Saturday, November 22, 2008

Obama's position on abortion is more extreme than any pro-abortion Democrat


By Dr. Patrick Jonston

November 16, 2008

Uncle Tom was the figure in Harriet Beecher Stow's famous novel Uncle Tom's Cabin. Instead of resisting the enslavement of his race, he helped his slave-owners maintain their control over the lesser field slaves. Uncle Toms would be useful in mistreating and punishing the other slaves, and would receive preferential treatment for it.

Obama's an Uncle Tom.

Obama has officially consorted with Planned Parenthood in the slaughter of millions of black babies, and in office he plans to expand the reach of the child-killers. In July of 2007, Obama told Planned Parenthood that the first piece of legislation he would sign would be the Freedom of Choice Act, a bill that would invalidate virtually all abortion limits approved by state legislatures in all fifty states. All partial birth abortion bans, all parental notification laws, virtually all state legislation that has decreased the amount of abortions would be overturned by Obama's bill. In fact, the Freedom of Choice Act would see the closing of Catholic and other religious or private hospitals. This legislation would remove any conscience-clause measures from state laws that protect doctors, hospitals, and medical professionals who don't want to be involved in abortions.

Obama's position on abortion is more extreme than any pro-abortion Democrat. As an Illinois State Senator, he publicly defended infanticide, the killing of living, breathing babies who survived late-term abortions. Even Hillary Clinton voted for the Born Alive Protection Act, the legislation in the U.S. Senate that was akin to the Illinois legislation that Obama opposed. He is a strong supporter of Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion killing organization in the world.

Planned Parenthood's founder, Margaret Sanger, was an advocate of eugenics who coined the term "birth control". Her views were very extreme, and yet Planned Parenthood, the recipient of hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer funding, has never repudiated her, but continues to honor her and even distributes an annual "Margaret Sanger Award" to supporters. Margaret Sanger advocated birth control and, if necessary, forced sterilization for those deemed unfit for reproduction. She believed that African Americans were an inferior race that required white masters to control and subdue them for the betterment of civilization.

Margaret Sanger wrote of her dependence upon African-American ministers and social leaders in order to succeed in her "Negro Project" mission to exterminate the black race. In essence, she needed some Uncle Tom's. She said, "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members... I note that you doubt it worthwhile to employ a full-time Negro physician. It seems to me from my experience ... that, while the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors, they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table, which means their ignorance, superstitions and doubts. They do not do this with white people and if we can train the Negro doctor at the clinic, he can go among them with enthusiasm and ... knowledge, which ... will have far-reaching results among the colored people."

Barack Obama is the Uncle Tom of Planned Parenthood and Margaret Sanger, who had as their mission to "exterminate the Negro population." So are all the African-American Christian ministers who turned a blind eye to Obama's extreme pro-abortion views and endorsed him because of the color of his skin. Racists and Uncle Toms, all of them. The injustice of slavery and other forms of fatal discrimination could never continue without the likes of them.

What hypocrisy for Obama to claim to champion the dream of African Americans since the time of colonial slavery, and yet lead the way in slaughtering more African American babies than ever! For every two African American women that get pregnant one will choose to abort. A black baby in America is five times more likely to be killed in the womb than a white baby. Even so, that's not enough dead black babies for Barack Obama.

The preborn child is Obama's "nigger-slave" - the dehumanized expendable human being whose rights are to be ignored and who is to be exploited and destroyed for the profit of the powerful.

At Least Obama May Make Republicans Act Like Conservatives Again

It is my hope that, in response to Obama's election, conservatives in Congress will begin to act like conservatives instead of Republicans. Remember, it was under Clinton's executive leadership that we saw the Contract of America and welfare reform in Congress. With a liberal in the White House, Republicans act like the conservatives they claimed to be on the campaign trail. The G.W. Bushs and the John McCains in Washington, D.C., have all but ruined the Republican Party, with their endorsement of a larger centralized government, their funding of Planned Parenthood, their unjustifiable pre-emptive invasion of Iraq and incessant war-mongering, their welfare expansions for seniors and the poor, their proposals for amnesty for illegal immigrants, and their free-trade globalism that has exported our manufacturing base and resulted in the loss of three to four million jobs. Bush has an approval rating of 25%; Reagan and Clinton left office with ratings more than twice as high. I am convinced that Obama's electoral landslide was not so much of an endorsement of his socialist economic plan that wreaks of Communism, his pro-gay marriage, pro-abortion, liberal fanaticism, but Obama's election resulted from a popular desire to "throw out the rascals" in office.

As evidence, consider the gay marriage bans passed in Florida, Arizona, and California. In these three states, support for the gay marriage bans was greater than the support for the Republican candidate for President. In California, homosexual activists outspent the pro-family advocates more than 2-1 and Obama won the state by more than a million voters, yet still the state overwhelmingly voted to ban gay marriage. Also, in Arkansas, voters passed a law barring adoption for same-sex couples. Obama's election was more of a repudiation of the neo-conservativism of the Republican Party under G. W. Bush than it was an endorsement of Obama's Marxist plan for America. The Democrats didn't win because of their ideas, but rather, the Republicans lost because they acted like Democrats.

Bracing for Obama's tyranny, and preparing for the revolution.

