Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide Global Warming

Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?
By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007
Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the only one trying to make people open up their eyes and see the truth. But few listen, despite the fact that I was the first Canadian Ph.D. in Climatology and I have an extensive background in climatology, especially the reconstruction of past climates and the impact of climate change on human history and the human condition. Few listen, even though I have a Ph.D, (Doctor of Science) from the University of London, England and was a climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. For some reason (actually for many), the World is not listening. Here is why.
What would happen if tomorrow we were told that, after all, the Earth is flat? It would probably be the most important piece of news in the media and would generate a lot of debate. So why is it that when scientists who have studied the Global Warming phenomenon for years say that humans are not the cause nobody listens? Why does no one acknowledge that the Emperor has no clothes on?
Believe it or not, Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). This in fact is the greatest deception in the history of science. We are wasting time, energy and trillions of dollars while creating unnecessary fear and consternation over an issue with no scientific justification. For example, Environment Canada brags about spending $3.7 billion in the last five years dealing with climate change almost all on propaganda trying to defend an indefensible scientific position while at the same time closing weather stations and failing to meet legislated pollution targets.
No sensible person seeks conflict, especially with governments, but if we don't pursue the truth, we are lost as individuals and as a society. That is why I insist on saying that there is no evidence that we are, or could ever cause global climate change. And, recently, Yuri A. Izrael, Vice President of the United Nations sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) confirmed this statement. So how has the world come to believe that something is wrong?
Maybe for the same reason we believed, 30 years ago, that global cooling was the biggest threat: a matter of faith. "It is a cold fact: the Global Cooling presents humankind with the most important social, political, and adaptive challenge we have had to deal with for ten thousand years. Your stake in the decisions we make concerning it is of ultimate importance; the survival of ourselves, our children, our species," wrote Lowell Ponte in 1976.
I was as opposed to the threats of impending doom global cooling engendered as I am to the threats made about Global Warming. Let me stress I am not denying the phenomenon has occurred. The world has warmed since 1680, the nadir of a cool period called the Little Ice Age (LIA) that has generally continued to the present. These climate changes are well within natural variability and explained quite easily by changes in the sun. But there is nothing unusual going on.
Since I obtained my doctorate in climatology from the University of London, Queen Mary College, England my career has spanned two climate cycles. Temperatures declined from 1940 to 1980 and in the early 1970's global cooling became the consensus. This proves that consensus is not a scientific fact. By the 1990's temperatures appeared to have reversed and Global Warming became the consensus. It appears I'll witness another cycle before retiring, as the major mechanisms and the global temperature trends now indicate a cooling.
No doubt passive acceptance yields less stress, fewer personal attacks and makes career progress easier. What I have experienced in my personal life during the last years makes me understand why most people choose not to speak out; job security and fear of reprisals. Even in University, where free speech and challenge to prevailing wisdoms are supposedly encouraged, academics remain silent.
I once received a three page letter that my lawyer defined as libellous, from an academic colleague, saying I had no right to say what I was saying, especially in public lectures. Sadly, my experience is that universities are the most dogmatic and oppressive places in our society. This becomes progressively worse as they receive more and more funding from governments that demand a particular viewpoint.
In another instance, I was accused by Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki of being paid by oil companies. That is a lie. Apparently he thinks if the fossil fuel companies pay you have an agenda. So if Greenpeace, Sierra Club or governments pay there is no agenda and only truth and enlightenment?
Personal attacks are difficult and shouldn't occur in a debate in a civilized society. I can only consider them from what they imply. They usually indicate a person or group is losing the debate. In this case, they also indicate how political the entire Global Warming debate has become. Both underline the lack of or even contradictory nature of the evidence.
I am not alone in this journey against the prevalent myth. Several well-known names have also raised their voices. Michael Crichton, the scientist, writer and filmmaker is one of them. In his latest book, "State of Fear" he takes time to explain, often in surprising detail, the flawed science behind Global Warming and other imagined environmental crises.
Another cry in the wildenerness is Richard Lindzen's. He is an atmospheric physicist and a professor of meteorology at MIT, renowned for his research in dynamic meteorology - especially atmospheric waves. He is also a member of the National Academy of Sciences and has held positions at the University of Chicago, Harvard University and MIT. Linzen frequently speaks out against the notion that significant Global Warming is caused by humans. Yet nobody seems to listen.
I think it may be because most people don't understand the scientific method which Thomas Kuhn so skilfully and briefly set out in his book "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions." A scientist makes certain assumptions and then produces a theory which is only as valid as the assumptions. The theory of Global Warming assumes that CO2 is an atmospheric greenhouse gas and as it increases temperatures rise. It was then theorized that since humans were producing more CO2 than before, the temperature would inevitably rise. The theory was accepted before testing had started, and effectively became a law.
As Lindzen said many years ago: "the consensus was reached before the research had even begun." Now, any scientist who dares to question the prevailing wisdom is marginalized and called a sceptic, when in fact they are simply being good scientists. This has reached frightening levels with these scientists now being called climate change denier with all the holocaust connotations of that word. The normal scientific method is effectively being thwarted.
Meanwhile, politicians are being listened to, even though most of them have no knowledge or understanding of science, especially the science of climate and climate change. Hence, they are in no position to question a policy on climate change when it threatens the entire planet. Moreover, using fear and creating hysteria makes it very difficult to make calm rational decisions about issues needing attention.
Until you have challenged the prevailing wisdom you have no idea how nasty people can be. Until you have re-examined any issue in an attempt to find out all the information, you cannot know how much misinformation exists in the supposed age of information.
I was greatly influenced several years ago by Aaron Wildavsky's book "Yes, but is it true?" The author taught political science at a New York University and realized how science was being influenced by and apparently misused by politics. He gave his graduate students an assignment to pursue the science behind a policy generated by a highly publicised environmental concern. To his and their surprise they found there was little scientific evidence, consensus and justification for the policy. You only realize the extent to which Wildavsky's findings occur when you ask the question he posed. Wildavsky's students did it in the safety of academia and with the excuse that it was an assignment. I have learned it is a difficult question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the most important question to ask if we are to advance in the right direction.
Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project (www.nrsp.com), is a Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. He can be reached at letters@canadafreepress.comThis page printed from: http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming020507.htm

ARE AL-QAEDA AND RUSSIANS JOINED AT THE HIP?

ARE AL-QAEDA AND RUSSIANS JOINED AT THE HIP?

