Wednesday, October 04, 2006

THE COMING TRIBULATION

THE COMING TRIBULATION

By Samuel Blumenfeld

September 30, 2006

NewsWithViews.com

The solemn Memorial exercises at Ground Zero on September 11th reminded us all that we are at war and that those who were killed by the enemy on that fateful day five years ago were the war’s first official casualties. The names of the dead were read by their relatives who still suffer their losses. And it is important that we should be reminded of that day, which destroyed our delusion that the fall of the Berlin Wall would usher in a new era of world peace and happiness. Instead, we now face, for the indefinite future, a new World War declared by radical Islam, and the next President may even have to impose the draft.

A PBS Frontline film showed, for the first time, people flying out of the windows of the World Trade Center, hurtling their bodies to sudden death. They had all gone to work that morning expecting nothing more than the usual minor decisions of the day—what to have for lunch, what movie to see that night, what to bring home for the kids. They had no idea that in less than an hour they would have to choose how to die: be burned alive or leap from the building. Not exactly your usual choices on an ordinary work day, courtesy of the religion of peace.

Several thousand people, unable to get out of the buildings, were faced with such biblical choices. Of course, hundreds were killed instantly when the planes plowed into the towers and the Pentagon. Their lives were snuffed out before they even knew what hit them. That is how this new World War will be fought by the enemy.

The Pope, in his call for dialogue, was trashed by Muslims world-wide because he quoted a 14th century Byzantine Emperor who minced no words about Muhammad’s religion: “Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.” Can there really be dialogue with Islam?

The enemy has lots of names: Radical Islam, jihadism, Islamo-fascism, Islamic terrorism. But there is no doubt that at the bottom of all of this is the religion of Islam itself. In his book, Signs of the Times, published in 1832, the Rev. Alexander Keith quoted Revelation 9:1-2, which states:

And the fifth angel sounded, and I saw a star fall from heaven unto the earth: and to him was given the key of the bottomless pit. And he opened the bottomless pit; and there arose a smoke out of the pit, as the smoke of a great furnace; and the sun and the air were darkened by reason of the smoke of the pit.

Keith then commented: “Like the noxious and ever deadly vapors which the winds, particularly from the southwest, diffuse in Arabia, Mahometanism spread from hence its pestilential influence—arose as suddenly and spread as widely as smoke arising out of the pit, the smoke of a great furnace. Such is a suitable symbol of the religion of Mahomet, of itself, as compared with the pure light of the gospel of Jesus. It was not, like the latter, a light from heaven, but a smoke out of the bottomless pit.”

It is always necessary to revert to the Bible in order to understand the ways of evil in this world, and how they manifest themselves in our high-tech civilization. All of the Islamist hijackers who flew the planes into the Twin Towers were driven by an ideology of death which calls itself a religion. Keith wrote further:

“A false religion was set up, which, although the scourge of transgressions and idolatry, filled the world with darkness and delusion; and swarms of Saracens, like locusts, overspread the earth, and speedily extended their ravages over the Roman Empire from east to west.”

And what Islam is doing today is merely resuming their war against Christianity and the West. But now they have the riches from their oilfields, which means they have the money to build nuclear bombs. And since they believe in a religion that reveres death, they will not be deterred by “mutually assured destruction.” They are as ready as ever to sacrifice millions of their own people for victory over the infidels.

And anyone who understands the geopolitics of this war, understands that the war in Iraq is very much a part of this World War. Meanwhile, the Democrats play irresponsible politics, the liberal media undermines the President and the war effort, and the American people don’t quite know what to make of all of this. They are too busy trying to keep their heads above water. But they now know that incredibly stupid politics among our protective agencies let 9/11 take place. It was not just a bomb on a subway train or in a night club, but the destruction of the two tallest buildings in the world in the first metropolis of the Western world and the destruction of four giant airliners resulting in the deaths of almost 3,000 people. The price for inept politics can be astronomical.

And we are being told by liberals that it is the war in Iraq which is causing such hatred of America among the Muslims. But I guess they loved us when they bombed the Marine barracks in Beirut killing over 200 Marines and bombed the embassies in Africa. Israel has been hated by the Muslims since it was created in 1948. Yet, Israel continues to exist and prosper. If we formulate our policies on the basis of how well we are loved or hated by others, we shall have surrendered our freedom and sovereignty and chosen to live as slaves to the whims of our enemies.

© 2006 Samuel Blumenfeld - All Rights Reserved

MIND WARFARE: THE N.E.A. JIHAD

MIND WARFARE: THE N.E.A. JIHAD

By Greg Evensen

September 27, 2006

NewsWithViews.com

School has started. Once again, parents have built-in baby-sitters. All is well with the world. Hold on, please think this one over very carefully.

My professional career has included two distinctively different highlights. The first, concerning law enforcement, was posted here a few weeks ago. The second is as a teacher. Some schools in America today are achieving well. Many are failing. Regardless of their status in that regard, it is a marvelous place to influence young minds. The National Education Association has seen to that. Since the NEA began influencing and helping to institute social programming in teacher preparation programs, the trend toward eliminating content and values has escalated alarmingly. Additionally, their support of controversial international “degree” programs, subversive historical revisionism through “position” planks in the NEA organization, and support for a variety of worthless educational mechanics, has crippled the minds of several generations of Americans.

I teach REAL history and not the preferred International Baccalaureate Program that is NEA supported and dripping with one world happy talk bull. I test, not assess my students on absolute facts, not a fuzzy watered down history from worthless textbooks that mentions the Nazi German and Imperialistic Japanese period in two short pages. I REQUIRE that they read, word for word and line for line, the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution. I translate difficult to understand passages written for a time when people could REALLY read and comprehend three syllable or more words. I see the minds of young children more interested in the latest “drive by shooting” video games purchased by brain dead parents, finally come alive with—so THAT’S what the constitution means! I have held the highly political positions of principal and superintendent. However, active classroom teaching is my choice. Kids matter to me.

However, just like the militarization of American police departments, the NEA has a “take no prisoners” attitude toward people like me. The light of common sense, truth, decency, moral absolutes and educational techniques that work, is beginning to more than irritate the NEA and its 50 state subsidiaries. The lack of an NEA member dissenting voice of substance that is given credibility is pervasive. The constant orchestrated “vote for the democrat” in virtually all political races is policy. NEA raises the dues so they can continue lobbying with only the most liberal congressional members. Finally, you really aren’t NEA unless you are in complete lockstep with their TOTAL mindset and it is killing our profession indirectly and directly.

I not only belong to the largest “labor union” in the nation, I belong to an immensely influential beast that is a premiere advocacy group for the promotion of homosexual culture. They drool at the latest innovative “guess the word or answer version of language and math” programs. The upper level NEA socialist worshipping staff of propagandists has bought into every worthless educational technique ever devised by moronic university professors who churn out subversive programs by the dozens. NEA stands at the forefront of lobbying for tax dollars that are wasted by the billions in search of the latest “no-science needed unless it’s Darwinism” environmental positions, revisionist US history programs painting the US as the forever villain, as well as state sponsored politically correct curricula.

The NEA hates and fears the home schooling movement precisely because home schooling offers true academic freedom. That is, freedom that says you can at least debate whether the human race came from the mud or was created. The NEA cannot get its clutches into moms and dads who home school or send their children to privately funded schools.

The NEA has just released in its magazine, “NEA Today” the September 2006 edition, “Democracy in Action” (pages 52-56) the new and amended resolutions adopted at this year’s national convention. This small excerpt should give you a taste for some of the more “important” issues the NEA feels must be promoted. They include the following “educational” issues. B-11: Racism, Sexism, Sexual Orientation, and Gender Identification Discrimination, B-45: Environmental Education, (Emphasis on bio-diversity, Evolution and Agenda 21 concepts) B-75: Home Schooling (Against), and I-1: Peace and International Relations. These are but a few of the more easily recognizable headings that readers would expect to see under the guise of NEA issues of educational concern.

The time is certainly long gone when classrooms were a laboratory for group learning. Individuals worked hard to achieve their own high level of necessary and crucially demonstrated mastery of language, mathematics, history, science and the arts. The instructor looked like a professional, spoke with a fluency deserving of respect by students, parents and his teaching peers. Values were inculcated into the students by way of modeling, reinforcement during activities of the entire day, and parental involvement with each student found in home shared learning, centered around the family unit.

Discipline was fair, strict and swift. No exceptions for star athletes, the “big name families” or anyone else. School boards were staffed by diligent, talented, motivated purveyors of the intrinsic and eternal virtues of a fully earned and respected high school diploma. The educational factory mentality and the drive to equalize everyone in the process regardless of their abilities and potential, took over as individuals who coasted through and gained nothing sought civil remedy against the system for their own failure to study and excel. To assure these budding welfare cases that they would receive diplomas somehow, education passed from the arena of common sense into the coliseum of personal combat. Parents sued boards over grades, over ineligibility, truancy excuses (it’s hard to learn when you are not there), blending of low achievers and special education students with all other students. Finally, there are mandatory court placements of delinquents into a homogenized classroom where the learning atmosphere becomes something akin to a “Star Wars Intergalactic Saloon.”

I will only mention briefly that the NEA’s advocacy for the teacher’s desperately changing increasingly hostile environment, long ago took a back seat to the political, cultural and liberal socialist philosophy of Dewey, the ACLU, and the internationalizing of the educational curriculum nationwide.