Don't despair, my fellow conservatives. Remember, we thought the world was going to end when Clinton was in office too. We deserve the spanking coming because we have not been true to our own principles of life, individual liberty, and limited government. We must brace ourselves for Obama and the Democratic congressional majority's assault on Christianity and our constitutional liberties. Prepare for the government to outlaw homeschooling and spanking. Prepare for public speaking against homosexuality to be prosecuted as hate speech. Prepare for an expansion of gay rights and gay marriage at the federal level.

Prepare for Obama to increase taxes on ammunition and guns and incrementally ban them. Prepare for Obama to grant amnesty to the 12 to 20 million illegal immigrants in America. Prepare for legalization of physician-assisted suicide nationwide. Prepare for the most extreme leftist bureaucrats and judges in the land at all levels of government. Prepare for more job losses, as taxes will be raised on the top 5% of wage-earners who already carry 60% of the U.S. income tax burden. Prepare for an increase in social security taxes and in the taxes necessary for Obama's universal healthcare plan. Prepare for federal funding of human-embryo-killing stem cell research. Prepare for economy-choking regulations of America's businesses in try and fend off "global warming."

Prepare for the U.S. to become the most pro-abortion nation on earth.

Don't despair. Keep faith in God, stand for the right, do justly, pray hard, take names, buy guns for Christmas and teach your children to shoot them well. There may be a Revolution coming.

© 2008 Patrick Johnston - All Rights Reserve



By Cliff Kincaid

November 22, 2008

The American people may be losing their jobs and savings, but on Friday night, on the eve of the international financial summit, they provided President Bush and other G20 leaders a lavish banquet that included $300-a-bottle wine, Vermont Brie, eggplant fondue, and rack of lamb. Details of the “culinary delights” and “sumptuous feast” provided to the politicians who departed their black limousines were included in wire service stories. They were toasting the demise of America as a global economic and military superpower and planning to loot another trillion dollars from U.S. taxpayers.

Stories about the feast can only cause rising anger in the United States. A C-SPAN moderator on Sunday morning, hosting a discussion of the growing financial crisis and taking calls, himself commented that there was a lot of anger out there. One caller mentioned taking up arms against the government over the looting of the taxpayers.

We have seen the people react this way in the past to proposals for Congressional pay raises and illegal alien amnesty. But the growing anger over the endless series of taxpayer bailouts is getting louder and louder. In response to the stories about the lavish G20 banquet and my own columns on the growing financial crisis, I received this email:

“I just finished reading the menu that I and the US Taxpayers just bought these idiots and thieves. $300 bottles of wine? Racks of lamb? (Does the image of Nero fiddling while Rome burns come to mind?) What if Bush had announced that the menu was going to reflect the seriousness of the situation? Maybe a great minestrone soup and some good Carlo Rossi red? Show the world that he (Bush) was serious about caring for our money. I realize it doesn’t make a bean’s worth of difference in the whole budget but when do we, as taxpayers, get any respect? Personally I resent more and more everyone associated with my government. And especially the country club Republicans that Bush (I was fooled) and [Treasury Secretary Henry] Paulson represent. I may have to lay off two good guys this coming week. I’m sure they will understand that the President had to keep up the image to all these ‘important’ people and that the King of Saudi Arabia and the Premier of China and assorted other international flotsam enjoyed their largesse.”

By the way, Carlo Rossi red is a California wine that goes for about $6.99 a bottle. It apparently wasn’t good enough for the global elite.

In a development that attracted the attention of some media, the U.S. agreed at the conference to the establishment of “supervisory colleges” by March 31, 2009, to monitor “all major cross-border financial institutions.” It is the beginning of a new global regulatory body that could eventually impose and collect a currency transactions tax known as the Tobin Tax, named after the late Yale University economist, James Tobin. Such a tax, which could affect stocks, mutual funds, and pensions, could generate hundreds of billions of dollars a year.

But ignored by most of the media was the fact that buried in the “declaration” endorsed by Bush and other leaders meeting on Saturday was (Point number 14) support for the United Nations Millennium Development Goals, “the development assistance commitments we have made,” and a reaffirmation of “the development principles agreed at the 2002 United Nations Conference on Financing for Development in Monterrey, Mexico, which emphasized country ownership and mobilizing all sources of financing for development.”

This language may sound vague or confusing. But to those familiar with the U.N. and its conferences and the Millennium Development Goals, it all makes perfect sense. This is a commitment to devote 0.7 percent of the Gross National Product to official foreign aid, a plan envisaged in President-elect Barack Obama’s Global Poverty Act. It will cost $845 billion, to be recovered in whole or part through a global tax. The phrase “all sources of financing for development” is U.N.-speak for global taxes.

In addition to his Global Poverty Act, which could pass Congress in a lame duck session or after President Obama takes office, the Jubilee Act is also being pushed for the benefit of other nations of the world. It would cancel as much as $75 billion in debt owed by foreign countries. The total of the two measures is $920 billion.


It is no coincidence that one of Obama’s personal representatives to the G20 meeting was former Republican Rep. Jim Leach, a left-winger who not only gave a speech backing Obama at the 2008 Democratic National Convention but is a long-time collaborator of the World Federalist Movement. This is a group that favors global taxes to finance world government.

Leach is clearly hoping for an appointment from Obama as the new U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, where he could help implement the Millennium Development Goals.

