Rockefeller Commission on Population and the American Future was commissioned by President Richard Nixon. The commission, which was chaired by John D. Rockefeller III, lamented the prospect of “one of the most serious challenges” facing America. They outlined three “positions” that needed to be addressed as population policy, which included greater access to contraceptives and “fertility control,” the promotion of “equal rights” for women and minorities — getting them busy in careers so they aren’t tempted to have children — and finally a reshaping of American values to harmonize them with environmental conservation. Of the last point, the commission writes,

“The third position deals with the population problem in an ecological framework, one whose primary axiom asserts the functional interdependence of man and his environment. It calls for a far more fundamental shift in the operative values of modern society. The need for more education and knowledge and the need to eliminate poverty and racism are important, but not enough. For the population problem, and the growth ethic with which it is intimately connected, reflect deeper external conditions and more fundamental political, economic, and philosophical values. Consequently, to improve the quality of our existence while slowing growth, will require nothing less than a basic recasting of American values.”

It is this “recasting of American values” that is precisely what attorney and environmental activist Daniel Sitarz, the author of the authoritative version of Agenda 21, referred to when in 1992, at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, he stated:

“Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced — a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level. There are specific actions which are intended to be undertaken by multinational corporations and entrepreneurs, by financial institutions and individual investors, by high-tech companies and indigenous people, by workers and labor unions, by farmers and consumers, by students and schools, by governments and legislators, by scientists, by women, by children — in short, by every person on Earth.”

To put it another way, Sitarz is saying that there is no single person on the planet that won’t be effected by the implementation of Agenda 21. He chooses words such as “profound reorientation”, “major shift” and “unprecedented” to describe their own agenda! Does this not sound a little revolutionary?

At this point, one must ask the question, who gave these people the mandate to reshape society and “recast” our values toward the principles of “sustainability” and Agenda 21? What right do they have to tell us how and where to live, how much water to use, what we can and cannot eat, and what to do with our own property?

The answer is, of course, we did. We’ve been so pacified with TV, movies, celebrity worship, video games, gossip magazines, and a million other things that accomplish nothing, that we have not fulfilled our duties to govern our country. Now, we don’t like the results of leaving the process of government to the professionals. The truth of the matter is that we are living the consequences of our own acquiescence. We are reaping what we’ve sewn, and we are now being targeted for extermination.

Quoting again from the Rockefeller Commission,

“Population growth is one of the major factors affecting the demand for resources and the deterioration of the environment in the United States. The further we look into the future, the more important population becomes. From an environmental and resource point of view, there are no advantages from further growth of population beyond the level to which our past rapid growth has already committed us. Indeed, we would be considerably better off over the next 30 to 50 years if there were a prompt reduction in our population growth rate. This is especially true with regard to problems of water, agricultural land, and outdoor recreation. While the nation can, if it has to, find ways to solve the problems growth creates, we will not like some of the solutions we will have to adopt.”

To what potential solutions could Rockefeller and his cohorts on the commission have been referring? Could it have been the massive depopulation efforts that we are currently experiencing in the 21st century? Could they have been eluding to the poisoning of our air, water, and food supply? Could it have been the limitless wars, and orchestrated acts of terrorism? Perhaps, it was pre-born infanticide that they were referencing, as we’ve murdered over a million unborn children a year since the Supreme Court made its ruling on abortion the year after Rockefeller’s report on population was issued.

Chapter 5 of United Nations’ Agenda 21 says it this way,

“The growth of world population and production combined with unsustainable consumption patterns places increasingly severe stress on the life-supporting capacities of our planet. These interactive processes affect the use of land, water, air, energy and other resources. Rapidly growing cities, unless well-managed, face major environmental problems. The increase in both the number and size of cities calls for greater attention to issues of local government and municipal management. The human dimensions are key elements to consider in this intricate set of relationships and they should be adequately taken into consideration in comprehensive policies for sustainable development. … Population policy should also recognize the role played by human beings in environmental and development concerns. There is a need to increase awareness of this issue among decision makers at all levels and to provide both better information on which to base national and international policies and a framework against which to interpret this information.”

What are the specific details of the “population policies” inherent in Agenda 21? How is it that America was never told about this program to organize and/or eliminate life on planet earth?

The truth is that we’re not supposed to know because if the great unwashed were made aware of the plans to control every aspect of their lives, and to kill off a major portion of their numbers, they might find it somewhat objectionable.

The radical environmentalists, once on the fringe of extremist groups, have now been institutionalized into every area of governance, academia, and law, from the United Nations on down. And you and your children are targeted for mass extinction.

To those who care, you are implored to educate yourself and then become involved in the fight to stop this agenda, at a local level where the plans are being implemented.

And to those radical environmentalists who truly believe the planet would be better served if there were less humans living here, you should lead by example. The rest of us might find, after you’re gone, that you were right.

© 2007 Darren Weeks - All Rights Reserved

Related Article:
The Eco-Radicals' Real Motives


Darren Weeks is a life-long activist and researcher. A graduate of the Specs Howard School of Broadcast Arts in Michigan, he has been a professional radio and television broadcaster since 1991 and has used his influence to expose corruption in local government. It was through his career that he discovered the alternative media and awakened to the serious issues facing America.

In addition to his role as husband and father, Weeks hosts the Govern America radio program on the First Amendment Radio Network and is presently working on the creation of a public database of the international players that are behind the push toward the new one-world system.

E-Mail: darren@darrenweeks.net

Web site: www.governamerica.com