Teachers hand hundreds of thousands of students each year to universities that complete the brain damaging process by infusing their own peculiar brand of subversive ideology. It is promoted by truly whacked out degreed morons that have no character, moral base from which to present a cogent lesson, or the courage to teach a 360 degree view of the real world. They cannot bring themselves to allow or encourage student’s higher level thinking skills to penetrate the debate at any point. Accepting professorial propaganda and pleasing the instructor so a passing grade can be achieved are clearly the issues that matters most. There are significant exceptions of course, found in the academic ranks, but they are found in increasingly smaller numbers at the public university level. Smaller, private schools are far better prepared to “educate” fairly and consistently at the high school and collegiate level.

My suggestion for a meaningful way out of this pathetic educational dilemma is three fold. First, parents must continue their own education along with their child’s, and be fully engaged in the process at home and in school conferences. Second, school boards and state departments of education must move past the political correctness in curricula so that meaningful educations can be pursued by all students who will work for them.

Finally, teachers must be prepared to act outside the mentality of the national teacher’s unions and lobby heavily for a return to values centered, straight forward, factually based courses. These will build the foundation for students who will bring about needed changes in social, scientific, and the traditional family culture for the next generation. Without those elemental building blocks to restructure our semi-useless society, only the most persuasive and cunning will rule, while the rest don’t have a clue as to what is going on. Sound familiar? This is the society we have been given thanks to NEA and our complicit federal government through its educational department.

Start with your local school. Demand that all administrators hold proven records of solid educational philosophy and district management. The good old boys who seem to get along with everybody are a waste of time and tax dollars. I know, I live with that and those types have nearly ruined our district. Elect boards that have no agenda except to see student success. Everything else including the sports teams comes second or third. Demand that leadership is continuingly accountable and when they drive off course, fire them, period. Hire someone who can do the job correctly!

Nothing less than the literal survival of our nation is found tied to the side of the educational system. We must break the internationalist educational movement that seeks to break down the unique history and sovereignty of our nation. Unless we do, children will feel no allegiance to America anymore. They will measure their lives against an Islamic or socialist world that cares nothing for the United States or its people. That is a one-way highway to cultural disaster. Stand diligent. Accept no excuses. Do not compromise what you know is right and necessary for our children and our nation to achieve true literacy. Their fate, and that of the nation, is in our hands.

FRIENDLY FIRE

FRIENDLY FIRE

Coach Dave Daubenmire
September 28, 2006
NewsWithViews.com

“When all of the shootin' starts, first be sure all of the enemy is in front of you.” --A wise old man.

I am no theologian. I don’t claim to be one. I haven’t attended Bible College, studied in depth eschatology, nor have I been trained in exegesis and hermeneutics. But I can read, have studied the Bible, and spent a great deal of time in the school of the wilderness.

I was raised a Catholic, attended catechism, first communion, and confirmation. My wife and I were married in the Catholic Church. But in 1987 after 35 years of regular church attendance, I met Christ in an evangelical church. He radically changed me. I jokingly say to others that Jesus did for me what a phone booth did for Clark Kent….changed me into a brand new creature. The transformation was real. I have been following hard after Jesus ever since.

When I was about 14, I remember asking my Protestant mom, “Are Catholics considered Christians?” She reassured me that we were, at least to the depth that both of us understood that term.

Let me stop right here a moment. Please do not flood me with emails about how the Catholic Church is the “whore of Babylon,” that Catholics are not saved, etc. That is not what this article is about. Save your time. And also, Catholics please don’t send me emails exhorting me to return to the “Mother Church.” I am not as dumb or as blind on both issues as many readers like to assume I am. Can we please stay on topic? I believe that Catholics can be saved, just like some Baptist who think they are, aren’t.

If I understand my theology correctly, there are Essential doctrines that all professing Christians must believe. Those beliefs consist of certain Christian doctrines that constitute the core of the faith. Central doctrines include the Trinity, the deity of Christ, the bodily resurrection, the atoning work of Christ on the cross, and salvation by grace through faith. These doctrines so comprise the essence of the Christian faith that to remove any of them is to make the belief system non-Christian. As far as I know, all Christian denominations believe that, or they are just pretending to be Christian.

With me so far?

Denominations are a cluster of separate congregations, which have unified together due to their agreement on certain issues, and perhaps due to their disagreement with the viewpoints of other churches or denominations. Christian denominations agree on the essential doctrines listed above, but disagree on non-essential, or “peripheral” issues. Peripheral (i.e Of minor relevance or importance.) doctrines include such issues as the timing of the tribulation, the method of baptism, or the structure of church government. For example, one can be wrong about the identity of "the spirits in prison" 1 Peter 3:19 ) or about the timing of the rapture and still go to heaven, but one cannot deny salvation by grace or the deity of Christ (John 8:24) and be saved.

Man, I wish someone would have explained this to me years ago. It would have saved me a lot of headaches. As a “new Christian” I was naïve enough to assume that Christians agreed with each other. After years of dodging arrows from other “Christians” I now understand America’s problem.

When will we Christians figure out who the real enemy is?

Christians are a strange group. If you were to ask the average church-goer what religion he was, he would most likely respond “I’m a Methodist,” or “I am a Baptist.” He would self-identify his faith by his denomination. The correct answer would be “I am a Christian.” Unfortunately, most of our loyalties lie with our denomination. Remember, denominations are formed around “non-essential” issues.

What denomination are you? If you are a Methodist, can you explain to me what really separates you from a Lutheran, a Baptist, a Presbyterian, a Church of Christ, or the dreaded non-denominational? Most of us had our denomination chosen for us. I was Catholic because my dad was. I had no idea where an Episcopal differed from us. I’m not sure I know today.

Sadly, today, most churches major on the minors. Rather than working together across denominational lines, and standing together for the essentials of the Faith, most Christians spend their time fighting other denominational issues. We fight over

Baptism--whether to submerge or sprinkle.

The Rapture—pre-trip, mid-trip, post trip.

Tongues—of the Lord or of the Devil, ceased or not ceased.

Dress---jewelry good, jewelry bad. Long hair, short hair,

Bible----literal translation, figurative translation. Legalism, apostasy.
Jesus said: “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.” --Matthew 23:23-24

Straining at a gnat while America crumbles; that is the American church.

Mark 7: 7-9 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do. And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition…. Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered:

This came home to me a few years ago. I was invited by a local church to come and speak at a youth rally. The youth leader was all excited about the opportunity to bring together Christian kids in the community. He had contacted other churches, youth leaders, and pastors. He had mailed letters of invitation, produced fliers, and taken out radio ads. This energetic young man, on fire for Christ, had done all he could do to make the event a success. His energy on the phone the night before the event filled me with anticipation.

You know the result. The next evening 20 kids showed up, all but one from the hosting church. The youth leader was crushed. He knew the battle our young kids face. He knew the sense of isolation Christians felt in school. He understood that the eternal souls of children in that town were in danger, and that it was up to the Christians to do something.

When I got home I called a pastor friend of mine who lived in the same town. I shared the story I just told you. I asked him why no other churches encouraged their kids to go to the rally. I’ll never forget his reply.

“Coach, we appreciate his efforts, but the truth is we couldn’t encourage our kids to go because we don’t agree with their theology.”

I felt the hair stand up on the back of my neck. “Shame on you, Pastor, for not supporting their efforts, I told him as I bristled. “I notice you have no problem encouraging your kids to go to the public schools, and you certainly know the theology there. When we get to Heaven I think we will all be surprised at who is, and isn’t, there.”

Teaching for commandments the doctrines of men……

Get your head out of your church!

Have you looked around America lately? Are your eyes open to the frontal assault that the haters of God have launched against this nation? Don’t you know 4,000 babies are being murdered every day, the homosexual agenda is being forced down the throats of Christian children, that radical Islam is chomping at the bit for the opportunity to convert your child at the point of a sword, and that daily millions of souls are careening towards an eternity apart from God? All the while we fight our Christian brothers over man-interpreted rules.

Mark 9:38-40. And John answered him, saying, Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name, and he followeth not us: and we forbad him, because he followeth not us. But Jesus said, Forbid him not: for there is no man which shall do a miracle in my name, that can lightly speak evil of me. For he that is not against us is on our part.

What was it Ben Franklin is reported to have said? We will all hang together, or we will all hang separately.

Hey Christians. Other Christians are not your enemy.

© 2006 Dave Daubenmire - All Rights Reserved
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Coach Dave Daubenmire, founder and President of Pass The Salt Ministries www.ptsalt.com and Minutemen United www.minutemenunited.org, is host of the high octane Pass The Salt radio show heard in Columbus, Ohio.

In 1999 Coach Daubenmire was sued by the ACLU for praying with his teams while coaching high school in Ohio. He now spends his energy fighting for Christian principles in the public domain.

The agenda of the party power players behind the scenes was one world government and a mix of fascism and communism.

SILENCING THE PEOPLE & 911

By: Devvy Kidd
October 2, 2006

© 2006 - NewsWithViews.com

"Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government." -- James Madison, 4th president, known as "Father" of the U.S. Constitution

This past week we saw the traitorous, yes, traitorous Republicans pass new legislation to protect their backsides and Bush's from being charged with war crimes. To say this latest move by Congress is beyond any horror most of us hardened warriors said wouldn't happen, is the understatement of the century, i.e.:

"The compromise legislation, which is racing toward the White House, authorizes the president to seize American citizens as enemy combatants, even if they have never left the United States. And once thrown into military prison, they cannot expect a trial by their peers or any other of the normal protections of the Bill of Rights." This column in The Washington Post lays it out quite succinctly and any member of Congress who voted for this abomination should be thrown out of Congress, period. Of course, regular readers of my column know that I support throwing out every single incumbent up for reelection except Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo. Unfortunately, with electronic ballot machines running the show, the shadow government will deal the deck they way they want in November. A further and frightening analysis of this unconstitutional, Nazi style legislation is found here. Any American who questions this government - especially those questioning 911 - are now a target of this draconian legislation.