By Betty Freauf
February 1, 2007
NewsWithViews.com
On January 17, 2002 I wrote “Those Who Say Appease, Appease” are hung by those they tried to please. I explained how the Hegelian Dialectic is being used to bring people to consensus and how subtle it is to the novices. In the article I wrote that Communism was a perpetual philosophy and that it was not dead.
I have been troubled about President Reagan telling Mikhail Gorbachev to “Take down this wall” and it miraculously fell down as quickly as the building in Oklahoma City, the Twin Towers and Building 7 (that had not been hit by airplanes) which have always remained suspicious to me. I guess if there was no yellow police tape around those buildings, then they weren’t considered crime scenes. Ya, right! Check out prisonplanet.com for the rest of the story and watch the two- hour video “Terror Storm” narrated by Alex Jones on infowars.com
What later followed in the Soviet Union was a kinder, gentler coup. Gorby was not harmed. In fact, he was allowed equipment to produce a videotaped denunciation of his captors that he later released upon his return to Moscow.[1] After that he came out with an instant book about the failed August 1991 coup that netted him a reported $500,000 and the Reagans were playing host to the Gorbachevs at their ranch. The “Cold War” was a case of thesis v. antithesis= synthesis as described in my 1/17/2002 article noted above. Let’s face it, folks, the “freeing” of the Soviet Union was planned, not spontaneous.
If anyone would have said that by 1995, the “Master Manipulator” and former leader of the Soviet Union would have his Gorbachev Foundation at a former U.S. military base (the Presidio in San Francisco) and rubbing elbows with the rich and famous corporate executives who attend his “State of the World Forums,” no one would have thought it possible.
He’s also been paid lucrative honorariums to make appearances at college campuses where he receives standing ovations and he delivered a fund-raising speech for the National Republican Senatorial committee for which he was paid $70,000. Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Tx), the committee chairman, noted in a letter to Republican donors that Gorbachev “travels the world, fostering communication and diplomacy among all nations.” When Lenin was consolidating the Bolshevik revolution, he wrote how he could implement the Communist bureaucracy without hard-core Marxist believers. He would exploit the natural vanity and ambition on people to forward his agenda without them knowing what they were really doing. He called them “Useful Idiots? We find them both in elected positions and in the voting booth. [Read]
And awarding Gorby a Nobel peace prize for helping end the Cold War, was like one wag said, “ a little bit like bestowing the award on Hirashito for surrendering to the U.S. in WWII” and Rush Limbaugh added, “It was like giving Pharaoh a reward for letting the Israelites out of Egypt.” He has been given a new global pulpit as president of International Green Cross to promote his environmental issues and save Mother earth. Unlike the Marshall Plan, which helped European countries remain free from Communism in the aftermath of WWII, then President George H.W. Bush made sure the Soviets got billions in U.S. aid. In other words, the Communists again got the gold and the U.S. taxpayers got the shaft.
Michael Chertoff, a Russian Jew, was quick to rise to power and became head of Homeland Security. [Read] The Washington Times in January 2005 reported Chertoff was a federal appeals court judge and headed the Justice Department Criminal Division from 2001 to 2003, where he played a central role in the nation’s legal response to the September 11th attacks and helped craft the early “war on terror” strategy. Google Operation Northwoods or go to [Read]
Ex-KGB officer and defector Anatoliy Golitsyn in his book New Lies for Old said the Communist Party Central Committee of the Soviet Union, with implementing help from the KGB, secretly set in motion a long-range plan that is still playing out today. A key feature of this plan would be a whole series of controlled “splits” within the Communist movement and between Communist countries that the Kremlin strategists would use to manipulate Western policies. This was initiated at the 1960 Moscow Congress of 82 Communist parties from around the world. All genuine factions, splits, and power struggles within the Communist block were completely ended at that meeting. From that point forward, any such infighting between Communists, or any popular resistance against Communism, would be artificial and under the full control of the extensive secret-police networks permeating societies under Communist rule.[2] And now you know why the Berlin wall came down so quickly.
Mikhail Gorbachev’s perestroika (restructuring) and glasnot (openness) were another cruel joke on the Russian people. The KGB never gave up power. The market reforms in Russia were to appear more like America’s free enterprise system. Everyone was supposed to get a piece of the prosperity pie. They learned well from America. A concentration of ownership was put in the hands of a few wealthy, scheming, and well-connected “insiders” and the common folks in Russia are in dire straits today.
Remember the recent murder-by-poison of Russian KGB/FSB defector Alexander Litvinenko? In a 2005 interview with the Polish newspaper Rzeczpospolita, Litvinenko revealed that Ayman al-Zawahiri, the reputed Number 2 chief in al-Qaeda and the man second only to Osama bin Laden on the FBI’s “Most Wanted Terrorists” list, was trained by the Russian FSB. Since 9/11, al-Qaeda has become the new global menace, supposedly even more dangerous than the Soviet Union ever was. It certainly wouldn’t do to have it widely know that our “partner” against terror, Putin, and his FSB, are joined at the hip with the perpetrators of 9/11.[2] The plot thickens.
If all of this is true, is it possible that a similar scenario has been set up in the Middle East? Will all those factions soon get together and decide like the Communists there would be no more infighting? Will that mysterious Osama bin Laden that the media can always find but the military can’t, soon be found? Then they could all be united against America.
The neoconservatives in America, who are believers in intervention and “democracy” throughout the world, are behind this Iraq war. The original neocons were leftists to the core. Most were followers of Leon Trotsky, the revolutionary Communist leader who was expelled from Russian following a power struggle with Stalin in the 1920s. They didn’t like Stalin, but they did like the style of Communism advocated by Trotsky. In his 1995 book Neoconservatism, the author Irving Kristol, (father of William who currently presides over The Weekly Standard, and a regular guest on FOX news), proudly stated, “I regard myself as lucky to have been a young Trotskyite and I have not a single bitter memory.” As students of the Communist movement well know, Trotsky broke with Stalin in 1927 merely over which tactics would best succeed in achieving the world domination each sought… The Trotsky link provides a key to understanding neoconservatives.[2]
Many of the early neocons were Democrats. But in 1972, they were repulsed by the Democrat candidacy of George McGovern because of his isolationism and his embrace of the countercultural excesses of the New Left (drugs, free love, radical feminism, homosexuality, etc.) Bill Clinton, with his bushy head of curly hair, was a youthful campaign worker for McGovern. What they saw in the McGovern campaign propelled the early neocons to seek a new home in the Republican Party…and they were giddily accepted, not only by liberal Republicans but also by many anti-Communist GOP conservatives who seemed oblivious to the fact they were welcoming socialists and internationalists into their midst.[2]
They found they had a friend in Ronald Reagan when he courted them during his 1980 campaign and then gave several of them administration posts when he triumphed. Long on pleasing rhetoric but short on comparable performance, Reagan named neocon Jeane Kirkpatrick ambassador to the UN, and Richard Perle and Elliott Abrams were given posts in the Defense Department. Neoconservativism’s most prominent adherents want it to be linked to Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal socialism and, because of its rejection of “isolationism,” and to be further identified as a champion of meddling in the affairs of other nations. They praised Reagan for being “the first Republican president to pay tribute to Franklin D. Roosevelt.”[2]
Reagan had promised to abolish the Department of Education when he ran for president but after elected, Charlotte Iserbyt in her book Deliberate Dumbing Down of America told how he not only did not abolish that Department but he signed Education agreements with the Soviets. This information certainly should take the wind out of the sails of many GOP members who thought Reagan walked on water. Some mothers so idolized some of these traitors they named their children after presidents.
These interlocks certainly prove that politics does make strange bedfellows. In 2003, one Republican Congressman, who has never been swept into the neoconservative camp, addressed his colleagues in a speech entitled “Neoconned.” Dr. Ron Paul (R-Tx), who recently announced he would be running for President (no mention in the mainline controlled media), noted that replacing the Clinton Democrats with the George W. Bush Republicans “has not made a difference.” He attributed the lack of change to neoconservatives who had “diligently worked their way into positions of power and influence”. Among the modern-day neocons he named were Richard Perle, Elliott Abrams, William Kristol, Michael Ledeen, James Woolsey, Bill Bennett, Frank Gaffney, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld.
And while Congressman Paul did not mention former House Speaker, Newt Gingrich, a strong advocate for the Middle East war(s) and frequently being puffed on FOX, I fear he may be throwing his hat in the ring for President. His “Contract with America” helped produce huge Republican victories in 1994 and that is when even more federal aid to education, land controls, foreign aid, NAFTA, GATT (which became WTO), the Mexican bailout, the Export-Import Bank, the use of U.S. military force to “democratize” the world, the United Nations and whatever else would take America away from limited government and nonintervention was passed. Irving Kristol considered the stunning GOP success a neocon triumph. Another neocon, National Review founder, William F. Buckley, was also delighted and saluted Gingrich as a “greatly gifted” leader.[2]
Congressman Paul summed up the problem facing our nation:
“Neoconservatism is not the philosophy of free markets and a wise foreign policy. Instead, it represents big-government welfare at home and a program of using our Military might to spread their version of American values throughout the world.”[2]
In his speech, Paul condemned American Enterprise leader Michael Ledeen’s 1999 characterization of the attack on Pearl Harbor as a “lucky” event that led our nation away from neutrality. Ledeen had actually longed for another such event that could be used to entangle our nation in more overseas adventures. Paul also pointed to the Project for the New American Center’s hope expressed in 2000 for “a Pearl Harbor event” that he said, “Would galvanize the American people to support their ambitious plans to ensure political and economic domination of the world.”[2] I wonder how many of these neocons, who desire perpetual war, have put their children on the front battle lines?
Paul never accused neocons of support for or knowledge of the 9/11 events, but he stated very clearly that it has been used “to promote an agenda that strict Constitutionalists and devotees of the Founders of this nation find appalling.”[2] Paul has a strong belief in the Constitution and has a 100% Constitutional voting record, which makes him, according to Homeland Security guidelines, a terrorist. He is also a great friend of taxpayers’ associations.
Footnotes:
1, New American 9/24/10012, New American 1/22/2007
Also Read:
1, Is Communism Dead?2, Socialism must rest upon force3, 'Smart Growth' Or, dumbed down by consensus politicians
© 2007 Betty Freauf - All Rights Reserved
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Betty is a former Oregon Republican party activist having served as state party secretary, county chairman, 5th congressional vice chairman and then elected chairman, and a precinct worker for many years but Betty gave up on the two-party system in 2004 and joined the Constitutional Party.
Betty is a researcher specializing in education, a freelance journalist and a regular contributor to www.NewsWithViews.com