To demonstrate how the media view all of this, Washington Post columnist Sebastian Mallaby on Thursday devoted a column headlined “Supersize the IMF” to the idea that the global financial institution known as the International Monetary Fund should get a massive infusion of American taxpayer dollars as well. He argued that the U.S. and other governments should triple their financial commitments to the IMF.

Mallaby, who doubles as director of the Center for Geoeconomic Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, didn’t put a price tag on this. But it was clear that he believes the more money the better. “A bigger IMF should be on its [the Obama Administration’s] agenda, he said.

Meanwhile, now that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has admitted that his $700-billion plan didn’t work out as planned, some in the media are acknowledging that they helped stampede the Congress into passing it.

On his CNN Reliable Sources show, Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post asked his colleague Steven Pearlstein, “Wasn’t there a prevailing drumbeat that this package had to pass?” The reply: “I was, I guess, part of that drumbeat. It did have to pass.” Pearlstein added, “You know, the Congress and the government had to do something to get liquidity moving in the financial system. There’s no playbook for how to do this in a situation like this. People are making it up as they go along. And so we really shouldn’t be surprised that they tried something, it doesn’t work. They try something else, maybe it works. They’re throwing a lot of darts at the wall.”

But since it didn’t work and Paulson changed the plan, Kurtz asked, “Where is the journalistic outrage here?” It’s a good question. The only outrage I can find is coming from the taxpayers.

For his part, Pearlstein’s new column, “Toward a New International Capitalism,” includes no apologies over his central role in what has happened. Instead, he hails the arrival of a new era in which America “can no longer expect to dominate the institutions of international finance and will have to share power and influence with rapidly developing countries…”

In other words, America has been cut down to size and the beneficiaries are those who were always jealous of her wealth and power. The result will not only be less U.S economic power but the diminution of American military power. One will inevitably follow the other, especially if more U.S. manufacturing industries go bankrupt.

This isn’t “international capitalism.” It’s the victory of global socialism. The stage is perfectly set for the U.S. presidency to be occupied by a revolutionary Marxist.

“We are the world” is coming true.

© 2008 Cliff Kincaid - All Rights Reserved



By Selwyn Duke
November 16, 2008

In all my life I have never seen such intense emotion surrounding a leader as that evoked by Barack Obama. Even Ronald Reagan, the Gipper himself, didn’t enjoy the kind of prostration of the will offered to the president-elect by hordes of followers. Yet, while people the world over are imbued with “hope” and chant Obama’s slogan “Yes, we can!” – for instance, the French are using their translation of it, “Oui, nous pouvons!” – some of the intense emotion is of a very different species.

It is fear.

In all my life I have never seen an American politician who could make so many Americans’ blood run cold. Some may mention the left’s feelings regarding Reagan or President Bush, but there is no equivalency. For all of leftists’ bluster and melodrama, they weren’t afraid of those men as much as they, well, just hated them. Sure, leftist ideologues said those two Republicans were scary, but the same people also said that each one was both dumb and Machiavellian. Hatred is an emotion, and emotion isn’t logical; it just conjures up whatever feels right at the moment.

In Obama’s case, however, I sense a real, palpable, go-white-in-the-face fear akin to what might be evident in someone who has a gun put to his head or believes he has seen a demon. I know for instance, a stout-hearted man of rough-hewn breeding and my political persuasion who has said about the impending changing of the guard, “I’m afraid.”

However, he is a right-winger like me, and just as with the leftist ideologues who “feared” Reagan and Bush, we aren’t exactly a representative sample of America.

But this is what is truly, well, scary. I have seen this fear not just in rightist politics wonks but also in people who are not in the habit of troubling much over politics at all. For example, I was surprised recently when a woman I know – someone who could easily abide by the injunction, “Never discuss religion or politics” – said in a most sober fashion that she was thinking of leaving the country. Then there is an elderly Jewish gentleman of my acquaintance who lived through WWII; this man could be described as almost apolitical, was probably more apt to vote Democrat than Republican and isn’t given to issuing political opinion, let alone hyperbole. Yet when someone else broached the subject of Obama’s legions of fawning admirers, he broke his pattern and interjected, “This is like what happened with Hitler. . . .”

Then consider this statement printed a couple of months ago:

“Big Brother had nothing on the Obamas. They plan to herd American youth into government-funded reeducation camps where they'll be brainwashed into thinking America is a racist, oppressive place in need of ‘social change.’”

Is this the rambling of some right-wing site occupying the dark recesses of the Web or a radical on a soapbox? I mean, after all, it’s not the kind of thing you read in the New York Times. Actually, it’s excerpted from a September 4 piece in Investor’s Business Daily (IBD), a mainstream paper of great repute.

Are all these people delusional? Are they simply stuck in time and afraid of change?

Maybe it’s that they have some idea what that change will be.

Fear can certainly be and often is irrational. Yet, generally speaking, the most real fear comes from real threats. A ghost story may scare a child, but not nearly as much as if he actually sees a ghost. Imagining what it’s like to have a gun to your head may be scary, but not as much so as if you feel cold, blued steel pressed against your temple. And I sense real fear.

What is there to be afraid of? A good place to start is with the content of the IBD story cited earlier.