Recently I received an e-mail from a man who wanted me to beat up the Democrats more instead of just proving the Republicans in control of Congress are destroying the Bill of Rights. Those who have been reading my columns for more than a decade know I play no favorites. Last week I received an e-mail from a sincere sounding lady: "I'm trying to figure out how to salvage the upcoming November elections by getting paper ballots into the polling places. Google led me to your site, where I was completely with you until you labeled Democrats as Communists. It doesn't matter how many communists voted for John Kerry, that doesn't make Democrats communists..."

I have written for years that the agenda of the Democrat Party is communism and see no reason why the Democrat Party shouldn't go ahead and merge with the Communist Party USA. Why do you think the Communist Party USA endorsed John Kerry for president? Because they knew if he became president and ruler of the Democrat Party, he would push to continue their agenda. If you belong to a party that has adopted the communist manifesto and support it, then what are you supporting? Communism. You can't label it any other way. If you don't support communism, then walk away from that party. I was a life long Republican until 1996 when I walked from the GOP after years of research and coming to the painful realization that the agenda of the party power players behind the scenes was one world government and a mix of fascism and communism. How could I continue to belong to and support an organization that is so completely anti-American? I could not, so I left the party and have never regretted it despite the amount of flack which flows into my e-mail box daily. Steven LaTulippe recently wrote an excellent column on this very issue; see here.

So, to answer Jennifer's question: if you agree that America is sliding down the razor blade of totalitarian government aided and abetted by the "leadership" of the two main political parties, then how can you remain a member of these parties, giving these political machines your loyalty, time and money? In essence what you are doing is supporting your own destruction. I am fully cognizant that tens of millions of Americans are loyal to their party even though that party is destroying their lives, their livelihoods and their children's future. I am fully cognizant that tens of millions of Americans are too afraid to walk away from one of the two wings of the same bird of prey because of uncertainty and the perks promised and delivered by corrupt politicians serving in those parties. It is a difficult situation to say the least, but at some point you have to either withdraw your support for the enemy or go down in flames, and whether Americans choose to acknowledge it or not, we are standing on the cliff of total annihilation.

Sadly, so many Americans really don't know what's going on and this position was once again bolstered last week while I was in Denver. I had surgery on my spine last Wednesday; the hospital discharged me on Thursday and my husband and I began the long drive back home to Texas. The surgery was a 100% complete success to date. The excruciating pain I've lived with since mid-June is blessedly totally gone and other than the pain from the incision and stitches, I'm on the mend. Hey, I never let an opportunity go by - even dressed up in hospital garb - to ask questions to get a feel for what people are thinking in different parts of the country. Every person I spoke with at hotels, restaurants, the medical facility where I had the tests and conferences with the neurosurgeons and the huge hospital where I was operated on, knew nothing about the North American Union or the "bigger picture." How many do you suppose know anything other than the official line regarding 911? The one topic my fellow Americans from Texas to Denver and back didn't hesitate to give me their opinion about was the war in Iraq and the war on terrorism; the comments were refreshing and not supportive of the Bush regime's war mongering.

Ah, why are we in Iraq? Oh, yeah, 911 and the endless war on terror. Time has shaken out the truth and we know that justification was a big lie. Those who continue to support Bush's one world imperial quest from God always use the same rhetoric: "Haven't you ever heard of Al Qaeda?" If you don't support the war on terrorism or buy the government's version of events on 911, you support terrorists and condone the barbarians known as Islamic radicals. Of course, those family members whose loved ones were slaughtered on 911 and who have fought so hard to get the truth about 911 must all be soft on terrorism. One columnist recently wrote: "And while I will probably receive unnumbered responses to what I've just said from conspiracy believers, what I've said needs to be said because it is estimated that 1/3 of Americans are starting to believe some of these conspiracy theories, proving once again what Nazi propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels said, "If the lie is big enough and told often enough, it will be believed." I'm glad the government has started to address these conspiracy theories and speculations. The sad thing is that there are some people who are more interested in believing what they believe than in knowing the truth."

So, you see - ask any reasonable questions about 9/11, form your own opinion based on hard research and lack of proof by the government as to their version of events and you are a victim of Joseph Gobbels syndrome. Sure, I've heard of Al Qaeda and Ussamah Bin Laden - you know the guy the U.S. government funded and courted behind the scenes - the same U.S. government that funded and supported their good friend, Saddam Hussein, until it became necessary to remove him from power. Anyone who has done five minutes of real research on Bin Laden and the whole Middle East mess understands how rotten and corrupt the past several administrations have been and will continue unless the American people withdraw their support. The other favorite is: "911 conspiracy theorists are the idiots who promote FDR knew the Japanese were going to attack." In my column on this very issue, I scanned a few pages from Stinnett's book, Day of Deceit. These documents cannot be denied. A federal judge ordered their release stemming from a FOIA lawsuit that lasted more than a decade. Let me quote from just two of the official documents released:

TOP SECRET: "On Friday, November 28, 1941, Admiral Harold Stark, the Chief of Naval Operations, restored the previous day's omission by twice repeating that the United States desires that Japan commit the first overt act."

TOP SECRET: "Though it is signed "MARSHALL," this November 27, 1941, war warning message was originated by Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, acting on the orders of President Roosevelt. It directs the Hawaiian U.S. Army commander, Lieutenant General Walter Short, to follow an official U.S. government desire; "the U.S. desires that Japan commit the first overt act."

Of course, there is much more to Pearl Harbor than just those two documents, but I encourage you to follow up on this by reading my column on it linked above. Naturally, those in denial will emphatically cry out those documents don't mean what they say.

911 is becoming an extremely divisive issue, pitting Americans against each other and it's gotten very ugly. Like hundreds of other journalists, I have written a number of columns on 911. Sadly, some Americans are so dumb, they don't even comprehend what they read in my columns and post nonsense to blogs citing things I allegedly said in a column that aren't even there! Amazing. My last column on the FOIA lawsuit I filed brought a deluge of supportive mail. On the other hand, some of the e-mailers insist that the government's version of events is correct and provided me with many links to bolster their position.

One man who initially threatened me, came back and decided to send me several links which he claims proves the buildings collapsed because of the fires. I looked at the photos and they tell me nothing. You can't judge a book by its cover and that's why I so highly recommend 911 Mysteries: Demolitions, because this 90 minute professional presentation covers in-depth what went on inside the buildings, who was in charge of security and the strange power shut down the weekend before 911 at the twin towers. I have come to the conclusion regarding 911 that there is going to be disagreement for all kinds of reasons, mostly because Americans simply cannot and will not believe the government's story is not what really happened. However, this should not justify the increasing hostile attacks by those who do believe mother government's story against those who are seeking the truth.

I would like to bring forward two more items about 911 that many Americans may not be familiar with; I can only cram so much into each column. The first is Norm Minetta's testimony in front of the 911 Omission Commission and I'll reprint comments from a gentleman who contacted me right after my Flight 93 investigation was posted. He has been keenly interested in the remains of the passengers; this is his recent post to me:

Hi, Devvy. I was pulling together some notes for a blog entry this evening when it hit me: Norman Minetta's 4-minute searing 9/11 Commission testimony reveals the officially covered-up fates of Flights 93 and 77. Bear with me; I have visual evidence.

"In June, James Fetzer, founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, appeared on Hannity and Colmes. When asked by Colmes for evidence of White House complicity in 9/11, Fetzer outed former Transportation Secretary Norm Minetta for his testimony years before that outed Dick Cheney for his role in the operational bunker that fateful morning.

"If you're equipped with high-speed internet, take a look at the first two minutes of Fetzer's Fox interview when he busts Minetta for busting Cheney. Watch it here. Then the day after Fetzer's 22 June appearance on Fox, Minetta resigned. See here. Well, I didn't get it in my head until this evening to pay closer attention to Minetta's response to 9/11 Commissioner Hamilton revealed in this widely-circulated video clip.

"If you listen to it carefully enough, Minetta not only confirms he learned of a shoot-down order for Flight #93 but that he entered the command bunker shortly after Cheney had given a stand-down order for Flight #77 on its way at the time to Washington, D.C. Isn't that utterly amazing. Right in plan sight. I had never really listened to Minetta's testimony until this evening. You probably have made this connection, but I am stunned. Minetta's testimony, of course, was predictably maringalized the final 9/11 Commission report."

I have watched this video clip several times and it most certainly deserves wide dissemination. I also received mail from a man who sent me a web site about another plane landing at Cleveland Hopkins that morning which, quite frankly, blew me away as I had not read about this and I've tried to read everything on 911 - both sides of the argument representing hundreds of hours of research. There are two links, here and here. I found you have to read the first one to thoroughly understand the continuation in the second one. It took several hours to go through these two sites, not just because of the narrative and time lines, but because I hit on every link used as source reference material - including eye witness accounts from passengers. Here again, let me refer people to Paul Thompson's Timeline and Michael Ruppert's fully documented book, Crossing the Rubicon, for their meticulous reporting and analysis of the numerous military operations which coincidentally just happened to be underway during the attacks on 911. This is a crucial section of the puzzle and absolutely germane to the issue of Flight 93.

After reading this information about a second plane, I am more convinced than ever the FOIA I filed is critical. As I have said many times, there was unbelievable confusion that morning as the horrors of the day unfolded. Hard documentation is of paramount importance and the data I requested in my FOIA from the FAA will help in sorting out events. There is one update on my lawsuit. While I was in Denver having surgery, the General Counsel for the FAA in DC phoned me; my home, doggies and bird sitters were kind enough to take a message from him. As this column goes to press before business today, I won't find out what this FAA attorney has to say until I return his call, but I will keep readers updated in future columns.