PLANNED SLAVERY

PLANNED SLAVERY

By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
February 5, 2007
NewsWithViews.com
In previous articles, I have referred to U.S. Minister to Austria John Motley's 1861 expose of a conspiracy to break apart the U.S., creating a Gulf Empire with "unlimited Negroes" (slaves) producing unlimited cheap products. The same principle of economic slavery is at work today in Third World countries and is not dissimilar to what John D. Rockefeller used in the late 19th century, as men literally underbid each other to obtain employment from monopolists in the U.S.
The influence of these elitists like Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and J. P. Morgan was tremendous, even to the extent of enslaving the press. John Swinton (editorial page editor of THE NEW YORK TIMES, 1860-1870) told journalists on April 12, 1883, that "the business of the New York journalist is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon....We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumpingjacks; they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men."
I have also written before how by the early 20th century, Rockefeller agents were in every hamlet in the land monitoring people, and how AMERICAN FABIAN editor W. J. Ghent said most men were "labor slaves." People were considered (and still are considered) "human resources" to be managed.
The Rockefellers have also supported eugenic programs. In the 1920s, Rockefeller money heavily subsidized the German Mental Hygiene Movement. And according to Arthur Caplan's edited 1992 volume on bioethics: "It was Dr. Alexis Carrel of the Rockefeller Institute and a Nobel Prize winner , who so loudly applauded the actions of the Germans and blatantly advocated mass murder of mental patients and prisoners."
In the 1930s and during the Second World War, Rockefeller's Standard Oil tankers were not attacked by the Nazis as were other tankers. And the German General Staff developed a secret plan for the fulfillment of Nazi goals beginning in 2 generations (1990s). High-ranking U.S. government official Sumner Welles described this plan in THE TIME FOR DECISION (1944) as involving gaining "a controlling influence in labor unions, in the banking world, in Chambers of Commerce, and, through these channels, an indirect influence in the press."
The extent of Rockefeller's control was growing so great that Robert A. Taft, after his defeat at the 1952 Republican National Convention, announced: "Every Republican candidate for President since 1936 has been nominated by the (Rockefeller) Chase National Bank." In that same year (1952), John D. Rockefeller III founded the Population Council, which was supported by Senator Prescott Bush (father and grandfather to future Presidents), and which supported population control measures.
By the 1960s, the Rockefellers had supported the development of the IUD, an abortive device which does not prevent conception but rather the implantation of the conceived child. And in August 1965, Rockefeller actually wrote Pope Paul VI as follows regarding the Catholic Church's lack of support for the IUD: "If I may speak perfectly frankly, the Church will be bypassed on an issue of fundamental importance to its people and to the well-being of mankind The flooding tide cannot be stopped or even slowed."
In 1973, David Rockefeller founded the Trilateral Commission, which has a logo that almost looks like three 6s (666) with a "peace" symbol in the middle. And 3 years later, in Bob Woodward's and Carl Bernstein's THE FINAL DAYS (1976), Rockefeller protégé Henry Kissinger is quoted as saying that military men are "stupid, dumb animals to be used" as pawns in foreign policy.
Four years later, when Ronald Reagan was nominated for President in 1980, Kissinger visited Reagan at the Republican National Convention and "persuaded" a reluctant Reagan to choose George H. W. Bush to be his Vice-president. In February 1988, David Rockefeller would acknowledge Bush to be one of their own. But so, too, was Bill Clinton, as in November 1992, Marc Tucker would write to Hillary Clinton that he was in David Rockefeller, Jr.'s office and they were celebrating Bill Clinton's victory.
As President Franklin Roosevelt revealed, nothing in politics happens by accident. Do you really think a peanut farmer from Georgia (Jimmy Carter) becomes President without being groomed as a member of Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission? Do you really think a traffic engineer (Mahmoud Ahmadinejad) becomes President of Iran without being a key supporter of the Ayatollah Khomeini, whose assumption of power was supported by Zbigniew Brzezinski, the first director of David Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission and President Carter's National Security Adviser? And do you really think a physics teacher (Javier Solana) becomes Secretary-general of the European Union (via Section 666 of the Europa Code, and has an office in a building modeled after an unfinished Tower of Babel) just by accident?
Solana (see "Caution: The Dialectic Process at Work" and "Javier Solana and The End Times") is part of Cecil Rhodes' plan "to take the government of the whole world," working with Rockefeller and others. When David Rockefeller was chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR, 1970-1985), its journal FOREIGN AFFAIRS in April 1974 published an article by Rhodes scholar Richard Gardner about how they would achieve their planned world order by "eroding national sovereignty piece-by-piece" and using GATT (including the World Trade Organization) to do it. The CFR was an outgrowth of Rhodes' plan, which also included Rhodes scholars.
During the 1992 presidential campaign, Gardner was adviser to Bill Clinton (Rhodes scholar) on U.N. matters. On January 13, 1993, Clinton nominee for Secretary of State Warren Christopher and Senator Joe Biden discussed how NATO could become a peacekeeping surrogate for the U.N. specifically to further the "new world order." Gardner was then appointed U.S. Ambassador not to England nor France nor Germany nor Russia, etc., but specifically to Spain, where Javier Solana was located. Rhodes scholar General Wesley Clark was made military head of NATO, and then Clinton, Strobe Talbott (number 2 at the State Department, and Clinton's Rhodes scholar housemate), and Gardner selected Solana to be political head of NATO. Within weeks of Solana's appointment, he signed on December 21, 1995, The New Transatlantic Agreement (see "Global Integration") with the U.S., furthering Rhodes' plan (as revealed by his Association of Helpers member P. E. Corbett in POST-WAR WORLDS) to form regional alliances which then could be linked into a World Socialist Government.
In previous articles, I have quoted David Rockefeller in his MEMOIRS admitting that he is part of a secret cabal conspiring to bring about a world government. Remember, he told Congressman William Dannemeyer that some men were born to rule, but most men were born to be ruled. This is the power elite's mindset. And in case you doubt that what the elite have planned for us is enslavement, just read the following quote (especially the last 2 sentences) from "Winners and Losers in the Information Age," published in the November-December 1996 edition of SOCIETY (one year after Solana's appointment) and written by Ian Angell of the London School of Economics (founded by the Fabian Socialists): "Individuals and companies are setting up large transnational networks that pay absolutely no heed to national boundaries and barriers....Those who rap themselves in the flag can soon expect to be buried in it....We can expect massive civil unrest and disorder....Government, like all other organizations, will have to survive economically on the efforts of an elite few----and no nation-state has an automatic right to exist....Governments will have no other choice other than to acquiesce to the will of global enterprise....As far as global enterprises are concerned, liberal democracy is an artifact...(which) will soon mutate into irrelevancy. It will be merely the means of governing the immobile and dependent social workers. That citizens elect their slave masters makes democracy slavery none the less....The masses will not win in the natural selection for dominance of an increasingly elitist world."
Are there any signs of slavery today? Just look at the January 26, 2007, Reuters column "N.Y. scanners spark union cries of 'geoslavery'." Then look at the January 30, 2007, WASHINGTON TIMES article "Prague to Curb Work Visas" with subscript "Koreans work in Czech factories under what one human rights organization has described as 'slave' conditions." And finally, look at the World Trade Organization (WTO) November 13, 2006, press release "WTO Announces Formalized Slavery Model for Africa," presented at the Wharton Business School in Philadelphia by WTO representative Hanniford Schmidt. If someone like Ronald Reagan had said this 25 years ago, he would have been pilloried. But have you seen any big outcry about this in the media or press? No. In fact, Schmidt was thanked for his macroscopic perspective by Dr. Laurie Ann Agama (director of African Affairs at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative).
Remember, the WTO has literally told the U.S. Congress which federal laws Congress had to change to comply with WTO rulings, and Congress has complied. Therefore, don't be surprised if one day in the future there is a WTO press release titled "WTO Announces Formalized Slavery Model for the U.S." That could mean slavery for you!
But, you say, the American people will never tolerate such (economic) enslavement. Well, let me explain how this works. First, you have Presidents and Congresses who facilitate the destruction of American jobs. For example, U.S. tax laws for a long time have said if a corporation relocates a factory overseas and repatriates its profits back into the U.S., the corporation has to pay taxes on those profits. But if the corporation keeps its profits overseas, they are not taxed! Could there be any greater incentive for corporations to destroy American workers' jobs and keep their profits away from the U.S.?
What might change this, of course, would be press and media publicity. However, the strategy of J.P. Morgan (mentioned earlier in this series in dealing with this is just as effective today. In March 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests began a strategy to control the most influential newspapers in the U.S. by purchasing them. Similarly, the Macquarie Media Group recently purchased for $80 million American Consolidated Media, which publishes 40 newspapers in Texas and Oklahoma that have opposed the TransTexas Corridor.

Macquarie Media Group is a subsidiary of Macquarie Group Australia, which also owns Macquarie Infrastructure Group. And this latter group is an investment partner with Cintra (of Spain) in a 99-year lease of the Chicago Skyway toll road and a 75-year lease on the Indiana Toll Road. Cintra will manage the TransTexas Corridor, and on January 11, 2007, President Bush nominated David James Gribbin (former division director for Macquarie in Washington, DC) to be general counsel of the U.S. Department of Transportation.

Don't count on Gribbin opposing Macquarie's or Cintra's efforts in the U.S. Don't count on the mainstream press or media exposing these efforts. And don't count on Presidents or Congresses to stop tax incentives for corporations to send American manufacturing jobs and money overseas, to stop outsourcing American high-tech jobs to people in other countries, and to stop foreign guest workers from taking American service industry jobs in the U.S. Given all this, the future economic enslavement of Americans is not an impossibility!
© 2007 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved
Order Dennis Cuddy's new book "Cover-Up: Government Spin or Truth?"
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political analyst, received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (major in American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy has taught at the university level, has been a political and economic risk analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior Associate with the U.S. Department of Education.
Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Cuddy has authored or edited twenty books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles appearing in newspapers around the nation, including The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He has been a guest on numerous radio talk shows in various parts of the country, such as ABC Radio in New York City, and he has also been a guest on the national television programs USA Today and CBS's Nightwatch.

EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE TYRANNY

EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE TYRANNY

By Michael J. ChapmanFebruary 3, 2007NewsWithViews.com
The United Nations Plan for Our Children
On September 10, 2003 in Prague at the International Conference on Education for a Sustainable Future, the United Nations declared 2005 through 2015, “The Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD).” To nobody’s surprise, the UN also named UNESCO (The United Nations Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organization) as the lead agency for this global effort. The official launch ceremony took place on March 1st, 2005 in New York City.[1]
Few Americans paid attention. They should have. On June 12, 2002, President Bush had announced that America would rejoin UNESCO and “…participate fully in its mission….”[2] According to UNESCO, “The Decade of ESD is a far-reaching and complex undertaking… that potentially touches on every aspect of life. The basic vision…is a world where everyone…learns the values, behavior, and lifestyles required for a sustainable future and for positive societal transformation.”[3]
Unfortunately for America, the “values, behavior, and lifestyles” that UNESCO requires for “societal transformation” run contrary to a Christian Worldview and American principles of liberty.
What is Sustainable Development?
The term “Sustainable Development” (SD) was introduced in 1987 at the World Commission on Environment and Development. Their report entitled, “Our Common Future” defined Sustainable Development as: “Meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”[4] Behind this noble sounding goal, however, was a radical agenda that had more to do with controlling the economy and society than sustaining development. [See Michael's DVD: Education For Sustainable Tyranny]
Our Common Future, for example, revealed that SD involves “…a progressive transformation of the economy and society (p.43), …international interdependence (p.47), …redistribution [of wealth] (p.50) …less material and more equitable growth (p.50-52), …ensuring a sustainable level of population (p. 55), …merging environment and economics in decision making (p.62); …and a new ethic that will include the relationship between man and nature above all (p.71). Clearly there is more to SD than simply good stewardship of natural resources.
At the September 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development, un-elected “representatives of the peoples of the world” adopted a document called, “Agenda 21,” and called it the global roadmap for SD implementation.[5] The Chapter Titles of Agenda 21 reveal the extent of government control necessary to implement SD, including goals to: Change Consumption Patterns; Promote Sustainable Human Settlements; Plan & Manage All Land Resources, Ecosystems, Deserts, Forests, Mountains, Oceans, Fresh Water; Agriculture; Rural Development; Biotechnology; Ensuring Equity; an increased role for Non-Government Organizations (NGOs); and even define the role of Business and Financial Resources. All this was to be accomplished on a global, national, and local scale.[6]
Since freedom-loving people would never willingly submit to such totalitarian control, education became the “key” to sustainable development. Chapter 36 of Agenda 21, called Education, Public Awareness, and Training, made clear an intention to integrate Agenda 21 into ALL curriculum as a de facto international education standard.
America’s Sustainable Development Education Standards
Is ESD part of the plan for American education? According to Dr. Robert Paige, President George W. Bush’s first Secretary of Education, the answer is “YES!” On October 3, 2003, celebrating our new partnership with UNESCO, then-Secretary Paige addressing the UN Round Table on Education explained: “The United States is pleased to return to UNESCO… There and here, we agree that we must make education a universal reality. Our governments have entrusted us with the responsibility of preparing our children to become citizens of the world. … UNESCO…knows the importance of education on a global level by coordinating the Education for All initiative (EFA). EFA is consistent with our recent legislation, the No Child Left Behind Act.[7] (emphasis added) In other words, the United States and UNESCO’s goals for education are one in the same and mandated through No Child Left Behind.
In fact, ESD has been a goal in America for many years. To save space, I’ll connect the dots only as far back as 1990 - the year President Bush Sr. endorsed UNESCO’s EFA Initiative and promised implementation by the year 2000. (America 2000 was written by the National Governors’ Association, chaired by then Governor, Bill Clinton.) In June 1993, as President, Bill Clinton signed an executive order creating the President’s Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD). In 1994, the PCSD published “Education for Sustainability: an agenda for action,” calling on educators “to serve society by fostering the transformations needed to set us on the path to sustainable development.”[8] That same year, the EFA/ESD goals became President Clinton’s “Goals 2000,” establishing the framework for our National Standards, Curriculum, and Assessments. All 50 states adopted Goals 2000 in order to receive the funding that came with it.[9]
Today, President Bush’s No Child Left Behind (NCLB) holds states “accountable” to implement their previously signed agreements. States and districts that refuse to “align” their standards, curriculum, and assessments with these so-called “world-class standards” will lose federal funding. NCLB requires full implementation by the end of 2014 – which just so happens to be the final year of The United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. What a coincidence!
The US Department of Education carefully insulated themselves from critics of this radical agenda by funding tax-exempt, non-government organizations (NGOs) to do their dirty work. Sometimes an NGO is several layers removed from its true funding source. For example, the Education for Sustainable Development Toolkit, published through the University of Tennessee in July 2002, was “made possible by a grant from The Waste Management Research and Education Institution,” (an NGO funded by the US Department of Education).[10]
According to the Toolkit: “From the time sustainable development was first endorsed…in 1987, the parallel concept of education to support sustainable development has also been explored. …Initial thoughts concerning ESD were captured in Chapter 36 of Agenda 21…”[11] One goal the Toolkit holds for education is: “World Citizenship: A Global Ethic for Sustainable Development” defined as “encompassing the constellation of principles, values, attitudes and behavior that the people of the world must embrace if sustainable development is to be realized.”[12]
ESD, Global Citizenship, and America’s National Curriculum
Promoting World Citizenship over National Sovereignty is now Official US government policy for education. Evidence may be found by looking at The Center for Civic Education (CCE) – an NGO funded by the US DOE in 1994 to write America’s “National Standards for Civics and Government.” The CCE and its model Civics textbook, “We the People,” continue to be specifically named and funded by No Child Left Behind.[13] (All publishers are now rewriting their textbooks to conform to the official model.)
To illustrate their mission, the CCE posted an article on their website called: “Teaching Democracy Globally, Internationally, and Comparatively: The 21st Century Mission of Schools.” It explains: “In the past century, the civic mission of schools…was education for democracy in a sovereign state…. In this century, by contrast… education will become everywhere more global…. And we ought to…improve our curricular frameworks and standards for a world transformed by globally accepted and internationally transcendent principles….”[14] (Emphasis Added)
In other words, education is no longer about preserving liberty based on American principles, but transforming America based on international principles.
The international “constellation of principles, values, attitudes, and behaviors” that our children “must embrace” are imbedded in today’s curriculum and divided into three major themes as explained in Agenda 21, the US Agenda for Action, and the US ESD Toolkit: They are: Sustainable Environment, Economy, and Society. [See: DVD Liberty or Sustainable Development]
Sustainable Environment – A New Global Ethic
The “sustainable environment” education standards are captured in “The Earth Charter,” commissioned by the UN in 1987 and approved by UNESCO in March 2000. Claiming to represent “the values and principles for a sustainable future,” it is actually an Earth-centered religious treatise carried to schools throughout the world in a mock ark-of-the-covenant called, “The Ark of Hope.”[15] The four sides of the ark carry depictions of the four pagan spirits: Earth, Wind, Fire, and Water. Mikhail Gorbachev, who participated in writing the Earth Charter, said: “My hope is that this charter will be a kind of Ten Commandments, a ‘Sermon on the Mount,’ that provides a guide for human behavior.”[16]
In the United States, the tenets of the Earth Charter are included in the ESD Toolkit, including its goal of “a shared vision of basic values to provide an ethical foundation for the emerging world community.”[17]
One good example of the “new Earth ethic” is, “Dear Children of the Earth,” a popular children’s book written as a letter from Mother Earth. Heavily illustrated with mystical paintings of animals, children are frightened into believing people are a cancer and threat to the sustainability of the planet. The text, under one illustration of a dying Rhinoceros, explains: “The animals have told me, ‘We are worried, Mother Earth. We are afraid because our homes are being destroyed by people who don’t know better, or don’t care. …Tell me, my children, where will the animals live when my forests are gone? Where will the whales and dolphins swim when my oceans are too dirty to live in?”[18]
Likewise, mainstream textbooks include such scare tactics based on questionable science. For example, one popular second grade textbook celebrates Earth Day by asking second graders: “How would you feel if there were no trees?”[19] Another popular fifth grade social studies textbook parrots the dying-earth theme by summarizing: “The Earth needs your help…we are all children of the Earth. It does not matter what country you look at. We are all Earth’s children and we should treat her as our Mother.”[20]
Do these lessons have an effect on our children’s worldview? A recent St. Paul Pioneer Press “letter to the editor” from a second-grader indicates the message is taking root: “The black rhinoceros is becoming extinct because of us. …When we cut down trees to build homes for us, we are destroying homes that were already there. Some people say, ‘why should we help save the black rhinoceros?’ I say because to me they are no more or less than we are. …The animals are dying 1,000 times faster than they would be if it were just plants and animals in the world.”[21] So much for this 7-year-old’s self-esteem lessons!
Sustainable Economy - Toward a Socialist Global State
The threat of environmental catastrophe is used to justify global governance including a planned economy. Children are indoctrinated to accept total control through biased economic lessons in their social studies texts. Compare the positive language describing government control over the economy to the negative language describing free-market systems:
Under a lesson on Stalin: “An economy completely controlled by government is called a command economy. Within just 20 years the Soviet Union became one of the world’s strongest industrial nations. Thousands of railroad lines crisscrossed the country, linking towns and cities that had never been connected before.”[22]
Castro’s Cuba: “For some people life became better under Castro’s communist dictatorship. There is less poverty since Castro gained control.”[23]
Mao’s China: [Next to a picture of Mao surrounded by cheering peasants]: “The Communists...had become very popular…. The Communists also worked with farmers, showing them ways to produce more crops… They provided housing, medical care, and food supplies for city workers. They supported education for all, along with equal rights for women.”[24]
American Economics: “Understanding Imperialism: The chief motivation behind imperialism is usually economic gain. Powerful nations can establish new markets for their manufactured goods…. Despite the importance of economics, Americans usually cited other reasons to justify their imperialism. Many Americans believed that they had a right and obligation to extend what they considered their superior culture to people less fortunate than themselves.”[25]
Under a Cartogram depicting America controlling most of the world’s wealth: “Do you remember how imperialism affected countries in Africa and Asia?
The natural resources and labor from those countries helped build the strong economies of…North America…” Although the countries of the world are linked by interdependence, not all of them share equally in the world’s riches.”[26]
The message for our children is: True economic success comes from government control, but in America, success came from imperial aggression. Missing are the failures of socialism. McMillan’s, The World Past and Present, for example, ends a lesson on the Soviet Union by asking 7th graders: “How do people in Moscow recycle some products?” [Teachers answer:] “Torn stockings are used to stuff pillows or to scrub dishes; milk cartons take the place of pots and pans.”[27] Apparently, these measures were not the result of economic failure, but an ecologically conscious Soviet citizenry!
Are these lessons having an effect? According to the National Center for Education Statistics report, “What Democracy Means to Ninth-Graders,” the answer is YES:
84.2 percent of 9th-graders now believe it’s the government’s responsibility to set prices.
63.5 percent believe government is responsible for “reducing differences in income and wealth among people.”
58.6 percent now believe government must “provide an adequate standard of living for the unemployed.”[28]
What’s frightening is that the US Dept. of Education considers these “attitudes” correct answers, and identifies them as “international principles of democracy!”
Sustainable Society – Global Interdependence
The ultimate goal of Education for Sustainable Development is to prepare children to accept the total transformation of America under global totalitarian control – for the good of all. A popular McMillan 7th grade teachers’ edition explains the methodology used to build understanding toward the goal: “A growing awareness of deep national and international interdependence is vital… [This book] systematically builds students’ understanding of the economic, cultural, political, and ecological connections among peoples.”[29] Here are some social studies lesson examples from a variety of grades and publishers:
2nd Grade Silver Burdett and Ginn Teacher’s Edition: “Why is the Earth one community? …Second graders develop a sense of being involved with other people and of the earth being everyone’s global home.” [30]
4th Grade Houghton-Mifflin: “To be a community, people must share the same customs and have some common purpose…. You also belong to the world community. …The things we share in our world are far more valuable than those which divide us. …What might ‘global village’ mean? Ask [students] to find out more about the idea of a ‘global village.’…[31]
5th Grade Houghton-Mifflin: “Today, the debate over how land is used involves the entire world.”[32]
7th Grade McMillan, Teachers’ Edition: “Encourage students to think of such possibilities as government or voluntary agencies to regulate the sale of land, size of factories, hours of labor, supervision of children, etc. Discuss all possibilities.”[33]
5th-9th Grade Constitutional Rights Foundation Curriculum: “The police power also allows the government to restrict the use of property…or force an owner to give up his or her land under the exercise of eminent domain…. Governments sometimes use the power of eminent domain to protect the environment. Taking land for environmental reasons generally falls under two categories: (1) controlling pollution and (2) preserving natural areas.”[34]
By following the book sequence, one may easily see how students are programmed to respond, “Yes” to world citizenship and prepare to accept new principles. For example, the textbook demotes America’s Bill of Rights as an antiquated “document of the eighteenth century, reflecting the issues and concerns of the age in which it was written.”[35] The lesson then promotes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as “positive” rights and the next phase in mankind’s social evolution.[36] Although the entire Universal Declaration of Human Rights is contained in the appendix, the textbook fails to teach what it says about the source of human rights in contrast to America’s Declaration.
According to America’s Declaration of Independence, our Founders understood the self-evident truth that “all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights….” Therefore, they recognized the primary function of government was to protect those inalienable Creator-given rights. The Universal Declaration by contrast, limits Human Rights to an enumerated list, and then gives government the power to take them away. According to Article 29.3 “These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.” In other words, under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, man – as represented by a United Nations global government – becomes god!
Once government becomes our god, citizenship takes on a new meaning. According to the CCE, “citizenship” is defined as “the status of being a member of a state, one who owes allegiance to the government.”[37] NOT allegiance to the principles of liberty – but allegiance to government – the new source of our rights. That was exactly Hitler’s definition of citizenship! According to the CCE, “civic virtue” now means: “The dedication of citizens to the common good, even at the cost of their individual interests.”[38] …Even at the cost of liberty.