Most of us have heard Obama state that “We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the military. This alone is enough to send shivers up an informed spine, but it gets even worse when you hear the specifics. Obama intends to use a radical activist group he helped found called “Public Allies” as the model for, as IBD puts it, “. . . his Orwellian program, ‘Universal Voluntary Public Service.’”

IBD reports on the inducements used to entice young people into this national service corps and its true aim:

. . . they'll get a monthly stipend of up to $1,800, plus paid health and child care. They also get a post-service education award of $4,725 that can be used to pay off past student loans or fund future education.

But its real mission is to radicalize American youth and use them to bring about ‘social change’ through threats, pressure, tension and confrontation — the tactics used by the father of community organizing, Saul "The Red" Alinsky.

As bad as this sounds, I believe the reality will be far worse. I’ll explain where I think this will lead, but first we must understand a collective psychological phenomenon that is now apparent.

When Abraham in the Bible was prepared to obey God’s command and sacrifice his son Isaac on Mount Moriah, it was, and this may shock some, understandable. God is perfect and the author of morality, and while we may not always understand His ways, the Divine Mind always knows what is best. So the story is a lesson of faith and trust in God. God cannot be wrong. You don’t question God.

Whether you have faith or not, it’s easy enough to grasp that such deference is understandable when talking about a perfect, divine being. But it’s downright dangerous when applied to a human being. Any human being.

Unfortunately, while the deific monikers applied to Obama such as “The One” or “The Messiah” have become grist for comedians, humorists and just plain old wise-guys, they’re no laughing matter. They reflect a real spirit that has imbued millions, and this is why far scarier than Obama are his followers. They have deified the man, and you don’t question your god. I truly believe that just as many Germans followed Hitler over the precipice during WWII, there are many Americans today who would follow Obama unquestioningly, unthinkingly, unknowingly – into the fires of Hell.

If this sounds as laughable as deific labels, know that it isn’t radical to claim that a continually-recycling historical pattern will manifest itself again and can do so here; radical is to imply that within American borders the laws of man’s nature are somehow suspended. In nature (not culture), Americans are no different from the people who followed Hitler, Mussolini, Ayatollah Khomeini, Pol Pot or Lenin. The tendency to deify leaders is universal.

With this understanding, I’ll now give you my prediction as to how Obama’s Universal Voluntary Public Service program will evolve.

With his oratorical skills and a complicit media, the president-elect will be able to sell this scheme with talk about security, equality and liberating the downtrodden. “It’s the best way to combat crime, hopelessness and a lack of opportunity in the inner city,” he will say. “And I know this well from my days as a community organizer on Chicago’s mean streets.” He will tout how it provides health care, education and skills to the have-nots, and his media-oiled silver tongue’s salesmanship will prevail. It will be sold with a low-end price tag, and his fellow-traveler controlled Houses will echo the message and deliver the votes. Of course, just like Social Security and a trove of other government programs, its cost will make a mockery of predictions. But Uncle Sam’s budget projections aren’t designed for budgets, but for marketing.

As always happens with such groups, program members will eventually be identified with some colloquial and catchy label. I can’t tell you what it will be, only that it won’t be Brownshirts or Blackshirts. And the official name of the program itself may even be changed a few years hence.


As with the Public Allies program, members will have to attend seminars and “retreats” where they will be indoctrinated with leftist ideology. Aside from learning how America is a “racist and “sexist” country, they will be taught that she is also ridden with “heterosexism,” which, IBD writes, “. . . a Public Allies training seminar in Chicago describes as a negative byproduct of ‘capitalism, white supremacy, patriarchy and male-dominated privilege.’” They will be taught that these evils can never be vanquished until every last vestige of traditional America is utterly destroyed.

The pressure to conform will be immense, as it always is in politically-correct entities. The corps will have a huge core of true believers, who will act as ideological hammers. They will preach diversity but practice conformity.

Just like Public Allies, this program may be birthed primarily in the inner cities. That is where Obama’s main support is, and, as stated before, he will claim this is where the corps’ help is needed most. It will then be empowered to do “social good,” which could mean anything from helping at soup kitchens to recruiting those ripe for indoctrination to forming some kind of neighborhood crime watch. As for the last task, though, given the corps’ ideology and the fact that it will be drawing members from high-crime areas initially, I expect it to contain a not insignificant criminal element. It will be corrupt from the get-go and may even assume the character of an organized crime syndicate.

But its “security” mandate will be chilling. In the name of combating garden-variety crime and, more specifically, terrorism, who knows what powers the corps will be granted? Will they one day help enforce an order to seize firearms, if not via direct action then through information gathering? I can’t know exactly, but I do know the powers will be misused.

Over time, the program may be expanded to include a corps for even younger adolescents, perhaps starting at age 13 or 14. As before, I can’t tell you exactly what it will be called, but it won’t be “The Obama Youth” – not officially, anyway. And, certainly by this time, joining it will be the thing the “cool” kids do, sort of like the Boy Scouts’ evil twin.

Then, the result may be that we will have, to use John Edwards’ terminology, “two Americas”: Those who belong to the corps and those who don’t. But I think I know which of the two will be more formidable. Remember when the student thugs at Columbia University stormed a stage to stop Minutemen representatives from speaking? Similar things have happened at colleges throughout the country, and they give us a glimpse into the character of the corps. Just picture the same fascist-minded bullies, only more organized, more numerous, even more ideological and far, far bolder. And many authorities in the nation may tolerate their intimidation with a wink and a nod.