© 2006 - NewsWithViews.com - All Rights Reserved

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty, which sold close to 2,000,000 copies. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country, ran for Congress and is a highly sought after public speaker. Your complimentary copy of the 32-page report may be obtained from El Dorado Gold. Devvy is a contributing writer for www.NewsWithViews.com.

VOTE INCUMBENTS OUT

VOTE INCUMBENTS OUT

By Frosty Wooldridge
October 2, 2006
NewsWithViews.com

This letter entered my inbox this week. It’s a good start as to why we must vote out most incumbents from Congress.

“oh mr. frosty, you are a lone voice crying out in the wilderness, and no one is listening. my brothers continue to stream into our beloved aztlan by the thousands every day, and your government does nothing. why? because deep down they understand that resistance is futile, and they realize the southwest rightfully belongs to the bronze descendants of the mighty aztecs. our women bear 5 children to every one born to whites. we have cowed your politicians into turning a blind eye to our invasion. they know that if they dare speak out they will no longer have a job. the reconquista is in full swing, and the beloved dream of aztlan is well within our grasp. would you deny that once more california belongs to us? our ancient language, nahuatl, is being taught in "illegal immigrant" charter schools funded by "your" own government. Ha! Ha! Ha! i'll bet that really gets your goat to know that your own tax dollars are being given to us to further our glorious reconquista. the white man has become weakened by guilt and decadence and that is why we must inevitably win. you have already lost "your" country, you just aren't smart enough to realize it. move to canada or back to europe, because the white man has no place in the coming bronze order. you fool! even "your" top law enforcement officer is one of us! why do you think "your" US justice department does nothing? viva mexico! viva aztlan!”

Sub-commandante pedro

MeCHA Brown Berets

Did this little slime-butt get under your skin with his taunting? If America is to survive this invasion, you, dear reader, you fellow voter, must stand up, speak out, and vote most incumbents out of office. Save Tom Tancredo, Steve King, Mike Price, Nathan Deal, J.D. Hayworth, Ron Paul, James Sensenbrenner and a few other patriots, we need to clean out the deadwood in the House and Senate.

Let’s start with some of the big ones. Dick Mountjoy faces Dianne Feinstein of California in November while Ken Chase tries to unseat Ted Kennedy. Both enjoy a good chance of being elected because their opponents are two of the most vocal open-borders and amnesty-for-all advocates in the country.

These constitute two of the most important races in our nation in the upcoming election. Go after the big ones and the rest tumble like Humpty Dumpty. Your voice must speak out, “Serve us and our Constitution or we will fire you!”

“By going to their respective web sites, one can see that both Ken Chase and Dick Mountjoy have strong conservative credentials,” said Paul Goedinghaus, Alamo Alliance president. “By campaigning on illegal immigration, the candidates will not only be attacking their opponents where they are the most vulnerable, they will also have strong appeal to independent and cross-over voters.”

You and your organization’s endorsement will help in getting these two candidates elected. Endorsements for Ken Chase should be sent to dan@chaseforsenate.com and endorsements for Dick Mountjoy should be sent to Pmew60@aol.com.

No single issue in America today grabs voters by the throat more than illegal immigration. It affects every sector, level and community in the nation. Kennedy, Feinstein, McCain, Hatch, First, Hillary Clinton, Cannon, Degette, Pelosi, Salazar, Craig, Udall, Reid and hundreds like them need to be deported out of Congress.

Goedinghaus puts it this way; “Americans need to be given a clear choice in November. There is no middle ground on this issue. The legislature has drawn the lines and they will either enact an amnesty or they will vote to secure our borders and enforce our immigration laws. That is the reason for the America First Contract.”

The America First Contract states that the candidate pledges:

During my term in office, I will vote against any legislation that weakens our current immigration laws in any respect or allows for increased immigration, increased guest workers or any form of amnesty. Amnesty shall be defined as any law that allows people who are in this country illegally to do anything other than leave the United States.
Within the first 30 days of my term in office, I will co-sponsor and vote for legislation to adequately fund enforcement of our existing immigration laws.
Within the first 60 days of my term in office, I will co-sponsor and vote for legislation to build a security fence along the entire southern border of the United States, with the exception of areas where it would be impossible to build such a fence. In areas where a fence is not feasible, I will vote for other security measures as deemed adequate to secure those areas. I will also vote to appropriate any and all funds necessary to accomplish this.
Within the first 90 days of my term in office, I will co-sponsor and vote for legislation to properly define the 14th Amendment to apply only to the children of people who are legal residents of the United States. Said legislation will specifically state that the intent of the 14th amendment was NEVER to have applied to the children of people who were in this country illegally and is therefore retroactive.
Within the first 90 days of my term in office, I will co-sponsor and vote for legislation to deny any and all government benefits to people who are in this country illegally and to provide tort reform so that hospital emergency rooms can turn away non-emergency cases without facing lawsuits for doing so and to provide that no liability, criminal or civil, attaches to any emergency facility for refusing to treat non-emergency cases.
Within my first 120 days in office, I will co-sponsor and vote for legislation requiring valid proof of citizenship of any and all persons registering to vote and proof of citizenship in order to vote in our elections. Said legislation shall provide that any U.S. citizen who cannot afford it shall bear no cost for providing said proof of citizenship.
This is not the time to say that your vote won’t count. It won’t count if you don’t vote. Additionally, go down to your precinct. Force paper trail voting. Stand guard over the ballot box. Quit saying, “they” have the electronic votes rigged. A republican form of government doesn’t brook excuses. Get involved, get your hands dirty and become a part of the solution.

That little twerp at the head of this column laughs at us and our government. Why? Because after six years, our public servant, George Bush, whom we voted into office to uphold our U.S. Constitution, fails us every single day since 9/11. Why does that Mexican alien twerp laugh? Because 62 members of our U.S. Senate voted to let more of his kind into our country! You can send 33 U.S. senators into the unemployment line on November 7, 2006. That will straighten up the remaining 67. While you’re at it, you can replace the entire House of Representatives, save the few patriots aforementioned. It’s time we cleaned House and swept out the Senate.

If we vote the same people back into office, we’re a bunch of fools on a ship with no rudder, being piloted by a captain with no understanding of his disastrous destination, and a crew blindly following an incompetent man at the risk of endangering future passengers. Have you ever heard of the Titanic? Its destiny could have been changed if someone had spoke up, if someone had acted. It’s time for you to act as if you were on the Titanic and you knew what was going to happen.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You’re invited to support the PRR. Send donations to: 21st Century Paul Revere Ride at POB 207, Louisville, CO 80027. Additionally, we have 300 Paul Revere Ride T-shirts left that feature: “Stop Illegal Immigration” on the front and the very cool “21st Century Paul Revere Ride” logo on the back with web sites. You’re invited to order them at the same address above for $15.00 which includes handling and postage. State your size.

Wooldridge presents a 45 minute program to colleges, high schools, civic clubs, church groups and political clubs across America titled: “COMING POPULATION CRISIS IN AMERICA: WHAT YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT.” Go to his website for further information on booking the program. www.frostywooldridge.com

Would you like to support the PRR? Send donations to: 21st Century Paul Revere Ride at POB 207, Louisville, CO 80027. www.21stCenturyPaulRevereRide.us; www.carryingcapacity.org; www.numbersusa.com; www.thewakeupamericafoundation.com. Also, check out www.alipac.us at 1 866 329 3999; www.theamericanresistance.com; www.ccir.net; www.theByteShow.com; www.projectusa.org; www.borderguardians.org; www.immigrationwatchcanada.com; www.mothersagainstillegalaliens.org; www.unitedpatriotsofamerica.com; www.unitedstates.fm; www.worldfreedomtour.info; My book: “IMMIGRATION’S UNARMED INVASION: DEADLY CONSEQUENCES” Call: 1 888 280 7715. www.TiANews.com – www.victimsofillegalaliens.org; www.pacinlaw.org; USBorderAlert.com; SanDiegoBorderAlert.com; www.LaurieRothShow.com

© 2006 Frosty Wooldridge - All Rights Reserved

TREASON IN THE CHURCH: TRADING TRUTH FOR A “SOCIAL GOSPEL”

TREASON IN THE CHURCH: TRADING TRUTH FOR A “SOCIAL GOSPEL”PART 2

By Berit Kjos

October 1, 2006

NewsWithViews.com

"Rockefeller... provided support to about 220 churches and missionary organizations of his own denomination [Baptist] as well as to about 80 institutions of other denominations; to more than 160 social welfare and moral reform organizations and institutions; and to more than 100 schools and universities."[1]

"Some even believe we [the Rockefellers] are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure--one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." [2]David Rockefeller's Memoirs

"...we should no longer be children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness of deceitful plotting..." Ephesians 4:14-15

Infiltration and deception have been tools of conspirators through the ages, and the Church has been a primary target! After all, God warns us that "the whole world is under the sway of the evil one." (1 John 5:19) One of his most effective schemes is to redefine God's Word and divert Christians from His unchanging Truth to man's shifting ideals.

For example, God calls and equips us to serve the poor. That's why His true followers around the world have willingly given their lives to share His truth and love in perilous places. But today's world-centered church illustrates a different kind of service. Designed to please man rather than God, it trains its servers to hide the "offensive" truths of the gospel.