Are these lessons taking hold? One distraught mother showed me her daughters test response to the question: “Is the United States a ‘sovereign state?” Her “correct” answer: “Yes; because our government has absolute authority over the citizenry.”[39] Our children – America’s future citizens, voters, and government officials – are being prepared to accept total government control in the name of “sustainable development!”

20 million American children have now graduated from the Center for Civic Education’s program of indoctrination. Many Christian schools have also adopted the “We the People” textbooks - unaware. The warnings of scripture are clear: While we were sleeping, the enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat. Our Founders sacrificed their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor to give us our liberty. Don’t let the torch of freedom flicker and die on our watch! Wake up oh sleeper and strengthen what remains... before it’s too late!
Footnotes:
1, Education for Sustainable Development2, President Bush's speech to the UN General Assembly, Sept. 12, 20023, Education for Sustainable Development4, Our Common Future; World Commission on Environment and Development, [no date] Oxford University Press, New York, see Chapter 2, "Towards Sustainable Development" p. 43.5, The Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development, September 4, 2002, UN Agenda Item 13, p. 1.6, www.un.org7, www.ed.gov/news/speeches/2003/10/10032 0038, Education for Sustainability; 1994; US Gov. Printing Office; ISBN 0-16-048783-8, Introduction.9, For a detailed analysis of international agreements implemented in the United States, see America's Schools: The Battleground for Freedom, by Allen Quist. Chaska Minnesota, EdWatch, 2005, especially pp. 57-63, ISBN 0-9675196-4-0 [available through edwatch.org].10, see www.esdtoolkit.org and follow the funding link.11, McKeown, Ph.D., Education for Sustainable Development Toolkit; University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN; Version 2, 2002. (Available at www.esdtoolkit.org)12, McKeown, ESD Toolkit, p. 22.13, National Standards for Civics and Government; Center for Civic Education, Second Printing 1997, Calabasas, California: see inside cover: "Funded by the U.S. Department of Education and The Pew Charitable Trusts"14, Patrick, Indiana University, Bloomington, June, 2003; www.civiced.org/articles_Patrick_global.pdf p.1-2.15, See www.arkofhope.org16, LA Times, May 8, 199717, McKeown, ESD Toolkit, p. 23.18, Schimmel, Dear Children of the Earth; Northword Press, Inc; Minocqua, Wi, 1994, 19, Living in Communities, Teacher's Edition; 1995 Silver Burdett Ginn; Morristown, NJ, p.20720, This is My Country, Teacher's Edition; 1994; Houghton Mifflin Company; Boston, MA, p. 343.21, St. Paul Pioneer Press; Monday, December 1, 2003, opinion page22, World: Adventures in Time and Place, 1997, Macmillan/McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 538.23, The World Past and Present, Teacher's Edition, 1993, Macmillan/McGraw-Hill, p. 649.24, World: Adventures in Time and Place, p.552.25, A More Perfect Union, 1991, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, p. 534.26, The World Past and Present, p. 660.27, The World Past and Present, p. 663.28, What Democracy Means to 9th Graders, US Results From the IEA Civic Education Study, US DOE, NCES 2001-096, 2001, p.6229, The World Past and Present, Teachers Edition, 1993, p. T15.30, Living in Communities, 1995, p. U6-C.31, This is My Country; HMSS Teachers' Edition, Boston, 1994, p. 334 & 336 margin.32, America Will Be, Houghton Mifflin, 1994, p. 9233, The World Past and Present, p.285.34, The Challenge of Governance, p. 30.35, We the People, p. 20736, We the People, p. 208 [book #4]37, National Standards for Civics and Government, Appendix C, Glossary "citizenship" p. 151.38, We the People, Glossary under: "civic virtue", p. 266.39, Chapter 1 Quiz on "Role of Government" - 7th Grade, Sept. 2002, Golden Valley Public School, question #6.
© 2007 Michael J. Chapman - All Rights Reserved
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Michael J. Chapman is an author, education researcher, and founder of American Heritage Research. Comparing his unique rare-books collection with current curriculum, Michael proves how widespread the censorship of American Heritage really is!
Michael has spoken at various state and national education conferences from Maine to California - including the Education Policy Conference in St. Louis, the Council on National Policy in Washington D.C, and National Eagle Forum Leadership Conference with Phyllis Schlafly; He has given workshops to staff at Focus on the Family, The Association of Christian Schools International (ACSI), The Minnesota Association of Christian Home Educators (MACHE), and The Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod in Minnesota.
Michael has lately been sounding the alarm regarding the true agenda behind the so-called "Education for Sustainable Tyranny" declared by the United Nations in 2005.
E-Mail: RAH98@hotmail.com
Web-Sites: AmericanHeritageResearch.com andEdWatch.org

THE MORAL COMPASS OF THE NATION PART 1 of 2

THE MORAL COMPASS OF THE NATION PART 1 of 2

By Bill BarnsteadJanuary 24, 2007 NewsWithViews.com
Before my days as the Chairman of the Republican Party of Massachusetts (during the Nixon era); and even long before the nominating committee of the Men's Club of my church asked me to assume the role of president of the organization (during the Eisenhower years) I was consciously aware that I lived in a nation with a strong moral compass. I was proud to be an American. Every citizen of this great nation—native or naturalized—was, too. We proudly wore our patriotism like a badge of honor. We may have been Baptists, Congregationalists, Catholics or Pentecostals, and we our families may have come from Ireland, England, Poland, Italy, China—or Mexico or Russia, but first and foremost, we were Americans. Not hyphenated Americans, or "universal" Americans from one of the American continents. We were distinctly US Americans—and we were proud of that distinction.
What set us apart from the rest of the world was not just America's affluence. Affluence comes from investing sweat equity in nation-building. What set us apart from the rest of the world was our moral compass—our belief in a Supreme God, and the lifestyle associated with right living. The needle in the moral compass of America pointed reverently towards God and to pious consideration of our fellow man—regardless of his station in life. We gauged our fellow man not by his financial net worth, but rather, by his moral compass: his integrity and honesty, his trustworthiness and moral cleanliness, and finally, his bravery and loyalty.
This is the yardstick by which most of us measure our friends. But, for some unknown reason we don't apply that same yardstick to those we elect to public office. Does it not make sense to "hire" mayors, Assemblymen, Congressmen, Senators, federal judges, governors and Presidents who possess the same qualities we expect in our friends? Why are we content with politicians who lack integrity, and who sell us out for 30 pieces of silver whenever they accept legal bribes that, with tongue-in-cheek, are referred to by the mainstream media as campaign contributions? Million dollar campaign war chests are merely favors waiting to be repaid—at the expense of the taxpayer.
Integrity and honesty. When we think about moral compasses, we instinctively measure family and friends with the same yardstick we use to gauge ourselves. We instinctively expect those we entrust with our friendship to be trustworthy because we, who were instilled with the attributes of Christian values and morality from our youth, are trustworthy. Do we not have the right to expect those same "good citizen" qualities in our elected officials? Not only do we have a right to expect it, we have a patriotic obligation to demand it.
About ever two years or so we can usually, in complete candor, say something like: "We've just experienced the uncovering of several cases of misconduct on the part of our appointed and elected officials. As citizens and good Christians we should have risen as one in righteous wrath and threw them out of office. But, we didn't. What did we do? Our apathy took over, and we decided it was someone else's responsibility." In point of fact, addressing the congregation at my local church on one such occasion, that is pretty much what I did say. It's like dé-já-vue. Whenever you open a newspaper or turn on the TV, its the same story replayed over and over again—only with a different name, a different face and a different political party. The only thing that remains the same is the small cadre of lobbyists and/or industrialists, businessmen and bankers doling out the bribes.
Political cronyism. Lack of integrity. Graft. Bribery. Deceit. Lack of trustworthiness. And most of all, greed and the lust for power. These men (and women) have no moral compass because the nation itself no longer has a moral compass. Let me cite a couple of examples.
On July 30, 2005 Congressman William Jefferson [D-LA] met with Lori Mody at the trendy Ritz-Carlton in northern Virginia just across the Potomac from Washington, DC. At the conclusion of their meeting, they walked to Mody's car in the hotel parking lot. She popped the trunk and handed Jefferson a leather briefcase containing $100 thousand in $100 bills. The money was to be used to grease the palms of some Nigerian officials in a deal supposedly concocted by Mody. The money was marked. Mody was an undercover operative for the FBI. Video camcorders in the room recorded the deal and four strategically-placed camcorders in the parking lot recorded the transfer of the bribe. Four days later FBI agents raided Jefferson's Capitol Hill home and found $90 in marked bills, wrapped in aluminum foil and stuffed into plastic frozen-food containers, in his freezer.
What makes the Jefferson incident most interesting is not that one more corrupt politician accepted a bribe. What makes it newsworthy is that, after being caught—and videotaped taking a $100 thousand bribe—the voters of the 2nd Congressional District of Louisiana elected Jefferson to his 9th term in Congress. Not only does Jefferson not have a moral compass, nor apparently do the voters of the 2nd District. Even more appalling, because Jefferson had to stand in a special run-off election against State Rep. Karen Carter on Dec. 9, he was applauded by the the Democrats when he showed up at the 110th Congress was sworn in. Democrats as a whole, it appears, have no moral compass.
On May 18, 2006 the GOP-controlled Congress launched an investigation into reports that lobbyist Jack Abramoff had given Congressman Bob Ney [R-OH] $50 thousand to play with at one of the Indian casinos in exchange for favorable treatment for the Coushatta Indian casinos. On Aug. 7, 2006 Ney withdrew from the GOP House race. On Sept. 15, 2006 he pleaded guilty to charges of accepting a bribe. On Nov. 3, 2006, four days before the election, he resigned his congressional seat. Ney was sentenced to 30-month and the slim GOP majority in Ohio rejected what they viewed as the Republican's moral lapse.
Zachary Space, the Democratic candidate for Ney's seat beat Ohio State Senator Joy Padgett by a margin of 62% to 38%. Most Ohio Republicans in the 18th District stayed home. They couldn't vote for Space and wouldn't vote for Padgett. Where Democrats don't believe accepting a bribe is grounds for removal from office, the GOP leadership removed Ney from his leadership role in the House and forced him to drop out of the 2006 House race. That was the difference in the moral compasses of the two parties.
While on the surface it looked like the voters' rejection of Padgett was a rejection of the GOP's lack of moral character. However, locals had reason to believe that Padgett's moral compass was, itself, in question. Many of the protest GOP "non-votes" in the 18th Congressional District knew that Padgett and her husband got a business loan for $737 thousand through JP Morgan Chase Bank and renegotiated a 3-year $100 thousand loan and then, 14 months later, filed for bankruptcy on their business followed, 8 months later in their filing personal bankruptcy. In the interim, the Padgetts transferred ownership of family property to Joy Padgett's brothers to keep the property out of the bankruptcy. In addition, the Padgett's sold their client list to a North Canton, Ohio company for $129 thousand—and kept the proceeds out of bankruptcy. Padgett's moral compass was also broken.
The largest majority of the American people, and most certainly the mainstream media, believe the moral compass of the nation was broken on June 17, 1972 when covert operatives paid by the Committee to Reelect President Nixon broke into the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate Hotel. The reality is that the moral compass of the nation began to disintegrate with the assassination of John F. Kennedy on Nov. 22, 1963.
On the morning of the day that Kennedy was assassinated, the US Senate Rules Committee chaired by Senator B. Everett Jordan [D-NC] was investigating the Vice President of the United States. The investigation was taking place in a secret session brought about by Attorney General Robert Kennedy's investigation of Bobby Baker after Kennedy discovered firm ties between Baker and several Mafia bosses who were doing business with Johnson.