We should also take note of the program’s name, Universal Voluntary Public Service. One of the definitions of “universal” is, “affecting, concerning, or involving all [emphasis mine].” And I suspect the word most likely to be dropped from the name eventually is not “universal” but “voluntary.”

Of course, they don’t call me the Amazing Kreskin. I’m no soothsayer and I could be wrong about many of the details I provided. But the fear is real and the historical allusions are valid.

Speaking of which, Georgia Congressman Paul Broun recently addressed the program and exhibited both fear and a grasp of history, saying:

"That's exactly what Hitler did in Nazi Germany and it's exactly what the Soviet Union did. When he's proposing to have a national security force that's answering to him, that is as strong as the U.S. military, he's showing me signs of being Marxist."

Of course, many will nevertheless say that such concerns are but the musings of the tin-foil hat crowd. But such scoffing is par for the course. As Professor Manfred Weidhorn of Yeshiva University wrote:

“. . . even if you are prescient enough to observe oncoming evils, you are prevented from acting precisely because other people, being normal, lack your prescience. They therefore see you, rather than the evil person, as the deluded or warmongering malevolent soul. When Churchill warned about Hitler in the 1930s, many people became more upset with Churchill than with Hitler. The anomaly is that the prophet has therefore to wait for the evil to manifest itself and thereby to make everyone else see things the prophet’s way. But by then the chance to do anything may be gone.”

So there is an answer for those who would say “You’ve thoroughly Godwinned yourself, Duke.” If you bristle at the comparison and don’t want to wear the shoe, then the onus is on you to be vigilant, to make sure it never, ever fits.

© 2008 Selwyn Duke - All Rights Reserve



By Coach Dave Daubenmire
November 20, 2008

President Bush reportedly said that the Constitution was “just a G—D—n piece of paper.” It is hard to believe that the report is true, but you would have to admit that recent happenings in this once-great Constitutional Republic reflect the opinions of many in power in the nation’s capital.

Despite what you might hear on the news, or out of the mouth of our elected officials, America is not a Democracy. In fact, according to our Founders, a democracy was the worst form of all governments. Listen to what some wise men have said.

Ben Franklin said “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.”

“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.” Winston Churchill

“Democracy is the road to socialism.” Karl Marx

According to Webster’s unabridged Dictionary, a republic is “A form of government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law."

I don’t have the time or the space to go over it for you. Please just read this commentary that I wrote two-years ago if you need it explained further.

Socialism is coming at us faster than a locomotive and we can’t even hear the train whistle. If we don’t rise up soon and DEMAND that government stay within the restrictions that the Founders put in place we will never pass to the next generation the “blessings of liberty” that our fathers passed to us.

The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Without it, America is a lawless nation and those in power are the boldest criminals.

Please remember this; we have no Constitutional Rights, we have God-granted rights. The purpose of the Constitution was to restrain government. The Bill of Rights should actually be called the Bill of Government Limitations. Individual citizens cannot violate the Constitution. Only governments can.

I am doing my best to write this commentary without my usual hyperbole. As Joe Friday would say, “Just the facts.”

Our ‘elected officials” swear an oath to uphold the Constitution. None of them do and we let them get away with it. The Courts are the worst. The “domestic enemies” use the courts to subvert this nation and hardly a peep is heard as judges arbitrarily rewrite the Constitution. Marbury v Madison was the source of the decree that “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” Marbury vs. Madison 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803).

We must reclaim the Constitution if the Republic is to be saved. Look at how far we have fallen.

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Most of these freedoms are under assault as courts determine when and where they can be exercised. The fairness doctrine, public prayer, freedom of assembly, and hate speech legislation are all eviscerating the restraints on government.

Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

The new administration promises “change”. Those who are awake know that one of those changes will be government restriction on the God-given right to own guns. That’s why gun sales are through the roof with the election of Obama.

Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

American soldiers are never to be used against the citizenry. It is call Posse Comitatus which has been suspended by “Executive Order.” The 3rd Infantry is now active on American soil. Of course, they are here to help in “emergencies.”

Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Can you say unwarranted wiretaps in the name of security, thanks to the Patriot Act? Under this “un-Constitutional law” a person can now be detained without cause. Habeaus Corpus is gone.

Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Ditto. See Patriot Act above

Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

See Habeas corpus above.

Need I go on?

So the voters in California determined that marriage shall remain a union between a man and a woman and the anarchists hit the streets. They invade churches, and appeal to the courts to overturn the will of the people.

Anarchy is defined as a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of governmental authority.

Lawless is abounding in America. Bankers openly steal from the people, government hands out money in violation of their oath, voter fraud runs rampant, and our new president may not even be eligible for the office.

America’s Constitution is a “living breathing document” because God’s Word is no longer the rock upon which all law stands. Remove God and you remove His laws. Remove His laws and you remove the pillars. The non-constitutional separation between the church and the state has removed the foundation of all moral law.

If God is gone, then government is god. “In those days there was no king in Israel, but every man did that which was right in his own eyes.”

"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams.