Like Rick Warren, it uses the Bible to validate its purposes but emphasizes organizational behavior rather than Biblical beliefs -- in short, deeds instead of creeds.[3] Behind its noble appearance hides a postmodern version of the century-old "Christian Socialism."

THE SOCIAL GOSPEL AND THE COUNCIL OF CHURCHES

Called "Father of the Social Gospel," Walter Rauschenbusch (1861-1918), grew up in a German Lutheran immigrant family in New York. He studied theology at the University of Rochester, one of hundreds of educational and "Christian" institutions funded by John D. Rockefeller. After pastoring a Baptist Church among poor immigrants in New York City for a few years, he joined the faculty at Rochester Theological Seminary -- also funded by Rockefeller. In 1902 he became its Professor of Church History.

From this prominent platform, he wrote books such as "Christianizing the Social Order" and "A Theology for the Social Gospel."[4] Steeped in "higher criticism" and socialist ideology, he taught what many considered a more relevant and compassionate gospel. Eventually, he "changed both the emphases and the direction of American Protestantism."[5]

Rauschenbusch introduced Jesus "not as one who would come to save sinners from their sins but as one who had a 'social passion' for society."[6] He and his comrades established the "Brotherhood of the Kingdom," which unified like-minded church leaders under a common socialist quest for an earthly "Kingdom of God."

Their plan would have fit our times! It called for political reform, ecumenical unity, "social justice" (ending poverty), and global peace. To justify its place in "Christian" theology, words like redemption and regeneration were redefined to fit their socialist ideals.[7]

Sounds familiar, doesn't it? Popular church leaders use the same strategy today! Pastor Brian McLaren's recent book, The Secret Message of Jesus, twists God's Word into an endorsement of an earthly, interfaith Kingdom.[8] Likewise, Tony Campolo's hope of earthly perfection mocks the Biblical promise of eternal life:

"The gospel is not about... pie-in-the-sky when they die.... It is imperative that the up and coming generation recognize that the biblical Jesus was committed to the realization of a new social order in this world.... Becoming a Christian, therefore, is a call to social action."[9]

In 1907, Rauschenbusch met with the leaders of Fabian socialism in England, Sidney Webb and Beatrice Potter Webb. Unlike impatient Marxist revolutionaries, the methodical Fabians emphasized peaceful transformation through propaganda and infiltration of universities, seminaries and churches.

Through the years, this socialist movement grew to include Bertrand Russell, H. G. Wells (who wrote Open Conspiracy), Sinclair Lewis, Theosophical leader Annie Besant, and the Communist leader Harry Dexter White who worked with Alger Hiss to establish the United Nations.[10] It spread through Western nations -- thanks, in part, to liberal churches that preached its message as if backed by the authority of God.

As you saw in Part 1, the Rockefellers and other powerful "change agents" fueled this movement. Their funding would sway universities, seminaries, and churches from coast to coast. They supported psycho-social research through Hitler's eugenics program, through London's Tavistock Institute, and through various American Universities and institutions. This new "science" would raise propaganda, persuasion, and mind control to ever more sophisticated levels.

With Rockefeller support, Rauschenbusch and his comrade Rev. Harry Ward helped establish the Federal Council of Churches (FCC) in 1908.[11] Dr. Ward, through his Soviet connections and influential positions, would become the main source of Communist infiltration into the FCC (later renamed NCC: "National Council of Churches"), Christian seminaries, and compassionate unsuspecting pastors and congregations across the country. Hard to believe? Then look at the evidence below.

COMMUNIST INFILTRATION

The following testimonies were given under oath before the Committee on Un-American Activities of the U.S. House of Representatives, 83rd Congress, in July, 1953.[12] Robert Kunzig, chief counsel for the committee, asked the questions. Manning Johnson, formerly a top member of the Communist Party, answered this particular set of questions. Page 2266, Congressional Record.

KUNZIG: "...the name Harry Ward has appeared in so many of these various organizations and groups. It seems as if there is almost an interlacing tie-up... through various sects and denominations. Have you any comment to make on this situation?

JOHNSON: "Yes, I have. Dr. Harry F. Ward, for many years, has been the chief architect for Communist infiltration and subversion in the religious field.

According to this Congressional Report, Rev. Ward also taught "Christian ethics" at Union Theological Seminary [funded by the Rockefellers], presided over the Federal Council of Churches, chaired the American Civil Liberties Union, and worked with the Y.M.C.A., Y.W.C.A. and the Interchurch World Movement.[13] Page 2170.

JOHNSON: "I would first like to read to you what William Z. Foster [General Secretary of the U.S. Communist Party USA] has to say on this matter."

'Communists must ever be keen to cultivate the democratic spirit of mutual tolerance among the religious sects.... A still greater lesson for us to learn, however, is how to work freely with religious strata for the accomplishment of democratic mass objectives....

'A very serious mistake of the American left wing during many years... has been its attempt arbitrarily to wave aside religious sentiments among the masses. Reactionary forces [mainly concerned Christians] have already known how to take advantage of this shortsighted sectarian error.... 'In recent years, however, the Communist Party, with its policy of ‘the outstretched hand,’ has done much to overcome the harmful left-wing narrowness of former years and to develop a more healthy cooperation with the religious masses....'”

KUNZIG: "Was deceit a major policy of Communist propaganda and activity?"

Mr. JOHNSON: "Yes, it was. They made fine gestures and honeyed words to the church people which could be well likened unto the song of the fabled sea nymphs luring millions to moral decay, spiritual death, and spiritual slavery....." Pages 2201 and 2202.

JOHNSON: "The Methodist Federation for Social Service or the Methodist Federation for Social Action, headed by the Rev. Harry F. Ward, whom I have already identified as a Party member, was invaluable to the Communist Party... because through it the Party was able to get contacts with thousands of ministers all over the country.

"...quite a few ministers, for example, participated in the united front known as the American League Against War and Fascism.... In fact, they were so deeply involved through Harry F. Ward that they became the spokesmen -- the advocates, the builders, and the leaders of this most important Communist front that engaged in everything from simple assault on a government to espionage, sabotage and the overthrow of the Government...." Page 2228.

Part of Manning Johnson's testimony was an article in the Daily Worker (5-7-53). This "Exhibit No. 21" reports on a dinner held in Dr. Ward's honor. Notice the name of Corliss Lamont, the communist son of Thomas Lamont, the head of the J. P. Morgan banking conglomerate, who was introduced in Part 1 of this series:

"...New World Review, a progressive monthly devoted to circulating the truth about the Socialist and People’s Democracies abroad... brought out several hundred friends and former students of Dr. Ward, and some of those who knew him well, like... Corliss Lamont... told the others of how Dr. Ward’s teachings enriched them personally and how his tremendous work for brotherhood, peace, and justice has influenced the nation."

KUNZIG: "...could you give us a summary of the overall manner in which the Communists have attempted to infiltrate and poison the religious organizations of America wherever possible?"

JOHNSON: "Once the tactic of infiltrating religious organizations was set by the Kremlin, the actual mechanics of implementing the 'new line' was a question of following the... church movement in Russia, where the Communists discovered that the destruction of religion could proceed much faster through infiltration of the church by Communist agents operating within the church itself.

"...the infiltration tactic in this country would have to adapt itself to American conditions.... In the earliest stages it was determined that with only small forces available it would be necessary to concentrate Communist agents in the seminaries and divinity schools. The practical conclusion drawn by the Red leaders was that these institutions would make it possible for a small Communist minority to influence the ideology of future clergymen....

"...the idea was to divert the emphasis of clerical thinking from the spiritual to the material.... Instead of emphasis towards the spiritual and matters of the soul, the new and heavy emphasis was to deal with those matters which, in the main, led toward the Communist program of “immediate demands” [or "felt needs"]....

Does the last point sound familiar? It should to those who are concerned about the worldwide Purpose-Driven movement. For Rick Warren prompted that same shift from "the spiritual" to "the material." As he told thousands of pastors around the world through his "Ministry Toolbox," the focus of his ministry has shifted from faith in God's Word to service to the world:

"The first Reformation clarified what we believe. This reformation is all about how we act and operate in the world. It involves the key components of purpose, decentralization, lay mobilization, use of technology, and continuous learning. Churches that change are thriving and growing more effective. Churches that refuse to change will miss the reformation, and are dying."[14] --Rick Warren

Not true! God's uncompromising and eternal Church can never die! As Jesus, the head of His Church, told His disciples, "My kingdom is not of this world." Nor are His followers "of the world!" Yet, He sends us "into the world" so that we, "speaking the truth in love,"[15] may demonstrate His truth and love (not man's pragmatic ideals) to all who will hear.

"I have given them Your word; and the world has hated them because they are not of the world, just as I am not of the world.... Sanctify them by Your truth. Your word is truth." John 17:14,17

In Part 3, we will compare the strategies of the socialist/Communist infiltrators with the new transformational strategies used by trained facilitator/leaders within the Church Growth and Purpose-Driven movements. For part one click below.

Click here for part -----> 1.



Footnotes:

1, Rockefeller Archive Center
2, David Rockefeller, Memoirs (Random House, New York, 2002) Chapter 27, pages 404 and 405.
3, Equipping Leaders to 'Lead Like Jesus'? and Whom do we serve?
4, Rauschenbusch, Walter
5, Dr. A.W. Beaven, former president of the Federal Council of Churches. Collectivism in the Churches, page 99. Referenced below:
6, Edgar C Bundy, Collectivism in the Churches: A documented account of the political activities of the Federal, National, and World Councils of Churches (Wheaton, Illinois: Church League of America, 1957), page 97.
7, Ibid
8, Who defines the kingdom of God?
9, Reflections on youth minstry in a global context:
10, Fabian Society
11, . Bundy, page 97.
12, The Congressional Record on Investigation of Communist Activities in the New York City Area (Parts 6-8). Hearing Before The Committee on Un-American Activities, House of Representatives, 83rd Congress, First Session, July 7-8 and 13-14, 1953. Bundy, Chapter 2.
13, Bundy, page 131.
14, www.pastors.com/RWMT/?ID=89
15, John 18:36; John 17:16, 18; Ephesians 4:15.