As they were listening to testimony from insurance executive Don B. Reynolds, the Senators were unaware that the nation had just been stunned by the loss of John F. Kennedy who had just been shot in Dallas, Texas. Because Jordon sealed the hearing, no one on the Senate Rules Committee was allowed to leave the room. Nor was anyone allowed to enter. There were no phones in the room, so no one knew that JFK had been killed.

Nor did they know that man they were investigating had just become the President of the United States. Reynolds told the committee that he personally saw Bobby Baker give Johnson a suitcase containing what he was told was $100 thousand. The kickback, he said, was for LBJ helping Baker with a lucrative deal in Fort Worth. Reynolds also revealed that in 1950 Johnson and Baker purported helped Intercontinental Hotels Corporation get some casino licenses in the Dominican Republic for Mafia bosses Meyer Lansky and Sam Giancana. When the casinos opened their doors in 1955, Johnson and Baker were invited as official guests of the syndicate. For part 2 click below.
Click here for part -----> 2,
© 2007 Bill Barnstead - All Rights Reserved
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Bill Barnstead is a Boston businessman and former Chairman of the Massachusetts Republican Party. Bill has been a solid supporter of the GOP for over 45 years and has been a major contributor of the Republican party and Republican causes. He is currently disillusioned with the GOP and George W. Bush. The old warrior is now speaking out.

THE MORAL COMPASS OF THE NATION PART 2 of 2

THE MORAL COMPASS OF THE NATION PART 2 of 2

By Bill BarnsteadJanuary 24, 2007 NewsWithViews.com
In 1962, Baker 'serving as Vice President Johnson's chief-of-staff' formed Serv-U Corporation. Serv-U provided vending machines to companies who had received substantial federal grants. The vending machines were manufactured by a company owned by Giancana. The companies receiving "free money" from Uncle Sam were pressured to use vending machines recommended by the Vice President of the United States..
Had Kennedy not been assassinated that day, Johnson would have followed Ulysses S. Grant's vice president, Schulyer Colfax into the halls of political infamy. Johnson should have been the second veep to resign from office under a cloud. Instead, Nixon's vice president, Spiro Agnew, became that person. Had the information the Senate Rules Committee was sitting on leaked out, Lyndon Johnson would have been the first president removed from office by impeachment. To help his new boss—and guarantee that LBJ couldn't fire him—FBI Director Hoover convinced Senator Jordan that the Johnson files were safer with him. Hoover then gave the files to LBJ—but not before he copied it.
The moral compass of the nation has rapidly decayed from that point—but not as fast as the character of the men the American people allowed into the White House without first requiring them to pass a litmus test for integrity. As the size of the campaign war chests grew from 1976 to 2006 so did the indebtedness of our political candidates to the transnational industrialists, bankers and merchant princes who filled them. Their benefactors are men without moral compasses who are fighting to dissolve America's borders in order to create a world economy solely to increase their personal fortunes at the expense of the American taxpayers.
Of our last seven presidents, only two—Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan—could successfully pass the moral compass litmus test. Reagan and Ford had the moral character that Americans expect but seldom see in their leaders. Two presidents—Nixon and Clinton—were morally bankrupt. Articles of impeachment were drawn up on both. Both should have been removed from office. Four—Carter, Clinton, Bush-41 and Bush-43—sold out the American people to the barons of business and banking who filled their campaign coffers. Of the four, Carter was inept—and the most dangerous since he sold out his own Christian principles for power. He was not a leader but a bumbling puppet who, on the orders of the puppetmasters of Utopia, helped depose the Shah of Iran and hand that country over to radical Islam. Carter's CIA helped overthrow the pro-American Nicaraguan government of Anastasio Somosa in favor of Marxist Daniel Ortega. But his coupe de grâce was the giveaway of the Panama Canal that is now under the control of the People's Republic of China. Carter remains a willing puppet of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Clinton was a dandy whose appetite for power was second only to his appetite for women. It would not be much of a stretch to say that Clinton traded his moral compass for a box of condoms early on, and never missed his own lack of moral character. Clinton committed two crimes against the people. First, he committed a felony by accepted millions of dollars in illegal campaign contributions from the People's Republic of China. Second, he betrayed the people of America by surrendering America's consumer markets to a country desperate for enough money to build an arsenal of nuclear weapons sufficient to destroy America.
Clinton was sandwiched between the two Bush presidencies. Bush-41 attempted to legitimize the term "the New World Order," and Bush-43 has been doing his best to bring it into existence. Bush-41 came in under the radar as the vice president of the nation's most popular president. Conservative America viewed George Herbert Walker Bush as Reagan-Lite, and gave his moral compass only a cursory glance. If George Herbert Walker Bush was okay for Ronnie, he was okay for himself. America failed to realize that Bush was not a running mate Reagan would have picked himself. He was forced on Reagan by to the puppetmasters at the pinnacle of power—the New World Order-in-waiting. And Reagan made them wait—a quarter century. Reagan's brand of democracy set the globalists back 25 years. During the Reagan years the moral compass of America reflected a newfound patriotism, and the gradual rebirth of a semblance of moral character during the 80s almost made us forget the sexual decadence of the 70s.
Christian conservatives saw the Election of 2000 as an opportunity to bring Reaganism back to the mainstream of American politics. Texas governor George W. Bush seemed to epitomize the integrity of Reagan. Conservative America elected him in the closest presidential race since 1876. It was a historic race that was settled by the US Supreme Court.
During his first term, George W. Bush remained an icon of Reaganesque patriotism. Memories of Bush, standing on the smoldering ruins of the World Trade Center warning the Islamic terrorists that we were coming to get them were still fresh in the minds of the American people when they went to the polls in 2004. As the 1993 NAFTA jobs drain to Mexico continued unabated throughout his first term, Bush-43 promised to protect the small business owners of America since job growth and prosperity in the United States had to come from them.
Those memories were also fresh in the minds of Americans expecting the prosperity that began during the Reagan years to continue forever. But Bush-43 was not Reagan-Lite—he was Clinton-Lite. Concealed behind the Reagan facade was a Rockefeller Republican whose elections were financed by the Rockefellers. His goals in 2005 were no longer the Reaganesque goals of 2001, they had evolved into the utopian, one-world goals of the Rockefeller Foundation and the Council on Foreign Relations. A world without borders. A nationless hegemony of global communities welded into a new world order.
The climate of America changed radically in 2005 as the American wage earner faced a new threat. Illegal aliens. As the American taxpayer demanded the government obey its own laws and round up and deport the illegals, Bush-43 promised to get tough. Then he proposed an amnesty that would legalize upwards of 15 million illegals. The American people demanded the president seal and protect the borders to keep illegals out of the United States. Bush promised the voters he would. But, just as quickly he broke his word. Congress funded a 700-mile wall to keep illegals out of the country. But Democrats, expecting to win the White House in 2008, insisted on giving the President (whomever he is) the option to defund the wall and spend the money on other border-related projects—like funding water stations along the most common routes taken by the illegals through the deserts of the American Southwest.
Stuck in Congress now is a new amnesty bill—and one that will grant Social Security benefits to illegals. The American people saw this as a betrayal by President George W. Bush. Those jobs that had not been exported to Mexico through NAFTA were now in jeopardy of being handed to illegals as the average wage of the American worker plummeted. Adding insult to injury, as Congress voted to dilute the paychecks of America's working middle class by granting special status to the illegals that will drive down the incomes of those jobs, it also voted to raise the minimum wage. Bush lost his moral compass. Sadly the moral compass of the nation is determined by the man who resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

The Election of 2006 was more than just a repudiation of a president who tarnished the mantle of the Reagan legacy. It was a repudiation of globalism. It was a repudiation of unsecured borders. It was a repudiation of amnesty for illegal aliens. But most of all, it was a repudiation of an Administration that sold it's soul for 30 pieces of silver. That is the reason the voters could not overlook the corruption by Republicans when they ignored even worse corruption by Democrats. Conservatives are supposed to be the good guys. They are required to have integrity—and all of the other Christian qualities that are needed to make good citizens.