"We have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We’ve staked the future of all our political institutions upon our capacity…to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God." [1778 to the General Assembly of the State of Virginia] James Madison.

Anarchy has come to America.



By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
November 17, 2008

[Note: Pundits across the U.S. have engaged in post-election analysis of why of Sen. Obama won, and the answer is really quite simple. Democrats almost never propose cutting taxes, but a long time ago when Obama promised that 95% of Americans would get a tax cut under his plan, I said that could win for him. While Sen. McCain also proposed cutting taxes, because Obama said he’d increase taxes on “the rich” (making over $250,000 per year), he was able to offer more of a tax cut to the 95% making under $250,000 per year. It‘s just that simple. A majority of Americans merely voted in their own economic self interest.

Concerning Obama’s transition team, given the importance of Pakistan today, it’s interesting that 4 of the 15 transition team members thus far are Indian-Americans (remember Obama carries a replica of the Hindu monkey god idol in his pocket). And Obama’s choice for chief-of-staff is Rahm Emanuel who was a director of Freddie Mac “when scandal was brewing at the troubled agency,” according to ABC News. Also regarding Emanuel, there’s a question of why, given Obama’s criticism of “Wall Street,” he would pick a chief-of-staff who had received millions of dollars in contributions from those in large investment and private equity firms as well as those in hedge funds.

Finally, on the PBS “Charlie Rose Show” (November 15), several “experts” discussed the coming “New International Economic Order” with greater government regulations and international cooperation to provide international financial stability. All this means moving closer to the World Socialist Government with a global currency “The Phoenix” on the cover of THE ECONOMIST, January 9, 1988.]

Late on the evening of November 4, a black ABC news reporter was practically in tears because of his joy over Sen. Barack Obama winning the presidency. Millions of other black Americans cheered the election results because of race as well, and this is sad because Act 10:34 tells us “God is not a respecter of persons.” God doesn’t care about the race of whoever becomes president, nor should we.

Coming out of the cruelty of slavery in America, Blacks were extremely Biblical people, often singing spiritual songs. That is why it greatly grieves me to see so many blacks today who apparently put race ahead of the Biblical admonition not to shed innocent blood. This is what abortion clearly does, cruelly shedding the innocent blood of preborn babies. And Sen. Obama supports women’s choice to do this.

There has been a myth largely perpetrated by liberals that millions of white Americans, especially southerners, are racists who would never support a black person for elective office, but this is a base canard. Many white southerners applauded the selection of Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court, and regarding elective office they supported the black surgeon Mildred Jefferson when she ran for the presidency.

Had Dr. Jefferson been elected president years ago we would have had both the first black person and the first woman as president of the U.S. However, liberals didn’t want someone who adhered to the Biblical admonition against shedding innocent blood which is the result of the violent brutality of abortion. Rather, they wanted Sen. Obama who supports the anti-Biblical Roe v. Wade decision.

What has happened in America is an unfortunate shift in values among people of all races. A friend recently was talking to me in terms which I understood because of my age, but I stopped him and said he needed to understand that especially Americans under 50 years of age no longer thought, felt, or believed as we did. I told him to talk to people in this age group, and he will soon understand they are largely obsessed with themselves or what they want. This is the result of decades of pounding by public schools that situation ethics is the new moral compass. It’s all about doing what you want when you want. This is also why Sen. McCain’s “experience” claim was somewhat irrelevant to the younger generations, because experience connotes considerations other than acting upon one’s immediate desires. “Experience” also implies the importance of historical knowledge and understanding, which public schools have deliberately de-emphasized.

Thus, the younger generations are primarily interested in satisfying themselves based upon their feelings here and now, even to the extent of routinely displaying cognitive dissonance which older Americans consider mentally deficient. For example, these people (and Obama) on the one hand support Roe v. Wade because they believe government shouldn’t impose any particular morality upon women who choose to kill brutally their preborn babies. Yet at the same time they want government to impose their anti-Biblical abortion morality upon those Americans who object to their tax dollars funding these barbaric bloody, violent attacks upon these helpless, innocent children.

Liberal cognitive dissonance displays itself as hypocrisy perhaps nowhere better than in education. Liberals say they champion students’ rights, but they oppose such things as the federal Pupil Protection Amendment protecting students from privacy-invading research, psychological testing, etc. The U.S. Supreme Court recently allowed to stand a lower court’s ruling that parents sending their children to public schools could not opt out their children from indoctrination in homosexuality.

Liberals also claim to desire parental involvement in school activities, but they don’t want to require school-based clinics to inform parents if their children receive contraceptives and/or abortions. Liberals say they defend the right of free speech, but they oppose voluntary audible school prayer in classrooms. They say schools should teach the science of evolution but they oppose students being presented with the scientific evidence against evolution. At the college level, liberals claim to want a free expression of ideas, but then many “shout down” conservatives on campus.

All of the above, including the election of Sen. Obama as president, is really about values and whether we as a people choose what God wants us to do or what we want to do. Unfortunately, we for years have not chosen to follow the will of God. The American people did not prevent Elian Gonzales from being returned not to his father, but as anti-God dictator Fidel Castor said, “to the State.” The American people also didn’t prevent Terry Schiavo from being murdered by the government.