© 2006 Berit Kjos - All Rights Reserved
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Berit Kjos is a widely respected researcher, writer and conference speaker. A frequent guest on national radio and television programs, Kjos has been interviewed on Point of View (Marlin Maddoux), The 700 Club, Bible Answer Man, Beverly LaHaye Live, Crosstalk and Family Radio Network. She has also been a guest on "Talk Back Live" (CNN) and other secular radio and TV networks. Her last two books are A Twist of Faith and Brave New Schools. Kjos Ministries Web Site: http://www.crossroad.to/index.html

Abbas asks Rice for weapons from U.S.

Abbas asks Rice for weapons from U.S.
Previous American arms transfer shared with terrorists


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: October 4, 2006

By Aaron Klein
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

RAMALLAH – In his meeting today with U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas requested a large shipment of weapons from the United States purportedly to arm his group against Hamas following recent intense clashes with the rival group, a senior Palestinian Authority official told WND.

The official said Rice, in private, expressed her support for Abbas' government and said the U.S. would review ways to bolster it, including possibly with weapons.

"Rice was very positive in her attitude toward steps needed to bolster Abbas," said the PA official. "She said an answer to our requests would likely be affirmative."

The U.S. government previously sent weapons to Abbas in May after the Palestinian leader requested the arms to bolster Fatah's Force 17 security forces against possible clashes with Hamas.

In June, WND broke the story about how assault rifles that were part of a cache of weapons transferred by the U.S. made its way to members of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group, some of whom are also officers of Force 17. The weapons may have been used in a string of shootings, including an ambush against a busload of Israeli school girls here, Al Aqsa members told WND.

Following her meeting here today with Abbas, Rice told reporters the U.S. would find ways to help the PA president. She said she had "great admiration" for Abbas' leadership and for what she said was his "willingness" to restart Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.

"You have the strong commitment of the United States to that cause and the personal commitment of me and the personal commitment of the president," she told Abbas.

In Jerusalem, Defense Minister Amir Peretz said Rice's meeting with Abbas was meant to strengthen him against Hamas.

"The secretary of state's visit is aimed at reviving dialogue with Abu Mazen (Abbas) and to bolster him," Peretz told Israel's leading Yediot Aharonot daily.

The statements follow clashes the past few days between Hamas and Fatah in which 11 Palestinians were killed and more than 130 were injured in Gaza Strip and the West Bank. The infighting broke out this past Sunday when a 3,500-strong Hamas militia confronted members of Fatah's security forces protesting the government's inability to pay their wages.

In a marked escalation of rhetoric, the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, the declared "military wing" of Fatah, threatened yesterday to kill Hamas leaders, including Damascus-based Hamas chieftain Khaled Meshal.

The Brigades, along with the Islamic Jihad terror group, are responsible for every suicide bombing in Israel the past two years. The group has also carried out scores of shooting and rocket attacks against Israeli civilians.

A senior Palestinian official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told WND Fatah security officials noted that in Sunday's firefights Hamas members used weaponry more advanced than what was known to have been in the Hamas arsenal, including newer styles of assault rifles and rocket propelled grenades.

The official said Abbas has enlisted senior Egyptian and Jordanian officials to help him petition the U.S. for more weapons to arm his group, particularly Fatah security forces in Gaza, against Hamas.

The U.S. considers Abbas to be a "moderate" and regularly supports his Fatah organization with money and weapons.

In May, Egypt, Jordan and Israel reportedly were involved in talks requesting weapons from the U.S., stating rifles and ammunition were needed to arm Fatah for possible clashes with Hamas. The U.S. reportedly agreed.

The weapons were transported in late May into Israel from the Jordanian border and were delivered to Force 17 by a convoy protected by the Israeli Defense Forces. The cache was driven to Ramallah and to the Gaza Strip border.

In Ramallah, the U.S. weapons were trucked to the main Fatah government building, used by both Force 17 and members of the Al Aqsa Brigades, Palestinian officials involved in the transfer told WND.

The U.S. weapons transfer reportedly included 3,000 American-made M-16 assault rifles and more than 1 million rounds of ammunition.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert announced he had approved the shipment of weapons and ammunition, explaining the transfer was meant for Abbas' personal protection.

"I did this because we are running out of time and we need to help Abu Mazen," Olmert told reporters.

But following the transfer, Force 17 senior officer Abu Yousuf told WND in an exclusive interview the American weapons will be shared with the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades and utilized for attacks against Jews.

Abu Yousuf is also a member of the Al Aqsa Brigades. He hinted the weapons were used in shooting attacks in June that killed one Israeli civilian and wounded another.

Many Force 17 officers are also members of the Brigades. In June, Abbas appointed senior Brigades leader Mahmoud Damra to head Force 17. Damra is on Israel's most-wanted list of terrorists. He is accused of masterminding a string of attacks. Damra was arrested by Israel last month.

Abu Yousuf told WND the U.S. and Israel facilitated the May transfer of weapons to his Force 17 unit "for its own political purposes. We are not concerned with the reasons. The weapons will not be used against our brothers, only (against) Israelis."

Sources close to the Al Aqsa Brigades told WND the American assault rifles were used in three separate anti-Israel shooting attacks in June. One attack killed a 35-year-old Israeli Arab on a major West Bank highway on the outskirts of Jerusalem. Israeli security officials say the shooters likely mistook the victim for a Jew. The second attack, which occurred June 13 on the same highway, lightly wounded an Israeli.

In the third attack, June 19, the Al Aqsa Brigades ambushed a bus carrying Israeli school girls on a West Bank highway. The bus was armored. The school girls escaped unharmed.

Abu Yousuf refused to confirm whether the American weapons were used in the spate of highway shootings, but he hinted the information was accurate.

"It is no coincidence that as soon as these American weapons arrived, we were able to carry out these accurate shootings," Abu Yousuf said.

Schwarzenegger signs bill to give homosexuals standing as 'couples'

Gov. Arnold 'terminates' man-and-woman marriage plan
Schwarzenegger signs bill to give homosexuals standing as 'couples'


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: October 4, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com


Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has given homosexuals in his state the rights of marriage, and has failed to fully protect school children from the "gay" agenda, according to those assessing the results of this year's state legislature.

One weblog contributor described much of the work turned in as "lesbolation," and many believe Schwarzenegger buckled under pressure from alternative lifestyle activists.

Schwarzenegger vetoed some pieces brought by lesbian lawmakers, providing a nominal amount of protection for the millions of Californians who hold to traditional values, but what he did sign will cause massive damage, pro-family organizations said.

For example, the governor signed a bill terminating the last vestige of traditional marriage, with a plan to allow "domestic partners" to file personal income taxes by checking either "married filing jointly" or "married filing separately" categories.

"Shame on Arnold Schwarzenegger for attacking marriage between a husband and wife, and for being two-faced about this sacred institution," Randy Thomasson, president of the Campaign for Children and Families, said afterwards.

"SB 1827 equates a wife with a homosexual, which makes no sense at all. How dare the Governor turn marriage inside out and upside down. Where's his respect for marriage? Where's Schwarzenegger's respect for California voters who demanded that marriage rights be protected for a man and a woman?"

The CCF said the plan was initiated and pushed through the state's liberal legislature by lesbian state Sen. Carole Migden, a San Francisco Democrat. It literally awards marriage status to homosexual pairs, officials said.

In an interview with the "San Jose Mercury News" earlier, Migden admitted that it was the "final piece" of legislation in the plan to obtain marriage benefits for homosexuals, "and I'm proud of it."

The governor, meanwhile, provided some protection for public schools from gay activists, but failed to do the same thing for colleges, leaving Christian institutions of higher learning facing a difficult future.

He vetoed three "sexual indoctrination" bills that posed a "triple threat" to families.

The Capitol Resource Institute said AB 606, AB 1056 and SB 1437 were dropped by the wayside just as the signing deadline was approaching.

"This is a victory for California families," said Karen England, chief of the CRI. "Due to the public outcry over these outrageous attacks on students with moral beliefs, the governor vetoed all three."

Many groups, including several national outreaches such as the Colorado Springs-based Focus on the Family and others had lobbied their constituents to oppose the plans.

The CRI said AB 606 would have required the State Board of Education to increase sensitivity to so-called "discrimination." Under the plan the state Superintendent of Public Instruction would have had unlimited discretion to withhold state funds from schools that did not comply with that individual's interpretation of the law. It would have allowed discrimination complaints to be based on "perceived" actions.

A second plan, AB 1056, would have "integrated tolerance training" into history and social science curriculum and started a pilot program that would have forced students to learn a "new definition" of tolerance, one that would require them to not only accept but advocate for homosexuality, bisexuality and transgenderism, the CRI said.

"The governor's office received thousands of phone calls, e-mails, letters and faxes regarding the triple threat," said Meredith Turney, CRI's legislative liaison. "Citizen activism is extremely effective."

SB 1437 would have prevented any school teaching materials or activities from "reflecting adversely" upon homosexuals, bisexuals or transgenders. It also would have revised all social sciences programs to reflect the special contributions of homosexuals throughout history.

"The bills are not education, they are indoctrination, designed to inculcate our children and grandchildren," said former California Assemblyman Larry Bowler, R-Elk Grove.