No man—not even the President of the United States—can serve two masters. A president who accepts the gratuities of those who are tearing down the walls of sovereignty to build a new world order run by them cannot be loyal to his own moral compass or his citizen constituents. Presidents—like Clinton, Carter and Bush-Lite—who are unfettered by conscience and have no moral compass to guide them, find the grey areas that allow compromises born out of necessity without qualms or twinges of conscience. As he sacrificed his moral compass, Bush changed a nation. Sadly, he changed it for the worse. As it's leader goes, so goes the nation. For part 1 click below.
Click here for part -----> 1,
© 2007 Bill Barnstead - All Rights Reserved
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Bill Barnstead is a Boston businessman and former Chairman of the Massachusetts Republican Party. Bill has been a solid supporter of the GOP for over 45 years and has been a major contributor of the Republican party and Republican causes. He is currently disillusioned with the GOP and George W. Bush. The old warrior is now speaking out.

OF MEN AND APES

OF MEN AND APES

By Jim R. Schwiesow
January 15, 2007NewsWithViews.com
There are those, thanks to our educational hierarchy and many of the educated morons of our scientific community, who believe that the human species has a direct lineal connection to a lovesick amoeba, which oozed from a primordial soup and morphed from its primitive one-cell state into a series of ever ascending species of creatures, until at last it came into that wonderfully bipedal human form of being with a brain of capabilities, which far surpass our most sophisticated computers. The wonder here is how supposedly intelligent people could embrace such an absolutely ignorant supposition, while at the same time rejecting the Biblical account of creation. These people seem to be living proof that Darwin’s hypothesis was reversed; it is men who turn into monkeys. That can be the only explanation for such convoluted rationally incomprehensible thinking. Or could it be that the thinking is not irrational at all, and that this is a part of a master plan for the complete subjugation of the people by a new world order?
That the foundation of this nation was based upon Biblical principles cannot be denied. This contention can be argued against, it can be attacked by demagogues, and the unknowledgeable, misinformed, and uninformed can deny it, but the cold hard fact is that it is supported incontrovertibly. Even a cursory reading of the Declaration of Independence, the preamble to the Constitution, and the Constitution itself contradicts any other argument or conclusion. The great majority of our founding fathers understood God’s Word, and believed in God’s Word. And they put His word to practice in their lives.
We have come to the most critical times in the history of our nation. We are witnessing a carefully planned program of social engineering, which is being carried out by an increasingly despotic government and the internationalists thereof. The nation is rapidly being immersed in a depraved satanic system. For the government to carry out this program for the total subjugation of a once free people it is necessary to dull the senses of the people and instill in them a totally false system of beliefs. They must be dumbed down and made compliant.
One of the key elements of the program to bring about a slavery to a socialistic system is to destroy the people's faith and belief in a sovereign God. It is infinitely easier to control one who believes that his existence is the result of a biological mutational accident and that it is the ancestral blood of apes that courses through his veins, than it is to bring under subjection one who has an absolute faith that he was wonderfully created in the image of his creator, Almighty God. Certainly one who believes that he owes his very existence to the great God who breathed into him life and that his spirit is of God and by God, and that he was created as a free agent with an ability to chart his own course in life is not easily controlled. That Satan has succeeded wildly with his platform for disinformation and control is evident when we look at our nation today and assess the extent to which we have been deprived of our liberties and subjugated to a despotic ruling elite. We are being controlled by corporations, fascists, internationalists and communists, all birds of a feather and brothers under the skin who share to a great extent the same ideology and the same goal, which is a new world order.
The Tower of Babel is well on the way to reconstruction, and this time God is not going to come to earth and disrupt the process. We see today in many of the world’s leaders an incarnation of Nimrod. And we are also witnessing much success in the perversion of the human soul by human agents who promote the agenda of the powers and principalities of the air. This success in corrupting the people has to be gratifying to those who lead the way to that new world order. That they have succeeded in dumbing down the people cannot be denied. And that they have corrupted and desensitized the human psyche likewise cannot be denied. The national conscience has been seared.
Jay Leno has, with great success and hilarity, pointed up the stupidity of our new generation with his famous man on the street segments, during which he randomly selects individuals of both sexes and asks them relatively simple questions. The answers are uproarious, and at the same time pathetic. The people that he selects cannot answer the most simple of questions, and their improvisations often times cause convulsive laughter, which dissipates into dismay at the ignorance displayed. That the segment is a comedic success for Mr. Leno cannot be questioned, but what it says about the nation is profoundly pathetic.
This domestic ignorance is the product of the social engineering of the one world elite's, who occupy strategic positions in our educational hierarchy, which enables them to ensure that our youngsters will move into society without the ability to understand even the most basic of concepts. If they cannot reason, they cannot question. They simply take up space and follow blindly the direction provided by the elite's who direct them along paths, which lead in the wrong direction. Real knowledge had been replaced by superstition, myth, and occultic tripe. Too many of our young cannot read, they cannot write, and they cannot think. They walk through life like programed zombies contributing only to the collective ignorance of the nation.
What has happened to the soul of this nation? If our values and our morals are a reflection of that soul we have progressed to a most execrable state of being. Over the course of the last thirty-two years, forty-seven million three hundred thousand babies have been cold-bloodedly murdered. They were delivered into the hands of medical executioners, who murdered many of them in the most heinous of ways. Living babies fully developed with beating hearts were stabbed in the head and their brains were suctioned by mentally diseased sociopath How were these murders justified by the women who delivered them up to the executioners? If your answer is that it was done to save a mother’s life you are miles away from the truth. The truth is, as verified, by those who sought a medical abortion of their babies, that these murders were done for expedience or convenience. Seventy-five percent of those who were queried said that a baby would interfere with their work, school, or other responsibilities. If their mothers had felt likewise, these women wouldn’t be around to worry about work or the responsibilities of life.
The sanctity of human life means nothing to the social engineers who are guiding our destiny in the most depraved way. Their perspective on a human being is strictly from a biological viewpoint. They have no more regard for a human life than they have for the life of an animal. In fact it has been proven time and time again that they exhibit more compassion for animals than they do for human beings. To them a human being is just another primate of limited value. If a person’s parts are showing some wear get rid of the person to make way for another. This kind of thinking has had a profound affect on medical ethics in our nation. A new breed of cats called bioethics has come upon our national scene. They have undermined the Hippocratic oath and have redefined life and death. They have made great strides in making forced euthanasia a part of our new national culture. Their guiding light is Darwinism. They embrace this half-baked hypothesis in the same manner that Hitler embraced it, to justify the killing of the infirm and the disabled.

And their methods are most horrible to contemplate. They kill their victims slowly and with great suffering and pain. Their work was highlighted nationally with the recent legal medical murder of Terri Schiavo. If a dog were to be put to death by starvation and dehydration, the perpetrator of that act would be prosecuted and incarcerated. When a human being is put to death in such a horrifying manner it is with the approval of the courts and with the blessing of the system. The fact that medical practitioners can be found to carry out so inhumanely the taking of a helpless human life is a commentary on the depths to which this nation has fallen.

If the putrescence that we are witnessing today in society is just a small sample of things to come in a new world order, we have to contemplate the future of our children and grandchildren with great anguish. But, such is the future that we build for them with our complacence and failure to deal with those who lead us down the path to destruction.
I’m through, and I‘m sick.
© 2007 - Jim R. Schwiesow - All Rights Reserved
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Jim Schwiesow is a retired sheriff with 46 years of law enforcement service. He served with the Unites States Army with the occupation forces in post war Berlin, Germany, and has a total of nine years of military service, which includes six years in the U.S. Army Reserve.
His law enforcement service includes: three years in the military police, fifteen years as an Iowa municipal police officer, and twenty-eight years as the duly elected sheriff of Sioux County, Iowa.
Jim has written a number of articles, which have been published in various professional law enforcement journals.