These are examples of the Power Elite’s population control agenda, and that’s why they wanted Sen. Obama elected president. He will have the opportunity to replace at least two Supreme Court justices who will see to it that the anti-God Roe v. Wade decision is not reversed. In complying with the Power Elite’s will, the American people on November 4 chose the death of preborn babies by abortion over the right to life with which we were endowed by our Creator, God.

Thus, what NBC’s Brian Williams told PBS host Tavis Smiley on election eve was correct. Instead of saying we’re electing the next president of the free world, Williams said (and wasn’t corrected by Smiley) “We’re electing the president of the next free world.” He was right.

The free world of the past operated largely on the basis of Biblical values, but “the next free world” is one in which man has replaced God (Genesis 3:4 “ye shall be as gods.”) as the final arbiter of what’s right or wrong. God, though, is “not a respecter of persons,” and Americans will reap the whirlwind (Hosea 8:7) of what they have done.

Once again, God has set before us life and death, urging us to “choose life” (Deuteronomy 30:19), but Americans have chosen death (abortion) in electing a president who supports Roe v Wade. Woe unto the American people for this, as Proverbs 1:32 may describe our economic future while Proverbs 1:25-31 may describe our overall future including “destruction (which) cometh as a whirlwind.”

© 2008 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved



By Sheriff Jim R. Schwiesow, Ret.

November 20, 2008

“The drums sound with measured beat; the Sun sets slowly with diminished heat. Listen to the dirge and mark the cadence of a song of death for a once great nation.”

One of the fun things about writing a column is the receipt of mail, good and bad, in response to my articles. Those who understand the message and have pertinent arguments and constructive comment are a blessing and greatly appreciated. Their comments are most often stimulating, interesting and nearly always challenging and enlightening.

The nescient few who write to vent their spleen and pour out a completely illiterate, unlettered and mindless invective can be weirdly entertaining. Given the bizarreness of their messages it is sad to think that the writers of these are the finished product of the American Education system. When I read these offerings I continually wonder when and how the writer escaped the asylum. It is scary to think that those who are so inimically disposed might be running around with a fingernail file in their pocket. I can imagine that their Kindergarten teachers appended their report cards with such messages as “fails to color within the lines” and “does not get along well with classmates.” These do help me to partially understand the Transportation Security Administration’s obsession with penknives and small manicuring implements. Remember I said partially as I am not altogether sure that many of those of the TSA are not often recruited from among this very segment of society.

Then we have those who are enthusiastically enamored of their self-perceived wit and intelligence, it is these who write to me messages that they think to be wildly clever and endearingly cute. Witness the following example: "Now that we have a wonderful new president why don't you, and those like you, leave the country." The same was written in a hugely large and boldface font. Oftentimes I find that the larger the font, of a perverse message, the smaller the mind behind it. Undisciplined messages seem to come from undisciplined minds. It always amazes me how these dimwits claim sole ownership of the country, it is analogous to saying, “Who allowed you to be born into my world?”

Now let’s extrapolate from that silly little statement. Without the slightest bit of a doubt it has never occurred to the rocket scientist who sent this message that if the nearly half of the population who comprise the most productive and giving members of society who most likely voted against the self-proclaimed messiah of this person’s adulation and worship were to move from the country there would be no one to support the remaining non-productive half of the population. Clearly every willingly unemployed individual, the indigent by choice, and every bum looking for a handout were hog tied and dragged to the polls by the Obama cultists and registered to vote, very often multiple times under differing names. And while they were at it they also registered cadavers, pet dogs, pet cats and beady-eyed parrots.

And then, of course, we cannot discount the fact that there are many thousands of those parasitic human sponges out there that are perfectly capable of figuring out with no help from others that the Obamas’ of the system slaver at the chance to extract from the wages of the industrious and bestow what they have purloined upon the slothful. Ah yes, it was a campaign of which we can take great national pride if one is to believe the media. To quote Chris Matthews it must have just sent a little thrill up the leg of all the little Bolsheviks who live in our modern day la la land. More on Chris Matthews and his compatriots, those insufficiently cooked (half-baked), denizens of the national media later.

We continually hear from these changelings of their deep compassion for the disadvantaged and dispossessed of society. They spend millions of taxpayer dollars promoting boondoggle social programs and they prattle endlessly about entitlements, welfare, earned income tax credits, affirmative action, compassionate welfare and a myriad of other societal programs that are supposed to have the intended effect of making it a fail safe culture where without personal effort or individual initiative even the most indolent can enjoy the good life.

The truth of the matter is that there are those who are truly ambitious and do have work ethics who could use a hand up to cope with unavoidable serious financial hardship until they are on their feet and able to pull their own weight. Our despotic government in its typical blundering and unjust way has put into effect, through its numerous bureaucratic agencies, a labyrinth of glaringly inequitable hoops to jump through that have every appearance of being designed to inhibit any help to the truly necessitous while virtually dumping money on the intentionally lazy. And I know with a certainty that the readers of this message can think of many instances to substantiate what I have just written.