The governor also vetoed AB 2510, which would have forced school children to be questioned about whether they've been exposed to "bullying" based on sexual orientation.

But family groups remained concerned that Schwarzenegger on Aug. 28 signed SB 1441, which will force religious colleges – if a single student is attending on a state grant – to promote transexuality, bisexuality and homosexuality.

Thomasson told WND at the time that it "tramples the religious values of faith-based institutions."

"The Christian colleges are very afraid," Thomasson said earlier. "They are huddling together talking about a plan of action."

Thomasson had told WND at stake are the "hearts and minds" of 6.5 million schoolchildren in the state, who, with implementation of the programs, would have become "sexualized activists" in public schools.

The governor also signed a law to allow the public shaming of pharmacists who have religious objections to dispensing abortion pills and to assemble a panel of abortionists to recommend actions on crimes against them.

Thomasson remained concerned over the new "counterfeit marriage" available to homosexuals in California. It's a special privilege granted by no other state except Massachusetts so far.

"There is now no difference in California law between marriage rights for a husband and wife and marriage rights for homosexuals," Thomasson said.

The legislation defied the will of California voters, who earlier had voted by nearly a 2-to-1 margin to protect marriage for only a man and a woman.

The same weblog participant who cited the "lesbolation" also concluded that "California really needs a political enema."

"I say let Schwarzenegger just burn politically. It isn't worth the fight if he is going to sign some of this kind of crazy legislation … Let a real wholesome liberal win it so we don't have to bear the disgrace of Schwarzenegger with an R beside his name."

However, polls show the governor pulled ahead of his opponent, state Treasurer Phil Angelides, as the election nears, and a report in the San Fransisco Chronicle showed that conservatives mostly are sticking with him, despite his positions.

One reason is that there hasn't been any serious challenger to Schwarzenegger's role as leader of the GOP in California, and Republicans have the horrors of giving up to Democrats.

Real estate investor Ken Sheppard told the newspaper that he's upset with some of the governor's actions, but, "if the other side were going to win, we would be hit with higher taxes for years and years and years. It's not like voting for Arnold. It's voting against Angelides."

Abbas asks Rice for weapons from U.S.

Abbas asks Rice for weapons from U.S.
Previous American arms transfer shared with terrorists


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: October 4, 2006

By Aaron Klein
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

RAMALLAH – In his meeting today with U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas requested a large shipment of weapons from the United States purportedly to arm his group against Hamas following recent intense clashes with the rival group, a senior Palestinian Authority official told WND.

The official said Rice, in private, expressed her support for Abbas' government and said the U.S. would review ways to bolster it, including possibly with weapons.

"Rice was very positive in her attitude toward steps needed to bolster Abbas," said the PA official. "She said an answer to our requests would likely be affirmative."

The U.S. government previously sent weapons to Abbas in May after the Palestinian leader requested the arms to bolster Fatah's Force 17 security forces against possible clashes with Hamas.

In June, WND broke the story about how assault rifles that were part of a cache of weapons transferred by the U.S. made its way to members of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group, some of whom are also officers of Force 17. The weapons may have been used in a string of shootings, including an ambush against a busload of Israeli school girls here, Al Aqsa members told WND.

Following her meeting here today with Abbas, Rice told reporters the U.S. would find ways to help the PA president. She said she had "great admiration" for Abbas' leadership and for what she said was his "willingness" to restart Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.

"You have the strong commitment of the United States to that cause and the personal commitment of me and the personal commitment of the president," she told Abbas.

In Jerusalem, Defense Minister Amir Peretz said Rice's meeting with Abbas was meant to strengthen him against Hamas.

"The secretary of state's visit is aimed at reviving dialogue with Abu Mazen (Abbas) and to bolster him," Peretz told Israel's leading Yediot Aharonot daily.

The statements follow clashes the past few days between Hamas and Fatah in which 11 Palestinians were killed and more than 130 were injured in Gaza Strip and the West Bank. The infighting broke out this past Sunday when a 3,500-strong Hamas militia confronted members of Fatah's security forces protesting the government's inability to pay their wages.

In a marked escalation of rhetoric, the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, the declared "military wing" of Fatah, threatened yesterday to kill Hamas leaders, including Damascus-based Hamas chieftain Khaled Meshal.

The Brigades, along with the Islamic Jihad terror group, are responsible for every suicide bombing in Israel the past two years. The group has also carried out scores of shooting and rocket attacks against Israeli civilians.

A senior Palestinian official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told WND Fatah security officials noted that in Sunday's firefights Hamas members used weaponry more advanced than what was known to have been in the Hamas arsenal, including newer styles of assault rifles and rocket propelled grenades.

The official said Abbas has enlisted senior Egyptian and Jordanian officials to help him petition the U.S. for more weapons to arm his group, particularly Fatah security forces in Gaza, against Hamas.

The U.S. considers Abbas to be a "moderate" and regularly supports his Fatah organization with money and weapons.

In May, Egypt, Jordan and Israel reportedly were involved in talks requesting weapons from the U.S., stating rifles and ammunition were needed to arm Fatah for possible clashes with Hamas. The U.S. reportedly agreed.

The weapons were transported in late May into Israel from the Jordanian border and were delivered to Force 17 by a convoy protected by the Israeli Defense Forces. The cache was driven to Ramallah and to the Gaza Strip border.

In Ramallah, the U.S. weapons were trucked to the main Fatah government building, used by both Force 17 and members of the Al Aqsa Brigades, Palestinian officials involved in the transfer told WND.

The U.S. weapons transfer reportedly included 3,000 American-made M-16 assault rifles and more than 1 million rounds of ammunition.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert announced he had approved the shipment of weapons and ammunition, explaining the transfer was meant for Abbas' personal protection.

"I did this because we are running out of time and we need to help Abu Mazen," Olmert told reporters.

But following the transfer, Force 17 senior officer Abu Yousuf told WND in an exclusive interview the American weapons will be shared with the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades and utilized for attacks against Jews.

Abu Yousuf is also a member of the Al Aqsa Brigades. He hinted the weapons were used in shooting attacks in June that killed one Israeli civilian and wounded another.

Many Force 17 officers are also members of the Brigades. In June, Abbas appointed senior Brigades leader Mahmoud Damra to head Force 17. Damra is on Israel's most-wanted list of terrorists. He is accused of masterminding a string of attacks. Damra was arrested by Israel last month.

Abu Yousuf told WND the U.S. and Israel facilitated the May transfer of weapons to his Force 17 unit "for its own political purposes. We are not concerned with the reasons. The weapons will not be used against our brothers, only (against) Israelis."

Sources close to the Al Aqsa Brigades told WND the American assault rifles were used in three separate anti-Israel shooting attacks in June. One attack killed a 35-year-old Israeli Arab on a major West Bank highway on the outskirts of Jerusalem. Israeli security officials say the shooters likely mistook the victim for a Jew. The second attack, which occurred June 13 on the same highway, lightly wounded an Israeli.

In the third attack, June 19, the Al Aqsa Brigades ambushed a bus carrying Israeli school girls on a West Bank highway. The bus was armored. The school girls escaped unharmed.

Abu Yousuf refused to confirm whether the American weapons were used in the spate of highway shootings, but he hinted the information was accurate.

"It is no coincidence that as soon as these American weapons arrived, we were able to carry out these accurate shootings," Abu Yousuf said.

Fatah member explains PA president's ultimate goal to destroy Jewish state

Abbas recognition of Israel 'political calculation'
Fatah member explains PA president's ultimate goal to destroy Jewish state

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: October 4, 2006

By Aaron Klein

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
JERUSALEM – Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas' stated recognition of Israel's right to exist is part of a "political calculation" aimed at ultimately destroying the Jewish state, a terror group leader and member of Abbas' Fatah party told WND in an interview.

The leader said the Fatah party does not recognize Israel and that any final accord that doesn't include flooding the Jewish state with millions of Palestinians will not be supported by the Fatah party and will lead to Palestinian civil war.

"The base of our Fatah movement keeps dreaming of Tel Aviv, Haifa, Jaffa and Acco," said Abu Ahmed, Fatah member and leader of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades in the northern Gaza Strip. "There is no change in our position. Abbas recognizes Israel because of pressure that the Zionists and the Americans are exercising on him. We understand this is part of his obligations and political calculations."

(Story continues below)


The Brigades is the declared "military wing" of Abbas' Fatah party. Together with the Islamic Jihad terror group, the Brigades has taken responsibility for every suicide bombing inside Israel the past two years, including an attack in Tel Aviv this past April that killed an American teenager and nine Israelis. The Brigades also has carried out scores of deadly shooting and rocket attacks against Israeli civilians in recent months.

Brigades leaders are members of Fatah. The terror group's founder, Marwan Barghouti, is an elected Fatah official and is largely considered one of the most popular Fatah figures. Several top Brigades members serve in Abbas' Force 17 personal security detail.

Abbas and Hamas the past few months have been negotiating the possibility of forming a national unity government in part to end international sanctions imposed on the Palestinian Authority after Hamas won the majority of parliamentary seats earlier this year. But the unity talks reportedly fell through because of Hamas' refusal to recognize Israel's right to exist. Fatah and Hamas have been clashing in Gaza and the West Bank the past few days.

The U.S. and Europe label Hamas a terror group, while Fatah largely is considered "moderate," in part for its purported willingness to accept Israel. The U.S. has given large sums of financial aid and weapons to Fatah since late Palestine Liberation Organization leader Yasser Arafat signed the Oslo Peace Accords with the Jewish state in 1993.