WARNING: THE END OF AMERICA AS WE KNOW IT IS AT HAND

WARNING: THE END OF AMERICA AS WE KNOW IT IS AT HAND

By Greg Evensen
February 5, 2007
NewsWithViews.com
The Patriot's Preamble
"Let it be known far and wide that American Patriots will come together in the year 2007, to unite the citizens and statesmen of the Republic of the United States of America. They will gather with the purpose of maintaining our nation's sovereignty, to reinstate our Constitutional and Natural Rights, and to free the American people from institutional servitude. They will come to pursue this course with Honor, Dignity, and Courage, while acknowledging that unless God keeps our nation and guides her steps, we will have labored in vain."
The United States of America and its citizenry has been assessed, warned, plotted against, and sold out by internationalists in government, business, and the banking industry. Its workforce has been decimated, its standard of living shredded and its working people made financial slaves through unjust taxation, socialist government practices, rules and regulations at all levels in society that would make any communist dictator grin with envy.
Our role as partners in governmental affairs has been reduced to a whisper that is not heard by any elected official anywhere—with very, very few exceptions. Our representative government has become 535 regional dictators who live a life of luxury, self-importance and as arrogant master over the populace. The congress of the United States has carefully exempted itself from virtually all repressive laws they choose not to adhere to and have given themselves retirement pensions, health care and other perks, the rest of us can only dream of. They have become the Duma (Soviet Parliament) types who exemplify nothing other than crass selfishness at the expense of every American working citizen.
The Bush Administration has been pursuing a blending of Canada, America and Mexico into the “North American Union.” They have done it under the cover of governmental darkness. They have been running a race as to how fast they can manipulate our great nation into a “no going back” strategic position with these other two nations. The president and his cabal of sell-out White House/Congressional turncoats have intentionally kept the American people in a state of confusion (war on terror, etc.) so that organized resistance to this national sovereignty killing plan can not be formulated. Business and banking interests are salivating at the thought of trillions of dollars in “free trade” being exchanged throughout North America.
The cultures of Canada and Mexico are not that of the United States and its citizens. A disaster of Biblical proportions is on its way WHEN this plan is forced upon our nation. It is only one of several scenarios that are nearing completion and will spell the absolute end of the United States as we know it. Some will argue that the USA needs drastic overhauling and that this is the natural result of “planned obsolescence” in American culture. There are huge problems that must be addressed (www.heartlandusaparty.org) now by the American public, or the last opportunity to do so under “open and free” conditions will be lost. There is no more time to talk this sorry state of affairs to death. Decisive and uncompromising action must be taken. Here is what I suggest to my fellow victims:
TAKE THIS BULL BY THE HORNS AND PUT IT ON ITS BACKSIDE
Unless you accept that this country is in its LAST days, you will continue to shake your heads and laugh at all who have written week after week on NewsWithViews.com and others to help you realize just how much will SOON be lost to our nation forever. You will be counted among those who were as responsible as the complicit socialist Washington government for our national demise precisely because you were intentionally ignorant. The power through information written by authors of brilliant and inciteful backgrounds has given a massive amount of data that could have and should have made a difference in your lives, your interest in government actions, and a marvelous treasure chest of debate justifications when you discuss these issues with others.
There is NO TIME LEFT for you to take the luxury of non-involvement. You will face a time when you will give an account to your family as to why you couldn't or wouldn't take the time to educate yourself about your nation’s sacred history. You will stand alone as the verdict comes in that you were negligent in NOT preparing to protect and care for your family and friends during military government (Martial Law) because of a “terrorist” attack, financial/stock market collapse or any other number of possibilities real or contrived that gives the government the justification for arrest and indefinite incarceration in detention camps already built for you and your loved ones. THEY ALREADY EXIST!! These detention/ re-education camps are for those who aren't willing to submit to the new global order that is about to be established.
Precisely because you are uninformed and intentionally ignorant, you will blindly board the truck that takes you to your likely last destination. You will trust the government to help you one last time. Some of you will stumble around the camp looking for your welfare check, prescription drugs or how you can contact the nearest legal defense or ACLU attorney so that you can take the camp commander to court for mistreatment. You, who I have just described, deserve a detention camp. “…..may your chains rest lightly upon your wrists.”
All of us MUST take responsibility for what is coming. Many of us have adamantly fought against the rising tide of a police state government. We are losing badly. NOT because we don’t care, NOT because we haven’t tried, and certainly NOT because we haven't committed to resisting this complete sell-out of the Founders dream for this nation and its people. We are failing because YOU have not protested at the school board meetings, the city council chambers, the county commission boards and the state and federal legislatures while you still have freedom of speech. Because, out of indifference or fear, you have not stood up to this criminal neglect and criminal actions against our constitution, these elected sell-outs have sensed your negligence and have had the boldness to give America away to the highest bidder.
You have allowed the Federal Reserve to “regulate” our currency into a mountain of debt and steer the dollar into oblivion. You have allowed Congress to abandon gold and silver and encouraged the mighty international consortium of bankers to call every political policy in Washington. You have allowed presidents and representatives to subvert our constitution to the point of irrelevance because many of you who were constitutional experts would not challenge these republic killing “laws” at their source or in the courts. Above all, you have allowed yourself to be compromised when serving on the jury, a good example is how a brainwashed jury convicted 2 innocent border agents for shooting an illegal drug smuggler.
Many of you in the medical field have believed your own myth building lifestyle that suggests you are some type of god that sells pharmaceuticals like snake oil to unsuspecting people who can neither understand nor challenge your control of their lives, let alone afford the drugs that they “needed.” You have refused to endorse less expensive, natural remedies that could have made the critical difference for some or avoided the pain and expense of chemo “cures” for cancer in others that in most cases only prolonged the agony of those buying in to your version of medicine. There is a movement to ban natural vitamins and you are silent there, as well.
You business owners who scammed the public or charged obscene prices for your products, and then squeezed the worker and his family into poverty, take a short second place in shame to America’s bankers. The oldest professions in the world are not prostitution or politicians, but bankers. You alone shoulder the responsibility along with the Federal Reserve for bankrupting America’s families and our nation’s financial system. Jail for individuals mentioned here is kind compared to a hangman’s noose in my view.
Regardless of the cause or the effect, America is on her knees. She is a haggard old woman unable to understand who she used to be. No longer are the strong arms of brave young men and women able to help her to her feet. There is no one left who knows this original America or cares.
I appeal to my friends in the law enforcement community.
Whether you are serving now, retired, or were in short of full retirement, the burden has fallen to you. There is no time left to muddle this about. The nation needs you now and will in the near future. When I left law enforcement, I never had to sign a statement giving up my oath. I did not give up that oath to defend America from all enemies—foreign and domestic—when I left the military. I have no intention of abandoning America now, in her time of ultimate peril. I have stood in that great gap. I have been shot at. I have fought for my life along a lonely stretch of highway against tall odds to bring in two or three wanted fugitives. I have tracked the killers through dark fields and deserted farmhouses. I have held the dying and comforted them to the end. I am no hero, just someone dedicated to seeing to it that as many as possible do not have to face a horrible police state America, where those older, traditional police officer—peace officers—big men with big hearts were the ideal of our communities, no longer exist.
All people from all walks of life are invited, encouraged, and desperately needed to attend our two day summit in KC this summer. I believe it to be one of the last best chances to make a real, long lasting difference in our nation. We may fail, but we will surely at least give our very best. I am asking our newly formed “Centurions for America” organization to stand with me and other gallant police officers from all levels of service to come to Kansas City. I am asking these great men and women to absolutely promise that they will not submit their badge and their oath to a criminal element masquerading as government officials. I ask that all of you help these men and women assume their last great roll call assignment as defenders of their communities against crime and criminal activity from WHATEVER source. If those of you who were trained to serve and protect, fail in this coming confrontation with world-wide forces of evil whose only goal is the destruction of America and her people, then indeed, the fight has been lost.
Winston Churchill said it best when he declared in a speech to the British Parliament in 1943, “you may have to fight knowing that there is absolutely no chance for success and you will surely not survive, but to live on as a slave is a far worse fate.” Where will you stand my law enforcement friends? When the government moves against its people to institute martial law or implement a “North American Union,” or sign on to the United Nations World Government, will you let our communities and beloved homes be sold to international elites? My heart says NOT EVER!
Let’s agree to stand together as necessary and in the manner in which our nation requires us to stand. Not government politics nor embedded traitors dictates, but the needs of our constitution, our Declaration of Independence with its new relevance for our time, and for the dedication of hundreds of thousands of soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines, coast guardsmen, merchant marines and police officers at all levels who have answered the call and given their all so that you and I, our children and grandchildren could be free. It is to them that I humbly say, “yes, sir, I am reporting as needed.” Fellow Americans, you are needed NOW. Get involved, NOW. Call these arrogant self-serving, liberal bureaucrats and DEMAND change NOW. Show up at the city and county meetings where your community is being fenced in around an Agenda 21 model that will kill private property usage and ownership. Don't be fooled into accepting an unelected, unaccountable county manager who doesn't represent you, but rather serves the good-ol-boy system. Keep your county commissioners, who are elected and accountable to we, the people.

Don't count on your church leadership to expose evil and save America. They have compromised their principles for money and relationship building and can no longer discern evil. Jesus said when salt loses its savor it is to be trodden underfoot. Pastors have lost their savor, and in the process, have lost their backbone and the love for their fellow man. They fear IRS more than God.

Finally, ask Almighty God to bless your efforts, protect you and your family from the evil, and as Churchill also said in England’s darkest hour, “NEVER, NEVER, EVER GIVE UP.” America is worth every effort we make fellow lawmen, even unto death. Let’s stand together now and win the battle by the force of truth, conviction of a righteous cause, and with the help of our friends and fellow citizens, in a powerful and persuasive show of solidarity in defense of a free and honorable America.
What do cockroaches and evil in people have in common? When exposed they both run for cover. Political Correctness is the cloak that protects evil. And remember that Truth is hate to those who hate the Truth.
Any questions? E-Mail me at: gevensen@up.net
© 2007 Greg Evensen - All Rights Reserved
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
Greg Evensen is a former long time highly decorated Kansas lawman who travels the nation speaking about the law enforcement officer’s role in American society. He has organized the 2007 Heartland Constitutional Summit to be held in Kansas City this summer. All are welcome and all may participate.
Greg offers a special invitation to police officers from all jurisdictions to attend. Sheriff Richard Mack is a featured speaker along with three other well known American Icons who will share their vision along with Greg as Americans gather to help revive and reinvigorate America toward the goal of a free and prosperous, sovereign nation.
Website: HeartlandUSAparty