It is difficult to be inclined to the slightest wonderment at the defeat of John McCain and the Republican Party. This guy ran the most inept campaign in history. If I were a betting man I would bet that he was actually bribed by those with inimical vested interests to throw the campaign as a prizefighter throws a fight. To observe him as he cheerily gave critical campaign issues wide berth and heaped upon his political foe his sweet admiration and goodwill made one wonder why we were even having a campaign. The only seemingly heartfelt speech that he made in the entire campaign was his concession speech in which he smilingly and cheerfully acknowledged that he and Obama were of one mind, one heart and one soul. That speech left not a doubt or question about the fact that there is now no difference between Democrats and Republicans. I have written previously of the fact that the Republican Party has done more to enable the destruction of a once proud Republic than irreverent Democrats. I invite the reader to view that article.

McCain might just as well have conceded the election up front and saved everyone a lot of trouble. It would have spared the millions, who already knew what the outcome would be, the suffering they experienced through a maddening and utterly biased harangue and bombardment by the media every minute of every hour of every day. An additional upside to such a front end concession would have been that the Obama campaign wouldn’t have had to resort to all that underhanded and criminal chicanery in the raising of those millions of dollars in disguised illegal contributions, but then of course they wouldn’t have had any mad money to throw around.

I would like to use this column to thank those illegal contributors to Obama for all of the money that they clandestinely pumped into the system, but I can’t speak or write Arabic or Chinese. But, they will be gratified to know that their friends in the American media made out like bandits and put the funds to good use with a splendidly stupendous propaganda program. And, hey! The American people just had a ball following their self-proclaimed political messiah around the country to the various lavishly produced performances. With breasts swelling in exultation and their resounding cheers bouncing off the clouds, the frenzied worshippers leapt to the occasion in exuberance and with eager outstretched hands sought the hem of the garment of their political savior. These expensively choreographed spectaculars were reminiscent of the great Nuremberg rallies during which the German people also worshipped their chosen savior, Adolph Hitler.

The national media is a mirror into the soul of the nation, their truly abominable and soullessly depraved conduct throughout the course of the campaign was most certainly grist to the mill of the demonic interests that continuously pursue and advocate for a Godless society and a world-wide satanic kingdom. One could not detect even a scintilla of integrity and probity in the reporting by, and the conduct of, the majority of the media personages that so noxiously embellished the TV screens, airwaves, and printed pages of the major newspapers and publications with their perverse and perverted works. The ignominy and disgrace of their deliberate and evilly uncivilized endeavors was a taint upon not only their profession, but upon the entire nation.

Despite the fact that the country was rapidly descending into the tank during the entirety of the campaign nothing could divert the attention of the people from their worship at the feet of their newfound savior. The markets were toppled and corruption of the most contemptible kind brought down major Wall Street financial institutions, the debased policies of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac executives brought the mortgage industry to its knees and businesses and corporations of long standing duration were forced into bankruptcy. The major American automobile manufacturers were near extinction and main street businesses were being eliminated by an inability to obtain capital, and yet the Obama worshippers soldiered on in feverish jubilance, undiminished adoration and blissful reverie. And while they poured out a religious devotion to their chosen, as to a deity, the American capitalist system bifurcated, wandered off into new avenues and crashed.

Presidential candidates, Tweedle-Dee and Tweedle-Dum and that distinguished comedic group the American Congress lent their greatly anemic talents to the task of saving Wall Street. With the help of that great poobah of the Order of the Skull and Bones, George Walker Bush, these mentally diminished heroes of the new age bent their backs and feeble minds to the task of creating a brand new and innovative version of socialism.

There would now be two recipient groups of the monies of a dwindling productive middle-class taken by the confiscate machinations of a now bolshevistic government. And the futures of our children, our children’s children and their offspring’s offspring were mortgaged far into the future.

It was resolved and settled that two determinate groups would now feed at the government trough to the detriment and sacrifice of working middle-class taxpayers. The first of these groups continues to be an old parasitic and ever prevalent collective of the habitually and volitionally indolent, while the new feeders at the public treasury’s buffet are the shame deficient corruptly rich whose criminal actions and greedy excesses drove their corporations into bankruptcy and negated the payment of untold billions of dollars to their creditors. That such would be the recipients of the fruits of the labors of truly diligent and productive Americans is a tragedy of unending consequence.

The minds of the American people are fogged and made vacuous and benumbed by spiritual decadence and by the chemical concoctions of the unrighteous and immoral pharmaceutical malefactors that reap billions through the commercialization of the unholy substances that rob the health of the minds and bodies of the deceived and the deluded who are enslaved by their products. A monstrously perfidious campaign, unquestionably enhanced by the FDA, by the national media, the medical community and the obscenely wealthy manufacturers of these pernicious essences has made this a drug soaked and sodden culture. Is it any wonder that the young do illegally that which their mentors of the adult world do legally, and that is to use drugs as a crutch and as a substitute for righteous and spiritually healthy pursuits.


“Their feet run to evil, and they make haste to shed innocent blood: their thoughts are thoughts of iniquity; wasting and destruction are in their paths.” Isaiah 59.7

The United States has come to the point of inevitableness in regard to an ultimate, and perilously near, pending total destruction. Its ashes will be scattered to the winds and its once prosperous ways will be made desolate. Vultures will roost in the remains of its cities and putrefaction will embrace its once fertile lands. It is a nation of derelict minds and iniquitous pursuits, and the fruits of its unrighteousness are ripe for harvesting. Its people have followed crooked paths to their own destruction. And that destruction is fast upon us.

© 2008 - Jim R. Schwiesow - All Rights Reserved