Abu Ahmed explained Fatah itself has never officially recognized Israel.

"It is the PLO, which is a separate entity, that recognized Israel,and this was a step, a tactical step that had as its goal to bring the resistance and the revolution closer to the lands of Palestine," Abu Ahmed said.

The PLO was the official governing body of the Palestinians until the A was formed following the Oslo Accords. Subsequent Israeli-Palestinian agreements were signed officially by the Fatah-led PA but not by Fatah as a party.

Still, Fatah leaders, including Abbas, have made scores of statements recognizing the Jewish state.

But Abu Ahmed commented, "There is an opportunistic class at the head of the Fatah leadership that for personal and political interests says it accepts the existence of Israel. There is no change in our official position. Fatah as a movement never recognized Israel. It is the PLO who did so for the reasons I mentioned."

'Al Aqsa Brigades loyal to Abbas'

The U.S. State Department considers the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades a terror organization.

A State Department spokesman yesterday told WND the Brigades is "separate" from Abbas' Fatah party. But Abu Ahmed explained his Brigades group is "one and the same" with the Fatah party.

"We are members of Fatah, and there are normal organic relations between us and the Fatah. We are in the Al Aqsa Brigades because we are Fatah members. We participate in all political decisions making of the Fatah movement."

Abu Ahmed said Brigades members consider Abbas their legitimate leader and answer ultimately to the PA president.

"Of course we are loyal to Abbas. He is our elected leader. We would of course prefer if his policy toward Israel was different, but we understand his obligations and calculations, and we do not consider ourselves limited by these calculations," the terror leader said.

Abu Ahmed explained the difference between Hamas and Fatah is that the Fatah party "is ready to discuss a political arrangement for the Jews."

But he said any arrangement must include the "right of return" of millions of Palestinians to Israel.

"We demand [any agreement with Israel] be based upon the principles that the great majority of our people support and first of all the right of return to the refugees, which mean that there cannot be any recognition of the Zionist entity.

"If any Palestinian government will dare sign a deal without this it means that this government has decided to throw away the fate and destiny of more than four million Palestinian refugees, and we cannot accept this."

The "right of return" is widely seen by Israelis as a ploy to flood Israel with millions of Palestinians, thus threatening the country's Jewish character.

Israel has a population of about 6.9 million; about 5.3 million are Jewish; nearly 1.3 million are Arab. The Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and West Bank claim a population of 3.8, but recent studies found the current Palestinian population may be inflated by up to 50 percent, with some major cities even being counted twice.

Abu Ahmed pointed to recent opinion polls showing upwards of 70 percent of the Palestinian public does not support Israel's right to exist.

He warned if the PA concludes an agreement with Israel that does not include the "right of return," it will result in civil war.

"We will fight such a government that would make an agreement (without the "right of return"), even if this may lead to a civil war. We are of course not interested in such a war but we want to ensure that any political process does not give up any of our holy principles," Abu Ahmed said.

Chavez outrage fuels 'boycott Citgo' effort

Chavez outrage fuels 'boycott Citgo' effort
Comments about President Bush, overthrow of U.S., infuriate many


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: October 4, 2006
8:00 p.m. Eastern

© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

Citgo Petroleum has lost a contract to supply 7-Eleven fuel needs around the nation, elected leaders in two states are considering formal action against the company and dozens of smaller boycotts are being launched because owner Hugo Chavez called President Bush "the devil" and envisions the destruction the United States.

"I can't buy a product from a country that wants to destroy our way of life as we know it," one supporter of the Citgo Boycott website said. "I don't care if Citgo starts selling gas for $.50/gal. I will go to another station and pay $2.50. All Americans must realize that by purchasing gas from Citgo, you're digging your own grave … or your children's graves."

"I think Americans should absolutely boycott Citgo stations. Despite how people may feel about President Bush, it is our right as Americans to offer criticism or praise as we so choose. Not for some foreign clown to use the UN in a U.S. city as a soapbox," concluded another.

Still another was more abbreviated: "Stop funding these morons who hate us and wish to destroy us."

The reaction has been so intense that Citgo itself has launched a campaign to counteract its effects. In a new statement released this week, Citgo said it wanted to correct the "inaccurate and misleading" information about itself.


Hugo Chavez

"The most recent example was how Citgo's decision to allow its supply agreement with 7-Eleven to expire at the end of September was misrepresented as a reaction by 7-Eleven to the remarks recently made by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez," the company said.

"In reality a final decision about the contract was made about three months ago," the company announced in a statement dated Sept. 27.

However, its own website included no apparent confirmation of that, and in fact, it had several announcements about that time "three months ago" about realigning the company's "national retail gasoline network footprint" with no mention of giving up 7-Eleven as a customer.

Citgo said its changes would result in a "stronger company presence" in the East and Gulf Coast regions and quoted Citgo President Felix Rodriguez as saying only "less-efficient" markets were being dropped.

The company also said calls for boycotts of its products would ignore the implications of such actions on American businesses and the general public.

Citgo said it is, after all, a U.S. company, even though it is owned by Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA) and the most recent board action awarded a dividend of $280 million payable to its parent immediately, bringing the 2006 total of those payments to about $400 million.

"The payment of this dividend reflects the company's strong performance and the continued alignment of Citgo and PDVSA," Alejandro Granado, CITGO chairman, said at the time.

PDVSA, meanwhile, is fully owned by the Venezuelan government, which is run by Chavez.

The company also said its employees "spent countless hours" volunteering after hurricanes Katrina and Rita devastated the Gulf Cost, and the company donated $2 million.

"Citgo is the largest corporate sponsor of the Muscular Dystrophy Association and we are proud of our 21-year relationship with this organization, to which we have contributed more than $83 million," the company said.

However, those good deeds appear to not be enough to convince many groups in the United States to continue their support for the company, following Chavez condemnation of all things American.

He recently appeared at the U.N. to call Bush a devil, and say the stench of sulfur still lingered from an earlier appearance by Bush.

Months earlier, Chavez, who is pushing a socialist revolution and has close ties to Fidel Castro, had teamed with anti-Bush activist Cindy Sheehan in calling for people to "bury imperialism this century."

Citgo describes itself as a Houston-based "refiner and marketer of transportation fuels, lubricants, petrochemicals, refined waxes, asphalt and other industrial products."

But the timing of the situation appears to be more than coincidence. The 7-Eleven convenience store chain announced it would stop selling Citgo gas just a week after Chavez' attack on Bush.

Officials for the Dallas-based 7-Eleven confirmed the company disapproved of Chavez' statements, but said politics were not used in the decision-making process.

"Regardless of politics, we sympathize with many Americans' concerns over derogatory comments (from Chavez) about our country and its leadership," 7-Eleven said.

A source quoted in a report on MSNBC said Citgo had supplied 2,100 7-Eleven locations and wanted to renew a contract to supply stores in some states, but not others, but 7-Eleven officials rejected the plan.

Despite characterizing the United States as a slaveowner in its relationship with Venezuela, Chavez has not made the decision to stop selling oil to the U.S., which is his largest customer.

The end result is that 7-Eleven said it is taking down Citgo signs and will sell under its own brand of fuel, and Citgo will be selling elsewhere.

Taking down Citgo signs was a popular subject among others, too.

Florida state Rep. Adam Hasner, R-Delray Beach, said he wants Florida to strip Citgo of its contract to run gas stations on Florida's Turnpike. In a letter to the state secretary of transportation he said Chavez' attack was "more than the normal anti-American rhetoric."

He told the St. Petersburg Times that ending the contract would send a message that Florida will not support "institutions that seek the destabilization of America."

The state's 312-mile toll road has seven rest areas about 45 miles apart, each one limited to the sale of Citgo gas, officials said.

Chavez' comments were condemned by both Democrats and Republicans, including some of the strongest critics of Bush and his policies.

And a city councilor in Boston has issued a call that a large Citgo sign visible from the famed Fenway Park, be removed. Councilor Jerry McDermott said the sign would be replaced with an American flag.

Apparently the first group to issue a call for a boycott of Citgo was American Family Association, which was the subject of an earlier report by WND.

"Sales of products at Citgo stations send money back to Chavez to help him in his vow to bring down our government," said AFA founder Don Wildmon in a statement early in 2006.

AFA noted Chavez had told a television audience: "Enough of imperialist aggression; we must tell the world: down with the U.S. empire. We have to bury imperialism this century."

Chavez also had met with American entertainer Harry Belafonte, who called President Bush "the greatest terrorist in the world" while in Venezuela.

"Regardless of your feelings about the war in Iraq, the issue here is that we have a socialist dictator vowing to bring down the government of the U.S. And he is using our money to achieve his goal!" warned Wildmon.

Another weblog writer said he had stopped shopping at Citgo months ago. "Basically it has to do with not wanting one cent of my money finding its way into the grubby little hands of Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez."

Other boycott calls reportedly have been issued by "The Jawa Report" and "Hyscience," bloggers said.

Online reports show that the Citgo brand was launched in 1965 by Cities Service Company, but that was acquired by Occidental in 1982. The next year it was sold to Southland Corp., and the Venezuelan company bought a 50 percent interest in 1986, obtaining the rest in 1990.

Bloggers at CitgoBoycott.org say radio talk show host Michael Savage also wants listeners to boycott and some other companies also will refuse to buy Citgo products.

"It's simple; Chavez hates America, what we stand for and has been critical to the point of blasphemy about our lifestyle patterns and our government. Yet, he still controls one of our nation's most productive companies," bloggers there said.

"This is America and if we can recover from the loss of Eastern AirLines, Enron and half of Silicon Valley, we can do without CITGO."